Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Combinator – a computer-based tool for creative idea generation based on a simulation approach

  • Ji Han (a1), Feng Shi (a1), Liuqing Chen (a1) and Peter R. N. Childs (a1)
Abstract

Idea generation is significant in design, but coming up with creative ideas is often challenging. This paper presents a computer-based tool, called the Combinator, for assisting designers to produce creative ideas. The tool is developed based on an approach simulating aspects of human cognition in achieving combinational creativity. It can generate combinational prompts in text and image forms through combining unrelated ideas. A case study has been conducted to evaluate the Combinator. The study results indicate that the Combinator, in its current formulation, has assisted the tool users involved in the case study in improving the fluency of idea generation, as well as increasing the originality, usefulness, and flexibility of the ideas generated. The results also indicate that the tool could benefit its users in generating high-novelty and high-quality ideas effectively. The Combinator is considered to be beneficial in expanding the design space, increasing better idea occurrence, improving design space exploration, and enhancing the design success rate.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Combinator – a computer-based tool for creative idea generation based on a simulation approach
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Combinator – a computer-based tool for creative idea generation based on a simulation approach
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Combinator – a computer-based tool for creative idea generation based on a simulation approach
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: j.han14@imperial.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Alesandrini, L.2016 Imperial design engineer named London’s most innovative international student. November 3 2016. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/newsandeventspggrp/imperialcollege/newssummary/news_3-11-2016-12-30-14.
Altshuller, G. S. 1984 Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of the Solution of Inventive Problems. Gordon and Breach Publishers.
Anderson, J. R. 1976 Language, Memory, and Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, J. R. & Bower, G. H. 2014 Human Associative Memory, 3rd edn. Psychology Press.
Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. 1968 Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 2, 89195. doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3.
Augello, A., Infantino, I., Pilato, G., Rizzo, R. & Vella, F. 2014 Robotic creativity driven by motivation and semantic analysis. In IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing 2014. doi:10.1109/icsc.2014.58.
Bacciotti, D., Borgianni, Y. & Rotini, F. 2016 An original design approach for stimulating the ideation of new product features. Computers in Industry 75, 80100. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.004.
Baddeley, A. D., Eysenck, M. W. & Anderson, M. C. 2009 Memory. Psychology Press.
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F. & Neubauer, A. C. 2014 To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage 88 (March), 125133. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021.
Besemer, S. P. & O’Quin, K. 1989 The development, reliability and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal 2, 268279.
Boden, M. A. 2004 The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, 2nd edn. Routledge.
Boden, M. A. 2009 Computer models of creativity. AI Magazine 30 (3), 2334. doi:10.1609/aimag.v30i3.2254.
Bolhuis, J. J. & Wynne, C. D. L. 2009 Can evolution explain how minds work? Nature 458 (7240), 832833. doi:10.1038/458832a.
Breen, J. W. 2004 JMDict: a Japanese-multilingual dictionary. In Coling 2004 Workshop on Multilingual Linguistic Resources, pp. 7178.
Butnariu, C. & Veale, T. 2006 Lexical combinatorial creativity with ‘Gastronaut’. In The Third Joint Workshop on computational Creativity.
Buzan, T. & Buzan, B. 1996 The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximize Your Brain’s Untapped Potential. New American Library.
Carruthers, P. 2011 Creative action in mind. Philosophical Psychology 24 (4), 437461. doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.556609.
Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B. & Nataraju, B. S. 2005 A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 19, 113132. doi:10.10170S0890060405050109.
Chakrabarti, A., Siddharth, L., Dinakar, M., Panda, M., Palegar, N. & Keshwani, S. 2017 Idea inspire 3.0 – a tool for analogical design. In Research into Design for Communities, Volume 2. ICoRD 2017 (ed. Chakrabarti, A. & Chakrabarti, D.), Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 66, pp. 475485. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3521-0_41.
Childs, P. R. N. 2014 Mechanical Design Engineering Handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Childs, P. R. N., Hamilton, T., Morris, R. D. & Johnston, G. 2006 Centre for technology enabled creativity. In DS 38: Proceedings of EandDPE 2006, the 8th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, pp. 367372.
Chiu, I. & Shu, L. H. 2012 Investigating effects of oppositely related semantic stimuli on design concept creativity. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (4), 271296. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.603298.
Chulvi, V., Sonseca, Á., Mulet, E. & Chakrabarti, A. 2012 Assessment of the relationships among design methods, design activities, and creativity. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (11), 111004–111004-11. doi:10.1115/1.4007362.
Cowan, N. 2008 What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research 169, 323338. doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(07)00020-9.
Cox, G.2005 Cox review of creativity in business: building on the UK’s strengths. Accessed September 2016. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/cox_review/coxreview_index.cfm.
Cross, N. 2008 Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 4th edn. John Wiley and Sons.
Cross, N. 2011 Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Berg Publishers.
Dean, D. L., Hender, J. M., Rodgers, T. L. & Santanen, E. L. 2006 Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7 (10), 646699.
De Bono, E. 2016 Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity. Penguin Life.
Design Council2011 Design for innovation. Accessed September 2016. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/DesignForInnovation_Dec2011.pdf.
Design Council2015 The value of design to the UK executive summary. Accessed September 2016. http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/The%20Design%20Economy%20executive%20summary_0.pdf.
Diedrich, J., Benedek, M., Jauk, E. & Neubauer, A. C. 2015 Are creative ideas novel and useful? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 9 (1), 3540. doi:10.1037/a0038688.
Fellbaum, C. 1998 WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press.
Fiedler, S., Knippertz, P., Woodward, S., Martin, G. M., Bellouin, N., Ross, A. N. & Heinold, B. et al. 2015 A process-based evaluation of dust-emitting winds in the CMIP5 simulation of HadGEM2-ES. Climate Dynamics 46, 11071130. doi:10.1007/s00382-015-2635-9.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M. 1996 Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. The MIT Press.
Frigotto, M. L. & Riccaboni, M. 2011 A few special cases: scientific creativity and network dynamics in the field of rare diseases. Scientometrics 89 (1), 397420. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0431-9.
Gadd, K. 2011 TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. John Wiley and Sons.
Georgiev, G. V., Sumitani, N. & Taura, T. 2017 Methodology for creating new scenes through the use of thematic relations for innovative designs. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 5, 7894. doi:10.1080/21650349.2015.1119658.
Gero, J. S. & Kumar, B. 1993 Expanding design spaces through new design variables. Design Studies 14 (2), 210221. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(93)80048-H.
Goel, A. K. & Bhatta, S. R. 2004 Use of design patterns in analogy-based design. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18 (2), 8594. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2004.09.003.
Goel, A. K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B. & Helms, M. 2014 Information-processing theories of biologically inspired design. In Biologically Inspired Design (ed. Goel, A. K., McAdams, D. & Stone, R.), pp. 127152. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5248-4_6.
Han, J., Shi, F. & Childs, P. R. N. 2016 The Combinator: a computer-based tool for idea generation. In Proceedings of the Design 2016 14th International Design Conference, pp. 639648.
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P.& the Deep-Play Research Group 2014 Twisting knobs and connecting things: rethinking technology and creativity in the 21st century. TechTrends 58 (1), 1519. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0713-6.
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. & Dekoninck, E. A. 2011 Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design 22 (8), 565581. doi:10.1080/09544821003598573.
Istre, G. R., McCoy, M. A., Moore, B. J., Roper, C., Stephens-Stidham, S., Barnard, J. J., Carlin, D. K., Stowe, M. & Anderson, R. J. 2013 Preventing deaths and injuries from house fires: an outcome evaluation of a community-based smoke alarm installation programme. Injury Prevention 20 (2), 97102. doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2013-040823.
Kang, Y. & Tang, D. 2013 Matrix-based computational conceptual design with ant colony optimisation. Journal of Engineering Design 24 (6), 429452. doi:10.1080/09544828.2012.756461.
Kawamoto, N.2013 ORISHIKI. Accessed November 14 2016. http://naokikawamoto.com/pg50.html.
Kawamura, T., Fukuhara, T., Takeda, H., Kono, Y. & Kidode, M. 2007 Ubiquitous memories: a memory externalization system using physical objects. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11 (4), 287298. doi:10.1007/s00779-006-0085-4.
Kudrowitz, B. M. & Wallace, D. 2013 Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design 24 (2), 120139. doi:10.1080/09544828.2012.676633.
Lehmann, J., Isele, R., Jakob, M., Jentzsch, A., Kontokostas, D., Mendes, P. N. & Hellmann, S. et al. 2015 DBpedia – a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semantic Web 6 (2), 167195. doi:10.3233/SW-140134.
Liikkanen, L. A. & Perttula, M. 2010 Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective. Journal of Engineering Design 21 (5), 545560. doi:10.1080/09544820802353297.
Liu, H. & Singh, P. 2004 ConceptNet – a practical commonsense reasoning tool-kit. BT Technology Journal 22 (4), 211226. doi:10.1023/b:bttj.0000047600.45421.6d.
Luis-Ferreira, F. & Jardim-Goncalves, R. 2013 Internet of persons and things inspired on brain models and neurophysiology. Computational Methods in Social Sciences 1 (1), 5264.
Millar, D., Goltan, S. & Cheng, T.2010 Shell. Accessed November 14, 2016.http://www.amazed.at/.
Mumford, M. D. 2003 Taking stock in taking stock. Creativity Research Journal 15, 147151. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651408.
Nagai, Y., Taura, T. & Mukai, F. 2009 Concept blending and dissimilarity: factors for creative concept generation process. Design Studies 30, 648675. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.004.
Osborn, A. F. 1979 Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving, 3rd edn. Charles Scribener’s Sons.
Patil, S., Bhattacharjee, S. & Ghosh, S. K. 2014 A spatial web crawler for discovering geo-servers and semantic referencing with spatial features. Distributed Computing and Internet Technology 8337, 6878. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04483-5_7.
Perttula, M. & Sipilä, P. 2007 The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design 18 (1), 93102. doi:10.1080/09544820600679679.
Pinker, S. 1999 How the Mind Works. Penguin Books.
Plucker, J. A. & Makel, M. C. 2010 Assessment of creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (ed. Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J.), pp. 4873. The Cambridge University Press.
Roper, S., Micheli, P., Love, J. H. & Vahter, P. 2016 The roles and effectiveness of design in new product development: a study of Irish manufacturers. Research Policy 45 (1), 319329. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.003.
Sarkar, P. & Chakrabarti, A. 2011 Assessing design creativity. Design Studies 32 (4), 348383. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002.
Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M. & Vargas-Hernandez, N. 2003 Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24 (2), 111134. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00034-0.
Shergill, H. K. 2012 Experimental Psychology. PHI Learning Private Limited.
Simonton, D. K. 2017 Domain-general creativity: on generating original, useful, and surprising combinations. In The Cambridge Handbook Of Creativity Across Domains (ed. Kaufman, J. C., Glaveanu, V. P. & Baer, J.), pp. 1840. The Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316274385.004.
Smith, S. M. 1995 Creative cognition: demystifying creativity. In Thinking and Literacy: The Mind at Work (ed. Hedley, C. N., Antonacci, P. & Rabinowitz, M.), pp. 3146. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sowa, J. F. 1992 Semantic networks. In Encyclopaedia of Artificial Intelligence (ed. Shapiro, S. C.), pp. 14931511. John Wiley and Sons.
Speer, R. & Havasi, C. 2012 Representing general relational knowledge in ConceptNet 5. In Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 36793686.
Stewart, D. & Simmons, M. 2010 Business Playground: Where Creativity and Commerce Collide. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Suzuki, W. A.2005 Associative learning and the hippocampus. In Psychological Science Agenda. American Psychological Association. Accessed September 1 2016.http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2005/02/suzuki.aspx.
Taura, T., Nagai, Y., Morita, J. & Takeuchi, T. 2007 A study on design creative process focused on concept combination types in comparison with linguistic interpretation process. In DS 42 Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 07), pp. 317318.
Taura, T., Yamamoto, E., Fasiha, M. Y. N., Goka, M., Mukai, F., Nagai, Y. & Nakashima, H. 2012 Constructive simulation of creative concept generation process in design: a research method for difficult-to-observe design-thinking processes. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (4), 297321. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.637191.
Thomas, M. S. C. & McClelland, J. L. 2008 Connectionist models of cognition. In The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology (ed. Sun, R.), pp. 2358. The Cambridge University Press.
Vergauwe, E. & Cowan, N. 2015 Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22 (4), 10011006. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0755-6.
Wang, Z., Childs, P. R. N. & Jiang, P. 2013 Using web crawler technology to support design-related web information collection in idea generation. In DS 75-6: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), pp. 229238.
Ward, T. B. & Kolomyts, Y. 2010 Cognition and creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (ed. Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J.), pp. 93112. The Cambridge University Press.
Westerlund, B. 2009 Design Space Exploration: Co-operative Creation of Proposals for Desired Interactions with Future Artefacts. Kungliga Tekniska högskolan.
Yan, Y. & Childs, P. R. N. 2015 Creativity tools selection for design engineers in idea generation. In DS 80 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), pp. 359370.
Yang, H. & Zhang, L. 2016 Promoting creative computing: origin, scope, research and applications. Digital Communications and Networks 2 (2), 8491. doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2016.02.001.
Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M. & Gonzalez, R. 2016 Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation. Design Studies 46, 95124. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.001.
Yin, R. K. 2013 Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th edn. SAGE Publications.
Zavbi, R., Fain, N. & Rihtaršič, J. 2013 Evaluation of a method and a computer tool for generating concept designs. Journal of Engineering Design 24 (4), 257271. doi:10.1080/09544828.2012.721539.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed