Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Ottoman Empire and the Imperial Turn

  • Alan Mikhail (a1) and Christine M. Philliou (a2)

As a polity that existed for over six centuries and that ruled on three continents, the Ottoman Empire is perhaps both the easiest and hardest empire to compare in world history. It is somewhat paradoxical then that the Ottoman Empire has only recently become a focus of students of empires as historical phenomena. This approach to the Ottoman Empire as an empire has succeeded in generating an impressive profusion of scholarship. This article critically assesses this literature within the larger context of what we term the Imperial Turn to explain how comparative perspectives have been used to analyze the empire. In doing so, it sheds new light on some older historiographical questions about the dynamics of imperial rule, periodization, and political transformation, while at the same time opening up new avenues of inquiry and analysis about the role of various actors in the empire, the recent emphasis on the empire's early modern history, and the scholarly literature of comparative empires itself. Throughout, the authors speak both to Ottoman specialists and others interested in comparative imperial histories to offer a holistic picture of recent Ottoman historiography and to suggest many possible directions for future scholarship. Instead of accepting comparison for comparison's sake, the article offers a bold new vocabulary for rigorous comparative work on the Ottoman Empire and beyond.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Alexander J. Motyl , “Is Everything Empire? Is Empire Everything?Comparative Politics 38 (2006): 229–49

Kenneth Pomeranz , “Empire & ‘Civilizing’ Missions, Past & Present,” Daedalus 134 (2005): 3445

Stephen Kotkin , “Mongol Commonwealth? Exchange and Governance across the Post-Mongol Space,” Kritika 8 (2007): 487531

Niall Ferguson , “The Unconscious Colossus: Limits of (& Alternatives to) American Empire,” Daedalus 134 (2005): 1833

Michael David-Fox , Peter Holquist , and Alexander M. Martin , “The Imperial Turn,” Kritika 7 (2006): 705–12

Ilya Gerasimov , Jan Kusber , and Alexander Semyonov , eds., Empire Speaks Out: Languages of Rationalization and Self-Description in the Russian Empire (Leiden: Brill, 2009)

A. Burton , ed., After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and Through the Nation (Durham: Duke University Press, 2003), 2

Donald Quataert , “Ottoman History Writing and Changing Attitudes towards the Notion of ‘Decline,’History Compass 1 (2003): 19

Virginia H. Aksan , “Locating the Ottomans among Early Modern Empires,” Journal of Early Modern History 3 (1999): 103–34

Marc David Baer , Honored by the Glory of Islam: Conversion and Conquest in Ottoman Europe (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)

Giancarlo Casale , The Ottoman Age of Exploration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)

Tijana Krstić , Contested Conversions to Islam: Narratives of Religious Change in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011)

Beshara Doumani , Rediscovering Palestine: Merchants and Peasants in Jabal Nablus, 1700–1900 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)

Molly Greene , “The Ottoman Experience,” Daedalus 134 (2005): 8899

Jack A. Goldstone , “The Problem of the ‘Early Modern’ World,” Journal of the Social and Economic History of the Orient 41 (1998): 249–84

Randolph Starn , “The Early Modern Muddle,” Journal of Early Modern History 6 (2002): 296307

Cornell Fleischer , “Royal Authority, Dynastic Cyclism, and ‘Ibn Khaldûnism’ in Sixteenth-Century Ottoman Letters,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 18 (1983): 198220

Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri , Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (New York: Penguin Press, 2004)

Dror Ze'evi , “Back to Napoleon? Thoughts on the Beginning of the Modern Era in the Middle East,” Mediterranean Historical Review 19 (2004): 7394

Christine Philliou , “Communities on the Verge: Unraveling the Phanariot Ascendancy in Ottoman Governance,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 51 (2009): 151–81

Dina Rizk Khoury and Dane Keith Kennedy , “Comparing Empires: The Ottoman Domains and the British Raj in the Long Nineteenth Century,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 27 (2007): 233–44

Thomas Kühn , “Shaping and Reshaping Colonial Ottomanism: Contesting Boundaries of Difference and Integration in Ottoman Yemen, 1872–1919,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 27 (2007): 315–31

C. A. Bayly , “Distorted Development: The Ottoman Empire and British India, circa 1780–1916,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 27 (2007): 332–44

Ussama Makdisi , “Ottoman Orientalism,” American Historical Review 107 (2002): 768–96

Janet Klein , The Margins of Empire: Kurdish Militias in the Ottoman Tribal Zone (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011)

Ryan Gingeras , Sorrowful Shores: Violence, Ethnicity, and the End of the Ottoman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)

Uğur Ümit Üngör , The Making of Modern Turkey: Nation and State in Eastern Anatolia, 1913–1950 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)

Ronald Grigor Suny , Fatma Müge Göçek , and Norman M. Naimark , eds., A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)

Sebouh David Aslanian , From the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean: The Global Trade Networks of Armenian Merchants from New Julfa (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 218 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 609 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.