Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Germond-Duret, Celine 2016. Tradition and modernity: an obsolete dichotomy? Binary thinking, indigenous peoples and normalisation. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 9, p. 1537.


    Tutka, Patrick and Seifried, Chad 2015. The Historical Ideal-Type as a Heuristic Device for Academic Storytelling by Sport Scholars. Quest, Vol. 67, Issue. 1, p. 17.


    Tafel-Viia, Külliki Viia, Andres Terk, Erik and Lassur, Silja 2014. Urban Policies for the Creative Industries: A European Comparison. European Planning Studies, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 796.


    Tarar, Nadeem Omar 2008. Aesthetic Modernism in the Post-Colony: The Making of a National College of Art in Pakistan (1950-1960s). International Journal of Art & Design Education, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 332.


    Fair, Jo Ellen 1988. Using literature to understand national development: A case study of five novels. Howard Journal of Communications, Vol. 1, Issue. 4, p. 195.


    1977. Alpacas, Sheep, and Men.


    ×
  • Comparative Studies in Society and History, Volume 17, Issue 2
  • April 1975, pp. 245-252

Tradition/Modernity: An Ideal Type Gone Astray

  • L. E. Shiner (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007799
  • Published online: 01 June 2009
Abstract

In a recent essay in this journal Dean C. Tipps subjected the tradition/ modernity concept to a thorough ideological and empirical critique and concluded that the time has come to get rid of it. Although his ideological and empirical analyses were convincing, the methodological remarks at the end of the essay were incomplete. If the contention that we should no longer attempt to revise the tradition/modernity concept is to stick, compelling methodological grounds must be given since ideological bias and empirical inadequacy can in principle be corrected. I want to show that in so far as the tradition/modernity concept is an ideal type, efforts to make it better ‘fit’ the spread of empirical data are in principle wrong. Moreover, efforts to transform the concept into an empirical ranking device or a classificatory system are open to equally serious objections. In order to do this I will first clarify the nature and function of ideal types, empirical types and classification systems.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Dean C. Tipps , ‘Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of Societies: A Critical Perspective’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 15, No. 2, 03, 1973, pp. 199225.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Comparative Studies in Society and History
  • ISSN: 0010-4175
  • EISSN: 1475-2999
  • URL: /core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×