Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Benefits and obstacles of sustainable product development methods: a case study in the field of urban mobility

  • Rainer Stark (a1) (a2), Tom Buchert (a1), Sabrina Neugebauer (a3), Jérémy Bonvoisin (a1) and Matthias Finkbeiner (a3)...
Abstract

In the last few years, numerous approaches have been introduced for supporting design engineers in developing more sustainable products. However, so far, these efforts have not led to the establishment of a commonly acknowledged standard methodology for Sustainable Product Development (SPD). This brings into question the relevance of developing new methods and calls for more efforts in testing the available ones. This article provides a reflection about the benefits and obstacles of applying existing SPD approaches to a real product development project. It reports the results of a project aimed at developing a new mobility solution under the constraints of sustainability-related targets. This project has led to the development of a new pedelec concept, focusing on the substitution of small passenger cars with the help of three SPD methods – Design for Sustainability Guidelines, Product Sustainability Index, and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. These methods have proved to be generally beneficial, thanks to a combination of qualitative and quantitative perspectives. However, the multitude of criteria offered by the methods put forth difficulties in evaluating which sustainability aspects are relevant and therefore lead to higher effort for information retrieval analysis and decision processes. Furthermore, the methods still lack an integrated perspective on the product, the corresponding services and the overarching system.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Benefits and obstacles of sustainable product development methods: a case study in the field of urban mobility
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Benefits and obstacles of sustainable product development methods: a case study in the field of urban mobility
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Benefits and obstacles of sustainable product development methods: a case study in the field of urban mobility
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: tom.buchert@tu-berlin.de
References
Hide All
Augenstein, K. 2015 Analysing the potential for sustainable e-mobility – the case of Germany. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 14, 101115. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.05.002.
Azevedo, K., Bras, B., Doshi, S. & Guldberg, T. 2009 Modeling sustainability of complex systems: A multi-scale framework using SysML. In Proceedings of the 29th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 14371448.
Barquet, A. P., Seidel, J., Buchert, T., Galeitzke, M., Neugebauer, S., Oertwig, N., Rozenfeld, H. & Seliger, G. 2016 Sustainable product service systems – from concept creation to the detailing of a business model for a bicycle sharing system in Berlin. Procedia CIRP 40, 524529.
Baumann, H., Boons, F. & Bragd, A. 2002 Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production 10 (5), 409425. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00015-X.
Bonvoisin, J., Stark, R. & Seliger, G. 2017 Field of research in sustainable manufacturing. In Sustainable Manufacturing: Challenges, Solutions and Implementation Perspectives (ed. Stark, R., Seliger, G. & Bonvoisin, J.), pp. 320. Springer International Publishing.
Brezet, H., Hemel, C. V., Böttcher, H. & Clarke, R.1997 Ecodesign: a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. United Nations Environment Programme. Industry and Environment, Rathenau Institut and Delft University of Technology.
Buchert, T., Halstenberg, F. A., Bonvoisin, J., Lindow, K. & Stark, R. 2017a Target-driven selection and scheduling of methods for sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 161 (10), 403421.
Buchert, T., Pförtner, A. & Stark, R. 2017b Target-driven sustainable product development. In Sustainable Manufacturing: Challenges, Solutions and Implementation Perspectives (ed. Stark, R., Seliger, G. & Bonvoisin, J.), pp. 129146. Springer International Publishing.
Buchert, T., Steingrímsson, J. G., Neugebauer, S., Nguyen, T. D., Galeitzke, M., Oertwig, N., Seidel, J., McFarland, R., Lindow, K., Hayka, H. & Stark, R. 2015 Design and manufacturing of a sustainable pedelec. Procedia CIRP 29, 579584. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.168.
Byggeth, S., Broman, G. & Robèrt, K. H. 2007 A method for sustainable product development based on a modular system of guiding questions. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (1), 111.
Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe2013 Aluminium/Bauxit – Rohstoffwirtschaftliche Steckbriefe.
Casals, L. C., Martinez-Laserna, E., García, B. A. & Nieto, N. 2016 Sustainability analysis of the electric vehicle use in Europe for CO2 emissions reduction. Journal of Cleaner Production 127 (2016), 425437.
Ciroth, A., Finkbeier, M., Hildenbrand, J., Klöpffer, W., Mazijn, B., Prakash, S., Sonnemann, G., Traverso, M., Ugaya, C. M. L., Valdivia, S. & Vickery-Niederman, G. 2011 Towards a live cycle sustainability assessment: making informed choices on products. In United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (ed. Valdivia, S., Ugaya, C. M. L., Sonnemann, G. & Hildenbrand, J.).
Ceschin, F. & Gaziulusoy, I. 2016 Evolution of design for sustainability: from product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies 47, 118163. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002.
Cox, P. 2008 The role of human powered vehicles in sustainable mobility. Built Environment 34 (2), 140160. doi:10.2148/benv.34.2.140.
Creutzig, F., Mühlhoff, R. & Römer, J. 2012 Decarbonizing urban transport in European cities: four cases show possibly high co-benefits. Environmental Research Letters 7 (4), 44042.
Crul, M. & Diehl, J. C.2006 Design for sustainability. A practical approach for developing economies, United Nation Environmental Programme, TU Delft, Paris,http://www.unep.fr/scp/publications/details.asp?id=DTI/0826/PA.
Ernzer, M. & Birkhofer, H. 2002 Selecting methods for life cycle design based on the needs of a company. In Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference.
Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A. & Traverso, M. 2010 Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2 (10), 33093322. doi:10.3390/su2103309.
Gehin, A., Zwolinski, P. & Brissaud, D. 2008 A tool to implement sustainable end-of-life strategies in the product development phase. Journal of Cleaner Production 16 (5), 566576.
German Federal Environment Agency2014 Electric bikes get things rolling: the environmental impact of pedelecs and their potential. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/electric-bikes-get-things-rolling.
Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G. & Strømman, A. H 2013 Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology 17 (1), 5364.
Holden, E. 2012 Achieving Sustainable Mobility: Everyday and Leisure-Time Travel in the EU. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Howarth, G. & Hadfield, M. 2006 A sustainable product design model. Materials & Design 27 (10), 11281133.
ifo Institut2013 VR Branchen special – Fahrradeinzelhandel. 45th ed.
IPCC 2014 Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Working Group III Contribution to The Fifth Assessment Report of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed. Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E. & Kadner, S. et al. ). Cambridge University Press.
Jerrett, M. 2015 Atmospheric science: The death toll from air-pollution sources. Nature 525 (7569), 330331.
Knight, P. & Jenkins, J. O. 2009 Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioner’s perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (5), 549558. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.002.
Kloepffer, W. 2008 Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13 (2), 8995. doi:10.1065/lca2008.02.376.
Lam, D. & Head, P. 2012 Sustainable urban mobility. In Energy, Transport, & the Environment: Addressing the Sustainable Mobility Paradigm (ed. Inderwildi, O. & King, D.), pp. 359371. Springer.
Le Bris, J. 2016 Pedelecs as new tools for active mobility: ‘cheating’ or sustainable transportation? In Sustainable Mobility in Metropolitan Regions: Insights from Interdisciplinary Research for Practice Application (ed. Wulfhorst, G. & Klug, S.), pp. 173188. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Lim, S. S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Rohani, H. R. & AlMazroa, M. A. et al. 2012 A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 380 (9859), 22242260. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8.
McAloone, T. C. & Pigosso, D. C. A. 2017 From ecodesign to sustainable product/service-systems: a journey through research contributions over recent decades. In Sustainable Manufacturing: Challenges, Solutions and Implementation Perspectives (ed. Stark, R., Seliger, G. & Bonvoisin, J.), pp. 99111. Springer International Publishing.
Neugebauer, S., Chang, Y.-J., Maliszewski, M., Lindow, K., Stark, R. & Finkbeiner, M. 2013 Life cycle sustainability assessment & sustainable product development: a case study on pedal electric cycles (pedelec). In Proceedings of the 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing.
Neugebauer, S., Emara, Y., Hellerström, C. & Finkbeiner, M. 2015 Calculation of fair wage potentials throughout products’ life cycle – introduction of a new midpoint impact category for social life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 143, 12211232.
Neugebauer, S., Forin, S. & Finkbeiner, M. 2016 From life cycle costing to economic life cycle assessment – introducing an economic impact pathway. Sustainability 8 (5), 428.
Neugebauer, S., Martinez-Blanco, J., Scheumann, R. & Finkbeiner, M. 2015 Enhancing the practical implementation of life cycle sustainability assessment – proposal of a tiered approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 102, 165176. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.053.
Paul, F. & Bogenberger, K. 2014 Evaluation-method for a station-based urban-pedelec sharing system. Transportation Research Procedia 4, 482493.
Pigosso, D. C. A.2012 Ecodesign maturity model: a framework to support companies in the selection and implementation of ecodesign practices. PhD Thesis, Universidade de S ao Paulo, Brazil.
Prill, T. & Lanzendorf, M. 2012 Pedelecs as a contribution for a more sustainable transport system? Acceptance, usage and impacts of electrically supported bicycles from the employer’s perspective. In Proceedings of the European Transport Conference 2012.
Rose, G. 2012 E-bikes and urban transportation: emerging issues and unresolved questions. Transportation 39 (1), 8196. doi:10.1007/s11116-011-9328-y.
Rosen, M. A. & Kishawy, H. A. 2012 Sustainable manufacturing and design: concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability 4 (2), 154174.
Rudolph, F. 2014 Promotion of pedelecs as a means to foster low-carbon mobility: scenarios for the German city of Wuppertal. Transportation Research Procedia 4, 461471.
Shuaib, M., Seevers, D., Zhang, X., Badurdeen, F., Rouch, K. E. & Jawahir, I. S. 2014 Product Sustainability Index (ProdSI). Journal of Industrial Ecology 18 (4), 491507. doi:10.1111/jiec.12179.
Telenko, C., O’Rourke, J. M., Seepersad, C. C. & Webber, M. E. 2016 A compilation of design for environment guidelines. Journal of Mechanical Design 138 (3), 31102.
Triebskorn, E.2012 Der Deutsche Außenhandel Im Jahr 2011, www.destatis.de.
Weinert, J., Ogden, J., Sperling, D. & Burke, A. 2008 The future of electric two-wheelers and electric vehicles in China. Energy Policy 36 (7), 25442555.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 62
Total number of PDF views: 195 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 428 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd October 2017 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.