Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Co-author network analysis of human-centered design for development

  • Nancy Li (a1), Julia Kramer (a2), Pierce Gordon (a3) and Alice Agogino (a2)
Abstract

Human-centered design (HCD) offers a systematic approach to innovation practice, driven by customer research and feedback throughout the design process. Within the community of engineers and researchers who engage in design for global development, interest in HCD has grown in the past decade. In this paper, we examine the human-centered design for development (HCD+D) academic community to better understand the interactions between researchers. By building and evaluating a co-authorship network from a dataset of HCD+D papers, in which the nodes are researchers and the connecting links are co-authorship relationships, we provide a decade-long benchmark to answer a variety of questions about collaboration patterns within this emerging field. Our analysis shows that most HCD+D authors publish few papers and are part of small, well-connected sub-communities. Influential authors that bridge separate communities are few. HCD+D is emerging from disparate disciplines and widely shared scholarship across disciplines continues to be developed. Influential authors in HCD+D play a large role in shaping HCD+D, yet there are few authors that are in a position to connect and influence collaborative research. Our analysis gives rise to several implications including an increased need for cross-disciplinary collaboration and the need for a stronger core of HCD+D practitioners.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Co-author network analysis of human-centered design for development
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Co-author network analysis of human-centered design for development
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Co-author network analysis of human-centered design for development
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: j.kramer@berkeley.edu
References
Hide All
ASME2017 Engineering for Global Development Research Forum, International Design Engineering Technical Conference (IDETC2017). https://www.asme.org/events/idetccie/program/egd-forum.
Barabasi, A. L., Vicsek, T. & Palla, G. 2007 Quantifying social group evolution. Nature 446, 664667.
Beaver, D. D. 2001 Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics 52 (3), 365377.
Brown, T. & Rowe, P. G. 2008 Design thinking. Harvard Business Review 86 (6), 252. doi:10.5437/08956308X5503003.
Brunette, W., Gerard, W., Hicks, M. A., Hope, A., Ishimitsu, M., Prasad, P., Anderson, R. E., Borriello, G., Kolko, B. E. & Nathan, R. 2010 Portable antenatal ultrasound platform for village midwives. In ACM DEV ’10 Proceedings of the First ACM Symposium on Computing for Development, 1(23).
Buchanan, R. 1992 Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8 (2), 521.
Clarke, A. 2015 Design for development, ICSID and UNIDO: the anthropological turn in 1970s design. Journal of Design History, epv029. http://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epv029.
Design Society2017 International Conference on Engineering Design with a theme of ‘Resource-Sensitive Design’. http://iced17.org/.
Estrada, E. & Knight, P. A. 2015 A First Course in Network Theory, 1st edn. Oxford University Press.
Fuge, M., Tee, K., Agogino, A. & Maton, N. 2014 Network analysis of collaborative design networks: a case study of OpenIDEO. ASME Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 14 (2).
Fuge, M. & Agogino, A. 2015 Pattern analysis of IDEO’s human-centered design methods in developing regions. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 137 (7).
Gilliam, M. L., Martins, S. L. & Bartlett, E. et al. 2014 Development and testing of an iOS waiting room ‘app’ for contraceptive counseling in a Title X family planning clinic. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 211, 481, e1–8.
Gordon, P., Kramer, J., Moore, G., Yeung, W. & Agogino, A.2017 A systematic review of human-centered design for development in academic research. Working Paper 16-1201, BEST Lab, UC Berkeley, http://tinyurl.com/HCDDcharacterizationpaper.
Gov.UKn.d. Department for International Development. Retrieved January 1, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/policies?organisations[]=department-forinternational-development.
Guo, T., Xu, J., Sun, Y., Dong, Y., Davis, N. E. & Allison, J. T. 2017 Network analysis of design automation literature. In ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
Haythornthwaite, C. 1996 Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research 18 (4), 323342.
Halasz, Z. 2015 Using clustering to further understand the design automation conference community. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Holme, P., Kim, B. J., Yoon, C. N. & Han, S. K. 2002 Attack vulnerability of complex networks. Physical Review E 65 (5), 056109.
IDEO2009 Human-centered design toolkit. http://www.designkit.org/resources/1 (accessed 9/2017).
ISO (International Organization for Standardization)2010 Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems, https://www.iso.org/standard/52075.html (accessed 9/2017).
Kharboutly, R. E. & Gokhale, S. S. 2015 Social analysis of the SEKE co-author network. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), pp. 237243. KSI Research Inc.
Krohn, W. & Küppers, G. 1990 Science as a self-organizing system outline of a theoretical model. In Selforganization, pp. 208222. Springer.
Laudel, G. 2002 What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation 11 (1), 315.
Levine, D. I., Agogino, A. M. & Lesniewski, M. A. 2016 Design thinking in development engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education 32 (3B), 13961406.
Liu, J., Li, Y., Ruan, Z., Fu, G., Chen, X., Sadiq, R. & Deng, Y. 2015a A new method to construct co-author networks. Physica A 419, 2939.
Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L. & Van de Sompel, H. 2015b Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management 41, 14621480.
Newman, M. E. J. 2004 Co-authorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (1), 52005205.
Newman, M. E. 2001a Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E 64 (1), 016131.
Newman, M. E. 2001b Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E 64 (1), 016132.
Newman, M. E. J. 2001c Who is the best connected scientist? A study of scientific co-authorship networks. Physical Review E 64, 337370.
Palepu, K. G. & Khanna, T. 2010 Winning in emerging markets: a road map for strategy and execution. In Harvard Business School Press Books, 1. http://doi.org/10.1080/1051712X.2012.666487.
Qiu, L. 1992 A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Evaluation 2 (3), 169175.
Ramirez, M. Jr 2011 Designing with a social conscience: an emerging area in industrial design education and practice. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), pp. 3948. Design Society.
Rittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. 1973 Dilemmas in a general theory of planning dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4 (2), 155169.
Rowe, P. G. 1987 Design Thinking. MIT Press.
Scott, J. 2013 Social Network Analysis, 3rd edn, chap. 1. Sage Publications.
Sen, A. 1993 Capability and well-being. Ethics 1 (December), xi, 453. 58 http://doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001.
Simon, H. A. 1969 The Sciences of the Artificial.
Uddin, S., Hossain, L., Abbasi, A. & Rasmussen, K. 2012 Trend and efficiency analysis of co-authorship network. Scientometrics 90, 687699.
United Nations2000 Millennium Development Goals. Retrieved January 1, 2016, from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/.
United Nations2015 Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved January 1, 2016, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs.
USAIDn.d. What We Do. Retrieved January 1, 2016, from https://www.usaid.gov/what-we-do.
Yang, C. H. & Heo, J. 2014 Network analysis to evaluate cross-disciplinary research collaborations: the Human Sensing Research Center, Korea. Science & Public Policy (SPP) 41 (6).
Zare-Farashbandi, F., Geraei, E. & Siamaki, S. 2014 Study of co-authorship network of papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences using social network analysis. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 19 (1), 4146.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed