Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Public investment and electric vehicle design: a model-based market analysis framework with application to a USA–China comparison study

  • Namwoo Kang (a1), Yi Ren (a2), Fred M. Feinberg (a3) and Panos Y. Papalambros (a4)
Abstract

Governments encourage use of electric vehicles (EV) via regulation and investment to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Manufacturers produce vehicles to maximize profit, given available public infrastructure and government incentives. EV public adoption depends not only on price and vehicle attributes, but also on EV market size and infrastructure available for refueling, such as charging station proximity and recharging length and cost. Earlier studies have shown that government investment can create EV market growth, and that manufacturers and charging station operators must cooperate to achieve overall profitability. This article describes a framework that connects decisions by the three stakeholders (government, EV manufacturer, charging station operator) with preferences of the driving public. The goal is to develop a framework that allows the effect of government investment on the EV market to be quantified. This is illustrated in three scenarios in which we compare optimal public investment for a city in USA (Ann Arbor, Michigan) and one in China (Beijing) to minimize emissions, accounting for customer preferences elicited from surveys conducted in the two countries. Under the modeling assumptions of the framework, we find that high customer sensitivity to prices, combined with manufacturer and charging station operator profit maximization strategies, can render government investment in EV subsidies ineffective, while a collaboration among stakeholders can achieve both emission reduction and profitability. When EV and station designs improve beyond a certain threshold, government investment influence on EV adoption is attenuated apparently due to diminishing customer willingness to buy. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that a diversified government investment portfolio could be especially effective for the Chinese market, with charging costs and price cuts on license plate fees being as important as EV subsidies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Public investment and electric vehicle design: a model-based market analysis framework with application to a USA–China comparison study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Public investment and electric vehicle design: a model-based market analysis framework with application to a USA–China comparison study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Public investment and electric vehicle design: a model-based market analysis framework with application to a USA–China comparison study
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: yren32@asu.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Abernethy , T. Evgeniou , O. Toubia  & J.-P. Vert 2008 Eliciting consumer preferences using robust adaptive choice questionnaires. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 20 (2), 145155.

H. Allcott  & S. Mullainathan 2010 Behavioral science and energy policy. Science 327 (5970), 12041205.

W. A. Brock  & S. N. Durlauf 2001 Discrete choice with social interactions. The Review of Economic Studies 68 (2), 235260.

S. Carley , R. M. Krause , B. W. Lane  & J. D. Graham 2013 Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: a survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 18, 3945.

M. A. Cohen  & S. Whang 1997 Competing in product and service: a product life-cycle model. Management Science 43 (4), 535545.

S. Delprat , J. Lauber , T. M. Guerra  & J. Rimaux 2004 Control of a parallel hybrid powertrain: optimal control. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 53 (3), 872881.

F. F. Easton  & M. E. Pullman 2001 Optimizing service attributes: the seller’s utility problem*. Decision Sciences 32 (2), 251276.

O. Egbue  & S. Long 2012 Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: an analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy 48, 717729.

T. Evgeniou , M. Pontil  & O. Toubia 2007 A convex optimization approach to modeling consumer heterogeneity in conjoint estimation. Marketing Science 26 (6), 805818.

D. G. Fiebig , M. P. Keane , J. Louviere  & N. Wasi 2010 The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Marketing Science 29 (3), 393421.

B. D. Frischknecht , K. Whitefoot  & P. Y. Papalambros 2010 On the suitability of econometric demand models in design for market systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (12), 121007.

K. S. Gallagher  & E. Muehlegger 2011 Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61 (1), 115.

J. C. Goodale , R. Verma  & M. E. Pullman 2003 A market utility-based model for capacity scheduling in mass services. Production and Operations Management 12 (2), 165185.

L. A. Greening , D. L. Greene  & C. Difiglio 2000 Energy efficiency and consumption the rebound effecta survey. Energy Policy 28 (6), 389401.

H. Hao , H. Wang  & M. Ouyang 2011 Fuel conservation and ghg (greenhouse gas) emissions mitigation scenarios for Chinas passenger vehicle fleet. Energy 36 (11), 65206528.

L. He , W. Chen , C. Hoyle  & B. Yannou 2012 Choice modeling for usage context-based design. Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (3), 031007.

N. Kang , F. M. Feinberg  & P. Y. Papalambros 2015b Integrated decision making in electric vehicle and charging station location network design. Journal of Mechanical Design 137 (6), 061402.

K. E. Lewis , W. Chen  & L. C. Schmidt 2006 Decision Making in Engineering Design. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Z. Li  & M. Ouyang 2011 The pricing of charging for electric vehicles in China–Dilemma and solution. Energy 36 (9), 57655778.

J. Liu 2012 Electric vehicle charging infrastructure assignment and power grid impacts assessment in Beijing. Energy Policy 51, 544557.

J. Liu  & H. Peng 2010 A systematic design approach for two planetary gear split hybrid vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 48 (11), 13951412.

D. McFadden  & K. Train 2000 Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (5), 447470.

M. Melaina  & J. Bremson 2008 Refueling availability for alternative fuel vehicle markets: sufficient urban station coverage. Energy Policy 36, 32333241.

J. J. Michalek , P. Ebbes , F. Adigüzel , F. M. Feinberg  & P. Y. Papalambros 2011 Enhancing marketing with engineering: optimal product line design for heterogeneous markets. International Journal of Research in Marketing 28 (1), 112.

J. J. Michalek , F. M. Feinberg  & P. Y. Papalambros 2005 Linking marketing and engineering product design decisions via analytical target cascading. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (1), 4262.

J. J. Michalek , P. Y. Papalambros  & S. J. Skerlos 2004 A study of fuel efficiency and emission policy impact on optimal vehicle design decisions. Journal of Mechanical Design 126 (6), 10621070.

W. R. Morrow , K. S. Gallagher , G. Collantes  & H. Lee 2010 Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions from the US transportation sector. Energy Policy 38 (3), 13051320.

W. R. Morrow  & S. J. Skerlos 2011 Fixed-point approaches to computing bertrand-nash equilibrium prices under mixed-logit demand. Operations Research 59 (2), 328345.

O. Netzer , O. Toubia , E. Bradlow , E. Dahan , T. Evgeniou , F. Feinberg , E. Feit , S. Hui , J. Johnson  & J. Liechty 2008 Beyond conjoint analysis: advances in preference measurement. Marketing Letters 19 (3), 337354.

M. E. Pullman  & W. L. Moore 1999 Optimal service design: integrating marketing and operations perspectives. International Journal of Service Industry Management 10 (2), 239261.

P. Rossi , G. Allenby  & R. McCulloch 2005 Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. Wiley.

A. Schroeder  & T. Traber 2012 The economics of fast charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Energy Policy 43, 136144.

C.-S. N. Shiau  & J. J. Michalek 2009a Optimal product design under price competition. Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (7), 071003.

C.-S. N. Shiau  & J. J. Michalek 2009b Should designers worry about market systems? Journal of Mechanical Design 131 (1), 011011.

S. J. Skerlos  & J. J. Winebrake 2010 Targeting plug-in hybrid electric vehicle policies to increase social benefits. Energy Policy 38 (2), 705708.

J. Smart  & S. Schey 2012 Battery electric vehicle driving and charging behavior observed early in the EV project. SAE International Journal of Alternative Powertrains 1 (1), 2733.

S. Stockar , V. Marano , G. Rizzoni  & L. Guzzella 2010 Optimal control for plug-in hybrid electric vehicle applications. In American Control Conference (ACC), 2010, pp. 50245030. IEEE.

J. Swait  & J. Louviere 1993 The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research 30 (3), 305314.

B. C. Tansel , R. L. Francis  & T. J. Lowe 1983 State of the art-location on networks: a survey. Part I: the p-center and p-median problems. Management Science 29 (4), 482497.

K. E. Train 2009 Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge university press.

R. Verma , G. M. Thompson , W. L. Moore  & J. J. Louviere 2001 Effective design of products/services: an approach based on integration of marketing and operations management decisions$^{\ast }$. Decision Sciences 32 (1), 165194.

H. J. Wassenaar  & W. Chen 2003 An approach to decision-based design with discrete choice analysis for demand modeling. Journal of Mechanical Design 125, 490.

K. S. Whitefoot  & S. J. Skerlos 2012 Design incentives to increase vehicle size created from the US footprint-based fuel economy standards. Energy Policy 41, 402411.

K. Yabe , Y. Shinoda , T. Seki , H. Tanaka  & A. Akisawa 2012 Market penetration speed and effects on $\text{CO}_{2}$ reduction of electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in Japan. Energy Policy 45, 529540.

X. Zhang , C.-T. Li , D. Kum  & H. Peng 2012 Prius+ and volt-: configuration analysis of power-split hybrid vehicles with a single planetary gear. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 61 (8), 35443552.

X. Zhang , H. Peng  & J. Sun 2013 A near-optimal power management strategy for rapid component sizing of power split hybrid vehicles with multiple operating modes. In American Control Conference (ACC), 2013, pp. 59725977.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 34
Total number of PDF views: 291 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 338 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.