Clain S., Diot S. and Loubère R., A high-order finite volume method for systems of conservation lawsmulti-dimensional optimal order detection (MOOD), J. Comput. Phys., 230(10) (2011), 4028–4050.
van Leer B., Towards the ultimate conservation difference scheme V: A second-order sequal to Godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys., 32(1) (1979), 101–136.
Liu X. D., Osher S. and Chan T., Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 115 (1994), 200–212.
Jiang G. and Shu C. W., Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 126(1) (1996), 202–228.
Jameson A., Schmidt W. and Turkel E., Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, AIAA-1981-1259, 1981.
Balsara D. and Shu C. W., Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy, J. Comput. Phys., 160 (2000), 405–452.
Yu J., Yan C. and Jiang Z., A hybrid high resolution low dissipation scheme for compressible flows, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 24 (2011), 417–424.
Adams N. A. and Shariff K., A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems, J. Comput. Phys., 127 (1996), 27–46.
Pirozzoli S., Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction, J. Comput. Phys., 178 (2002), 81–117.
Ren Y., Liu M. and Zhang H., A characteristic-wise hybrid compact-WENO scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 192 (2003), 365–386.
Hill D. J. and Pullin D. I., Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 194 (2004), 435–450.
Cosat B. and Don W. S., High order hybrid central-WENO finite difference scheme for conservation laws, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 204 (2007), 209–218.
Li G. and Qiu J., Hybrid weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with different indicators, J. Comput. Phys., 229 (2010), 8105–8129.
Diot S., Clain S. and Loubère R., Improved detection criteria for the multi-dimensional optimal order detection (MOOD) on unstructured meshes with very high-order polynomials, Comput. Fluids, 64 (2012), 43–63.
Diot S., Loubère R. and Clain S., The MOOD method in the three-dimensional case: very-high-order finite volume method for hyperbolic systems, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 73 (2013), 362–392.
Loubre R., Dumbser M. and Diot S., A new family of high order unstructured MOOD and ADER finite volume schemes for multidimensional systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, Commun. Comput. Phys., 16 (2014), 718–763.
Dumbser M., Zanotti O., Loubère R. and Diot S., A posteriori subcell limiting of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 278 (2014), 47–75.
Yu J. and Yan C., On the performance of two shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 36(1) (2010), 10–13.
Roe P. L., Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys., 43 (1981), 357–372.
Rider W. J., Methods for extending high-resolution schemes to non-linear systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 17(10) (1993), 861–885.
Nichols R. H., Tramel R. W. and Buning P. G., Evaluation of two high-order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes, AIAA J., 46(12) (2008), 3090–3102.
Woodward P. and Colella P., Numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flows with strong shocks, J. Comput. Phys., 54 (1984), 115–173.
Toro E. F., Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, second ed., Springer Berlin, 1999.
Balsara D. S., Self-adjusting, positivity preserving high order schemes for hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys., 231 (2012), 7504–7517.
Titarev V. and Toro E., Finite-volume WENO schemes for three-dimensional conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys., 201 (2004), 238–260.
Shu C. W., High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems, SIAM Review, 51(1) (2009), 82–126.