Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

On the Repugnance of Customary Law

  • Melissa Demian (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The Constitution of Papua New Guinea (PNG) features a peculiar artifact of colonial-era law known as a repugnancy clause. This type of clause, used elsewhere as a neutral mechanism to identify conflicts between legal provisions, has in PNG become a tool for the moral-aesthetic evaluation of “customary law.” In this article, I follow the history of the PNG repugnancy clause from its colonial origins and through the relevant case law since the country's independence in order to ask both how the clause acquired its non-legal meaning through legal usage, and why it has been retained in its original form in PNG when so many postcolonial legal regimes have discarded it. Comparative material from Indonesia, sub-Saharan Africa, and especially Australia is used to contextualize the durability of the PNG repugnancy clause, and theoretical material on the affect of disgust and shame is brought to bear in order to understand the use of repugnancy in its moral-aesthetic sense. The article concludes with a meditation on the way the repugnancy clause has enabled the judiciary of PNG to distance the law of the country not simply from an uneducated or inadequately Christian general populace, but also from a history in which all Papua New Guineans were regarded as a contaminating threat to the European colonizers whose legal system the country has inherited.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the Repugnance of Customary Law
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the Repugnance of Customary Law
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the Repugnance of Customary Law
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
m.demian@kent.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C. Banks 1998. Custom, Compensation and the Criminal Law (Compensation) Act—1991 of Papua New Guinea. British Journal of Criminology 38, 2: 299316.

C. Banks 2001. Women, Justice and Custom: The Discourse of “Good Custom” and “Bad Custom” in Papua New Guinea and Canada. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 42, 1–2: 101–22.

M. Demian 2003. Custom in the Courtroom, Law in the Village: Legal Transformations in Papua New Guinea. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9, 1: 97115.

M. Demian 2006. Reflecting on Loss in Papua New Guinea. Ethnos 71, 4: 507–32.

C. Filer 2006. Custom, Law and Ideology in Papua New Guinea. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 7, 1: 6584.

D. B. Gewertz and F. K. Errington . 1999. Emerging Class in Papua New Guinea: The Telling of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

M. Goddard 1996. The Snake Bone Case: Law, Custom and Justice in a Papua New Guinea Village Court. Oceania 67, 1: 5063.

E. Hviding 1993. Indigenous Essentialism? Simplifying Customary Land Ownership in New Georgia, Solomon Islands. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 149: 802–24.

D. S. Lev 1985. Colonial Law and the Genesis of the Indonesian State. Indonesia 40: 5774.

S. E. Merry 2009. Relating to the Subjects of Human Rights: The Culture of Agency in Human Rights Discourse. In M. Freeman and D. Napier , eds., Law and Anthropology: Current Legal Issues, Volume 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

S. Motha 2005. The Failure of “Postcolonial” Sovereignty in Australia. Australian Feminist Law Journal 22: 107–26.

E. Povinelli 2002. The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

A. Stoler 1989. Making Empire Respectable: The Politics of Race and Sexual Morality in 20th-Century Colonial Cultures. American Ethnologist 16, 4: 634–60.

M. Strathern 2004. Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. In A. Pottage and M. Mundy , eds., Law, Anthropology, and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. Street 2010. Belief as Relational Action: Christianity and Cultural Change in Papua New Guinea. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16, 2: 260–78.

S. Wastell 2007. Being Swazi, Being Human: Custom, Constitutionalism and Human Rights in an African Polity. In M. Goodale and S. E. Merry , eds., The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J. F. Weiner 1999. Culture in a Sealed Envelope: The Concealment of Australian Aboriginal Heritage and Tradition in the Hindmarsh Island Bridge Affair. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5, 2: 193210.

J. F. Weiner 2006. Eliciting Customary Law. Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 7, 1: 1525.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 51 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 202 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.