ClainS., DiotS. and LoubèreR., A high-order finite volume method for systems of conservation lawsmulti-dimensional optimal order detection (MOOD), J. Comput. Phys., 230(10) (2011), 4028–4050.
van LeerB., Towards the ultimate conservation difference scheme V: A second-order sequal to Godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys., 32(1) (1979), 101–136.
LiuX. D., OsherS. and ChanT., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 115 (1994), 200–212.
JiangG. and ShuC. W., Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 126(1) (1996), 202–228.
JamesonA., SchmidtW. and TurkelE., Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, AIAA-1981-1259, 1981.
BalsaraD. and ShuC. W., Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy, J. Comput. Phys., 160 (2000), 405–452.
YuJ., YanC. and JiangZ., A hybrid high resolution low dissipation scheme for compressible flows, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 24 (2011), 417–424.
AdamsN. A. and ShariffK., A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems, J. Comput. Phys., 127 (1996), 27–46.
PirozzoliS., Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction, J. Comput. Phys., 178 (2002), 81–117.
RenY., LiuM. and ZhangH., A characteristic-wise hybrid compact-WENO scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 192 (2003), 365–386.
HillD. J. and PullinD. I., Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 194 (2004), 435–450.
CosatB. and DonW. S., High order hybrid central-WENO finite difference scheme for conservation laws, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 204 (2007), 209–218.
LiG. and QiuJ., Hybrid weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with different indicators, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), 8105–8129.
DiotS., ClainS. and LoubèreR., Improved detection criteria for the multi-dimensional optimal order detection (MOOD) on unstructured meshes with very high-order polynomials, Comput. Fluids, 64 (2012), 43–63.
DiotS., LoubèreR. and ClainS., The MOOD method in the three-dimensional case: very-high-order finite volume method for hyperbolic systems, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 73 (2013), 362–392.
LoubreR., DumbserM. and DiotS., A new family of high order unstructured MOOD and ADER finite volume schemes for multidimensional systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, Commun. Comput. Phys., 16 (2014), 718–763.
DumbserM., ZanottiO., LoubèreR. and DiotS., A posteriori subcell limiting of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 278 (2014), 47–75.
YuJ. and YanC., On the performance of two shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 36(1) (2010), 10–13.
RoeP. L., Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 43 (1981), 357–372.
RiderW. J., Methods for extending high-resolution schemes to non-linear systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 17(10) (1993), 861–885.
NicholsR. H., TramelR. W. and BuningP. G., Evaluation of two high-order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes, AIAA J., 46(12) (2008), 3090–3102.
WoodwardP. and ColellaP., Numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flows with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 54 (1984), 115–173.
ToroE. F., Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, second ed., Springer Berlin, 1999.
BalsaraD. S., Self-adjusting, positivity preserving high order schemes for hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys., 231 (2012), 7504–7517.
TitarevV. and ToroE., Finite-volume WENO schemes for three-dimensional conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 201 (2004), 238–260.
ShuC. W., High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems, SIAM Review, 51(1) (2009), 82–126.