Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ssw5r Total loading time: 0.323 Render date: 2022-08-08T09:44:45.704Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Rat Cities and Beehive Worlds: Density and Design in the Modern City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2011

Jon Adams*
London School of Economics And Political Science
Edmund Ramsden
University of Exeter


Nestled among E. M. Forster's careful studies of Edwardian social mores is a short story called “The Machine Stops.” Set many years in the future, it is a work of science fiction that imagines all humanity housed in giant high-density cities buried deep below a lifeless surface. With each citizen cocooned in an identical private chamber, all interaction is mediated through the workings of “the Machine,” a totalizing social system that controls every aspect of human life. Cultural variety has ceded to rigorous organization: everywhere is the same, everyone lives the same life. So hopelessly reliant is humanity upon the efficient operation of the Machine, that when the system begins to fail there is little the people can do, and so tightly ordered is the system that the failure spreads. At the story's conclusion, the collapse is total, and Forster's closing image offers a condemnation of the world they had built, and a hopeful glimpse of the world that might, in their absence, return: “The whole city was broken like a honeycomb. […] For a moment they saw the nations of the dead, and, before they joined them, scraps of the untainted sky” (2001: 123). In physically breaking apart the city, there is an extent to which Forster is literalizing the device of the broken society, but it is also the case that the infrastructure of the Machine is so inseparable from its social structure that the failure of one causes the failure of the other. The city has—in the vocabulary of present-day engineers—“failed badly.”

Research Article
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alexiou, Alice Sparberg. 2006. Jane Jacobs: Urban Visionary. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Ardrey, Robert. 1970. The Social Contract: A Personal Inquiry into the Evolutionary Sources of Order and Disorder. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Bettelheim, Bruno. 1979. Surviving and other Essays. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Burt, Jonathan. 2006. Rat. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Calhoun, John B. 1962. Population Density and Social Pathology. Scientific American 306: 39148.Google Scholar
Calhoun, John B. 1963a. The Ecology and Sociology of the Norway Rat. Bethesda, Md.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, John B. 1963b. The Social Use of Space. In Mayer, W. and Gelder, R. van, eds., Physiological Mammalogy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, John B. 1971. Control of Population: Numbers. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 184: 148–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calhoun, John B. 1973. From Mice to Men. Transaction and Studies of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia 41: 92118.Google ScholarPubMed
Calthorpe, Peter. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Carson, Rachel. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Christian, John J. 1950. The Adreno-Pituitary System and Population Cycles in Mammals. Journal of Mammology 31: 247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, John J. 1961. Phenomena Associated with Population Density. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of American 47: 428–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, Alice. 1985. Utopia on Trial: Vision and Reality in Planned Housing. London: Hilary Shipman.Google Scholar
Conan, Michael. 2000. Introduction: Contested Claims and Creative Tensions. In Conan, M., ed., Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Wiley. 1926. The Birth and Development of the Tall Building. American Architect 129: 39.Google Scholar
Dantzig, George B. and Saaty, Thomas L.. 1973. Compact City. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Duany, Andrés and Plater-Zyberk, Elizabeth. 1994. The Neighborhood and the District. In Katz, Peter, ed., The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dubois, John. 1974. McHarg Awarded Art Alliance Achievement Medal. Evening Bulletin 21 Mar.: n.p.Google Scholar
Edwards, Arthur Trystan. 1924. Good and Bad Manners in Architecture. London: Philip Allan & Co.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. 1968. The Population Bomb. New York: Sierra Club and Ballantine.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claude S. and Baldassare, Mark. 1975. How Far from the Madding Crowd? New Society 32: 531–33.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. 1954. Introduction. Collected Short Stories. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. 2001. Selected Stories. Leavitt, David and Mitchell, Mark, eds. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freedman, Jonathan L. 1975. Crowding and Behavior. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Galle, O. R., Gove, W. R., and McPherson, J. M.. 1972. Population Density and Pathology: What Are the Relations for Man? Science 176: 2360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillette, King C. 1976 [1894]. The Human Drift: A Facsimile Reproduction. Roemer, Kenneth M., introduction. Delmare, N.Y.: Scholar's Facsimiles and Reprints.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Edward L., Gross, Meir, and DeGraaf, Richard M.. 1980–1981. Explorations in Bird/Land Geometry. Urban Ecology 5: 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropius, Walter. 1960. Architecture in Japan. In Tange, Kenzo, Gropius, Walter, and Ishimoto, Yashuro, eds., Katsura: Tradition and Creation in Japanese Architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hall, Edward T. 1969. Human Needs and Inhuman Cities. Ekistics 27: 181–84.Google Scholar
Hauser, P. M. 1971. Review of Paul R. and Anne H. Ehrlich's Population, Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology. Social Biology 18: 443–46.Google Scholar
Hogben, L. 1939. Dangerous Thoughts. Allen and Unwin: London.Google Scholar
Howard, Ebenezer. 1965 [1898]. Garden Cities of To-Morrow. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Keiner, Christine. 2005. Wartime Rat Control, Rodent Ecology, and the Rise and Fall of Chemical Rodenticides. Endeavour 29: 119–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krier, Leon. 1984. Houses, Palaces and Cities. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kultermann, Udo, ed. 1970. Kenzo Tange, 1946–1969: Architecture and Urban Design. London: Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, Charles Rollinson. 1904. City Plan. The Craftsman 6: 313.Google Scholar
Langdon, Philip. 1994. A Better Place to Live: Reshaping the American Suburb. Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Susanne K. 1962. Philosophical Sketches. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corbusier, Le. 1929. The City of To-Morrow and Its Planning. London: John Rodker.Google Scholar
Corbusier, Le. 1967 [1935]. The Radiant City: Elements of a Doctrine of Urbanism to Be Used as the Basis of Our Machine-Age Civilization. Knight, Pamela, Levieux, Eleanor, and Coltman, Derek, trans. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Light, Jennifer S. 2009. The Nature of Cities: Ecological Visions and the American Urban Professions, 1920–1960. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lima, Antonietta Iolanda. 2003. Soleri: Architecture as Human Ecology. New York: Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
Maass, John. 1969. Where Architectural Historians Fear to Tread. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 28: 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malzberg, Barry N. 1973. Culture Lock. In Elwood, Roger, ed., Future City. London: Sphere.Google Scholar
McHarg, Ian. 1962. The Ecology of the City. Journal of Architectural Education 17: 101–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHarg, Ian. 1964. The Place of Nature in the City of Man. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 352: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHarg, Ian. 1969. Design with Nature. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mencken, H. L. 1931. The New Architecture. American Mercury 22, 86: 164–65.Google Scholar
Müller, Rudolf. 1908. Osterreichische Wochenschrift fur den offentlich Baudienst, XIV, Jg. Eric M. Nay, 1995 translation online at: Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. 1924. Sticks and Stones: A Study of American Architecture and Civilization. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. 1956 [1948]. Prefabricated Blight. In From the Ground Up. New York: Harvest.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. 1961. The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. 1965. Utopia, the City, and the Machine. Daedalus 94, 2: 271–92.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. 1968. The Urban Prospect. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Murphy, Michelle. 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadenicek, Daniel Joseph and Hastings, Catherine M.. 2000. Environmental Rhetoric, Environmental Sophism: The Words and Work of Landscape Architecture. In Conan, M., ed., Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, Oscar. 1972. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pines, Maya. 1971. How the Social Organization of Animal Communities Can Lead to a Population Crisis which Destroys Them. In Segal, Julius, ed., National Institute of Mental Health; Mental Health Program Reports—5. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health Education and Welfare. (In John B. Calhoun Papers, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda.)Google Scholar
Porteous, J. Douglas. 1977. Environment and Behavior: Planning and Everyday Urban Life. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Porter, E. F. Jr. 1971. Scotsman Offers City a Wee Bit of Advice. St. Louis Post Dispatch 3 Dec.: n.p.Google Scholar
Preston, Claire. 2006. Bee. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Juan. 2000. The Beehive Metaphor: From Gaudi to Le Corbusier. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
Ramsden, Edmund and Adams, Jon. 2009. Escaping the Laboratory: The Rodent Experiments of John B. Calhoun and Their Cultural Influence. Journal of Social History 42: 761–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, Eric. 1987. British Town and Country Planning. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Roemer, Kenneth M. 1976 [1894]. Introduction. In Gillette, King C., ed., The Human Drift: A Facsimile Reproduction. Delmare, N.Y.: Scholar's Facsimiles and Reprints.Google Scholar
Schiffenbauer, A. I., Brown, J. E., Perry, P. A., Shulack, L. K., and Zanzola, A. M.. 1977. The Relationship between Density and Crowding: Some Architectural Modifiers. Environment and Behavior 9: 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, R. C. 1966. Density, Health, and Social Disorganization. Journal of American Institute of Planners 32: 3840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Geoffrey. 1924. On Humanism, Good Manners and Civic Values. Architecture 3: 8084.Google Scholar
Seligman, D. 1957. The Enduring Slums. In, editors of Fortune, The Exploding Metropolis. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Soleri, Paolo. 1969. Arcology: The City in the Image of Man. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Soleri, Paolo. 1983. Arcosanti: An Urban Laboratory? San Diego and Scottsdale, Ariz.: Avant Books and Consanti Foundation.Google Scholar
Soleri, Paolo. 2003. What If? Collected Writings, 1986–2000. Berkeley: Berkeley Hills Books.Google Scholar
Solomonson, Katherine. 2001. The Chicago Tribune Tower Competition: Skyscraper Design and Cultural Change in the 1920s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sommer, Robert. 1997. Benchmarks in Environmental Psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17: 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spirn, Anne Whiston. 2000. Ian McHarg, Landscape Architecture, and Environmentalism: Ideas and Methods in Context. In Conan, M., ed., Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steadman, Philip. 1979. The Evolution of Designs: Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steadman, Philip. 2008. The Evolution of Designs: Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts. Rev. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., and Schopler, J.. 1973. Physical, Social, and Personal Determinants of the Perception of Crowding. Environment and Behavior 5: 87115.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Louis. 1947. Kindergarten Chats and other Writings. New York: George Wittenborn.Google Scholar
Thompson, William Irwin. 1990. At the Edge of History and Passages about Earth: An Exploring of the New Planetary Culture. Hudson: Lindisfarne Press.Google Scholar
Vidler, Anthony. 1999. Technologies of Space/Spaces of Technology. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 58: 482–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G. 1966. Introduction to the Discussion. Sociologia Ruralis 6: 386–88.Google Scholar
Walker, Peter and Simo, Melanie. 1994. Invisible Gardens: The Search for Modernism in the American Landscape. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Who Was the First Architect? Or Bees and Bee-Hives. 1874. London: T. Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Whyte, William H. 1968. The Last Landscape. NewYork: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Winsborough, Halliman H. 1965. The Social Consequences of High Population Density. Law and Contemporary Problems 10: 120–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Tom. 1968. The Pump House Gang. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Wright, Frank Lloyd. 1931. Modern Architecture: Being the Kahn Lectures for 1930. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Frank Lloyd. 1949. Genius and the Mobocracy. New York: Duell Sloan and Pearce.Google Scholar
Yanni, Carla. 2003. The Linear Plan for Insane Asylums in the United States before 1866. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 62: 2449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanni, Carla. 2005. History and Sociology of Science: Interrogating the Spaces of Knowledge. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 64: 423–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rat Cities and Beehive Worlds: Density and Design in the Modern City
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Rat Cities and Beehive Worlds: Density and Design in the Modern City
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Rat Cities and Beehive Worlds: Density and Design in the Modern City
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *