Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The Social Construction of Population Science: An Intellectual, Institutional, and Political History of Twentieth-Century Demography

  • Susan Greenhalgh (a1)

Extract

Demographers have often lamented their field's reputation as one of “all methods and no theory.” Pushed by advances in computer technology and pulled by the appeal of being the “hardest,” most scientistic of the social sciences, the field has grown ever more sophisticated in mathematical technique. At the same time, theory has languished, becoming increasingly narrow and divorced from the realities of a rapidly changing post-Cold War world (McNicoll 1992). Leading members of the field routinely bemoan this state of affairs, though proposals for remaking the discipline are rarely offered (Preston 1993; Keyfitz 1993).

Copyright

References

Hide All
Amin, Samir. 1989. Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Bachrach, Peter; and Bergman, Elihu. 1973. Power and Choice: The Formulation of American Population Policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Becher, Tony. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Blaut, J. M. 1993. The Colonizer's Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: Guilford Press.
Bledsoe, Caroline H.; Hill, Allan G.; Umberto D'Allesandro; and Patricia Langeroc. 1994. “Constructing Natural Fertility: The Use of Western Contraceptive Technologies in Rural Gambia.” Population and Development Review, 20:1, 81113.
Bogue, Donald J.. 1993. “How Demography Was Born.” Demography, 30:4, 519–21.
Bogue, Donald J.. 1964. “The Demographic Breakthrough: From Projection to Control.” Population Index, 30:4, 449–54.
Caldwell, John C.. 1993. “Approaches to Anthropological Demography: An Overview,” in International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population Montreal, 1993, vol. 4:303–11.
Caldwell, John C.. 1988. “Micro-Approaches: Similarities and Differences, Strengths and Weaknesses,” in Caldwell, John C., Hill, Allan G., and Hull, Valerie J., eds., Micro-Approaches to Demographic Research, 458–70. London: Kegan Paul International.
Caldwell, John C., eds., 1982. Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic Press
Caldwell, John C., and Caldwell, Pat. 1986. Limiting Population Growth and the Ford Foundation Contribution. London: Frances Pinter.
Caldwell, John C., Caldwell, Pat; and Caldwell, Bruce. 1987. “Anthropology and Demography: The Mutual Reinforcement of Speculation and Research.” Current Anthropology, 28:1, 2543.
CD Editors., 1970a. “The PAA: A Time for Change.” Concerned Demography, 1:4, 13.
CD Editors., 1970b. “Reader Response—Pro and Con.” Concerned Demography, 1:4, 10.
CD Editors., 1970c. “The Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.” Concerned Demography, 2:2, 3941.
CD Editors., 1969a. “Why a New Organization?Concerned Demography, 1:1, 1,3,4,6.
CD Editors., 1969b. “Beginnings of Concerned Demographers.” Concerned Demography, 1:1,2,6.
CD Editors., 1969c. “Population—The Second Front.” Concerned Demography, 1:2, 13,7.
CD Editors., 1969d. “NIH, NSF: Up against the Wall?Concerned Demography, 1:6 2, 6.
Carter, Anthony T. 1995. “Agency and Fertility: For an Ethnography of Practice,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 5585. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cleland, John; and Wilson, Christopher. 1987. “Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View.” Population Studies, 41:1, 530.
Daly, Herman E. 1971. “A Marxian-Malthusian View of Poverty and Development.” Population Studies, 25:1, 2537.
Davis, Kingsley. 1945. “The World Demographic Transition.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 237: 111.
Demeny, Paul. 1988. “Social Science and Population Policy.” Population and Development Review, 14:3, 451–79.
Demeny, Paul. 1975. “Population Policy: The Role of National Governments.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 147161.
Dixon-Mueller, Ruth. 1993. Population Policy and Women's Rights: Transforming Reproductive Choice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Donaldson, Peter J.. 1990. Nature Against Us: The United States and the World Population Crisis, 1965–1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Finkle, Jason L.; and Crane, Barbara B.. 1985. “Ideology and Politics at Mexico City: The United States at the 1984 International Conference on Population.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 128.
Finkle, Jason L.; and Crane, Barbara B.. 1975. “The Politics of Bucharest: Population, Development, and the New International Economic Order.” Population and Development Review, 1:1, 87114.
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, vol. I. New York: Pantheon.
Freedman, Ronald; and Takeshita, John Y.. 1969. Family Planning in Taiwan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fricke, Thomas. Forthcoming. “Culture Theory and Population Process: Toward a Thicker Demography,” in Kertzer, David I. and Fricke, Thomas, eds., Anthropological Demography: Toward a New Synthesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fricke, Thomas. 1995. “History, Marriage Politics, and Demographic Events in the Central Himalaya,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 202–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Gieryn, Thomas F.. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review, 48:6, 781–95.
Gillis, John R.; Tilly, Louise A.; and Levine, David; eds. 1992. The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970: The Quiet Revolution. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
Ginsburg, Faye; and Rapp, Rayna, eds. 1995. Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Greenhalgh, Susan, ed. 1995a. Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenhalgh, Susan. 1995b. “Anthropology Theorizes Reproduction: Integrating Practice, Political Economic, and Feminist Perspectives,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenhalgh, Susan. 1990. “Toward a Political Economy of Fertility: Anthropological Perspectives.” Population and Development Review, 16:1, 85106.
Guest, Avery M.. 1994a. “Gatekeeping among the Demographers,” in Simon, Rita J. and Fyfe, James J., eds., Editors as Gatekeepers: Getting Published in the Social Sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Guest, Avery M. 1994b. [Letter]. January 2.
Hall, M.-Francoise. 1973. “Population Growth: U.S. and Latin American Views—An Interpretation of the Response of the United States and Latin America to Latin American Population Growth.” Population Studies, 27:3, 415–29.
Hammel, E. A. 1990. “A Theory of Culture for Demography.” Population and Development Review, 16:3,455–85.
Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, 14:3, 575–599.
Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
Harding, Sandra, ed. 1993. The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hauser, Philip M. 1964. “Demographic Dimensions of World Politics,” in Mudd, Stuart, ed., The Population Crisis and the Use of World Resources. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Mudd, Stuart, ed. 1958a. Population and World Politics. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Mudd, Stuart. 1958b. “Introduction,” in Hauser, Philip M., ed., Population and World Politics, 923. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Hauser, Philip M., and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds. 1959a. The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hauser, Philip M., Duncan, Dudley. 1959b. “Overview and Conclusions,” in Houser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal, 126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hauser, Philip M., Duncan, Dudley. 1959c. “Demography as a Profession,” in Hauser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal, 106–17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1989. “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth.” Signs, 14:3, 533–57.
Hendershot, Gerry E. 1973. “Population Size, Military Power, and Antinatal Power.” Demography, 10:4, 517–24.
Henry, Louis. 1976. Population: Analysis and Models. New York: Academic.
Hodgson, Dennis. 1991. “The Ideological Origins of the Population Association of America.“ Population and Development Review, 17:1, 1ȁ34.
Hodgson, Dennis. 1988. “Orthodoxy and Revisionism in American Demography.” Population and Development Review, 14:4, 541–69.
Hodgson, Dennis. 1983. “Demography as Social Science and Policy Science.” Population and Development Review, 9:1, 134.
Horn, David G. 1994. Social Bodies: Science, Reproduction, and Italian Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kantner, John F. 1982. “Population, Policy, and Political Atavism.” Demography, 19:4, 429–38.
Kertzer, David I. 1995. “Political Economic and Cultural Explanations of Demographic Behavior,” in Greenhalgh, Susan, ed., Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, 2952. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kertzer, David I., 1993. Sacrificed for Honor: Italian Infant Abandonment and the Politics ofControl. Boston: Beacon.
Keyfitz, Nathan. 1993. “Thirty Years of Demography and Demography.” Demography, 30:4, 533–49.
Knodel, John; and Walle, Etienne van de. 1979. “Lessons from the Past: Policy Implications of Historical Fertility Studies.” Population and Development Review, 5:2, 217–45.
Kreager, Philip. 1993. “Anthropological Demography and the Limits of Diffusionism,” in International Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Montreal 1993, vol. 4: 313–26. Liège: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.
Longino, Helen E.. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lunde, Anders S. 1981. “The Beginning of the Population Association of America.” Population Index, 47:3, 479–84.
McCaughey, Robert A. 1984. International Studies and Academic Enterprise: A Chapter in the Enclosure of American Learning. New York: Columbia University Press.
Martin, Emily. 1987. The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon.
McCloskey, Donald N.. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNicoll, Geoffrey. 1994. “Institutional Analysis of Fertility,” in Lindahl-Kiessing, Kerstin and Lundberg, Hans, eds., Population, Economic Development, and the Environment, 199230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lundberg, Hans. 1992. “The Agenda of Population Studies: A Commentary and Complaint.” Population and Development Review, 18:3, 399420.
Lundberg, Hans. 1980. “Institutional Determinants of Fertility Change.” Population and Development Review, 6:3, 441–62.
Messer–Davidow, Ellen; Shumway, David R.; and Sylvan, David J., eds. 1993. Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
Moran, William E., Jr. 1965. Population Growth—Threat to Peace? New York: P. J. Kennedy and Sons.
National Research Council (Working Group on Population Growth and Economic Development, Committee on Population).
Moran, William E. 1986. Population Growth and Economic Development: Policy Questions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Notestein, Frank W. 1951. “Policy of the Indian Government on Family Limitation.” Population Index, 17:4, 254–63.
Notestein, Frank W.. 1945. “Population—The Long View,” in Schultz, Theodore, ed.,Foodfor the World, 3657. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Oudshoorn, Nelly.. 1994. Beyond the Natural Body: An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. London: Routledge.
PDR. 1975. “Editor's Note.Population and Development Review, 1:1, iii–iv.
Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1984. Abortion and Woman's Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Piotrow, Phyllis Tilson. 1973. World Population Crisis: The United States Response. New York: Praeger.
Prakash, Gyan. 1990. “Writing Post–Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Perspectives from Indian Historiography.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32:2, 383408.
Preston, Samuel H. 1993. “The Contours of Demography: Estimates and Projections.” Demography, 30:4, 593606.
Preston, Samuel H..1987. “The Social Sciences and the Population Problem.” Sociological Forum, 2:4, 619–44.
Reed, James. 1978. From Private Vice to Public Virtue: The Birth Control MovementAmerican Society Since 1830. New York: Basic.
Reynolds, Reid T. 1971. “Introduction.” Concerned Demography, 3:1, 34.
Rogers, Everett M. 1973. Communication Strategies for Family Planning. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, Everett M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, Dorothy.. 1979. “The Development of the Social Sciences,” in Oleson, Alexandra and Voss, John, eds.; The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America, 1860–1920, 107–38. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Said, Edward S. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Random House.
Schneider, Jane; and Schneider, Peter. 1996. Festival of the Poor: Fertility Decline and the Ideology of Class in Sicily, 1860–1980. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Schneider, Peter. 1984. “Demographic Transitions in a Sicilian Rural Town.” Journal of Family History, 9:3, 245–73.
Schofield, Roger; and Coleman, David. 1986. “Introduction: The State of Population Theory,” in Coleman, David and Schofield, Roger, eds., The State of Population Theory: Forward from Malathus, 113. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Shryock, Henry S.; and Siegel, Jacob S.. 1976. The Methods and Materials of Demography, condensed ed. New York: Academic.
Shumway, David R.; and Messer–Davidow, Ellen. 1991. “Disciplinarity: An Introduction.” Poetics Today, 12:2, 201–25.
Szreter, Simon. 1993. “The Idea of Demographic Transition and the Study of Fertility: A Critical Intellectual History.” Population and Development Review, 19:4, 659701.
Teachman, Jay D.; Paasch, Kathleen; and Carver, Karen Price. 1993. “Thirty Years of Demography.” Demography, 30:4, 523–32.
Thompson, Warren S. 1929. “Population.” American Journal of Sociology, 34:6, 959–75.
Tilly, Charles, ed. 1978. Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tipps, Dean C. 1973. “Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of Societies: A Critical Perspective.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15:2, 199226.
Vance, Rupert B. 1959. “The Development and Status of American Demography,” in Hauser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., The Study of Population: An Inventory and Appraisal, 286313. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hauser, Philip M. and Otis Duncan, Dudley. ed., 1956 [1952]. “Is Theory for Demographers?,” in Spengler, Joseph J., and Otis Duncan, Dudley, eds., Population Theory and Policy: Selected Readings, 8894. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Vining, Daniel R., Jr. 1995. “More on Demography.” P.A.A. Affairs, Summer, 2.
Watkins, Susan Cotts. 1991. From Provinces into Nations: Demographic IntegrationWestern Europe, 1870–1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Watkins, Susan Cotts. 1987. “The Fertility Transition: Europe and the Third World Compared.” Sociological Forum, 2:4, 645–73.
Watkins, Susan Cotts. 1986. “Conclusion,” in Coale, Ansley J. and Watkins, Susan C., eds., The Decline of Fertility in Europe, 420–49. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed