Skip to main content
×
Home

On the Repugnance of Customary Law

  • Melissa Demian (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The Constitution of Papua New Guinea (PNG) features a peculiar artifact of colonial-era law known as a repugnancy clause. This type of clause, used elsewhere as a neutral mechanism to identify conflicts between legal provisions, has in PNG become a tool for the moral-aesthetic evaluation of “customary law.” In this article, I follow the history of the PNG repugnancy clause from its colonial origins and through the relevant case law since the country's independence in order to ask both how the clause acquired its non-legal meaning through legal usage, and why it has been retained in its original form in PNG when so many postcolonial legal regimes have discarded it. Comparative material from Indonesia, sub-Saharan Africa, and especially Australia is used to contextualize the durability of the PNG repugnancy clause, and theoretical material on the affect of disgust and shame is brought to bear in order to understand the use of repugnancy in its moral-aesthetic sense. The article concludes with a meditation on the way the repugnancy clause has enabled the judiciary of PNG to distance the law of the country not simply from an uneducated or inadequately Christian general populace, but also from a history in which all Papua New Guineans were regarded as a contaminating threat to the European colonizers whose legal system the country has inherited.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the Repugnance of Customary Law
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the Repugnance of Customary Law
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the Repugnance of Customary Law
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
m.demian@kent.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Allott A. 1970. New Essays in African Law. London: Butterworths.
Banks C. 1998. Custom, Compensation and the Criminal Law (Compensation) Act—1991 of Papua New Guinea. British Journal of Criminology 38, 2: 299316.
Banks C. 2001. Women, Justice and Custom: The Discourse of “Good Custom” and “Bad Custom” in Papua New Guinea and Canada. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 42, 1–2: 101–22.
Bell D. 1998. Ngarrindjeri Wurruwarrin: A World that Is, Was, and Will Be. North Melbourne: Spinifex Press.
Bennett T. W. 2004. Customary Law in South Africa. Lansdowne: Juta and Company Ltd.
Bourdieu P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Corrin Care J. and Zorn J. G.. 2001. Legislating Pluralism: Statutory “Developments” in Melanesian Customary Law. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 46: 49101.
Demian M. 2003. Custom in the Courtroom, Law in the Village: Legal Transformations in Papua New Guinea. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9, 1: 97115.
Demian M. 2006. Reflecting on Loss in Papua New Guinea. Ethnos 71, 4: 507–32.
Demian M. 2011. “Hybrid Custom” and Legal Description. In Edwards J. and Petrović-Šteger M., eds., Recasting Anthropological Knowledge: Inspiration and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dinnen S. 1988. Sentencing, Custom and the Rule of Law in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 27: 1954.
Filer C. 1997. Compensation, Rent and Power in Papua New Guinea. In Toft S., ed., Compensation for Resource Development in Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Law Reform Commission (Monograph 6), and Canberra: Australian National University, National Centre for Development Studies (Pacific Policy Paper 24).
Filer C. 2006. Custom, Law and Ideology in Papua New Guinea. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 7, 1: 6584.
Fitzpatrick P. 1999. Passions out of Place: Law, Incommensurability, and Resistance. In Darian-Smith E. and Fitzpatrick P., eds., Laws of the Postcolonial. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Forsyth M. 2013. Witchcraft and Sorcery-Related Killings in Melanesia: The Legal Issues. Australian National University: State, Society & Governance in Melanesia In Brief 2013/1. At: http://ips.cap.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/SSGM_IB_2013_1_Proof2_PrintWeb.pdf (accessed 10 Jan. 2014).
Gewertz D. B. and Errington F. K.. 1999. Emerging Class in Papua New Guinea: The Telling of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gluckman M. 1956. Custom and Conflict in Africa. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goddard M. 1996. The Snake Bone Case: Law, Custom and Justice in a Papua New Guinea Village Court. Oceania 67, 1: 5063.
Hviding E. 1993. Indigenous Essentialism? Simplifying Customary Land Ownership in New Georgia, Solomon Islands. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 149: 802–24.
Independent State of Papua New Guinea. 1971. Sorcery Act. At: http://www.paclii.org/pg/legis/consol_act/sa1971117/ (accessed 11 Jan. 2014).
Independent State of Papua New Guinea. 1975. Constitution. At: http://www.paclii.org/pg/legis/consol_act/cotisopng534/ (accessed 11 Jan. 2014).
Independent State of Papua New Guinea. 2000. Underlying Law Act. At: http://www.paclii.org/pg/legis/consol_act/ula2000173/ (accessed 11 Jan. 2014).
Inglis A. 1975. The White Women's Protection Ordinance: Sexual Anxiety and Politics in Papua. London: Chatto and Windus for Sussex University Press.
Kaputin J. 1975. The Law: A Colonial Fraud? New Guinea 10: 415.
Kolnai A. 2004. On Disgust. Chicago: Open Court.
Leslie R. D. 1977. The Repugnancy Rule in African Law and the Public Policy Rule in Conflict of Laws. Acta Juridica 1977: 117–27.
Lev D. S. 1985. Colonial Law and the Genesis of the Indonesian State. Indonesia 40: 5774.
Llewellyn K. N. and Hoebel E. A.. 1941. The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Malinowski B. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Menninghaus W. 2003. Disgust: The Theory and History of a Strong Sensation. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Merry S. E. 2009. Relating to the Subjects of Human Rights: The Culture of Agency in Human Rights Discourse. In Freeman M. and Napier D., eds., Law and Anthropology: Current Legal Issues, Volume 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller W. I. 1997. The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Motha S. 1998. Mabo: Encountering the Epistemic Limit of the Recognition of “Difference.” Griffith Law Review 7, 1: 7996.
Motha S. 2005. The Failure of “Postcolonial” Sovereignty in Australia. Australian Feminist Law Journal 22: 107–26.
Mydans S. 1997. When the Bartered Bride Opts out of the Bargain. New York Times, 6 May: A4.
Narokobi B. 1983. The Melanesian Way. Port Moresby: Institute of Papua New Guinea Studies.
Nussbaum M. C. 2004. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ottley B. 1995. Looking Back to the Future: The Colonial Origins of Current Attitudes toward Customary Law. In Aleck J. and Rannells J., eds., Custom at the Crossroads in Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby: Faculty of Law, University of Papua New Guinea.
Ottley B. 2002. Reconciling Modernity and Tradition: Papua New Guinea's Underlying Law Act. Reform 80: 2225, 70–71.
Povinelli E. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Read J. S. 1972. Customary Law under Colonial Rule. In Morris H. F. and Read J. S., Indirect Rule and the Search for Justice: Essays in East African Legal History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Robbins J. 2005. The Humiliations of Sin: Christianity and the Modernization of the Subject among the Urapmin. In Robbins J. and Wardlow H., eds., The Making of Global and Local Modernities in Melanesia: Humiliation, Transformation and the Nature of Cultural Change. Farnham: Ashgate.
Roberts-Wray K. 1966. Commonwealth and Colonial Law. London: Stevens & Sons.
Rubin L. 1965. The Adaptation of Customary Family Law in South Africa. In Kuper H. and Kuper L., eds., African Law: Adaptation and Development. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Slaats H. and Portier K.. 1993. Sorcery and the Law in Modern Indonesia. In Watson C. W. and Ellen R., eds., Understanding Witchcraft and Sorcery in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
South African Law Commission. 1999. The Harmonisation of the Common Law and the Indigenous Law: Report on Conflicts of Law. Project 90. At: http://www.justice.gov.za/salrc/reports/r_prj90_conflict_1999sep.pdf (accessed 11 Jan. 2014).
Stoler A. 1989. Making Empire Respectable: The Politics of Race and Sexual Morality in 20th-Century Colonial Cultures. American Ethnologist 16, 4: 634–60.
Strathern M. 1999. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press.
Strathern M. 2004. Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. In Pottage A. and Mundy M., eds., Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Street A. 2010. Belief as Relational Action: Christianity and Cultural Change in Papua New Guinea. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16, 2: 260–78.
Strelein L. 2004. Symbolism and Function: From Native Title to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Self-Government. In Langton M., Tehan M., Palmer L., and Shain K., eds., Honour among Nations? Treaties and Agreements with Indigenous People. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Press.
Wastell S. 2007. Being Swazi, Being Human: Custom, Constitutionalism and Human Rights in an African Polity. In Goodale M. and Merry S. E., eds., The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weiner J. F. 1999. Culture in a Sealed Envelope: The Concealment of Australian Aboriginal Heritage and Tradition in the Hindmarsh Island Bridge Affair. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5, 2: 193210.
Weiner J. F. 2006. Eliciting Customary Law. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 7, 1: 1525.
Weisbrot D. 1988. Papua New Guinea's Indigenous Jurisprudence and the Legacy of Colonialism. University of Hawai'i Law Review 10, 1: 145.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 68 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 229 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.