Skip to main content
×
×
Home

On the integration of product and process models in engineering design

  • Claudia M. Eckert (a1), David C. Wynn (a2), Jakob F. Maier (a3), Albert Albers (a4), Nikola Bursac (a4), Hilario L. Xin Chen (a3), P. John Clarkson (a3), Kilian Gericke (a5), Bartosz Gladysz (a4) and Daniel Shapiro (a3)...
Abstract

Models of products and design processes are key to interacting with engineering designs and managing the processes by which they are developed. In practice, companies maintain networks of many interrelated models which need to be synthesised in the minds of their users when considering issues that cut across them. This article considers how information from product and design process models can be integrated with a view to help manage these complex interrelationships. A framework highlighting key issues surrounding model integration is introduced and terminology for describing these issues is developed. To illustrate the framework and terminology, selected modelling approaches that integrate product and process information are discussed and organised according to their levels and forms of integration. Opportunities for further work to advance integrated modelling in engineering design research and practice are discussed.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      On the integration of product and process models in engineering design
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      On the integration of product and process models in engineering design
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      On the integration of product and process models in engineering design
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: d.wynn@auckland.ac.nz
References
Hide All
Abramovici, M. & Chasiotis, C. 2002 Integrated documentation of procedural knowledge in product development. In Proceedings of Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) 2002, Nov. 21–22, 2002, Wroclaw, Poland.
Ahmad, N., Wynn, D. C. & Clarkson, P. J. 2010 When should design changes be allowed to accumulate? In Proceedings of IDMME – Virtual Concept 2010, Bordeaux, France, October 20–22. Springer.
Ahmad, N., Wynn, D. C. & Clarkson, P. J. 2013 Change impact on a product and its redesign process: a tool for knowledge capture and reuse. Research in Engineering Design 24 (3), 219244.
Albers, A. & Braun, A. 2011 A generalized framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes. International Journal of Product Development 15 (1–3), 625.
Ariyo, O. O., Eckert, C. M. & Clarkson, P. J. 2009 Challenges in identifying the knock-on effects of engineering change. International Journal of Design Engineering 2 (4), 414431.
Arndt, H. & Klein, R. 2002 An ontology-based collaborative framework for decision support in engineering. In Digital Enterprise Challenges: Life-Cycle Approach to Management and Production (ed. Kovács, G. L., Bertók, P. & Haidegger, G.), pp. 369381. Springer.
Aurisicchio, M. & Bracewell, R. 2013 Capturing an integrated design information space with a diagram-based approach. Journal of Engineering Design 24 (6), 397428.
Baxter, D., Gao, J., Case, K., Harding, J., Young, B., Cochrane, S. & Dani, S. 2007 An engineering design knowledge reuse methodology using process modelling. Research in Engineering Design 18 (1), 3748.
Bernard, A., Labrousse, M. & Perry, N. 2006 LC universal model for the enterprise information system structure. In Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development (ed. Brissaud, D., Tichkiewitch, E. & Zwolinski, P.), pp. 429446. Springer.
Box, G. E. P. & Draper, N. R. 1987 Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. John Wiley & Sons.
Braha, D. & Reich, Y. 2003 Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes. Research in Engineering Design 14 (4), 185199.
Browning, T. R. 2001 Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (3), 292306.
Browning, T. R. 2016 Design structure matrix extensions and innovations: a survey and new opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 63 (1), 2752.
Browning, T. R. & Eppinger, S. D. 2002 Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (4), 428442.
Browning, T. R. & Ramasesh, R. V. 2007 A survey of activity network-based process models for managing product development projects. Production and Operations Management 16 (2), 217240.
Bucciarelli, L. L. 1994 Designing Engineers. MIT Press.
Cartwright, N. 2003 Two theorems on invariance and causality. Philosophy of Science 70 (1), 203224.
Chasiotis, C.2006 Prozessbegleitende Wissensdokumentation und integrierte Wissensvisualisierung in der Digitalen Produktentwicklung. PhD dissertation, Shaker Verlag University Bochum, Aachen, Germany (in German).
Chua, D. K. H. & Hossain, M. A. 2012 Predicting change propagation and impact on design schedule due to external changes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 59 (3), 483493.
Clarkson, P. J. & Hamilton, J. R. 2000 ‘Signposting’, a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process. Research in Engineering Design 12 (1), 1838.
Danilovic, M. & Browning, T. R. 2007 Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. International Journal of Project Management 25 (3), 300314.
Demoly, F., Yan, X. T., Eynard, B., Gomes, S. & Kiritsis, D. 2012 Integrated product relationships management: a model to enable concurrent product design and assembly sequence planning. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (7), 544561.
DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02 (2010) US Department of Defense, http://dodcio.defense.gov/Library/DoDArchitectureFramework.aspx.
Eckert, C. M. & Clarkson, P. J. 2010 Planning development processes for complex products. Research in Engineering Design 21 (3), 153171.
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K. & Blessing, L. 2011 A framework for comparing design modelling approaches across disciplines. In Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 344355. Design Society.
Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P. & Gebala, D. A. 1994 A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Research in Engineering Design 6 (1), 113.
Flanagan, T.2006 Supporting design planning through process model simulation. PhD thesis, Cambridge University Engineering Department.
Frigg, R.2003 Re-representing scientific representation. PhD thesis, Department of Philosophy Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics.
Gärtner, T., Rohleder, N. & Schlick, C. M. 2009 DeSiM: a simulation tool for project and change management on the basis of design structure matrices. In Proceedings of the 11th International DSM Conference, Greenville, South Carolina, USA. Carl-Hanser.
Gericke, K. & Blessing, L. 2012 An analysis of design process models across disciplines. In Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, Vol. 1, pp. 171180. Design Society.
Gericke, K., Eckert, C. M. & Wynn, D. C. 2016 Towards a framework of choices made during the lifecycles of process models. In Proceedings of DESIGN 2016, the 14th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 12751284. Design Society.
Giere, R. N. 2004 How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71 (5), 742752.
Gonnet, S., Henning, G. & Leone, H. 2007 A model for capturing and representing the engineering design process. Expert Systems with Applications 33 (4), 881902.
Gorti, S. R., Gupta, A., Kim, G. J., Sriram, R. D. & Wong, A. 1998 An object-oriented representation for product and design processes. Computer-aided Design 30 (7), 489501.
Grebici, K., Wynn, D. C. & Clarkson, P. J. 2009 Describing information use in engineering design processes using a diagrammatic model. In Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24–27 August 2009, Vol. 1, pp. 571582. Design Society.
Heisig, P., Caldwell, N. H. M. & Clarkson, P. J. 2014 Core information categories for engineering design – contrasting empirical studies with a review of integrated models. Journal of Engineering Design 25 (1–3), 88124.
Heisig, P., Clarkson, P. J., Hemphälä, J., Wadell, C., Norell-Bergendahl, M., Roelofsen, J., Kreimeyer, M. & Lindemann, U.2009 Challenges and Future Fields of Research for Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes. Cambridge University Engineering Department, Technical Report CUED/C-EDC/TR. 148.
Klein, R. 2000 Knowledge modeling in design—the MOKA framework. In Artificial Intelligence in Design ’00 (ed. Gero, J. S.), pp. 77102. Springer.
Kreimeyer, M. & Lindemann, U. 2011 Complexity Metrics in Engineering Design: Managing the Structure of Design Processes. Springer.
Kurakawa, K. 2004 A scenario-driven conceptual design information model and its formation. Research in Engineering Design 15 (2), 122137.
Lévárdy, V. & Browning, T. R. 2009 An adaptive process model to support product development project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 56 (4), 600620.
Lindemann, U., Maurer, M. & Braun, T. 2009 Structural Complexity Management: An Approach for the Field of Product Design. Springer.
Maier, J. F., Wynn, D. C., Biedermann, W., Lindemann, U. & Clarkson, P. J. 2014 Simulating progressive iteration, rework and change propagation to prioritise design tasks. Research in Engineering Design 25 (4), 283307.
Mayer, R. J., Menzel, C. P., Painter, M. K., Dewitte, P. S., Blinn, T. & Perakath, B.1995 Information integration for concurrent engineering (IICE) IDEF3 process description capture method report, Knowledge Based Systems Inc. Technical Report KBSI-IICE-90-STR-01-0592-02, College Station, TX.
Melo, A. F.2002 A state-action model for design process planning. PhD thesis, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge.
Merlo, C. & Girard, Ph. 2004 Information system modelling for engineering design co-ordination. Computers in Industry 55 (3), 317334.
Munker, F., Albers, A., Wagner, D. & Behrendt, M. 2014 Multi-view modeling in SysML: thematic structuring for multiple thematic views. In Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 28, pp. 531538.
O’Donovan, B., Eckert, C. & Clarkson, P. J. 2004 Simulating design processes to assist design process planning. In Proceedings of ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Volume 3a: 16th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, September 28–October 2, 2004. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
Ouertani, M. Z. & Gzara, L. 2008 Tracking product specification dependencies in collaborative design for conflict management. Computer-Aided Design 40 (7), 828837.
Park, H. & Cutkosky, M. R. 1999 Framework for modeling dependencies in collaborative engineering processes. Research in Engineering Design 11 (2), 84102.
Potter, S., Culley, S. J., Darlington, M. J. & Chawdhry, P. K. 2003 Automatic conceptual design using experience-derived heuristics. Research in Engineering Design 14 (3), 131144.
Reich, Y. & Subrahmanian, E. 2015 Designing PSI: an introduction to the PSI framework. In DS 80-2 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15), Vol. 2: Design Theory and Research Methodology: Design Processes, Milan, Italy, July 27–30, 2015, pp. 137148. Design Society.
Robin, V., Rose, B. & Girard, Ph. 2007 Modelling collaborative knowledge to support engineering design project manager. Computers in Industry 58 (2), 188198.
Shah, J. J., Jeon, D. K., Urban, S. D., Bliznakov, P. & Rogers, M. 1996 Database infrastructure for supporting engineering design histories. Computer-Aided Design 28 (5), 347360.
Sharon, A., de Weck, O. L. & Dori, D. 2013 Improving project–product lifecycle management with model–based design structure matrix: a joint project management and systems engineering approach. Systems Engineering 16 (4), 413426.
Smith, R. P. & Morrow, J. A. 1999 Product development process modelling. Design Studies 20 (3), 237261.
Stachowiak, H. 1973 Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Springer.
Star, S. L. 1989 The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2 (ed. Huhns, M. & Gasser, L.). Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park, CA.
Suppe, F. 1977 The search for philosophic understanding of scientific theories. 2nd edn (ed. Suppe, F.). The Structure of Scientific Theories. University of Illinois Press.
Taura, T. & Kubota, A. 1999 A study on engineering history base. Research in Engineering Design 11 (1), 4554.
Wang, W., Duffy, A., Boyle, I. & Whitfield, R. 2013 Creation dependencies of evolutionary artefact and design process knowledge. Journal of Engineering Design 24 (9), 681710.
Whitfield, R. I., Duffy, A. H. B., Coates, G. & Hills, W. 2002 Distributed design coordination. Research in Engineering Design 13 (4), 243252.
Wynn, D. C. & Clarkson, P. J. 2005 Models of designing. In Design Process Improvement: A Review of Current Practice (ed. Clarkson, P. J. & Eckert, C. M.), pp. 3459. Springer.
Wynn, D. C., Eckert, C. M. & Clarkson, P. J. 2006 Applied signposting: a modeling framework to support design process improvement. In Proceedings of ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. 4a: 18th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, September 10–13, pp. 553562. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
Wynn, D. C. & Eckert, C. M. 2017 Perspectives on iteration in design and development. Research in Engineering Design 28 (2), 153184.
Yassine, A., Whitney, D., Daleiden, S. & Lavine, J. 2003 Connectivity maps: modeling and analysing relationships in product development processes. Journal of Engineering Design 14 (3), 377394.
Zhang, X., Hao, Y. & Thomson, V. 2015 Taking ideas from paper to practice: a case study of improving design processes through detailed modeling and systematic analysis. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (3), 10431048.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed