Aglietta, Michel. 1987. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. The US Experience. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. 1970. Reading Capital. London: NLB.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Freud and Lacan,” in Lenin and Philosophy, 189–219. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. 1977. “Contradiction and Overdetermination,” in Louis Althusser, For Marx, 87–128. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar

Arrighi, Giovanni; Hopkins, Terence; and Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1989. Anti-systemic Movements. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bagguley, Paul. 1992. “Social Change, the Middle Class and the Emergence of ‘New Social Movements’: A Critical Analysis.” The Sociological Review, 40:1, 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balibar, Etienne. 1991. “Is There a ‘Neo-Racism’?,” in Etienne Balibar and Immanuel Wallerstein, Race, Nation, Class, 17–28. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bark, Dennis L., and Gress, David R.. 1989. From Shadow to Substance 1945–1963, vol. 1 of A History of West Germany. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich. 1989. “Risikogesellschaft.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 36 (Sept. 1), 31–3.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich, ed. 1991. Politik in der Risikogesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Benton, Sarah. 1989. “The Party is Over.” Marxism Today, 33:3 (03), 32–37.Google Scholar

Berman, Russell. 1981. “Opposition to Rearmament and West German Culture.” Telos, 14:4 (no. 51), 141–58.Google Scholar

Badie, Bertrand, and Birnbaum, Pierre. 1983. The Sociology of the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Badie, Bertrand. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Badie, Bertrand. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Blackbourn, David, and Eley, Geoff. 1985. The Peculiarities of German History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bonefeld, Werner, and Holloway, John, eds. 1991. Post-Fordism and Social Form. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Praxis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital,” in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Richardson, J. C., ed., 241–58. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 1986. Democracy and Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Boyer, Robert. 1990. The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Boye, Robert, and Mistral, J.. 1982. Accumulation, Inflation, Crises. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Brand, Karl-Werner. 1982. Neue soziale Bewegungen. Entstehung, Funktion und Perspektive neuer Protestpotentiale. Eine Zwischenbilanz. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Brand, Karl-Werner; Büsser, Detlef; and Rucht, Dieter. 1986. Aufbruch in eine andere Gesellschaft. Neue Soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Brenner, Robert, and Mark Glick. 1991. “The Regulation Approach: Theory and History.” New Left Review, 188 (07-08), 45–119.Google Scholar

Butterwegge, Christoph, and Isola, Horst, eds. 1991. Rechtsextremismus im vereinten Deutschland. Randerscheinung oder Gefahr für die Demokratie? Berlin: Links.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1977. The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Castells, Manuel. 1978. City, Class and Power. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chopra, Ingrid, and Scheller, Gitta. 1992. “Die neue Unbeständigkeit.' Ehe und Familie in der spätmodernen Gesellschaft.” Soziale Welt, 43:1, 3:48–69.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean. 1985. “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contempo rary Social Movements.” Social Research, 52:4, 663–717.Google Scholar

Cotgrove, Stephen, and Duff, Andrew. 1980. “Environmentalism, Middle-Class Radicalism and Politics.” Sociological Review, 28:2, 333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delale, Alain, and Ragache, Gilles. 1978. La France de 68. Paris: éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

d'Entrèves, Alexander. 1967. The Notion of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eder, Klaus. 1985. “The ‘New Social Movements’: Moral Crusades, Political Pressure Groups, or Social Movements?” Social Research, 52:4, 869–90.Google Scholar

Elsaesser, Thomas. 1989. New German Cinema: A History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Epstein, Barbara. 1990. “Rethinking Social Movement Theory.” Socialist Review, 20:35–65.Google Scholar

Escobar, Arturo, and Alvarez, Sonia E., eds. 1992. The Making of Social Movements in Latin America: Identity, Strategy, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, Wolfram. 1987. “Wirtschafts- und sozialgeschichtliche Anmerkungen zum ‘deutschen Sonderweg’.” Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte, 16:96–116.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New York: Vintage House.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge, Gordon, Colin, ed. New York: Panthenon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1989. “Sécurité, territoire et population,” in Résumé des cours. 1970–1982, 99–106. Paris: Juillard.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality,” in The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, Burchell, Graham, ed., 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy. 1987. “Women, Welfare and the Politics of Need Interpretation.” Hy patia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 2:103–21.Google Scholar

Gorz, André. 1980. Adieux au prolétariat. Au-delà du socialisme. Paris: éditions Galilée.Google Scholar

Gorz, André. 1982. “The Reconquest of Time.” Telos, 16:1 (no. 55), 212–7.Google Scholar

Graham, Julie. 1991. “Fordism/Post-Fordism, Marxism/Post-Marxism: The Second Cultural Divide.” Rethinking Marxism, 41: 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. 1971 [1929–1935]. “Americanism and Fordism,” in Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 277–320. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. 1978. Cahiers de prison. Cahiers 10,11,12,13 (translation of Quaderni del Carcere). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Grebing, Helga. 1986. Der ‘deutsche Sandet-weg’ in Europa 1806–1945. Eine Kritik. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart. 1983. “The Problem of Ideology: Marxism Without Guarantees,” in Marx 100 Years On, Matthews, B., ed., 56–85. London.Google Scholar

Hall, Stuart. 1988. “The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the Theorists,” in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence eds., 35–73. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Handler, Joel F. n.d. “Social Protection: The Ambiguity of Decentralization, Privatization, and Empowerment.” Manuscript, Law School, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Hartford, Barbara, and Hopkins, Sarah. 1984. Greenham Common: Women at the Wire. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Heide. 1981. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union,” in Women and Revolution, Sargent, Lydia, ed., 1–42. Boston: South End press.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Herf, Jeffrey. 1991. War by Other Means. Soviet Power, West German Resistance, and the Battle of the Euromissiles. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim. 1980. Der Sicherheitsstaat. Frankfurt/Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim. 1981. “The New Leviathan and the Struggle for Democratic Rights.” Telos, 14:2 (no. 48), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim. 1983. “The Fordist Security State and New Social Movements.” Kapitallistate, nos. 10/11:75–88.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim. 1988. “The Crisis of Fordism, Transformations of the ‘Keynesian’ Security State, and New Social Movements,” in Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 10, Kriesberg, Louis and Bronislaw, Misztal, eds., 43–55.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim. 1990. Kapitalismus ohne Alternative? Materialistische Gesellschaftstheorie und Möglichkeiten einer sozialistischen Politik heute. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim. 1991. “From the Fordist to the Post-Fordist State,” in The Politics of Flex ibility. Restructuring State and Industry in Britain, Germany, and Scandinavia, Jessop, Bob, ed., 67–81. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim, and Roth, Roland. 1986. Das Neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus. Vom Fordismus zum Post-Fordismus. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.Google Scholar

Hirsch, Joachim. 1987. “Immer so weiter? Oder: Der Konservatismus der Linken,” and “Der Kapitalismus ist enorm anpassungsfáhig” (discussion). Sozialismus, 5 (05-06), 36–46.Google Scholar

Hoffmann-Axthelm, Dieter; Kallscheuer, Otto; Knödler-Bunte, Eberhard; and Wortmann, Brigitte. 1978. Zwei Kulturen? TUNIX, Mescalero und die Folgen. Berlin: Verlag Ästhetik und Kommunikation.Google Scholar

Hollander, Paul. 1992. Anti-Americanism: Critiques at Home and Abroad. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hubert, Eva. 1983. “Politiker fragen—Bürger antworten nicht! Die Boykottbewegung gegen die Volkszählung,” in Die Volkszählung, Taeger, Jurgen, ed. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Einhorn.Google Scholar

Hubner, Kurt. 1987. “Neue Gesichtszüge?” Sozialismus, 4 (04-05), 39–44.Google Scholar

Hülsberg, Werner. 1988. The German Greens. A Social and Political Profile. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Illich, Ivan Irving; Zola, Kenneth; McKnight, John; Caplan, Jonathan; Shaiken, Harley. 1977. Disabling Professions. London: Marion Boyars.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. 1992. “Actually Existing Marxism.” Unpublished paper,Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar

Jessop, Bob. 1983. “Accumulation, State, and Hegemonic Projects.” Kapitalistate, nos. 10/11:89–112.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. 1988. “Post-Fordismus. Zur Rezeption der Regulationstheo?e bei Joachim Hirsch.” Das Argument 34:3 (no. 193), 380–90.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. 1989. “Conservative Regimes and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Cases of Great Britain and West Germany” in Capitalist Development and Crisis Theory: Accumulation, Regulation and Spatial Restructuring, Gottdiener, M. and Komninos, Nicos eds. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. 1990a. State Theory. Putting States in Their Place. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. 1990b. “Regulation Theories in Retrospect and Prospect.” Economy and Society, 19:2, 153–216.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. 1991. “Thatcherism and Flexibility: The White Heat of a Post-Fordist Revolution,” in The Politics of Flexibility. Restructuring State and Industry in Britain, Germany and Scandinavia, Jessop, Bob, ed., 135–61. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Katsiaficas, George. 1987. The Imagination of the New Left. A Global Analysis of the 1960s. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar

Katznelson, Ira. 1981. City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 1985. “New Social Movements in West Germany and the United States,” in Political Power and Social Theory, vol. 5, Zeitlin, Maurice, ed., 5. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structure and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science, 16:1, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kivisto, Peter. 1986. “What's New about the ‘New Social Movements’?: Continuities and Discontinuities with the Socialist Project.” Mid-American Review of Sociology, 11:2, 29–43.Google Scholar

Klandermans, Bert, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1988. “Mobilization into Social Movements: Synthesizing European and American Approaches.” International Social Movement Research, 1:1–38.Google Scholar

Kocka, Jürgen. 1990. “Revolution und Nation 1989. Zur historischen Einordnung der gegenwärtigen Ereignisse.” Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte, no. 19:479–99.Google Scholar

Kramer, Jane. 1988. “Letter from Europe.” The New Yorker (November 28), 67–100.Google Scholar

Stephen, Krasner, ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1989a. “Local Mobilization for the People's Petition of the Dutch Peace Movement.” International Social Movement Research, 1:41–81.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1989b. “New Social Movements and the New Class in the Netherlands.” American Journal of Sociology, 95:1078–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Lasch, Christopher. 1978. The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lash, Scott, and Urry, John. 1987. The End of Organized Capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Lau, Christoph. 1991. “Neue Risiken und gesellschaftliche Konflikte,” in Politik in der Risikogesellschaft, Beck, Ulrich, ed., 248–65. Frankfurt am Main; Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Lecorte, Tomas. 1992. Wir tanzen bis zum Ende: die Geschichte eines Autonomen. Hamburg: Galgenberg.Google Scholar

Liddington, Jill. 1991. The Road to Greenham Common. Feminism and Anti Militarism in Britain since 1820. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar

Link, Jurgen. 1992. “Normalismus und Neorassismus.” Das Argument, 34:5 (no. 195), 714–22.Google Scholar

Lipietz, Alain. 1987. Mirages and Miracles. The Crises of Global Fordism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Maase, Kaspar. 1992. BRAVO Amerika: Erkundungen zur Jugendkultur der Bundesrepublik in den fünfziger Jahren. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar

Mahon, Rianne. 1991. “From ‘Bringing’ to ‘Putting’: The State in Late Twentieth Century Social Theory.” Canadian Journal of Sociology, 16:2, 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maier, Charles S. 1987. “Society as Factory,” in In Search of Stability. Explorations in Historical Political Economy, 19–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maier, Hans. 1980. Die Ältere Deutsche Staats- und Verwaltungslehre, 2nd ed.Munchen: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Mandel, Ernest. 1978. Late Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Martin, William C. 1988. “From Class Challenge to Comfortable Collaboration? Understanding Recent Fluctuations in the Politics of the Educated Middle Class.” Ph.D. Disser., Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar

Mattausch, John. 1989. A Commitment to Campaign: A Sociological Study of the CND. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Mayer, Margit. 1988. “The Changing Conditions for Local Politics in the Transition to Post-Fordism.” Paper prepared for the International Conference on Regulation Theory,Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar

Mayer, Margit. 1991. “Politics in the Post-Fordist City.” Socialist Review, 21:1, 105–24.Google Scholar

Melucci, Alberto. 1980. “The New Social Movements: A Theoretical Approach.” Social Science Information, 19:2, 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melucci, Alberto. 1981. “Ten Hypotheses for the Analysis of New Movements,” in Contemporary Italian Sociology, Pinto, Diana, ed., 173–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Melucci, Alberto. 1984. “An End to Social Movements? Introductory Paper to the Sessions on ‘New Social Movements’ and Change in Organizational Forms.” Social Science Information, 23:4, 819–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melucci, Alberto. 1989. Nomads of the Present. Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Mohr, Reinhard. 1992. Zaungäste. Die Generation, die nach der Revolte kam. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar

Mooser, Joseph. 1983. “Abschied von der ‘Proletarität.’ Sozialstruktur und Lage der Arbeiterschaft in der Bundesrepublik in historischer Perspektive,” in Sozialgeshichte der Bundesrepublik, Conze, Werner and Lepsius, M. Rainer, eds., 143–186. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Mouffe, Chantal. 1981. “Radical Democracy: Modern or Postmodern,” in Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism, Ross, Andrew, ed., 31–45. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Nelkin, Dorothy, and Pollak, Michael. 1981. The Atom Besieged: Extraparliamentary Dissent in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Niethammer, Lutz. 1979. “Rekonstruktion und Desintegration: Zum Verständnis der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung zwischeu Krieg und Kaltem Krieg.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft, Sonderheft 5.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus. 1980. “Konkurrenzpartei und kollektive politische Indentität,” in Parlementarisches Ritual und politische Alternativen, Roth, Roland, ed., 26–42. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus. 1984. “Work: The Key Sociological Category?,” in Contradictions of the Welfare State, 129–50. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus. 1987. “Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics: Social Movements since the 1960s,” in Changing Boundaries of the Political, Maier, Charles S., ed., 63–106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panitch, Leo. 1986. “Theories of Corporatism: Reflections on a Growth Industry,” in Working Class Politics in Crisis, 160–86. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Pasquino, Pasquale. 1991. “Theatrum Politicum: The Genealogy of Capital—Police and the State of Prosperity,” in The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality, Burchell, Graham, ed. 105–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Perrow, Charles. 1979. “The Sixties Observed,” in The Dynamics of Social Move ments, Zald, Mayer and McCarthy, John D., eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar

Pohrt, Wolfgang. 1982. Endstation: Uber die Wiedergeburt der Nation. Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag.Google Scholar

Postone, Moishe. 1993. Time, Labor and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poulantzas, Nicos. 1978. Political Power and Social Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Poulantzas, Nicos. 1980. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Raschke, Joachim. 1985. Soziale Bewegungen. Ein historisch-systematischer Grundrβ. New York: Campus.Google Scholar

Rochon, Thomas R. 1988. Mobilizing for Peace: The Antinuclear Movements in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenthal, John. 1988. “Who Practices Hegemony? Class Division and the Subject of Politics.” Cultural Critique (Spring), 25–52.Google Scholar

Roth, Roland. 1989. “Fordism and New Social Movements.” Unpublished Manu script. Free University of Berlin, Zentralinstitut für wissenschaftliche Forschung. Ruccio, David F. 1992. “After Communism.” Rethinking Marxism, 5:2, 7–22.Google Scholar

Rucht, Dieter. 1982. “Neue soziale Bewegungen oder: Die Grenzen bürokratischer Modernisierung.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 13:272–92.Google Scholar

Schemer, Christoph. 1989. “Das Fordismus-Theorem der französischen Regula tionsschule.” Manuscript, Otto-Suhr-Institut, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Rüdiger. 1990. Die Friedensbewegung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Ursachen und Bedingungen der Mobilisierung einer neuen sozialen Bewegung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitter, Phillipe, and Lehmbruch, Gerhard eds. 1979. Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar

Schneider, Michael. 1981. “Väter und Söhne, posthum. Das beschädigte Verhältnis zweier Generationen,” in Den Kopf verkehrt aufgesetzt oder Die melancholische Linke. Aspekte des Kulturverfalls in den siebziger Jahren, 8–64. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.Google Scholar

Schönhuber, Franz. 1992. “Mord von Rechts: Wer stoppt die Gewalt?” (Interview in television documentary film). German ZDF Network, 11 25.Google Scholar

Schröer, Burkhard. 1992. Rechte Kerle. Skinheads, Faschos, Hooligans. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar

Schroeren, Michael. 1990. Die Grünen: 10 bewegte Jahre. Wien: Ueberreuter.Google Scholar

Scott, Joan Wallach. 1988. “The Sears Case,” in Gender and the Politics of History, 167–77. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anne, Showstack-Sassoon, ed. 1982. Approaches to Gramsci. London: Writers and Readers.Google Scholar

Snow, David A.; JrRohford, E. Burke, Worden, Steven K. and Benford, Robert D.. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review, 51:4, 464–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snow, David A., and Benford, Robert D.. 1988. “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization.” International Social Movement Research, no. 1:197–217.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, George. 1990. “The Myth and the Reality of an Autonomous State: Indus t?alists, Junkers, and Social Policy in Impe?al Germany.” Comparative Social Research, no. 12:239–93.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, George. 1994. “Fordism and the ‘Immoral Economy’ of Right-Wing Violence in Contemporary Germany,” in Research on Democracy and Society, vol. 2. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Taeger, Jürgen, ed. 1983. Die Volkszählung. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Einhorn.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney. 1988. “Old Movements in New Cycles of Protest: The Career of an Italian Religious Community.” International Social Movement Research, no. 1:281–304.Google Scholar

Tergeist, Peter. 1984. “Berlin (West): Die USA als Besatzer.” Dollars und Träume. Studien zur Politik, Ökonomie, Kultur der USA, 10:30–41.Google Scholar

Therborn, Göran. 1992. “The Life and Times of Socialism.” New Left Review, 194 (07/08), 17–32.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles. 1986. The Contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Touraine, Alain. 1977. The Self-Production of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tucker, Kenneth H. 1991. “How New are the New Social Movements?” Theory, Culture and Society, 8:1, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vester, Michael. 1983. “Die ‘Neuen Plebjer.’ Thesen zur Klassen- und Schichtenstruktu? und zu den. Entwicklungsperspektiven der neuen sozialen Bewegungen,” in Gesellschaftliche Probleme als Anstoβ und Folge von Politik, Hart-wich, Hans-Hermann, ed., 215–6. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Vieten, Gunter C. 1983. “Holland—ein Land löβt sich nicht zählen,” in Die Volkszählung, Taegar, Jurgen, ed. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Einhorn.Google Scholar

Vollmer, Antje. 1992. “Die SPD nach dem Tod Willi Brandts.” tageszeitung (October 17), p. 10.Google Scholar

Wagner, Hilde, and Stahn, Peter. 1987. “Das neue Gesicht des Kapitalismus. Debatte des neuen Theorieentwurfs von Joachim Hirsch and Roland Roth.” Sozialismus, 4 (04-05), 29–38.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immauuel. 1991. “The Construction of Peoplehood: Racism, Nationalism, Ethnicity,” in Etienne Ballbar and Immanuel Wallerstein, Race, Nation, Class, 71–85. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immauuel. 1983. Historical Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Weakliem, David. 1991. “The Two Lefts? Occupation and Party Choice in France, Italy, and the Netherlands.” American Journal of Sociology, 96:1327–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max. 1947 [1921–1922]. “Class, Status, Power,” in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, eds., 180–95. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. 1985. The German Empire 1871–1918. Leamington Spa: Berg.Google Scholar

Weir, Margaret, and Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “State Structures and the Possibilities of ‘Keynesian’ Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States,” in Bringing the State Back In, Evans, Peter B., Rueschmayer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wilde, Lawrence. 1990. “Class Analysis and the Politics of New Social Movements.” Capital and Class, 42 (Winter), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiley, Norbert. 1970. “America's Unique Class Politics,” in The Logic of Social Hierarchies, Laumann, Edward, Siegel, Paul, and Hodge, Robert, eds. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar

Winkler, Heinrich August. 1990. “Mit Skepsis zur Einigung.” Die Zeit, Nr. 40 (09 28), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

Wittner, Lawrence S. 1988. “The Transnational Movement against Nuclear Weapons, 1945–1986: A Preliminary Survey,” in Peace Movements and Political Cultures, Chatfield, Charles and Dungen, Peter van den, eds., 265–94. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Erik Olin, 1978. Class, Crisis, and the State. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Wright, Erik Olin. 1985. Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Wright, Erik Olin. 1987. “Towards a Post-Marxist Radical Social Theory.” Contemporary Sociology, 16:5, 748–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Erik Olin; Becker, Uwe; Brenner, Johanna; Burawoy, Michael; Burns, Val; Carchedi, Guglielmo; Marshall, Gordon; Meiksins, Peter F.; Rose, David; Stinchcombe, Arthur; Paris, Philip Van. 1989. The Debate on Classes. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar