Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Psychology of Design

  • Claus-Christian Carbon (a1) (a2) (a3)

Abstract

Talking about design, most discussions circulate around physical objects or products, around their invention, development, production and marketing. While most modern design approaches do also cover questions pertaining to human interaction, e.g. within user- or human-centred design philosophies, a systematic and fundamental conception of the role and implications that human perception and emo-cognitive processing take with regard to designing physical goods is lacking. Under the umbrella term ‘Psychology of Design’, I will develop and elaborate on psychological dimensions that are highly relevant to the optimization and evaluation of design. I propagate a general psychological turn in design theory and practice in order to purposefully include not only the top-down processes triggered by context, framing, expectation, knowledge or habituation but also the psychological effects of Gestalt and Zeitgeist. Such psychological effects have the potential to determine whether the very same physical design will be aesthetically appreciated, desired, loved or rejected in the end. Psychology of design has a tremendous influence on the success and sustainability of design by triggering associations and displaying demand characteristics in a multimodal way. The paper is based on fundamental psychological theories and empirical evidences which are linked to applied examples from the world of art and design.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Psychology of Design
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Psychology of Design
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Psychology of Design
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: ccc@experimental-psychology.com

References

Hide All
Aaker, D. A. 2002 Building Strong Brands. Simon & Schuster UK Ltd.
Aaker, J. L. 1997 Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34, 347356.
Arnheim, R. 1954 Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. University of California Press.
Bar, M. & Neta, M. 2006 Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science 17 (8), 645648.
Bar, M. & Neta, M. 2007 Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia 45 (10), 21912200.
Batra, R., Seifert, C. & Brei, D.(Eds) 2015 The Psychology of Design. Routledge.
Berkowitz, M. 1987 Product shape as a design innovation strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management 4 (4), 274283. doi:10.1016/0737-6782(87)90031-2.
Breitschaft, S. J., Clarke, S. & Carbon, C. C. 2019 A theoretical framework of haptic processing in automotive user interfaces and its implications on design and engineering. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (1470), 118. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01470.
Briley, D. A. & Tucker-Drob, E. M. 2014 Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 140 (5), 13031331. doi:10.1037/a0037091.
Capaldi, E. J. & Proctor, R. W. 1994 Contextualism: is the act in context the adequate metaphor for scientific psychology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 (2), 239249. doi:10.3758/Bf03200775.
Carbon, C. C. 2010 The cycle of preference: long-term dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. Acta Psychologica 134 (2), 233244. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.004.
Carbon, C. C. 2011 Cognitive mechanisms for explaining dynamics of aesthetic appreciation. i-Perception 2, 708719. doi:10.1068/i0463aap.
Carbon, C. C. 2014 Understanding human perception by human-made illusions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (566), 16. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00566.
Carbon, C. C. 2015a Predicting preferences for innovative design: the ‘Repeated Evaluation Technique’ (RET). GfK Marketing Intelligence Review 7 (2), 3439. doi:10.1515/gfkmir-2015-0016.
Carbon, C. C. 2015b Wahrnehmungspsychologie [Perceptual psychology]. In Psychologie: Eine Einführung in ihre Grundlagen- und Anwendungsfelder [Psychology: an introduction to its fundamental as well as applied fields] (ed. Schütz, A., Brand, M., Selg, H. & Lautenbacher, S.). Kohlhammer.
Carbon, C. C. 2016a Beyond the predominance of the visual empire: a functional model on haptics & more. Electronic Imaging 2016a (16), 12.
Carbon, C. C. 2016b Integration of user-centric psychological and neuroscience perspectives in experimental design research. In Experimental Design Research (ed. Cash, P., Stanković, T. & Štorga, M.). Springer.
Carbon, C. C. 2018 Empirical Aesthetics: in quest of a clear terminology and valid methodology. In Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences (ed. Kapoula, Z., Volle, E., Renoult, J. & Andreatta, M.). Springer Nature.
Carbon, C. C. 2019 Empirical approaches to studying art experience. Journal of Perceptual Imaging 2 (1(010501)), 17. doi:10.2352/J.Percept.Imaging.2019.2.1.010501.
Carbon, C. C., Faerber, S. J., Augustin, M. D., Mitterer, B. & Hutzler, F. 2018 First gender, then attractiveness: indications of gender-specific attractiveness processing via ERP onsets. Neuroscience Letters 686, 186192. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.09.009.
Carbon, C. C. & Jakesch, M. 2013 A model for haptic aesthetic processing and its implications for design. Proceedings of the IEEE 101 (9), 111. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2012.2219831.
Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. 2005 The Repeated Evaluation Technique (RET): a method to capture dynamic effects of innovativeness and attractiveness. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19 (5), 587601. doi:10.1002/acp.1098.
Carbon, C. C. & Schoormans, J. P. L. 2012 Rigidity rather than age as a limiting factor to appreciate innovative design. Swiss Journal of Psychology 71 (2), 5158.
Chang, C. C. 2001 The impacts of personality differences on product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research 28, 2633.
Cox, D. & Cox, A. D. 2002 Beyond first impressions: the effects of repeated exposure on consumer liking of visually complex and simple product designs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (2), 119130.
Fechner, G. T. 1866 Das Associationsprincip in der Aesthetik. Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst 20, 179191.
Friston, K. J. 2005 A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 360 (1456), 815836. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622.
Gallagher, S. 2005 How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford University Press.
Gattol, V., Saaksjarvi, M. & Carbon, C. C. 2011 Extending the Implicit Association Test (IAT): assessing consumer attitudes based on multi-dimensional implicit associations. PLoS ONE 6 (1), e15849. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015849.
Gentner, D. & Maravilla, F. 2018 Analogical reasoning. In International Handbook of Thinking & Reasoning (ed. Ball, L. J. & Thompson, V. A.), pp. 186203. Psychology Press.
Gibson, J. J. 1966 The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. 1977 The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: toward an Ecological Psychology (ed. Shaw, R. & Bransford, J.), pp. 6782. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gibson, J. J. 1979 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
Goode, M. R., Dahl, D. W. & Moreau, C. P. 2010 The effect of experiential analogies on consumer perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 47 (2), 274286. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.2.274.
Greenwald, A. G. & Banaji, M. R. 1995 Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102 (1), 427.
Gregory, R. L. 1970 The Intelligent Eye. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Gregory, R. L. 1980 Perceptions as hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 290 (1038), 181197. doi:10.1098/rstb.1980.0090.
Gregory, R. L. 1997 Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 352 (1358), 11211127. doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0095.
Hagtvedt, H. & Patrick, V. M. 2008 Art infusion: the influence of visual art on the perception and evaluation of consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research 45 (3), 379389. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.379.
Hekkert, P., Thurgood, C. & Whitfield, T. W. A. 2013 The mere exposure effect for consumer products as a consequence of existing familiarity and controlled exposure. Acta Psychologica 144, 411417.
Hesslinger, V. M. & Carbon, C. C. 2016 #TheDress: the role of illumination information and individual differences in the psychophysics of perceiving whiteblue ambiguities. i-Perception 7 (2), 110.
Hirschman, E. C. 1983 Aesthetics, ideologies and the limits of the marketing concept. Journal of Marketing 47 (3), 4555. doi:10.2307/1251196.
Jakesch, M. & Carbon, C. C. 2012 The mere exposure effect in the domain of haptics. PLoS ONE 7 (2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031215.
Jakesch, M., Zachhuber, M., Leder, H., Spingler, M. & Carbon, C. C. 2011 Scenario-based touching: on the influence of top-down processes on tactile and visual appreciation. Research in Engineering Design 22, 143152.
Kaschak, M. P., Maner, J. K., Miller, S. & Coyle, J. M. 2009 Embodied social cognition: bodies, emotions, and blackberries Reply. European Journal of Social Psychology 39 (7), 12551256. doi:10.1002/ejsp.692.
Kimchi, R., Yeshurun, Y., Spehar, B. & Pirkner, Y. 2016 Perceptual organization, visual attention, and objecthood. Vision Research 126, 3451. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.008.
Koffka, K. 1935 Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Krishna, A. & Schwarz, N. 2014 Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: a review and introduction. Journal of Consumer Psychology 24 (2), 159168. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.12.006.
Lei, N., Faust, O., Rosen, D. W. & Sherkat, N.2018 Uncovering design topics by visualizing and interpreting keyword data. Paper presented at the International Design Conference DESIGN.
Lewin, K. 1926 Vorbemerkungen über die psychischen Kräfte und Energien und über die Struktur der Seele. Vorsatz Wille und Bedürfnis. Springer.
Lewin, K. 1936 Principles of Topological Psychology, Trans. 1st edn. (ed. Heider, F. & Heider, G. M.). McGraw-Hill.
MacLeod, C. M. 1991 Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 109 (2), 163203.
Maier, J. & Fadel, G. 2009 Affordance based design: a relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design 20 (1), 1327. doi:10.1007/s00163-008-0060-3.
Makin, A. D. J. 2017 The gap between asthetic science and asthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 24 (1-2), 184213.
Metzger, W. 1953 Gesetze des Sehens [Laws of vision], 2nd edn. Frankfurt/M: W. Kramer.
Mitchell, M. 1993 Analogy-Making as Perception: A Computer Model. MIT Press.
Mugge, R., Govers, P. C. M. & Schoormans, J. P. L. 2009 The development and testing of a product personality scale. Design Studies 30 (3), 287302. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.002.
Mumford, D. 1992 On the computational architecture of the neocortex. 2. The role of corticocortical loops. Biological Cybernetics 66 (3), 241251. doi:10.1007/Bf00198477.
Muth, C. & Carbon, C. C. 2013 The Aesthetic Aha: an the pleasure of having insights into Gestalt. Acta Psychologica 144 (1), 2530. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001.
Muth, C., Ebert, S., Markovic, S. & Carbon, C. C. 2019 ‘Aha’ptics: enjoying an Aesthetic Aha during haptic exploration. Perception 48 (1), 325. doi:10.1177/0301006618818014.
Norman, D. A. 1988 The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books.
Norman, D. A. 1995 Human error and the design of computer systems. In Human-Computer Interaction (ed. Ronald, M. B., Jonathan, G., William, A. S. B. & Saul, G.), pp. 681683. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Norman, D. A. 2002 Emotion & design: attractive things work better. Interactions 9 (4), 3642.
Norman, D. A. 2004 Emotional Design. Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.
Norman, D. A. 2013 The Design of Everyday Things, Revised and Expanded edn. Basic Books.
Ortlieb, S. A. & Carbon, C. C. 2019 Kitsch and perception: towards a new Aesthetic from Below. Art & Perception 7 (1), 126.
Plug, C. 1980 The golden section hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology 93 (3), 467487. doi:10.2307/1422725.
Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T. & Weber, B. 2010 Aesthetic package design: a behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20 (4), 431441. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009.
Schifferstein, H. N. J. & Spence, C. 2008 Multisensory product experience. In Product Experience (ed. Schifferstein, H. N. J. & Hekkert, P.), pp. 133161. Elsevier.
Simon, J. R. 1990 The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective (ed. Proctor, R. W. & Reeve, T. G.), pp. 3186. North-Holland.
Stein, B. & Meredith, M. A. 1993 The Merging of the Senses. MIT Press.
Tanabe, H. C., Sakai, T., Morito, Y., Kochiyama, T. & Sadato, N. 2011 Neural correlates and effective connectivity of subjective colors during the Benham’s top illusion: a functional MRI study. Cerebral Cortex 21 (1), 124133. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq066.
Urbantschitsch, V. 1888 Ueber den Einfluss einer Sinneserregung auf die übrigen Sinnesempfindungen. Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere 42 (1), 154182. doi:10.1007/bf01669354.
von Helmholtz, H. 1866 Treatise on physiological optics, Trans. 3rd edn. (ed. Southcall, J. P. C.), vol. 3. George Banta Publishing Company.
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M. & von Der Heydt, R. 2012a A century of Gestalt Psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin 138 (6), 11721217. doi:10.1037/A0029333.
Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P. A. & van Leeuwen, C. 2012b A century of Gestalt Psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin 138 (6), 12181252. doi:10.1037/A0029334.
Westerman, S. J., Gardner, P. H., Sutherland, E. J., White, T., Jordan, K., Watts, D. & Wells, S. 2012 Product design: preference for rounded versus angular design elements. Psychology and Marketing 29, 595605.
Westfall, R. S. 1962 The development of Newton’s theory of color. Isis 53 (3), 339358.
Wilson, R. A. & Foglia, L. 2017 Embodied cognition. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Keywords

Psychology of Design

  • Claus-Christian Carbon (a1) (a2) (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.