Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

How to assess a company’s open innovation situation?

  • Matthias R. Guertler (a1), Ioanna Michailidou (a1) and Udo Lindemann (a1)
Abstract

Open Innovation (OI) supports companies in systematically collaborating with external partners, offering various advantages. However, companies still face several challenges when applying OI, e.g., identifying relevant OI partners, collaboration methods, and project risks. Often, insufficient planning is the reason for subsequent deficits in OI projects. The analysis of relevant context factors (‘situation’) is important, which affect and constrain OI. To date, a general approach for analyzing (open) innovation situations or guidelines for developing one do not exist. Usually researchers develop their own situation analysis, including extensive literature reviews and experiencing similar challenges. This publication sets the basis for successfully planning OI projects. It focuses on developing an analysis approach for OI situations and supports other researchers in developing their own analysis approaches. The resultant objectives of the publication are to: (1) provide a list of potential situation analysis criteria; (2) provide a guideline for developing a situation analysis; (3) provide initial indications of relevant OI-specific situation criteria. The criteria were derived from the literature and qualitatively evaluated by three industry partners to assess their usability. Although this work is exploratory, and the results are not automatically generalizable, it is an important contribution for ensuring the success of OI, and for analyzing enablers and barriers to knowledge transfer from academia to industry.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      How to assess a company’s open innovation situation?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      How to assess a company’s open innovation situation?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      How to assess a company’s open innovation situation?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: guertler@pe.mw.tum.de
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A.-H. G. Abulrub  & J. Lee 2012 Open Innovation management: challenges and prospects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 41 (0), 130138.

P. Badke-Schaub  & E. Frankenberger 2004 Management kritischer Situationen. Springer.

C. Baldwin  & E. von Hippel 2011 Modeling a paradigm shift: from producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science 22 (6), 13991417.

A. Barge-Gil 2010 Open, semi-open and closed innovators: towards an explanation of degree of openness. Industry and Innovation 17 (6), 577607.

L. Boscherini , D. Chiaroni , V. Chiesa  & F. Frattini 2010 How to use pilot projects to implement Open Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 14 (06), 10651097.

A. Braun 2012 Open Innovation – Einführung in ein Forschungsparadigma. In Open Innovation in Life Sciences (ed. A. Braun , E. Eppinger , G. Vladova  & S. Adelhelm ), pp. 324. Gabler Verlag.

H. Chesbrough  & M. Bogers 2014 Explicating Open Innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In New Frontiers in Open Innovation (ed. H. Chesbrough , W. Vanhaverbeke  & J. West ), pp. 328. Oxford University Press.

H. Chesbrough  & A. K. Crowther 2006 Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management 36 (3), 229236.

H. Chesbrough , W. Vanhaverbeke  & J. West 2014 New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Y. H. Chiang  & K. P. Hung 2010 Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of inter-organizational knowledge flows. R&D Management 40 (3), 292299.

D. Chiaroni , V. Chiesa  & F. Frattini 2010 Unravelling the process from closed to Open Innovation: evidence from mature, asset-intensive industries. R&D Management 40 (3), 222245.

D. Chiaroni , V. Chiesa  & F. Frattini 2011 The Open Innovation journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation 31 (1), 3443.

W. M. Cohen  & D. A. Levinthal 1990 Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128152.

L. Dahlander  & D. M. Gann 2010 How open is innovation? Research Policy 39 (6), 699709.

K. Dittrich  & G. Duysters 2007 Networking as a means to strategy change: the case of Open Innovation in mobile telephony. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24 (6), 510521.

E. Enkel 2009 Chancen und Risiken von Open Innovation. In Kommunikation als Erfolgsfaktor im Innovationsmanagement (ed. A. Zerfaß  & K. M. Möslein ), pp. 177192. Gabler.

E. Enkel  & O. Gassmann 2010 Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Management 40 (3), 256270.

E. Enkel , C. Kausch  & O. Gassmann 2005a Managing the risk of customer integration. European Management Journal 23 (2), 203213.

E. Enkel , J. Perez-Freije  & O. Gassmann 2005b Minimizing market risks through customer integration in new product development: learning from bad practice. Creativity and Innovation Management 14 (4), 425437.

O. Gassmann 2006 Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management 36 (3), 223228.

O. Gassmann , E. Enkel  & H. Chesbrough 2010 The future of open innovation. R&D Management 40 (3), 213221.

O. Gassmann  & M. M. Keupp 2005 Globales Management von Innovation. In Handbuch Technologie-und Innovationsmanagement, pp. 207226. Gabler.

H. G. Gemünden , S. Salomo  & K. Hölzle 2007 Role models for radical innovations in times of open innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management 16 (4), 408421.

P. T. Gianiodis , S. C. Ellis  & E. Secchi 2010 Advancing a typology of Open Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 14 (4), 531572.

S. G. Green , M. B. Gavin  & L. Aiman-Smith 1995 Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 42 (3), 203214.

J. Hagedoorn 1993 Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal 14 (5), 371385.

J. Hagedoorn 2002 Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31 (4), 477492.

J. Hagedoorn  & M. Cloodt 2003 Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy 32 (8), 13651379.

C. Hales  & S. Gooch 2004 Managing Engineering Design. Springer Science & Business Media.

A. P. Hameri  & J. Nihtilä 1997 Distributed new product development project based on Internet and World-Wide Web: a case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (2), 7787.

J. Hauschildt  & S. Salomo 2005 Je innovativer, desto erfolgreicher? Journal für Betriebswirtschaft 55 (1), 320.

D. Hilgers  & F. Piller 2009 Controlling für Open Innovation – Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Konsequenzen. Controlling 21 (2), 511.

E. K. R. E. Huizingh 2010 Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31 (1), 29.

M. Inauen  & A. Schenker-Wicki 2012 Fostering radical innovations with open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 15 (2), 212231.

D. Jiménez-Jiménez  & R. Sanz-Valle 2011 Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research 64 (4), 408417.

K. Laursen  & A. Salter 2004 Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy 33 (8), 12011215.

K. Laursen  & A. Salter 2006 Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27 (2), 131150.

S. Lee , G. Park , B. Yoon  & J. Park 2010 Open innovation in SMEs – An intermediated network model. Research Policy 39 (2), 290300.

U. Lindemann 2009 Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte: Methoden flexibel und situationsgerecht anwenden. Springer.

J. D. Linton 2009 De-babelizing the language of innovation. Technovation 29 (11), 729737.

J.-P. Micaëlli , J. Forest , É. Coatanéa  & G. Medyna 2014 How to improve Kline and Rosenberg’s chain-linked model of innovation: building blocks and diagram-based languages. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 15 (3), 5977.

F. T. Piller  & D. Walcher 2006 Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management 36 (3), 307318.

W. Sofka  & C. Grimpe 2010 Specialized search and innovation performance – evidence across Europe. R&D Management 40 (3), 310323.

P. Trott  & D. Hartmann 2009 Why ‘Open Innovation’ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim) 13 (04), 715736.

V. van de Vrande , J. de Jong , W. Vanhaverbeke  & M. de Rochemont 2009 Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation 29 (6/7), 423437.

B. Verworn  & C. Herstatt 2007 Bedeutung und Charakteristika der frühen Phasen des Innovationsprozesses. In Management der frühen Innovationsphasen: Grundlagen – Methoden – Neue Ansätze (ed. C. Herstatt  & B. Verworn ), pp. 319. Gabler.

E. von Hippel 1986 Lead Users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science 32 (7), 791805.

M. Von Zedtwitz  & O. Gassmann 2002 Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy 31 (4), 569588.

J. West  & S. Gallagher 2006 Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management 36 (3), 319331.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 247 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 232 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.