Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:56:36.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chronology, Succession, and Sovereignty: The Politics of Inka Historiography and Its Modern Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2006

R. Alan Covey
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University

Abstract

Western scholars have long identified the existence of writing systems as a near-universal characteristic of high civilization, with Tawantinsuyu, the Inka empire, representing the only significant exception.1 Although writing was absent in the pre-Hispanic Andes, there existed the means of recording administrative information and preserving narratives of the past. Inka imperial overseers and specialized record-keepers produced tribute levies, population counts, and assessments of provincial development potential, using a system of knotted cords (a khipu) as their principal device.2 Such records fulfilled bureaucratic and administrative functions that were satisfied in other societies by writing; however, the maintenance of narratives of the Inka past contrasts with these practices in its hybrid use of oral tradition in consultation with similar record keeping devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Society for Comparative Study of Society and History

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)