Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

ADOPT: An augmented set-based design framework with optimisation

  • Alex Georgiades (a1), Sanjiv Sharma (a2), Timoleon Kipouros (a1) (a3) and Mark Savill (a1)

Abstract

During the early stages of any system design, a thorough exploration of the design space can prove to be challenging and computationally expensive. The challenges are further exacerbated when dealing with complex systems, such as an aircraft, due to the high dimensionality of their design space. Arising from the Toyota Product Development System, set-based design allows parallel evaluation of multiple alternative configurations in the early design stages. At the same time, optimisation methods can be employed at later stages to fine-tune the engineering characteristics of design variants. Presented in this paper, is the Augmented set-based Design and OPTimisation (ADOPT) Framework that introduces a novel methodology for integrating the two areas. This allows for a thorough design-space exploration while ensuring the optimality of the selected designs. The framework has been developed using a process-independent and tool-agnostic approach so that it can be applied to the design process of varying kinds of systems. To demonstrate the implementation and potential benefits, the framework has been applied to the design of a generic aircraft fuel system. The results from the case study and the framework itself are discussed, with a number of areas for further development and future work being identified and presented.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      ADOPT: An augmented set-based design framework with optimisation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      ADOPT: An augmented set-based design framework with optimisation
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      ADOPT: An augmented set-based design framework with optimisation
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: a.georgiades@cranfield.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Al-Ashaab, A., Golob, M., Attia, U., Khan, M., Parsons, J., Andino, A., Perez, A., Guzman, P., Onecha, A., Kesavamoorthy, S., Martinez, G., Shehab, E., Berkes, A., Haque, B., Soril, M. & Sopelana, A. 2013 The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering: a case study from an aerospace industry. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 21, 268285.
Ardema, M. D., Chambers, M. C., Patron, A. P., Hahn, A. S., Miura, H. & Moore, M. D.1996 Analytical fuselage and wing and weight estimation and of transport and aircraft, Technical memorandum, NASA.
Browning, T. R. 2001 Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans. Engineering Management 48, 292306.
Clarkson, P., Simons, C. & Eckert, C. 2004 Predicting change propagation in complex design. Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (5), 788797.
Cross, N. 2008 Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 4th edn. Wiley.
Ebrahimi, M. & Jahangirian, A. 2014 Aerodynamic optimization of airfoils using adaptive parameterization and genetic algorithm. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 162 (1), 257271.
Eppinger, S. D. & Browning, T. R. 2012 Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications (Engineering Systems). MIT Press.
Ertas, A. & Jones, J. C. 1996 The Engineering Design Process. Wiley.
European Aviation Safety Agency2016 Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Large Aeroplanes CS-25, Technical report, EASA.
French, M. J. 1998 Conceptual Design for Engineers. Springer GmbH.
Gavel, H.2007, On aircraft fuel systems – conceptual design and modelling, PhD thesis, Linkoping University.
Georgiades, A., Sharma, S., Kipouros, T. & Savill, M. 2017 Predicting and visualizing cost propagation due to engineering design changes. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17). Design Society.
Guenov, M., Fantini, P., Balachandran, L., Maginot, J., Padulo, M. & Nunez, M. 2010 Multidisciplinary design optimization framework for the pre design stage. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 59 (3), 223240.
Guenov, M., Nunez, M., Molina-Cristobal, A., Datta, V. & Riaz, A. 2014 Aircadia -an interactive tool for the composition and exploration of aircraft computational studies at early design stage. In Proceedings of the 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. International Council of The Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS).
Hannapel, S. & Vlahopoulos, N. 2014 Implementation of set-based design in multidisciplinary design optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 50 (1), 101112.
Hettenhausen, J., Lewis, A. & Kipouros, T. 2014 A web-based system for visualisation-driven interactive multi-objective optimisation. Procedia Computer Science 29, 19151925.
Holston, D. 2011 The Strategic Designer: Tools & Techniques for Managing the Design Process. F+W Media.
Howard, T., Culley, S. & Dekoninck, E. 2008 Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies 29 (2), 160180.
Inselberg, A. 2009 Parallel Coordinates – Visual Multidimensional Geometry and Its Applications. Springer.
Isaksson, O., Kossmann, M., Bertoni, M., Eres, H., Monceaux, A., Bertoni, A., Wiseall, S. & Zhang, X. 2013 Value-driven design – a methodology to link expectations to technical requirements in the extended enterprise. INCOSE International Symposium 23 (1), 803819.
Jenkinson, R. L. 1999 Civil Jet Aircraft Design. Elsevier Limited.
Keane, A. & Nair, P. 2005 Computational Approaches for Aerospace Design: The Pursuit of Excellence. Wiley.
Kennedy, B. M., Sobek, D. K. & Kennedy, M. N. 2014 Reducing rework by applying set-based practices early in the systems engineering process. Systems Engineering 17 (3), 278296.
Khan, M., Al-Ashaab, A., Doultsinou, A., Shehab, E., Ewers, P. & Sulowski, R. 2011 Set-based concurrent engineering process within the leanppd environment. In Improving complex systems today: proceedings of the 18th ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering. Springer.
Khan, M. S., Al-Ashaab, A., Shehab, E., Haque, B., Ewers, P., Sorli, M. & Sopelana, A. 2013 Towards lean product and process development. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 26 (12), 11051116.
Khandani, S.2005 Engineering design process- education transfer plan, Technical report, Initiatives for Science and Math Education.
Kipouros, T., Inselberg, A., Parks, G. & Savill, M. 2013 Parallel coordinates in computational engineering design. In 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA).
Landahl, J., Levandowski, C., Johannesson, H. & Isaksson, O. 2016 Assessing producibility of product platforms using set-based concurrent engineering. In Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 3544. IOS Press.
Langen, P. H. V. & Brazier, F. M. 2006 Design space exploration revisited. AI EDAM 20 (02), 113119.
Langton, R., Clark, C., Hewitt, M. & Richards, L. 2009 Aircraft Fuel Systems. Wiley.
Levandowski, C., Muller, J. & Isaksson, O. 2016 Modularization in concept development using functional modeling. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering 4 (Transdisciplinary Engineering: Crossing Boundaries), 117126.
Levandowski, C., Raudberget, D. & Johannesson, H. 2014 Set-based concurrent engineering for early phases in platform development. In Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 564576. IOS Press.
Malak, R. J., Aughenbaugh, J. M. & Paredis, C. J. 2009 Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design. Computer-Aided Design 41 (3), 214227; Computer Support for Conceptual Design.
McKenney, T. A., Kemink, L. F. & Singer, D. J. 2011 Adapting to changes in design requirements using set-based design. Naval Engineers Journal 123 (3), 6677.
Mebane, L. W., Carlson, M. C., Dowd, C., Singer, J. D. & Buckley, E. M. 2011 Set-based design and the ship to shore connector. Naval Engineers Journal 123 (3), 7992.
Moore, G.1964 The future of integrated electronics, Technical report, Fairchild Semiconductor.
Morgan, J. & Liker, J. 2006 The Toyota Product Development System. Integrating People Processes and Technology. Productivity Press.
Nocedal, J. & Wright, S. 2006 Numerical Optimization (Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering). Springer.
Nunez, M., Datta, V. C., Molina-Cristobal, A., Guenov, M. & Riaz, A. 2012 Enabling exploration in the conceptual design and optimisation of complex systems. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (10–11), 852875.
Oktay, E., Akay, H. & Merttopcuoglu, O. 2011 Parallelized structural topology optimization and cfd coupling for design of aircraft wing structures. Computers and Fluids 49, 141145.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. & Grote, K. H. 2006 Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer GmbH.
Pugh, S. 1991 Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Addison–Wesley.
Raudberget, D. 2010 Practical applications of set-based concurrent engineering in industry. Journal of Mechanical Engineering 56 (11), 685695.
Raudberget, D.2015 Industrial application of set-based concurrent engineering managing the design space by using platform system families, PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology.
Raudberget, D., Levandowski, C., Isaksson, O., Kipouros, T., Johannesson, H. & Clarkson, J. 2015 Modelling and assessing platform architectures in pre-embodiment phases through set-based evaluation and change propagation. Journal of Aerospace Operations 3 (3, 4), 203221.
Riaz, A., Guenov, M. D. & Molina-Cristobal, A. 2017 Set-based approach to passenger aircraft family design. Journal of Aircraft 54 (1), 310326.
Singer, D. J., Doerry, N. & Buckley, M. E. 2009 What is set-based design?. Naval Engineers Journal 121 (4), 3143.
Slotnick, J., Khodadoust, A., Alonso, J., Darmofal, D., Gropp, W., Lurie, E. & Mavriplis, D.2014, CFD Vision 2030 Study: A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences, Technical report, NASA.
Sobek, D., Ward, A. & Liker, J. 1999 Toyota’s principles of set-based concurrent engineering. Sloan Management Review 40 (2), 6783.
Sobieski, J. & Haftka, R. T. 1997 Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments. Structural Optimization 14 (1), 123.
Toropov, V., Jones, R., Willment, T. & Funnell, M. 2005 Weight and manufacturability optimization of composite aircraft components based on a genetic algorithm. In 6th World Congresses of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.
Ullman, D. 2002 The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw–Hill Science/Engineering/Math.
Veenhuis, C. 2008 A set-based particle swarm optimization method. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, vol. 5199, pp. 971980. Springer.
Ward, A. C. & Liker, J. K. 1994 Set-based concurrent engineering and toyota. In Proceedings of the ASME DTM, pp. 7990. ASME.
Ward, A., Liker, J. K., Cristiano, J. J. & Sobek, D. K. 1995 The second toyota paradox: how delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review 36 (3), 4361.
Ward, A. & Sobek, D. 2014 Lean Product and Process Development. Lean Enterprises Inst Inc.
Wheelwright, S. C. 2011 Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality. Free Press.
Wunderlich, T. 2015 Multidisciplinary wing optimization of commercial aircraft with consideration of static aeroelasticity. CEAS Aeronautical Journal 6 (3), 407427.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed