Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines

  • Seda Yilmaz (a1), Shanna R. Daly (a2), Colleen M. Seifert (a3) and Richard Gonzalez (a3)
Abstract

Research supports the central role cognitive strategies can play in successful concept generation by individual designers. Design heuristics have been shown to facilitate the creation of new design concepts in the early, conceptual stage of the design process, as well as throughout the development of ideas. However, we know relatively little about their use in differing disciplines. This study examined evidence of design heuristic use in a protocol study with 12 mechanical engineers and 12 industrial designers who worked individually to develop multiple concepts. The open-ended design problem was for a novel product, and the designers’ sketches and comments were recorded as they worked on the problem for 25 min and in a retrospective interview. The results showed frequent use of design heuristics in both disciplines and a significant relationship to the rated creativity of the concepts. Though industrial designers used more heuristics in their concepts, there was a high degree of similarity in heuristic use. Some differences between design disciplines were observed in the choice of design heuristics, where industrial designers showed a greater emphasis on user experience, environmental contexts, and added features. These findings demonstrate the prevalence of design heuristics in individual concept generation and their effectiveness in generating creative concepts, across two design domains.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: seifert@umich.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Ö. Akin  & C. Lin 1995 Design protocol data and novel design decisions. Design Studies 16 (2), 211236.

T. Amabile 1982 Social psychology of creativity: a consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (5), 9971013.

C. J. Atman  & K. M. Bursic 1998 Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education 87 (2), 121132.

L. Ball , J. Evans  & I. Dennis 1994 Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics 37 (11), 17531786.

L. J. Ball  & T. C. Ormerod 1995 Structured and opportunistic processes in design: a critical discussion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43 (1), 131151.

T. Barrett 2000 Studio critiques of student art: as they are, as they could be with mentoring. Theory Into Practice 39 (1), 2935.

M. S. Basadur  & C. T. Finkbeiner 1985 Measuring preference for ideation in creative problem-solving training. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 21 (1), 3749.

A. Bruseberg  & D. McDonagh-Philp 2002 Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers’ feedback. Journal of Applied Ergonomics 33 (1), 2738.

H. H. C. M. Christiaans  & K. Venselaar 2005 Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: modelling the expert. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (3), 217236.

P. M. Clark  & H. L. Mirels 1970 Fluency as a pervasive element in the measurement of creativity. Journal of Educational Measurement 7 (2), 8386.

A. W. Court 1998 Improving creativity in engineering design education. European Journal of Engineering Education 23 (2), 141154.

N. Cross 2004 Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies 25 (5), 427441.

D. W. Dahl  & P. Moreau 2002 The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1), 4760.

S. Daly , R. Adams  & G. Bodner 2012a What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education 101 (2), 187219.

S. Daly , E. Mosysjowski  & C. M. Seifert 2014 Teaching creativity in engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education 103 (3), 417449.

S. R. Daly , S. Yilmaz , J. L. Christian , C. M. Seifert  & R. Gonzalez 2012c Design heuristics in engineering concept generation. Journal of Engineering Education 101 (4), 601629.

K. H. Dorst  & N. Cross 2001 Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22 (5), 425437.

C. L. Dym 1994 Teaching design to freshmen: style and content. Journal of Engineering Education 83 (4), 303310.

K. A. Ericsson  & H. A. Simon 1993 Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press.

M. Gilli , D. Maringer  & P. Winker 2008 Applications of heuristics in finance. In Handbook on Information Technology in Finance (ed. D. Seese , C. Weinhardt  & F. Schlottmann ), pp. 635653. Springer.

V. Goel  & P. Pirolli 1992 The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science 16, 395429.

M. D. Goslar 1993 Decision support systems: advantages in consumer marketing settings. Journal of Consumer Marketing 3 (3), 4350.

R. Guindon 1990 Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human–Computer Interaction 5, 305344.

N. V. Hernandez , J. J. Shah  & S. M. Smith 2010 Understanding design ideation mechanisms through multilevel aligned empirical studies. Design Studies 31 (4), 382410.

I. M. Ilevbare , D. Probert  & R. Phaal 2013 A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation 33 (2–3), 3037.

D. G. Jansson  & S. M. Smith 1991 Design fixation. Design Studies 12 (1), 311.

M. Kavakli  & J. Gero 2002 The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies 23, 2540.

G. Klein 1998 Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. MIT Press.

P. Little  & M. Cardenas 2001 Use of ‘studio’ methods in the introductory engineering design curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education 90 (3), 309318.

P. Lloyd  & P. Scott 1994 Discovering the design problem. Design Studies 15, 125140.

R. E. Nisbett  & T. D. Wilson 1977 Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84 (3), 231259.

G. Pahl  & W. Beitz 1996 Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer.

P. B. Paulus  & H. Yang 2000 Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1), 7687.

M. Prats , S. Lim , I. Jowers , S. W. Garner  & S. Chase 2009 Transforming shape in design: observations from studies of sketching. Design Studies 30 (5), 503520.

A. T. Purcell  & J. S. Gero 1996 Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies 17 (4), 363383.

J. J. Shah , N. Vargas-Hernandez  & S. M. Smith 2003 Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24 (2), 111134.

H. A. Simon 1969 Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press.

L. A. Stauffer  & D. G. Ullman 1988 A comparison of the results of empirical studies into the mechanical design process. Design Studies 9 (2), 107114.

M. Suwa , J. Gero  & T. Purcell 2000 Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies 21, 539567.

M. Suwa  & B. Tversky 1997 What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies 18 (4), 385403.

E. P. Torrance 1972 Predictive validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior 6, 136140.

M. Tovey 1997 Styling and design: intuition and analysis in industrial design. Design Studies 18 (1), 531.

P. Tynjälä 1998 Traditional studying for examination versus constructivist learning tasks: Do learning outcomes differ? Studies in Higher Education 23 (2), 173189.

D. G. Ullman , T. G. Dietterich  & L. A. Stauffer 1988 A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data. AIEDAM 2, 3352.

B. Uluoglu 2000 Design knowledge communicated in studio critiques. Design Studies 21 (1), 3358.

S. Yilmaz  & C. M. Seifert 2011 Creativity through design heuristics: a case study of expert product design. Design Studies 32, 384415.

S. Yilmaz , C. M. Seifert  & R. Gonzalez 2010 Cognitive heuristics in design: instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing, Special Issue on Design Pedagogy: Representations and Processes 24, 335355.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 52
Total number of PDF views: 595 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 687 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.