Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The principle of reflexive practice

  • Yoram Reich
Abstract

‘Practice what you preach’ is a phrase occasionally used to refer to those not acting as they want others to act. There are countless opportunities in professional work and daily life to bring such criticism upon ourselves. While the subject is broad, this study focuses on the application of this idea in research practice, and more specifically in design research. One point of departure is the question: ‘how should we practice research if its results are products just like other products?’ The Principle of Reflexive Practice (PRP) states that considering the outcome of design research or research itself as a product, many design principles, tools, methods or knowledge are applicable to design research.

A corollary of the principle is that in order to succeed in contemporary research environments, design researchers would gain significant benefit such as improving the success rate of their research projects, if they exercise design methods and tools in designing their research. By exercising these methods, researchers would gain quick and rich feedback about the methods they develop; they would become aware of issues that require users’ perspective that could not be possible without their own practical use.

The PRP makes participants in design research aware of the reflexive opportunity in studying design that could be mobilized to advancing their practice and making their research results more effective. Notwithstanding, adopting the PRP is not easy; therefore, it is presented as a challenge to design research. Four examples of using the PRP as a guiding principle in research are presented to demonstrate its importance and benefits.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The principle of reflexive practice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The principle of reflexive practice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The principle of reflexive practice
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: yoram@eng.tau.ac.il
References
Hide All
Alexander, C. 1971 The state of the art in design methods. DMG Newsletter 5 (3), 37.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. 1996 Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of management journal 39 (5), 11541184.
Andreasen, M. M. 2011 45 Years with design methodology. Journal of Engineering Design 22 (5), 293332.
Antonsson, E. K. 1987 Development and testing of hypotheses in engineering design research. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design 109, 153154.
Arciszewski, T. 1990 Design theory and methodology in Eastern Europe. In Design Theory and Methodology – DTM’90 (Chicago, IL), pp. 209218. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Archer, L. B. 1981 A view of the nature of the design research. In Design: Science: Method, pp. 3047.
Ashmore, Malcolm The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. University of Chicago Press, 1989.
Babylonian Talmud Tractate Hagigah, page 14b or Tractate Yebamot, page 63b, English version is available in Soncino Edition.
Banathy, B. H. 1991 Systems Design of Education: A Journey to Create the Future. Educational Technology Publications.
Bayazit, N. 2004 Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Design Issues 20 (1), 1629.
Béguin, P. 2003 Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interacting with Computers 15, 709730.
Blessing, L. T. & Chakrabarti, A. 2009 DRM: A Design Research Methodology. Springer.
Birkhofer, H. 2011 From design practice to design science: the evolution of a career in design methodology research. Journal of Engineering Design 22 (5), 333359.
Bouchereau, V. & Rowlands, H. 1999 Analytical approaches to QFD. Manufacturing Engineer 78 (6), 249254.
Box, G. E. P. & Liu, P. T. Y. 1999a Statistics as a Catalyst to Learning by Scientific Method: part I-an example. Journal of Quality Technology 31 (1), 115.
Box, G. E. P. & Liu, P. T. Y. 1999b Statistics as a Catalyst to Learning by Scientific Method: part II-an discussion. Journal of Quality Technology 31 (1), 1629.
Bracewell, R., Wallace, K., Moss, M. & Knott, D. 2009 Capturing design rationale. Computer-Aided Design 41 (3), 173186.
Braha, D. & Reich, Y. 2003 Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes. Research in Engineering Design 14 (4), 185199.
Bunge, M. 1967 Foundations of Physics. Springer.
Cantamessa, M. 2003 An empirical perspective upon design research. Journal of Engineering Design 14 (1), 115.
CERNThe Large Hadron Collider, 2016 http://home.cern/topics/large-hadron-collider, accessed 25.4.16.
Chan, L.-K. & Wu, M.-L. 2002 Quality function deployment: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 143, 463497.
Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L. & Arnoff, L. E. 1957 Introduction to Operations Research. Wiley.
Clark, E. T. Jr. 2002 Designing and Implementing an Integrated Curriculum: a Student-Centered Approach. Holistic Education Press.
Committee on Engineering Design Theory and Methodology 1991 Improving Engineering Design: Designing for Competitive Advantage. National Academy Press.
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S. & Brodeur, D. 2007 Rethinking Engineering Education, The CDIO Approach. Springer.
Cristiano, J. J., Liker, J. K. & White, C. C. III 2001 Key factors in the successful application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD). IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (1), 8195.
Cross, N.(Ed.) 1984 Developments in Design Methodology. Wiley.
Cross, N. 1993 Science and design methodology: a review. Research in Engineering Design 5, 6369.
Cunliffe, A. L. & Sun, J. S. 2005 The need for reflexivity in public administration. Administration and Society 37 (2), 225242.
Cunningham, D., Subrahmanian, E. & Westerberg, A. W. 1997 A Java-Python interface to support evolutionary prototyping. In Python International Conference, San Diego, September.
Davis, J. G., Subrahmanian, E., Konda, S. L., Granger, H., Collins, M. & Westerberg, A. W. 2001 Creating shared information spaces for collaborative engineering design. Information Systems Frontier 3 (3), 377392.
Diamond, R. M. 1998 Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide. Jossey-Bass.
Dixon, J. R. 1988 On research methodology towards a scientific theory of engineering design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 1 (3), 145157.
Dorst, C. H. & Cross, N. G. 2001 Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22, 425437.
Dym, C. L. 2004 Design, systems, engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education 20 (3), 305312.
Dym, C. L., Sheppard, S. D. & Wesner, J. W. 2001 A report on Mudd design workshop II: designing design education for the 21st century. Journal of Engineering Education 90 (3), 291294.
Dym, C. L., Wood, W. H. & Scott, M. J. 2002 Rank ordering engineering designs: pairwise comparison charts and Borda counts. Research in Engineering Design 13, 236242.
Eckert, C. M., Clarkson, P. J. & Zanker, W. 2004 Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design 15 (1), 121.
Eder, W. E. 1998 Design modeling: a design science approach (and why does industry not use it?). Journal of Engineering Design 9, 355371.
Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P. & Gebbala, D. A. 1994 A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Research in Engineering Design 6, 113.
European Commission2015, Horizon 2020 First results, https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/sites/horizon2020/files/horizon_2020_first_results.pdf, accessed 20.4.16.
Finger, S. & Dixon, J. R. 1989a A Review of Research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes. Research in Engineering Design 11, 5167.
Finger, S. & Dixon, J. R. 1989b A Review of Research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle. Research in Engineering Design 11, 121137.
Finger, S., Subrahmanian, E. & Gardner, E. 1993 A case study in concurrent engineering for transformer design. In Proceedings of ICED-93 (The Haugue), Zürich, Heurista (ed. Roosenburg, N. F. M.), pp. 14331440.
Foley, D. E. 2002 Critical ethnography: the reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 15 (4), 469490.
Forman, E. H. & Gass, S. I. 2001 The analytic hierarchy process-an exposition. Operations research 49 (4), 469486.
Frey, D. D. & Dym, C. L. 2006 Validation of design methods: lessons from medicine. Research in Engineering Design 17 (1), 4557.
Frey, D. D., Herder, P. M., Wijnia, Y., Subramanian, E., Katsikopoulos, K. V. & Clausing, D. P. 2009 An evaluation of the Pugh controlled convergence method. Research in Engineering Design 20, 4158.
Frey, D., Herder, P., Wijnia, Y., Katsikopoulos, K., de Neufville, R., Oye, K., Subrahmanian, E. & Clausing, D. 2010 Letter to the Editor, Research in engineering design: the role of mathematical theory and empirical evidence. Research in Engineering Design 21 (3).
Friedman, K. 2003 Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. Design Studies 24, 507522.
Frost, R. B. 1999 Why Dose Industry Ignore Design Science? Journal of Engineering Design 10 (4), 301304.
Glanville, R. 1981 Why design research? In Design: Science: Method (ed. Jacques, R. & Powell, J. A.), pp. 8694. IPC Business Press Ltd.
Glanville, R. 1998 Keeping faith with the design in design research. In Designing Design Research 2: The Design Research Publication, Cyberbridge-4D Design (ed. Robertson, A.). De Montfort University, 26 February http://www.dmu.ac.uk/dept/schools/des-man/4dd/drs2.html.
Glanville, R. 1999 Researching design and designing research. Design issues 15 (2), 8091.
Gordon, T. J. & Raffensperger, M. J. 1969 A strategy for planning basic research. Philosophy of Science 36 (2), 205218.
Govers, C. P. M. 2001 QFD not just a tool but a way of quality management. International Journal of Production Economics 69, 151159.
Guindon, R. 1990 Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction 5 (2–3), 305344.
Hazelrigg, G. A. 2003 Thoughts on model validation for engineering design. In Proceedings of DETC’03, ASME 2003 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASME.
Hazelrigg, G. A. 2010 Letter to the Editor re: ‘The Pugh Controlled Convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory’. Research in Engineering Design 21 (3).
Hatchuel, A. & Weil, B. 2009 C–K design theory: an advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design 19 (4), 181192.
Hoegl, M. & Parboteeah, K. P. 2006 Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R&D Management 36 (2), 113125.
Holland, R. 1999 Reflexivity. Human Relations 52 (4), 463484.
Horvath, I. 2004 A treatise on order in engineering design research. Research in Engineering Design 15 (3), 155181.
Hubka, V. & Eder, E. 1987 A scientific approach to engineering design. Design Studies 8 (3), 123137.
Hubka, V. & Eder, W. E. 1988 Theory of Technical Systems. Springer.
Hubka, V. & Eder, W. E. 1996 Design Science: Introduction to the Needs, Scope and Organization of Engineering Design Knowledge. Springer.
Hundal, M. S. 1990 Research in design theory and methodology in West Germany. In Design Theory and Methodology – DTM’90 (Chicago, IL), pp. 235238. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Jarratt, T. A. W., Eckert, C. M., Caldwell, N. H. M. & Clarkson, P. J. 2011 Engineering change: an overview and perspective on the literature. Research in Engineering Design 22 (2), 103124.
Johnson, P. & Duberley, J. 2003 Reflexivity in Management Research. Journal of Management Studies 40 (5), 12791303.
Karniel, A. & Reich, Y. 2011 Managing the Dynamics of New Product Development Processes: The New Product Lifecycle Management Paradigm. Springer.
KMWorldKMWorld Award winners, Jan 1, 2006, http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=14823, accessed Jan 1st, 2006).
Kolberg, E., Reich, Y. & Levin, I. 2003 Project-based high school mechatronics course. International Journal of Engineering Education 19 (4), 557562.
Kolberg, E., Reich, Y. & Levin, I. 2005 Transforming design education by design. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTM). ASME.
Kolberg, E., Reich, Y. & Levin, I. 2014 Designing winning robots by careful design of their development process. Research in Engineering Design 25 (2), 157183.
Konda, S. L., Monarch, I. A., Sargent, P. & Subrahmanian, E. 1992 Shared memory in design. Research in Engineering Design 4 (1), 2342.
Krogh, B., Dutoit, A., Levy, S. & Subrahmanian, E. 1996 Strictly class based modeling can be harmful. In Proceedings of 29th HICSS, Hawaii.
Kuhn, T. S. 1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Le Dain, M.-A., Blanco, E. & Summers, J. D. 2013 Assesing design research quality: investigatng verification and validation criteria. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’13, Seoul, Korea.
Lettice, J.WindowsUpdate on Linux – an urban legend is born, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/08/27/windowsupdate_on_linux_an_urban/, August 27th, 2003.
Levy, S., Subrahmanian, E., Konda, S. L., Coyne, R. F., Westerberg, A. W. & Reich, Y.1993 An overview of the n-dim environment, Technical Report EDRC-05-65-93, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
Lynch, M. 2000 Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory Culture & Society 17 (3), 2654.
Maher, M. L. & Tang, H.-H. 2003 Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design 14 (1), 4763.
Malak, R. J. Jr. & Paredis, C. J. J. 2004 On characterizing and assessing the validity of behavioral models and their predictions. In Proceedings of ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, ASME New York, NY, DETC2004-57452.
McCoy, J. M. & Evans, G. W. 2002 The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal 14 (3–4), 409426.
McMahon, C.2014 Design Research: Current Status and Future Challenges, paper presented at The 3rd International Conference on Design Engineering and Science, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Mead, M. 1968 Cybernetics of cybernetics. In Purposive Systems (ed. von Foerster, H., White, J. D., Peterson, L. J. & Russell, J. K.), pp. 111. Spartan Books, New York.
Meijer, S., Reich, Y. & Subrahmanian, E. 2014 The future of gaming for design of complex systems. In Back to the Future of Gaming (ed. Duke, R. D. & Kriz, W.).
Monarch, A., Konda, S. L., Levy, S. N., Reich, Y., Subrahmanian, E. & Ulrich, C.1996 Shared memory in design: theory and practice, in Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work (G. Bowker, L. Gasser, L. Star, and W. Turner, eds.), (Hillsdale, NJ), Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nair, V. N., Abraham, B., MacKay, J., Nelder, J. A., Box, G., Phadke, M. S., Kacker, R. N., Sacks, J., Welch, W. J., Lorenzen, T. J., Shoemaker, A. C., Tsui, K. L., Lucas, J. M., Taguchi, S., Myers, R. H., Vining, G. G. & Wu, C. F. J. 1992 Taguchi’s parameter design: a panel discussion. Technometrics 34 (2), 127161.
Nidamarthi, S., Chakrabarti, A. & Bligh, T. P.1997 The significance of co-evolving requirements and solutions in the design process, presented at 11th ICED, Finland.
Olewnik, A. T. & Lewis, K. 2005 On validating engineering design decision support tools. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications 13 (2), 111122.
Opiyo, E. Z., Horváth, I. & Vergeest, J. S. M. 2002 Quality assurance of design support software: review and analysis of the state of the art. Computers in Industry 49, 195215.
Pedersen, K., Emblemsvag, J., Bailey, R., Allen, J. K. & Mistree, F. Validating design methods and research: the validation square. In ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, New York, NY, DETC2000/DTM-14579, 2000.
Pels, D. 2000 Reflexivity: One Step Up, Theory. Culture & Society 17 (3), 125.
Pugh, S.1990 Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Addison-Wesley, GB.
Reid, K. N., Cohen, R., Garrett, R. E., Rabins, M. J., Richardson, H. H. & Winer, W. O. 1984 Research Needs in Mechanical Systems: Summary of study from ASME Board Research to U.S. National Science Foundation. Mechanical Engineering 106 (3), 2843.
Reich, Y.1992 The Theory Practice Problem of Technology, Technical Report EDRC-12-51-92, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University.
Reich, Y. 1994a What is wrong with CAE and can it be fixed. In Preprints of Bridging the Generations: An International Workshop on the Future Directions of Computer-Aided Engineering, (Pittsburgh, PA), Department of Civil Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University.
Reich, Y. 1994b Layered models of research methodologies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing 8 (4), 263274.
Reich, Y. 1994c Special issue on research methodology. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing 8 (4).
Reich, Y. 1995a The study of design research methodology. Journal of mechanical Design 117, 211214.
Reich, Y. 1995b Computational quality function deployment is knowledge intensive engineering. In Proceedings of KIC-1: International Workshop on Knowledge Intensive CAD (ed. Tomiyama, T. & Mantyla, M.).
Reich, Y. 1996 AI-supported quality function deployment. In Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management (ed. Ein-Dor, P.), pp. 91106. Kluwer.
Reich, Y. 2000 Improving the rationale capture capability of QFD. Engineering with Computers 16 (3–4), 236252.
Reich, Y. 2010 Editorial, My method is better! Research in Engineering Design 21 (3), 137142.
Reich, Y. 2013 Editorial, Designing science. Research in Engineering Design 24 (3), 215218.
Reich, Y. & Barai, S. V. 1999 Evaluating machine learning models for engineering problems. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 13 (3), 257272.
Reich, Y., Konda, S. L., Levy, S. N., Monarch, I. A. & Subrahmanian, E. 1996 Varieties and issues of participation and design. Design Studies 17 (2), 165180.
Reich, Y., Subrahmanian, E., Cunningham, D., Dutoit, A., Konda, S., Patrick, R., Westerberg, A. & the n-dim group 1999 Building agility for developing agile design information systems. Research in Engineering Design 11 (2), 6783.
Reich, Y. & Kapeliuk, A. 2005 A framework for organizing the space of DSS with application to solving subjective, context dependent problems. Decision Support Systems 40 (3).
Reich, Y., Kolberg, E. & Levin, I. 2006 Designing contexts for learning design. International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (3), 489495.
Reich, Y. & Levy, E. 2004 Managing product design quality under resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research 42 (13), 25552572.
Reich, Y. & Shai, O.Order and design theory, presented at the 5th Design Theory SIG Workshop, Mines ParisTech, Paris, 30–31 January 2012.
Reich, Y. & Subrahmanian, E. 2013 Editorial, Philosophy of design, science of design, engineering (of) design: what is your choice? Research in Engineering Design 24 (4), 321323.
Reich, Y. & Subrahmanian, E. Designing PSI: An Introduction to the PSI Framework. In Proceedings International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’15, Milan, Italy 2015.
Reich, Y. & Subrahmanian, E.2017 The PSI matrix: a framework and a theory of design, submitted to publication.
Rittel, H. 1973 The state of the art in design methods. Design Research and Methods (Design methods and Theories) 7 (2), 143147.
Roozenburg, N. & Cross, N. 1991 Models of the design process – integrating across the disciplines. In International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED-91), Zurich.
Rzevski, G. 1981 On the design of a design methodology. In Design: Science: Method (ed. Jacques, R. & Powell, J. A.), pp. 617. IPC Business Press Ltd.
Rzevski, G., Woolman, D. & Trafford, D. B. 1980 Validation of a design methodology. Design Studies 1 (6), 325328.
Saaty, T. L. 1980 The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L. 1997 Discussion: that is not the Analytic Hierarchy Process: What the AHP is and what it is not. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6, 324335.
Salo, A. A. & Hämäläinen, R. P. 1997 On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6, 309319.
Schlange, L. E. & Jüttner, U. 1997 Helping managers to identify the key strategic issues. Long Range Planning 30 (5), 777786.
Schön, D. A. 1983 The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. 1973 Beyond the Stable State. Penguin.
Spillers, W. R. 1977 Design theory. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 7, 201204.
Shah, J. & Hazelrigg, H.1996 Research Opportunities in Engineering Design, NSF Strategic Planning Workshop, Final Report.
Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V. & Vargas-Hernandez, N. 2000 Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. J. Mech. Design 384, 377.
Stevens, G. A. & Burley, J. 1997 3,000 raw ideas equals 1 commercial success! Research Technology Management 40 (3), 1627.
Subrahmanian, E., Westerberg, A. W. & Podnar, G. 1991 Towards shared information models in engineering design. In Lecture Notes in Collaborative Product Development (ed. Sriram, D.). Springer.
Subrahmanian, E., Konda, S. L., Levy, S. N., Reich, Y., Westerberg, A. W. & Monarch, I. A. 1993 Equations aren’t enough: informal modeling in design. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing 7 (4), 257274.
Subrahmanian, E., Monarch, I., Konda, S. L., Granger, H., Collins, M., Milliken, R. & Westerberg, A. W. 2003 Boundary objects and prototypes at the interfaces of engineering design. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 12 (2), 185203.
Subrahmanian, E., Lee, C., Thomas, M. & Collins, M. 2006 Engineering change management for product variety and life cycle management. International Journal of Product Life Cycle Management; in press.
Subrahmanian, E., Reich, Y., Konda, S. L., Dutoit, A., Cunningham, D., Patrick, R., Thomas, M. & Westerberg, A. W. 1997 The -dim approach to building design support systems. In Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology DTM ’97. ASME.
Subrahmanian, E., Reich, Y., Smulders, F. & Meijer, S. A. 2011a Designing: insights from weaving theories of cognition and design theories. In Proceesings International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’11, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Subrahmanian, E., Reich, Y., Smulders, F. & Meijer, S. A. 2011b Design as a synthesis of spaces: using the P-S framework. In Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th World Conference in Design Research, Delft, The Netherlands.
Subrahmanian, E., Lee, C., Granger, H. & the n-dim group 2015 Managing and supporting product life cycle through engineering change management for a complex product. Research in Engineering Design 26, 189217.
Teegavarapu, S.2009 Foundations of design method development, PhD thesis, Clemson University, All Dissertations. Paper 344.
Triantaphyllou, E. 2001 Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 10, 1125.
Ullman, D.1991 Current Status of design research in the US, ICED-91, Zurich.
Westerberg, A. W., Subrahmanian, E., Reich, Y., Konda, S. & the n-dim group 1997 Designing the process design process. Computers & Chemical Engineering 21, S1S9.
Whitney, D. E. 1990 Designing the design process. Research in Engineering Design 2, 313.
Woolgar, S.(Ed.) 1988 Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. Sage.
Yin, R. K. 1994 Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications.
Zika-Viktorsson, A. & Ingelgård, A. 2006 Reflecting activities in product developing teams: conditions for improved project management processes. Research in Engineering Design 17 (2), 103111.
Ziv-Av, A. & Reich, Y. 2005 SOS – Subjective objective system for generating optimal product concepts. Design Studies 26 (5), 509533.
Zwicky, F. 1962 Morphology of Propulsive Power. Society for Morphological Research.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed