Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Fuzzy Sovereignty: Rural Reconstruction in Afghanistan, between Democracy Promotion and Power Games

  • Alessandro Monsutti (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This paper contributes to the study of new forms of transnational power constituted by the action of international and nongovernmental organizations, to which gravitate loose networks of activists variously promoting democracy, human rights, the empowerment of women, and environmental conservation. The paper's focus is impacts that the massive reconstruction effort is having on Afghan society, examined through a case study of The National Solidarity Programme (NSP), the main project of rural rehabilitation underway in the country. Launched in 2003, its objective is to bring development funds directly to rural people and to establish democratically elected local councils that will identify needs, and plan and manage the reconstruction. Although the NSP's political significance faded in the context of the presidential elections of 2009, which were characterized by quickly evolving alliances, the program illustrates how reconstruction funds are an integral part of Afghanistan's social and political landscape. My arguments are four-fold: First, the NSP subtly modifies participants' body gestures and codes of conduct. Second, the program's fundamental assumptions are at odds with the complex social fabric and the overlapping sources of solidarity and conflict that characterize rural Afghanistan. Third, the ways in which political actors use material and symbolic resources channeled through the NSP mirror national struggles for power. Finally, such programs are one element in a much larger conceptual and bureaucratic apparatus that promotes new forms of transnational governmentality that coexist with and sometimes challenge the more familiar, territorialized expressions of state power and sovereignty.

Copyright
Corresponding author
alessandro.monsutti@graduateinstitute.ch
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

James Ferguson and Akhil Gupta . 2002. Spatializing States: Towards an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality. American Ethnologist 29, 4: 9811002.

Thomas Blom Hansen and Finn Stepputat . 2006. Sovereignty Revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 295315.

Tania Murray Li . 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.

Alessandro Monsutti . 2004. Cooperation, Remittances, and Kinship among the Hazaras. Iranian Studies 37, 2: 219–40.

Alessandro Monsutti . 2009. Itinérances transnationales: Un éclairage sur les réseaux migratoires afghans. Critique Internationale 44: 83104.

Boris-Mathieu Pétric . 2005. Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan or the Birth of a Globalized Protectorate. Central Asian Survey 24, 3: 319–32.

Conrad Schetter . 2005. Ethnoscapes, National Territorialisation, and the Afghan War. Geopolitics 10: 5075.

Ann Laura Stoler . 2006. On Degrees of Imperial Sovereignty. Public Culture 18, 1: 125–46.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 61 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 185 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.