Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Iterative value models generation in the engineering design process

  • Marco Bertoni (a1) and Alessandro Bertoni (a1)

Abstract

Value models are increasingly discussed today as a means to frontload conceptual design activities in engineering design, with the final goal of reducing cost and rework associated with sub-optimal decisions made from a system perspective. However, there is no shared agreement in the research community about what a value model exactly is, how many types of value models are there, their input–output relationships and their usage along the engineering design process timeline. Emerging from five case studies conducted in the aerospace and in the construction equipment industry, this paper describes how to tailor the development of value models in the engineering design process. The initial descriptive study findings are summarized in the form of seven lessons learned that shall be taken into account when designing value models for design decision support. From these lessons, the paper proposes a six-step framework that considers the need to update the nature and definition of value models as far as new information becomes available, moving from initial estimations based on expert judgment to detailed quantitative analysis.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Iterative value models generation in the engineering design process
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Iterative value models generation in the engineering design process
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Iterative value models generation in the engineering design process
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: alessandro.bertoni@bth.se

References

Hide All
Bertoni, M. 2019 Multi-criteria decision making for sustainability and value assessment in early PSS design. Sustainability 11 (7), 1952.
Bertoni, A., Amnell, H. & Isaksson, O. 2015 Value modelling in aerospace sub-system design: linking quantitative and qualitative assessment. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED15, Milan, Italy (ed. Weber, C., Husung, S., Cascini, G., Cantamessa, M., Marjanovic, D. & Bordegoni, M.), pp. 421430. The Design Society.
Bertoni, M., Bertoni, A. & Isaksson, O. 2018 Evoke: a value-driven concept selection method for early system design. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 27 (1), 4677.
Bertoni, M., Panarotto, M. & Jonsson, P. 2017 Value-driven engineering design: lessons learned from the road construction equipment industry. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED17, Vancouver, BC (ed. Maier, A., Škec, S., Harrison, K., Kokkolaras, M., Oehmen, J., Fadel, G., Salustri, F. & Van der Loos, M.), pp. 319328. The Design Society.
Blessing, L. T. & Chakrabarti, A. 2009 DRM: A Design Research Methodology. pp. 1342. Springer.
Boyd, E. M. & Fales, A. W. 1983 Reflective learning: key to learning from experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 23 (2), 99117.
Castagne, S., Curran, R. & Collopy, P. 2009 Implementation of value-driven optimisation for the design of aircraft fuselage panels. International Journal of Production Economics 117 (2), 381388.
Chen, W., Hoyle, C. & Wassenaar, H. J. 2012 Decision-based Design: Integrating Consumer Preferences into Engineering Design. Springer Science & Business Media.
Cheung, J., Scanlan, J., Wong, J., Forrester, J., Eres, H., Collopy, P., Hollingsworth, P., Wiseall, S. & Briceno, S. 2012 Application of value-driven design to commercial aeroengine systems. Journal of Aircraft 49 (3), 688702.
Collopy, P. 2009 Aerospace system value models: a survey and observations. In AIAA Space 2009 Conference & Exposition, 14–17 Sep 2009, Pasadena, CA, p. 6560.
Collopy, P. 2012 A research agenda for the coming renaissance in systems engineering. In 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p. 799.
Collopy, P. D. & Hollingsworth, P. M. 2011 Value-driven design. Journal of Aircraft 48 (3), 749759.
Curran, R., Beelaerts van Blokland, W., Abu-Kias, T., Repco, M. J. F., Sprengers, Y. L. J. & Van Der Zwet, P. S. 2010 Value operations methodology for value driven design: medium range passenger airliner validation. In In 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, p. 847.
Eres, M. H., Bertoni, M., Kossmann, M. & Scanlan, J. 2014 Mapping customer needs to engineering characteristics: an aerospace perspective for conceptual design. Journal of Engineering Design 25 (1–3), 6487.
Fanthorpe, C., Soban, D., Price, M. & Butterfield, J. 2011 Developing a capability function relating aircraft systems cost overruns to aircraft design parameters. In 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, including the AIAA Balloon Systems Conference and 19th AIAA Lighter-Than, p. 6837.
Feldman, P. & Shtub, A. 2006 Model for cost estimation in a finite-capacity environment. International Journal of Production Research 44 (2), 305327.
Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M. & Horner, M. 2008 A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28 (4–5), 286311.
Grönroos, C. & Voima, P. 2013 Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41 (2), 133150.
Gupta, Y. P. 1983 Life cycle cost models and associated uncertainties. In Electronic Systems Effectiveness and Life Cycle Costing, pp. 535549. Springer.
Hazelrigg, G. A. 1998 A framework for decision-based engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design 120 (4), 653658.
Holmberg, J. & Robèrt, K. H. 2000 Backcasting – a framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 7 (4), 291308.
Hull, E., Jackson, K. & Dick, J. 2002 DOORS: a tool to manage requirements. In Requirements Engineering, pp. 187204. Springer.
INCOSE, A. 2014. A world in motion: systems engineering vision 2025. In International Council on Systems Engineering, available at http://www.incose.org/docs/default-source/aboutse/se-vision-2025.pdf; accessed May 20th, 2019.
Isaksson, O., Bertoni, M., Hallstedt, S. & Lavesson, N. 2015 Model based decision support for value and sustainability in product development. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED15, Milan, Italy (ed. Weber, C., Husung, S., Cascini, G., Cantamessa, M., Marjanovic, D. & Bordegoni, M.), pp. 2130. The Design Society.
Isaksson, O., Kossmann, M., Bertoni, M., Eres, H., Monceaux, A., Bertoni, A., Wiseall, S. & Zhang, X. 2013 Value-driven design – a methodology to link expectations to technical requirements in the extended enterprise. In INCOSE International Symposium, Vol. 23, pp. 803819.
Isaksson, O., Larsson, T. C. & Rönnbäck, A. Ö. 2009 Development of product-service systems: challenges and opportunities for the manufacturing firm. Journal of Engineering Design 20 (4), 329348.
Ishizaka, A. & Nemery, P. 2013 Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. John Wiley & Sons.
Johansson, C., Wall, J. & Panarotto, M. 2017 Maturity of models in a multi-model decision support system. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17), Vancouver, BC, Vol. 6 (ed. Maier, A., Škec, S., Harrison, K., Kokkolaras, M., Oehmen, J., Fadel, G., Salustri, F. & Van der Loos, M.), pp. 237246. The Design Society.
Kennedy, M., Harmon, K. & Minnock, E. 2008 Ready, Set, Dominate-Implement Toyota’s Set-Based Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You. Oaklea Press, Richmond, VA.
Khamukhin, A. A. & Eres, M. H. 2015 An improvement of the concept design analysis method by the use of the avoidance function. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 756, pp. 382388. Trans Tech Publications.
Kuzel, A. J. 1992 Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In Doing Qualitative Research (ed. Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L.), pp. 3144. Sage Publications.
Leavy, B. 2010 Design thinking – a new mental model of value innovation. Strategy & Leadership 38 (3), 514.
Lee, B. D., Binder, W. R. & Paredis, C. J. 2014 A systematic method for specifying effective value models. Procedia Computer Science 28, 228236.
Legard, R., Keegan, J. & Ward, K. 2013 In-depth interviews. In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (ed. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M. & Ormston, R.). SAGE Publications.
León, H. C. M. & Farris, J. A. 2011 Lean product development research: current state and future directions. Engineering Management Journal 23 (1), 2951.
Lockwood, T. 2010 Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value. Simon and Schuster.
McManus, H., Richards, M., Ross, A. & Hastings, D. 2007 A Framework for Incorporating ‘ilities’ in tradespace studies. In AIAA Space 2007 Conference & Exposition, Long Beach, CA, Vol. 1, pp. 941954.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. & Saldana, J. 2013 Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications Thousand Oaks.
Monceaux, A., Kossman, M., Wiseall, S., Bertoni, M., Isaksson, O., Eres, H. M., Bertoni, A. & Rianantsoa, N. 2014 Overview of value driven design research: methods, applications and relevance for conceptual design. Insight.
Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. W. 1996 Engineering Design – A Systematic Approach. Springer-Verlag.
Panarotto, M., Wall, J., Bertoni, M., Larsson, T. & Jonsson, P. 2017 Value-driven simulation: thinking together through simulation in early engineering design. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Vancouver, BC, Vol. 4 (ed. Weber, C., Husung, S., Cascini, G., Cantamessa, M., Marjanovic, D. & Bordegoni, M.), pp. 513522. The Design Society.
Papageorgiou, E., Eres, M. H. & Scanlan, J. 2017 Value driven conceptual design of unmanned air system for a defence application. Journal of Aerospace Operations 4 (3), 141158.
Pardessus, T. 2004 Concurrent engineering development and practices for aircraft design at Airbus. In Proceedings of the 24th ICAS Conf., Yokohama, Japan (Vol. 1, No. 2).
Patton, M. Q. 1990 Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc..
Price, M., Soban, D., Mullan, C., Butterfield, J. & Murphy, A. 2012 A novel method to enable trade-offs across the whole product life of an aircraft using value driven design. Journal of Aerospace Operations 1 (4), 359375.
Richardson, G., Penn, J. & Collopy, P. 2010 Value-centric analysis and value-centric design. In AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition, p. 8861.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. & Elam, R. G. 2013 Selecting samples. In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (ed. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M. & Ormston, R.). SAGE Publications.
Roozenburg, N. F. & Eekels, J. 1995 Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, Vol. 2. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Runnemalm, H., Tersing, H. & Isaksson, O. 2009 Virtual manufacturing of light weight aero engine components. In Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines (ISABE), Montreal, QC, pp. 711.
Severin, W. 1967 Another look at cue summation. AV Communication Review 15 (3), 233245.
Shakir, M. 2002 The selection of case studies: strategies and their applications to IS implementation case studies. Research Letters in the Information and Mathematical Sciences 3, 191198.
Siyam, G. I., Wynn, D. C. & Clarkson, P. J. 2015 Review of value and lean in complex product development. Systems Engineering 18 (2), 192207.
Soban, D. S., Price, M. A. & Hollingsworth, P. 2012 Defining a research agenda in value driven design: questions that need to be asked. Journal of Aerospace Operations 1 (4), 329342.
Solomon, P. J. & Young, R. R. 2007 Performance-based Earned Value. J. Wiley & Sons.
Steiner, F. & Harmon, R. 2009 The impact of intangible value on the design and marketing of new products and services: an exploratory approach. In PICMET’09–2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, pp. 20662079. IEEE.
Söderberg, R., Lindkvist, L. & Carlson, J. 2006 Virtual geometry assurance for effective product realization. In First Nordic Conference on Product Lifecycle Management-NordPLM, Vol. 6, pp. 2526.
Thomke, S. & Fujimoto, T. 2000 The effect of ‘front-loading’ problem-solving on product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17 (2), 128142.
Ullman, D. G. 2002 The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math.
Ulrich, K. T. & Eppinger, S. D. 2012 Product Design and Development, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Education.
Vallhagen, J., Isaksson, O., Söderberg, R. & Wärmefjord, K. 2013 A framework for producibility and design for manufacturing requirements in a system engineering context. Procedia CIRP 11, 145150.
Warren, C. A. 2002 Qualitative interviewing. In Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. SAGE publications, Thousand Oaks.
Weiss, S. I. 2013 Product and Systems Development: A Value Approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Wierzbicki, A., Makowski, M. & Wessels, J.(Eds) 2000 Model-based Decision Support Methodology with Environmental Applications. p. 475. Kluwer Academic.
Willard, B. 2012 The New Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line. New Society Publishers.
Wright, I. C. 1998 Design Methods in Engineering and Product Design. McGraw-Hill.
Wymore, A. W. 1993 Model-based Systems Engineering. CRC Press.
Yin, R. K. 2003 Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
Zhang, X., Auriol, G., Eres, H. & Baron, C. 2013 A prescriptive approach to qualify and quantify customer value for value-based requirements engineering. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 26 (4), 327345.

Keywords

Iterative value models generation in the engineering design process

  • Marco Bertoni (a1) and Alessandro Bertoni (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed