Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Casting innovative aerospace design case studies in the parameter analysis framework to uncover the design process of experts

  • Ehud Kroll (a1) and Ido Farbman (a2)
Abstract

Traditional aerospace design methods offer quick and efficient ways to generate new designs, but such that often resemble previous ones. For truly innovative design, however, a different approach is needed. This paper suggests that a general conceptual design method called ‘parameter analysis’ (PA) may be used for teaching and practicing innovative aerospace design. To support this proposition, we investigate four diverse, innovative and unique case studies, all carried out by very experienced aerospace designers: the ‘dam busting’ bouncing bomb of World War II, the Gossamer Condor human-powered plane of the 1970s, the asymmetric Boomerang twin-engine plane of the 1990s and the SpaceShipOne suborbital spacecraft of the early 2000s. The paper elaborates on how the methodology of case-study research has been adapted and applied to provide the evidence supporting the research hypothesis, and presents the results of analyzing the case studies. It shows that the expert aerospace designers followed a thought process similar to PA, even if unknowingly, where the similarity was measured by counting the number of PA characteristics that could be shown to exist in the case studies. Advantages and limitations of the research methodology are also discussed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Casting innovative aerospace design case studies in the parameter analysis framework to uncover the design process of experts
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Casting innovative aerospace design case studies in the parameter analysis framework to uncover the design process of experts
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Casting innovative aerospace design case studies in the parameter analysis framework to uncover the design process of experts
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: kroll@braude.ac.il
References
Hide All
Baxter, P. & Jack, S.2008 Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. [Online] 13 (4). 544–559. Available from: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/. (Accessed: 20th June 2015).
Blessing, L. T. M. & Chakrabarti, A. 2009 DRM: A Design Research Methodology. Springer.
Brickhill, P. 1999 The Dam Busters. Pan Books.
Burke, J. D.1980 The Gossamer Condor and Albatross: A Case Study in Aircraft Design. AIAA report no. AV-R-80/540.
Christensen, C. M. 1997 The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business School Press.
Cross, N. 2006 Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer.
Cross, N. 2011 Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Berg.
Firth, J.2011 Aerospace: designing a spaceship for everyone. Keynote lecture at the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’11), Copenhagen. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbzSmX9hzVk. [Accessed: 20th June 2015].
Flyvbjerg, B. 2011 Case study. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th edn. (ed. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S.). Sage.
Gerring, J. 2007 Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.
Hancock, D. R. & Algozzine, B. 2006 Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. Teachers College Press.
Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A. & Hooge, S. 2016 Mulitple forms of applications and impacts of a design theory: 10 years of industrial applications of C-K theory. Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice: Tools, Technology, and Training (ed. Chakrabarti, A. & Lindemann, U.), pp. 189209. Springer.
Kitchenham, B., Pickard, L. & Pfleeger, S. L. 1995 Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software 12 (4), 5262.
Kroll, E. 2013 Design theory and conceptual design: contrasting functional decomposition and morphology with parameter analysis. Research in Engineering Design 24 (2), 165183.
Kroll, E., Condoor, S. S. & Jansson, D. G. 2001 Innovative Conceptual Design: Theory and Application of Parameter Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Kroll, E., Le Masson, P. & Weil, B. 2014 Steepest-first exploration with learning-based path evaluation: uncovering the design strategy of parameter analysis with C–K theory. Research in Engineering Design 25 (4), 351373.
Lambie, J.1978 Gossamer Condor. AeroModeller. [Online] March. Available from: http://aerosociety.com/Assets/Docs/About_Us/HPAG/Magazine/HP_condor.pdf (Accessed: 21st June 2015).
Lawson, B. 2005 How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, 4th edn. Architectural Press.
Le Dain, M.-A., Blanco, E. & Summers, J. D. 2013 Assessing design research quality: Investigating verification and validation criteria. International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’13). Seoul, August 19–22.
Le Masson, P., Weil, B. & Hatchuel, A. 2010 Strategic Management of Innovation and Design. Cambridge University Press.
Li, Y. T., Jansson, D. G. & Cravalho, E. G. 1980 Technological Innovation in Education and Industry. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Linehan, D. 2008 SpaceShipOne: An Illustrated History. Zenith Press.
Linehan, D. 2011 Burt Rutan’s Race to Space: The Magician of Mojave and his Flying Innovations. Zenith Press.
MacCready, P.2003 A flight on solar wings. [Online] Available from: http://www.ted.com/talks/paul_maccready_flies_on_solar_wings#t-127238 (Accessed 21st June 2015).
Murray, I. 2009 Bouncing-Bomb Man: The Science of Sir Barnes Wallis. Haynes Publishing.
Noor, K. B. M. 2008 Case study: a strategic research methodology. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 5 (11), 16021604.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J. & Grote, K. H. 2007 Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 3rd edn. Springer.
Pettigrew, A. M. 1985 Contextualist research and the study of organizational change processes. Doing Research that is Useful for Theory and Practice (ed. Lawler, E.). Jossey-Bass.
RAF Museum2013 Bouncing bomb diagram. [Online] Available from: http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/research/online-exhibitions/617-squadron-and-the-dams-raid/bouncing-bomb-diagram.aspx (Accessed: 21st June 2015).
Raymer, D. P. 2012 Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 5th edn. AIAA.
Roskam, J. 2003 Airplane Design: Parts I to VIII, 2nd edn. Darcorporation.
Rutan Boomerang2015 Design [Online] Available from: http://rutanboomerang.com/design/ (Accessed: 21st June 2015).
Schön, D. A. 1987 Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Jossey-Bass.
Teegavarapu, S., Summers, J. D. & Mocko, G. M.2008 Case study method for design research: a justification, ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Paper No. DETC2008-49980, New York, August 3–6.
Torenbeek, E. 2013 Advanced Aircraft Design: Conceptual design, Analysis, and Optimization of Subsonic Civil Airplanes. Wiley.
Yin, R. K. 2014 Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. SAGE.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed