Skip to main content Accessibility help

Convergence of Achlioptas Processes via Differential Equations with Unique Solutions



In Achlioptas processes, starting from an empty graph, in each step two potential edges are chosen uniformly at random, and using some rule one of them is selected and added to the evolving graph. The evolution of the rescaled size of the largest component in such variations of the Erdős–Rényi random graph process has recently received considerable attention, in particular for Bollobás's ‘product rule’. In this paper we establish the following result for rules such as the product rule: the limit of the rescaled size of the ‘giant’ component exists and is continuous provided that a certain system of differential equations has a unique solution. In fact, our result applies to a very large class of Achlioptas-like processes.

Our proof relies on a general idea which relates the evolution of stochastic processes to an associated system of differential equations. Provided that the latter has a unique solution, our approach shows that certain discrete quantities converge (after appropriate rescaling) to this solution.



Hide All
[1]Achlioptas, D., D'Souza, R. M. and Spencer, J. (2009) Explosive percolation in random networks. Science 323 14531455.
[2]Aldous, D. (1999) Deterministic and stochastic models for coalescence (aggregation and coagulation): A review of the mean-field theory for probabilists. Bernoulli 5 348.
[3]Azar, Y., Broder, A. Z., Karlin, A. R. and Upfal, E. (1999) Balanced allocations. SIAM J. Comput. 29 180200.
[4]Bhamidi, S., Budhiraja, A. and Wang, X. (2015) Aggregation models with limited choice and the multiplicative coalescent. Random Struct. Alg. 46 55116.
[5]Bhamidi, S., Budhiraja, A. and Wang, X. (2014) Bounded-size rules: The barely subcritical regime. Combin. Probab. Comput. 23 505538.
[6]Bohman, T. and Frieze, A. (2001) Avoiding a giant component. Random Struct. Alg. 19 7585.
[7]Bohman, T. and Kravitz, D. (2006) Creating a giant component. Combin. Probab. Comput. 15 489511.
[8]Bollobás, B., Janson, S. and Riordan, O. (2007) The phase transition in inhomogeneous random graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 31 3122.
[9]Bollobás, B. and Riordan, O. (2009) Random graphs and branching processes. In Handbook of Large-Scale Random Networks, Vol. 18 of Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies, pp. 15–115.
[10]Cho, Y. S., Kim, S. W., Noh, J. D., Kahng, B. and Kim, D. (2010) Finite-size scaling theory for explosive percolation transitions. Phys. Rev. E 82 042102.
[11]da Costa, R. A., Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V. and Mendes, J. F. F. (2010) Explosive percolation transition is actually continuous. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 255701.
[12]D'Souza, R. M. and Mitzenmacher, M. (2010) Local cluster aggregation models of explosive percolation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 195702.
[13]Erdős, P. and Rényi, A. (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Magyar Tud. Akad. Mat. Kutató Int. Közl 5 1761.
[14]Friedman, E. J. and Landsberg, A. S. (2009) Construction and analysis of random networks with explosive percolation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 255701.
[15]Gut, A. (2005) Probability: A Graduate Course, Springer.
[16]Hurewicz, W. (1958) Lectures on Ordinary Differential Equations, MIT Press.
[17]Janson, S. (2011) Networking: Smoothly does it. Science 333 298299.
[18]Janson, S., Łuczak, T. and Ruciński, A. (2000) Random Graphs, Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, Wiley-Interscience.
[19]Janson, S. and Spencer, J. (2012) Phase transitions for modified Erdős–Rényi processes. Ark. Math. 50 305329.
[20]Kang, M., Perkins, W. and Spencer, J. (2013) The Bohman–Frieze process near criticality. Random Struct. Alg. 43 221250.
[21]Norris, J. (1999) Smoluchowski's coagulation equation: Uniqueness, nonuniqueness and a hydrodynamic limit for the stochastic coalescent. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9 78109.
[22]Radicchi, F. and Fortunato, S. (2010) Explosive percolation: A numerical analysis. Phys. Rev. E 81 036110.
[23]Riordan, O. and Warnke, L. (2011) Explosive percolation is continuous. Science 333 322324.
[24]Riordan, O. and Warnke, L. (2012) Achlioptas processes are not always self-averaging. Phys. Rev. E 86 011129.
[25]Riordan, O. and Warnke, L. (2012) Achlioptas process phase transitions are continuous. Ann. Appl. Probab. 22 14501464.
[26]Riordan, O. and Warnke, L. (2015) The evolution of subcritical Achlioptas processes. Random Struct. Alg. 47 174203.
[27]Seierstad, T. G. (2009) A central limit theorem via differential equations. Ann. Appl. Probab. 19 661675.
[28]Spencer, J. and Wormald, N. C. (2007) Birth control for giants. Combinatorica 27 587628.
[29]Wormald, N. C. (1995) Differential equations for random processes and random graphs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 5 12171235.
[30]Wormald, N. C. (1999) The differential equation method for random graph processes and greedy algorithms. In Lectures On Approximation and Randomized Algorithms, PWN, pp. 73155.
[31]Ziff, R. M. (2009) Explosive growth in biased dynamic percolation on two-dimensional regular lattice networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 045701.

MSC classification


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed