Skip to main content
×
Home

No Place Like Home? Surveillance and What Home Means in Old Age

  • W. Ben Mortenson (a1) (a2) (a3), Andrew Sixsmith (a4) and Robert Beringer (a4)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

New surveillance technologies like those included in ambient assisted living – such as body-worn and passive environmental sensors, smart interfaces, and communications networks – are being developed to improve the security and safety of “at risk” older people, but ethical questions have been raised about the extent to which they compromise the rights and privacy of the people being monitored. The qualitative study we conducted was designed to help us understand the ways these novel surveillance technologies would influence individuals’ everyday experiences of home. Participants felt new forms of surveillance would influence their sense of security, autonomy, and self-confidence, and would alter perceptions of home. The findings emphasize the need to improve our understanding of how ambient assisted living will affect the lives of those being monitored.

RÉSUMÉ

Les technologies de surveillance nouvelles, telles que celles inclus dans le logement avec assistance ambiante—les capteurs environnementaux portés sur le corps, les interfaces intelligentes, et les réseaux de communication—sont en cours d'élaboration afin d'améliorer la sécurité et la sûreté des personnes âgées qui sont à risque, mais des questions éthiques ont été soulevées quant à dans quelle mesure ils compromettraient les droits et la vie privée des personnes à surveiller. L'étude qualitative que nous avons mené a été conçu pour nous aider à comprendre les façons dont ces technologies de surveillance nouvelles seraient influencer les expériences quotidiennes des individus de leur maison. Les participants ont estimé que de nouvelles formes de surveillance auraient une influence sur leur sentiment de sécurité, de l'autonomie et de la confiance en soi, et modifieraient leurs perceptions chez soi. Les résultats soulignent la nécessité d'améliorer notre compréhension de la façon dont le logement assisté ambiant affectera la vie des personnes à surveiller.

Copyright
Corresponding author
La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: W. Ben Mortenson, Ph.D., O.T. University of British Columbia The Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy T-325-2211 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5 (ben.mortenson@ubc.ca)
References
Hide All
Aetna Inc. (2015). Wheelchairs and power operated vehicles (scooters) . Retrieved from http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/200_299/0271.html.
Altheide D. L., & Michalowski R. S. (1999). Fear in the news: A discourse of control. The Sociological Quarterly, 40(3), 475503.
Augusto J. C., Huch M., Kameas A., Maitland J., McCullagh P., Roberts J., et al. (2012). Handbook of ambient assistive living. Technology for healthcare, rehabilitation and well-being. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Beck U. (2006). The cosmopolitan vision (Cronin C., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original work published 2004).
Beck U. (2007). Beyond class and nation: Reframing social inequalities in a globalizing world. The British Journal of Sociology, 58(4), 679705.
Bentham J. (1995). Panopticon. In Božovič M. (Ed.), The Panopticon writings (pp. 2995). London, England: Verso Books.
Bowles K., & Baugh A. (2007). Applying research evidence to optimize telehomecare. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(1), 515.
Bryman A., & Teevan J. (2005). Social research methods (Canadian ed.). Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
Corner L., & Bond J. (2006). The impact of the label of mild cognitive impairment on the individual’s sense of self. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 13(1), 312.
Courtney K., Demiris G., Rantz M., & Skubic M. (2008). Needing smart home technologies: The perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Informatics in Primary Care, 16(3), 195201.
Creswell J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Demiris G., Hensel B., Skubic M., & Rantz M. (2008). Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 24(1), 120124.
Domènech M., & Tirado F. J. (1997). Rethinking institutions in the societies of control. International Journal of Transdisciplinary Studies, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.angelfire.com/amiga/misejercicios/eldespertador/variado/wlink1.html.
Dovey K. (1985). Home and homelessness. In Altman I., & Werner C. M. (Eds.). Home environments. Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research.(Vol. 8) (pp. 3364). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Dyck I., Kontos P., Angus J., & McKeever P. (2005). The home as a site for long-term care: Meanings and management of bodies and space. Health & Place, 11(2), 173185.
Foucault M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (Smith S., Trans.). London, England: Tavistock. (Original work published 1963).
Foucault M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London, England: Penguin Books.
Foucault M. (1978). The history of human sexuality (Hurley H., Trans.) (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Random House. (Original work published 1976).
Foucault M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777795.
Foucault M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Gordon C. (Ed.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Foucault M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Martin L. H., Gutman H., & Hutton P. H. (Eds.). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 1649). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Gilmour H., & Park J. (2006). Dependency, chronic conditions and pain in seniors. Health Reports Supplement, 8, 3345.
Gitlin L. (2003). Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 628637.
Kafka F. (1976). The diaries, 1910–1923. New York, NY: Schocken Books.
Korosec-Serfaty P. (1984). The home, from attic to cellar. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(4), 303321.
Lemke T. (2002). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Rethinking Marxism. A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 14(3), 4964.
Mallet S. (2004) Understanding home: A critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 6289.
Milligan C., Roberts C., & Mort M. (2011). Telecare and older people: Who cares where? Social Science & Medicine, 72(3), 374–354.
Mort M., Roberts C., Pols J., Domènech M., & Moser I. (2013). Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: A framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expectations, 18(4), 438439.
Pare G., Jaana M., & Sicotte C. (2007). Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: The evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(3), 269277.
Parker R., & Aggleton P. (2003). HIV and AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: A conceptual framework and implications for action. Social Science and Medicine, 57(1), 1324.
Percival J., & Hanson J. (2006). Big brother or brave new world? Telecare and its implications for older people’s independence and social inclusion. Critical Social Policy, 26(4), 888909.
Phillipson C. (1998). Reconstructing old age: New agendas in social theory and practice. London, England: Sage.
Powell D. H. (2004). Treating individuals with debilitating perfomance anxiety: An introduction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(8), 801808.
Powell J. L. (2012). Social work and elder abuse: A Foucauldian analysis. Social Work & Society, 10(1), 110.
Roberts C., & Mort M. (2009). Reshaping what counts as care: Older people, work and new technologies. ALTER - European Journal of Disability, 3(2), 138158.
Rogers E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press.
Rose N. (1997). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schiamberg L. B., & Gans D. (2000). Elder abuse by adult children: An applied ecological framework for understanding contextual risk factors and the intergenerational character of quality of life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 50(4), 329360.
Scott D. N. (2007). Risk as a technique of governance in an era of biotechnological innovation: Implications for democratic citizenship and strategies of resistance. In Law Commission of Canada (Ed.), Risk and trust. Including or excluding citizens? (pp. 2356). Blackpoint, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
Seaman D. (1993). Dwelling, seeing, and designing: Toward a phenomenological ecology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Seeman T. E., Unger J. B., McAvay G., & de Leon C. F. M. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs and perceived declines in functional ability: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Journals of Gerontology B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54(4), P214P222.
Sixsmith A. (1990). The meaning and experience of ‘home’ in later life. In Bytheway B., & Johnson J. (Eds.), Welfare and the ageing experience (pp. 172–92). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
Sixsmith A. (2013). Technology and the challenge of aging. In Sixsmith A., & Gutman G. (Eds.), Technologies for active aging. New York, NY: Springer.
Sixsmith A., & Sixsmith J. (2008). Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32(3), 219–235.
Smith D. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London, England: Routledge.
Suki N. M, & Suki N. M. (2013). Effects of social needs, social influences and convenience on smartphones dependency. In Chuan P., Khachidze V., Lai I. K. W., Liu Y., Siddiqui S., & Wang T. (Eds.), Innovation in the high-tech economy (pp. 143153). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Tracy S. C., Drummond N., Ferris L. E., Globerman J., Hébert P. C., Pringle D., et al. (2004).To tell or not to tell? Professional and lay perspectives on the disclosure of personal health information in community-based dementia care. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23(3), 203215.
van Hoof J., Kort H. S. M., Rutten P. G. S., & Duijnstee M. S. H. (2011). Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(5), 310331.
Verbeek P. P. (2009). Ambient intelligence and persuasive technology: The blurring boundaries between human and technology. Nanoethics, 3(3), 231242.
Wahl H. W., & Oswald F. (2010). Environmental perspectives on ageing. In Dannefer D. & Phillipson C. (Eds.), The handbook of social gerontology (pp. 111124). London, England: Sage.
Wendell S. (1996). The rejected body: Feminist philosophical reflections on disability. New York, NY: Routledge.
Wild K., Boise L., Lundell J., & Foucek A. (2008). Unobtrusive in-home monitoring of cognitive and physical health: Reactions and perceptions of older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 27(2), 181200.
Wilken D., Baur X., Barbinova L., Preisser A., Meijer E., Rooyackers J., et al. (2012). What are the benefits of medical screening and surveillance? European Respiratory Review, 21(124), 105111.
Zwijsen S. A., Niemeijer A. R., & Hertogh C. M. (2011). Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: An overview of the literature. Aging & Mental Health, 15(4), 419427.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
  • ISSN: 0714-9808
  • EISSN: 1710-1107
  • URL: /core/journals/canadian-journal-on-aging-la-revue-canadienne-du-vieillissement
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 103 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 790 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.