Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Going it Alone: A Scoping Review of Unbefriended Older Adults

  • Stephanie Chamberlain (a1), Sol Baik (a2) and Carole Estabrooks (a1)
Abstract

Older adults who have reduced decision-making capacity and no family or friends to compensate for these deficiencies are known as unbefriended and require a public guardian. The purpose of this study was to review the peer-reviewed and grey literature to determine the scope of available research on unbefriended older adults in Canada and the United States. We found limited research examining unbefriended older adults. No Canadian studies or reports were located. Unbefriended older adults were childless or had fewer children, were more cognitively impaired, and were older than older adults who were not unbefriended. These findings demonstrate a stark scarcity of studies on unbefriended older adults. Research is urgently needed using standardized data collection of guardianship status in order to enable studies of the prevalence of public guardianship in Canada.

Les personnes âgées dont la capacité de prise de décision est réduite et qui n’ont pas de soutien familial ou d’amis pour les aider à compenser ces déficits sont dites « solitaires » et nécessitent un tuteur public. Le but de cette étude était de recenser les publications avec comités de pairs et la littérature grise afin d’examiner la portée des travaux de recherches réalisés jusqu’à ce jour concernant les personnes âgées solitaires au Canada et aux États-Unis. Nous n’avons recensé que peu d’études sur ce sujet. Aucune étude ou rapport canadien n’a été trouvé. Les personnes âgées solitaires étaient plus avancées en âge, sans enfants ou avec peu d’enfants, et leurs troubles cognitifs étaient plus sévères, comparativement aux personnes âgées non solitaires. Ces résultats démontrent une rareté des études sur les personnes âgées solitaires. Il est urgent que davantage de recherches soient réalisées avec des collectes de données standardisées concernant la tutelle chez les personnes âgées solitaires afin de faciliter la réalisation d’études sur la prévalence de la tutelle publique au Canada.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Going it Alone: A Scoping Review of Unbefriended Older Adults
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Going it Alone: A Scoping Review of Unbefriended Older Adults
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Going it Alone: A Scoping Review of Unbefriended Older Adults
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be sent to / La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adresées à : Stephanie A. Chamberlain, BHSc, MA, PhD Candidate Faculty of Nursing University of Alberta 5-180, Level 5 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405-87 Ave. University of Alberta Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9 <sachambe@ualberta.ca>
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Stephanie Chamberlain is supported by an Alzheimer Society of Canada Doctoral Fellowship. Carole Estabrooks is supported by a Tier 1 CIHR Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Translation. No funding agency listed above had a role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, or interpretation of the data. We thank Thane Chambers (research librarian, University of Alberta) for her assistance with the literature review.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Albertini, M., & Mencarini, L. (2014). Childlessness and support networks in later life: New pressures on familistic welfare states? Journal of Family Issues, 35(3), 331357.
Alzheimer Society of Canada. (2010). Rising tide: The impact of dementia on Canadian society. Toronto, ON. Retrieved from http://www.alzheimer.ca/∼/media/Files/national/Advocacy/ASC_Rising_Tide_Full_Report_e.pdf
Alzheimer’s Disease International. (2015). World Alzheimer report 2015: The global impact of dementia. London, ENG. Retrieved from https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2015.pdf
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 1932. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). Cochrane Update. ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147150. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
Bandy, R., Helft, P., Bandy, R., & Torke, A. (2010). Medical decision-making during the guardianship process for incapacitated, hospitalized adults: A descriptive cohort study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(10), 10031009.
Bandy, R., Sachs, G., Montz, K., Inger, L., Bandy, R., & Torke, A. (2014). Wishard Volunteer Advocates Program: An intervention for at-risk, incapacitated, unbefriended adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(11), 21712179. doi:10.1111/jgs.13096
Banks, L., Haynes, P., & Hill, M. (2009). Living in single person households and the risk of isolation in later life. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 4(1), 5586. doi:10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.094155
Barrett, A. E., & Lynch, S. M. (1999). Caregiving networks of elderly persons: Variation by marital status. The Gerontologist, 39(6), 695704.
Bayles, F., & McCartney, S. (1987). Guardians of the elderly: An ailing system Part 1: Declared ‘legally dead’ by a troubled [system]. Retrieved from http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1987/Guardians-of-the-Elderly-An-Ailing-System-Part-I-Declared-Legally-Dead-by-a-Troubled-System/id-1198f64bb05d9c1ec690035983c02f9f
Boyle, P. A., Yu, L., Wilson, R. S., Gamble, K., Buchman, A. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2012). Poor decision making is a consequence of cognitive decline among older persons without Alzheimer’s disease or mild cognitive impairment. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43647. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043647
Bulcroft, K., Kielkopf, M. R., & Tripp, K. (1991). Elderly wards and their legal guardians: Analysis of county probate records in Ohio and Washington. The Gerontologist, 31(2), 156164.
Cohen, A. B., Wright, M. S., Cooney, L. Jr., & Fried, T. (2015). Guardianship and end-of-life decision making. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175(10), 16871691. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3956
Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O’Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., … Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 12911294. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
de Medeiros, K., Rubinstein, R. L., Onyike, C. U., Johnston, D. M., Baker, A., McNabney, M., … Samus, Q. M. (2013). Childless elders in assisted living: Findings from the Maryland Assisted Living Study. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 27(1/2), 206220.
Doherty, D. (2015). Annual report: New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission public trustee services. Fredericton, NB. Retrieved from http://www.legalaid.nb.ca/en/uploads/file/PT%20Annual%20Report%20and%20FS%202014-15%20Bilingual.pdf
Doron, I. (2004). Aging in the shadow of the law: The case of elder guardianship in Israel. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 16(4), 5977. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15724573
Effiong, A., & Harman, S. (2014). Patients who lack capacity and lack surrogates: Can they enroll in hospice? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 48(4), 745750. e741. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.12.244
Farrell, T. W., Widera, E., Rosenberg, L., Rubin, C. D., Naik, A. D., Braun, U., … the Ethics, Clinical Practice and Models of Care Public Policy Committees of the American Geriatrics, Society. (2017). AGS position statement: Making medical treatment decisions for unbefriended older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(1), 1415 (e11-e15). doi:10.1111/jgs.14586
Gillick, M. R. (1995). Medical decision-making for the unbefriended nursing home resident. Journal of Ethics, Law, & Aging, 1(2), 8792.
Gleeson, R. (2016). Backlog at N.W.T. public guardian’s office ‘a problem,’ says health minister. CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/nwt-public-guardian-backlog-1.3586088
Griffith, H. R., Dymekval-Valentine, M. P., Atchison, P., Harrell, L. E., & Marson, D. C. (2005). Medical decision-making in neurodegenerative disease: Mild AD and PD with cognitive impairment. Neurology, 65(3), 483485. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000171346.02965.80
Hartley-Jones, P. (2011). The role of the Office of the Public Guardian in investigations of abuse. Journal of Adult Protection, 13(3), 160166. doi:10.1108/14668201111160750
Hightower, D., Heckert, A., & Schmidt, W. (1990). Elderly nursing home residents’ need for public guardianship services in Tennessee. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 2(3–4), 105122. doi:10.1300/J084v02n03_07
Iris, M. A. (1988). Guardianship and the elderly: A multi-perspective view of the decision-making process. The Gerontologist, 28, 3945.
Janofsky, J. S., & Rovner, B. W. (1993). Prevalence of advance directives and guardianship in nursing home patients. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry & Neurology, 6(4), 214216.
Karp, N. (2006). Federal options to improve America’s ailing guardianship system: A white paper for the Senate Special Committee on Aging. Washington, DC: AARP. Retrieved from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/consume/m_2_guardianship.pdf
Karp, N., & Wood, E. (2003). Incapacitated and alone: Health care decision-making for the unbefriended elderly (Report: 1-59031-272-4). Washington, DC: American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/2003_Unbefriended_Elderly_Health_Care_Descision-Making7-11-03.authcheckdam.pdf
Kim, S. Y. H., Karlawish, J. H. T., & Caine, E. D. (2002). Current state of research on decision-making competence of cognitively impaired elderly persons. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10(2), 151165.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Science, 5, 69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
Lisi, L. B., & Barinaga-Burch, S. (1995). National study of guardianship systems: Summary of findings and recommendations. Clearinghouse Review, 29(6), 643653.
Menio, D., Halperin, A., Campbell, J., & Reever, K. (2013). The state of guardianship in Pennsylvania: Results from the 2012 CARIE study of guardianship in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://www.carie.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/CARIE-Guardianship-Study.pdf
Peters, R., Schmidt, W. C., & Miller, K. S. (1985). Guardianship of the elderly in Tallahassee, Florida. The Gerontologist, 25(5), 532538.
Pope, T. M., & Sellers, T. (2012). The unbefriended: Making healthcare decisions for patients without surrogates (Part 1). Journal of Clinical Ethics, 23(1), 8496.
Reynolds, S. L. (1997a). Criteria for placing older adults in public conservatorship: Age as proxy for need. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 518526.
Reynolds, S. L. (1997b). Protected or neglected: An examination of negative versus compassionate ageism in public conservatorship. Research on Aging, 19(1), 325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0164027597191001
Reynolds, S. L. (2002). Guardianship primavera: A first look at factors associated with having a legal guardian using a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults. Aging & Mental Health, 6(2), 109120. doi:10.1080/13607860220126718
Reynolds, S. L., & Carson, L.D. (1999). Dependent on the kindness of strangers: Professional guardians for older adults who lack decisional capacity. Aging & Mental Health, 3(4), 301310.
Reynolds, S. L., & Wilber, K. H. (1997). Protecting persons with severe cognitive and mental disorders: an analysis of public conservatorship in Los Angeles County, California. Aging & Mental Health, 1(1), 8797.
Rumrill, P. D., Fitzgerald, S. M., & Merchant, W. R. (2010). Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature. Work, 35(3), 399404. doi:10.3233/wor-2010-0998
Schmidt, W. (1984). The evolution of a public guardianship program. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 12(3), 349372.
Schmidt, W., Bell, W., & Miller, K. (1981). Public guardianship and the elderly: Findings from a national study. The Gerontologist, 21(2), 194202.
Schmidt, W., Miller, K., Bell, W., & New, E. (1981). Public guardianship and the elderly. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Schmidt, W., Miller, K., Peters, R., & Loewenstein, D. (1988). A descriptive analysis of professional and volunteer programs for the delivery of public guardianship services. Probate Law Journal, 8(2), 125156.
Teaster, P. B. (1997). When the state takes over a life: The public guardian as public administrator (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. Retrieved from https://theses.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-36171339701021/unrestricted/GUARDIAN.PDF
Teaster, P. B., Schmidt, W. C., Abramson, H., & Almeida, R. (1999). Staff service and volunteer staff service models for public guardianship and “alternatives” services: Who is served and with what outcomes? Journal of Ethics, Law & Aging, 5(2), 131.
Teaster, P. B., Wood, E. F., Lawrence, S. A., & Schmidt, W. C. (2005). Wards of the state: A national study of public guardianship. Stetson Law Review, 37. Retrieved from http://www.stetson.edu/law/lawreview/media/wards-of-the-state-a-national-study-of-public-guardianship.pdf
Teaster, P. B., Wood, E. F., Schmidt, W. C. Jr., & Lawrence, S. A. (2007). Public guardianship after 25 years: In the best interest of incapacitated people? Washington, DC: American Bar Association.
Theriault, M. (2014). Public trustee annual report. Halifax, NS: Office of the Public Trustee.
Wachterman, M. W., & Sommers, B. D. (2006). The impact of gender and marital status on end-of-life care: Evidence from the National Mortality Follow-Back Survey. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(2), 343352.
Weisensee, M. G., Anderson, J. B., & Kjervik, D. K. (1996). Family members’ retrospective views of events surrounding the petition for a conservatorship or guardianship. Journal of Nursing Law, 3(3), 1930.
Wilber, K., Reiser, T., & Harter, K. (2001). New perspectives on conservatorship: The views of older adult conservatees and their conservators. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 8(3), 225240.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
  • ISSN: 0714-9808
  • EISSN: 1710-1107
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-on-aging-la-revue-canadienne-du-vieillissement
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed