Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-jzjqj Total loading time: 0.387 Render date: 2022-08-10T01:30:54.835Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Purdah: Separate Worlds and Symbolic Shelter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Hanna Papanek
Affiliation:
University of Chicago

Extract

Purdah, meaning curtain, is the word most commonly used for the system of secluding women and enforcing high standards of female modesty in much of South Asia. Purdah is an important part of the life experience of many South Asians, both Muslim and Hindu, and is a central feature of the social systems of the area. The crucial characteristic of the purdah system is its limitation on interaction between women and males outside certain well-defined categories, which differ among Muslims and Hindus. Muslim purdah restrictions do not apply within the immediate kin unit,but only outside it, while Hindu purdah is based on a set of avoidance rules between a woman and her male affines. Muslim seclusion begins at puberty, Hindu seclusion strictly speaking begins with marriage.

Type
Women and Social Controls
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ali, Mrs. Meer Hassan, Observations on the Mussulmauns of India (London: Parbury, Allen, and Co., 1832), Vol. I, pp. 113, 176, 304–35; Vol. II, p. 74.Google Scholar

2 Mayo, Katherine, Mother India (New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1927), esp. pp. 111–22.Google ScholarHauswirth, Frieda (Mrs. Sarangadhar Das), A Marriage to India (New York: Vanguard Press, 1930);Google ScholarDas, Frieda Hauswirth, Purdah: The Status of Indian Women (New York: Vanguard Press, 1932).Google Scholar

3 Zwemer, Samuel M., Childhood in the Moslem World (New York: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1915).Google Scholar

4 Karve, D. D., The New Brahmans (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1963). esp. pp. 11104.Google Scholar

5 See, for example, footnote I, page 172, Honigmann, John J., ‘Woman in West Pakistan’, in Pakistan: Society and Culture, Maron, Stanley, ed. (New Haven: Human Relations Area File, 1957), pp. 154–76.Google Scholar

6 Papanek, Hanna, ‘The Woman Field Worker in a Purdah Society], Human Organization, Vol. 23, No. 2, Summer 1964, pp. 160–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Marriott, McKim, ‘Caste Ranking and Food Transactions: A Matrix Analysis], in Structure and Change in Indian Society, Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernard S., eds. (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.. 1968), pp. 133–71.Google Scholar

8 Chipp, Sylvia A., ‘The Role of Women Elites in a Modernizing Country: The All Pakistan Women's Association‘, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1970.Google ScholarChipp, Sylvia A., ‘Tradition vs. Change: The All Pakistan Women's Association’, Islam and the Modern Age, New Delhi, Vol. 1, No. 3, 09 1970, pp. 6990.Google ScholarJacobson, Doranne, ‘Hidden Faces: Hindu and Muslim Purdah in a Central Indian Village’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Department of Anthropology, 1970.Google ScholarJacobson, Doranne, ‘Purdah in Central India’, paper presented at American Anthropological Association Meetings, New Orleans, 1969.Google ScholarLuschinsky, Mildred S., ‘The Life of Women in a Village of North India’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1962.Google ScholarNewman, Ruth E., ‘Cross-Cultural Test of a Trait of Mental Process and Its Categorical Correlates’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, Department of Psychology, 1963.Google ScholarPastner, Carroll, ‘Sexual Dichotomization in Society and Culture: The Women of Panjgur, Baluchistan’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, Department of Anthropology, 1971.Google Scholar

9 Dumont, Louis, Homo Hierarchicus: An Essay on the Caste System (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), Chapter 10, pp. 201–16.Google ScholarAnsari, Ghaus, ‘Muslim Caste in Uttar Pradesh’, Eastern Anthropologist, Special Number, Vol. 13, No. 2, 12 195902 1960.Google Scholar

10 Papanek, Hanna, ‘Purdah in Pakistan: Seclusion and Modern Occupations for Women’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 33, No. 3, 08 1971, pp. 517–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11 Stuers, Cora Vreede-De, Parda: A Study of Muslim Women’s Life in Northern India (New York: Humanities Press, 1968), p. 76.Google Scholar

12 Eglar, Zekiye, A Punjabi Village in Pakistan (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960), p. 30.Google Scholar

13 Honigmann, , p. 159.Google Scholar

14 Murphy, Robert, ‘Social Distance and the Veil’, American Anthropologist, Vol. 66, No. 6, Part 1, 12 1964, pp. 1263–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Husain, A. F. A., Employment of Middle Class Muslim Women in Dacca (Dacca: Dacca University Socio-Economic Research Board, 1958), p. 14.Google Scholar

16 Stuers, Vreede-De, p. 84.Google Scholar

17 Faridi, Tazeen, The Changing Role of Women in Pakistan (Karachi: Ferozesons, 1960).Google Scholar

18 McCarthy, Florence E., ‘Google ScholarBengali Village Women: Mediators between Tradition and Development], unpublished MA. thesis, Department of Sociology, Michigan State Univer-sity, East Lansing, 1967, pp. 35–6.Google Scholar

19 Slocum, W. L., Jamila Akhtar and Abrar Fatima Sahi, Village Life in Lahore District: A Study of Selected Sociological Aspects (Lahore: Social Sciences Research Centre, University of the Panjab, 1960), p. 23.Google Scholar

20 Cambridge University Asian Expedition, The Budhopur Report, Lahore: Social Sciences Research Centre, University of the Panjab, 1962, pp. 1516.Google Scholar

21 Papanek, Hanna, ‘Pakistan's New Industrialists and Businessmen: Focus on the Memons,’ in Modernization of Occupational Cultures in South Asia, Singer, Milton, ed. (Durham: Duke University Program in Comparative Studies in Southern Asia, 1973).Google Scholar

22 Vreede-De Stuers, passim; Misra, S. C., Muslim Communities in Gujarat (Bombay: Asia Publishing House, 1964), pp. 159–60.Google Scholar

23 Maududi, Abul A'la, Birth Control: Its Social, Political, Economic, Moral and Religions Aspects (Lahore: English edition, Islamic Publications, Ltd., 1968), p. 82.Google Scholar

24 (Khan, Aga III) The Memoirs of Aga Khan: World Enough and Time (London: Cassell and Co., 1954), p. 188.Google Scholar

25 Papanek, Hanna, ‘Leadership and Social Change in the Khoja Ismaili Community’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Department of Social Relations, 1962.Google Scholar

26 Khan, Aga IIIPrecious Pearls, Firmans Mubarak of Mowlana Hazar Imam, compiled and translated by Alidina, Sherali and AH, Kassim (Karachi: Ismailia Association, Pakistan, 1954), p. 44.Google Scholar

27 Nawaz, Mumtaz Shah portrays some of these variations on the theme of purdah in a changing society, from the viewpoint of a single prominent Punjabi family in the years before the 1947 Partition, in her autobiographical novel, The Heart Divided (Mumtaz Publications,74 Lawrence Road, Lahore, 1957).Google Scholar

28 Mirza, Sarfaraz Hussain, Muslim Women's Role in the Pakistan Movement (Lahore: Research Society of Pakistan, University of the Punjab, 1969), pp. 67, 11, 27.Google Scholar

29 Mehta, Rama, The Western Educated Hindu Woman (New York: Asia Publishing House, 1970), pp. 1920.Google Scholar

30 Jacobson, , 1969 and 1970, p. 18.Google Scholar

31 Vatuk, Sylvia, personal communication; also see her ‘Reference, Address, and Fictive Kinship in Urban North India’, Ethnology, Vol. VIII, No. 3, 07 1969, pp. 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Hitchcock, John T. and Minturn, Leigh, ‘The Rajputs of Khalapur, India’, in Six Cultures: Studies of Child Rearing, Whiting, Beatrice B., ed. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963), pp. 233–6.Google Scholar

33 Kapadia, K. M., Marriage and Family in India (Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1966), pp. 124–34.Google Scholar

34 Kapadia, , p. 135;Google ScholarStuers, Vreede-De, pp. 2831.Google Scholar

35 See, for example, Kapadia, , p. 145 and Census of India, 1911, Vol. 14, Part I, Punjab: Report, pp. 294–5.Google Scholar

36 Jacobson, , 1969, p. 10.Google Scholar

37 Orenstein, Henry, ‘Toward a Grammar of Defilement in Hindu Sacred Law’, in Structure and Change in Indian Society, Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernard S., eds. (Chicago: Aldine Publishers, 1968), esp. pp. 122–3.Google Scholar

38 Yalman, Nur O., ‘On the purity of women in the castes of Ceylon and Malabar’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1963, 93: 2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 Hadath, (ritual impurity), p. 115Google Scholar and Wudu, (minor ritual ablution), pp. 635–6,Google Scholar in Gibb, H. A. R. and Kramers, J. H., Shorter Encyclopedia of Islam (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1953).Google Scholar

40 Rahman, Fazlur, Islam (New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday, 1968), p. 37.Google Scholar

41 In the translation by Arberry, Arthur J., The Koran Interpreted (New York: Macmillan, 1955), II, pp. 4950, Sura 24: 30.Google Scholar

42 Rahman, , 1968, p. 35.Google Scholar

43 Sura, 4 (‘Women’): 129, in Arberry I, p. 119.Google Scholar

44 Fyzee, Asaf A. A., Outlines of Muhammadan Law (London: Oxford University Press, 1955, second edition), esp. Chapters 12–14, pp. 318403.Google Scholar

45 Fyzee, , p. 73.Google Scholar

46 Fyzee, , pp. 110–22;Google ScholarStuers, Vreede–De, p. 15;Google ScholarMcCarthy, , p. 31.Google Scholar

47 Mahmood, Shaukat, Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 (Lahore: Pakistan Law Times Publications, 1962), pp. 26–7;Google ScholarFaridi, , pp. 17–8.Google Scholar

48 Mahmood, , Family Laws Ordinance, pp. 2730;Google ScholarAnderson, J. N. D., ‘The Role of Personal Statutes in Social Development in Islamic Countries’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01 1971, pp. 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

49 Sura, 4: 35, in Arberry, I, p. 105.Google Scholar

50 Rahman, Fazlu, ‘Islamic Modernism: Its Scope, Method and Alternatives’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. I, No. 4, 10 1970, pp. 329–51.Google Scholar

51 Maududi, , p. 82, with footnote 110 included in parentheses.Google Scholar

52 Sura, 24: 1, in Arberry, II, p. 46.Google Scholar

53 Cf.Michener, James, Caravans (New York: Bantam Books, 1968), pp. 112–17 and 433.Google Scholar

54 Antoun, Richard T., ‘On the Modesty of Women in Arab Muslim Villages: A Study in the Accommodation of Traditions’, American Anthropologist, Vol. 70, No. 4, 08 1968, pp. 671–97;CrossRefGoogle ScholarAbu–Zahra, Nadia M., ‘On the Modesty of Women in Arab Muslim Villages: A Reply’, American Anthropologist, Vol. 72, No. 5, 10 1970, pp. 1079–88;CrossRefGoogle ScholarAntoun, Richard T., ‘Antoun‘s Reply to Abu–Zahra’, American Anthropologist, Vol. 72, No. 5, pp. 1088–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 Dodd, Peter C., ‘Women's Honor (il 'ird) in Contemporary Arab Society’, September 1970, paper presented at seventh world congress, International Sociological Association, Varna, Bulgaria.Google Scholar

56 Brown, Judith K., ‘A Note on the Division of Labor by Sex’, American Anthropologist, Vol. 72, No. 5, 10 1970, p. 1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

57 Ikramullah, Shaista, Behind the Veil (Karachi, Pakistan Publications, no date (probably early 1950's)).Google Scholar

58 McCarthy, , pp. 23.Google Scholar

59 Akhtar, Slocum and Sahi, , pp. 45–6.Google Scholar

60 Eglar, , p. 34.Google Scholar

61 Bean, Lee L., ‘Utilisation of Human Resources: The Case of Women in Pakistan’, International Labour Review, Vol. 97, No. 4, 04 1968 (International Labour Office, Geneva), pp. 391410.Google Scholar

62 For a more detailed discussion, see Papanek, 1971.

63 Papanek, 1973.

64 Other examples of this very special kind of division of labor are mentioned by Pauline Kolenda in a recent survey article dealing with family structure: Kolenda, Pauline‘Perspec-tives on Fertility in the Context of the Indian Family’, paper presented at conference on FamilyPlanning and Traditional Indian Values,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,August 1970, p. 6.Google Scholar

65 Some work of this kind has been undertaken by Hitchcock and Minturn: Hitchcock and Minturn, 1963; Minturn, Leigh and Lambert, William W., Mothers of Six Cultures (New York: Wiley, 1964).Google Scholar

66 Lloyd, A.. and Fallers, Margaret C., ‘Sex Roles in Egeli’, unpublished draft paper, cited by permission.Google Scholar

67 Djébar, Assia, Women of Islam (London: André Deutsch, Ltd., 1961), pp. 1214.Google Scholar

68 Carstairs, G. Morris, The Twice–Born (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1967), p. 74.Google Scholar

69 Honigmann, , p. 156.Google Scholar

70 Kolenda, Pauline M., ‘Regional Differences in Indian Family Structure’, in Regions and Regionalism in South Asian Studies, Crane, Robert I., ed. (Duke University, Monograph No. 5, Comparative Studies on Southern Asia series), pp. 147226;Google ScholarHaddon, Lorraine and Kolenda, Pauline M., ‘Correlates of Indian Joint Family Living’, unpublished paper.Google Scholar

71 Pehrson, Robert N., The Social Organization of the Marri Baluch, Viking Fund Publica-tions in Anthropology No. 43 (New York: Wenner Gren Foundation, 1966), p. 70.Google Scholar

72 Pastner, , 1971, and personal communication.Google Scholar

73 Antoun, , 1968, pp. 683–5.Google Scholar

74 Dube, Leela, Matriliny and Islam: Religion and Society in the Laccadives (Delhi: National Publishing House, 1969), p. 24.Google Scholar

75 Korson, J. Henry, ‘Student Attitudes Toward Mate Selection in a Muslim Society: Pakistan’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 31, No. 1, 02 1969, pp. 153– 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

76 Eglar, , pp. 207–9;Google ScholarStuers, Vreede-De, pp. 813;Google ScholarAnsari, , pp. 52–7.Google Scholar

77 Jacobson, , 1970, p. 205.Google Scholar

78 McCarthy, , p. 31;Google ScholarPastner, , pp. 151–5;Google ScholarEglar, , pp. 45, 186.Google Scholar

79 Husain, , p. 15.Google Scholar

80 Singer, Milton, ‘The Indian Joint Family in Modern Industry’, in Structure and Change in Indian Society, Singer, Milton and Cohn, Bernard S., eds. (Chicago: Aldine Publishing, 1968), p. 439.Google Scholar

81 Mirza, , p. 12;Google ScholarStuers, Vreede-De, pp. 41, 53–4.Google Scholar

82 Tandon, Prakash, Punjabi Century 1957–1947 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968), p. 106.Google Scholar

83 Bertocci, Peter, personal communication.Google Scholar

84 Fyzee, , pp. 99100.Google Scholar

85 Sushila, , No, I am Not Ashamed (New Delhi: Capital Book Company, no date).Google Scholar

86 Cf.Haddon, and Kolenda, ; Inden, Ronald B. and Nicholas, Ralph W., ‘A Cultural Analysis of Bengali Kinship’, in Prelude to Crisis: Bengal and Bengal Studies in 1970, Bertocci, Peter, ed. (East Lansing: Michigan State University, Asian Studies Center Occasional Paper No. 18, 1972), pp. 91–7.Google Scholar

75
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Purdah: Separate Worlds and Symbolic Shelter
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Purdah: Separate Worlds and Symbolic Shelter
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Purdah: Separate Worlds and Symbolic Shelter
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *