Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Sharedness of team mental models in the course of design-related interaction between architects and clients

  • Hernan Casakin (a1) and Petra Badke-Schaub (a2)
Abstract

This study deals with the role of mental models in the coordination of team activities during design problem-solving. The work centers on the sharedness of mental models in a design team setting, mainly on the interaction between an architect and two clients. A major goal is to gain insight into how modifications in mental models affect coordination, and how sharedness develops through the process. Our focus is to explore, through a case study, the individual contributions of the architect and the clients to coordination of the work process, and how sharedness of the development of the team mental model evolves in the early stage of concept generation. Our claim is that work teams develop a certain degree of sharedness of the mental models of individual team members during information exchange. This team mental model can be insufficient or even wrong, but as long as the team members feel agreement in the team, they coordinate their work on that basis. Thus, sharedness of mental models is believed to be a powerful team asset, especially when it is reached in the earlier phases of the design process. Our findings suggest that in order to attain sharedness among design team members, design activities related to the task mental model should be encouraged, specifically the generation of new ideas and the analysis of solutions. Implications for practice and education are suggested.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Sharedness of team mental models in the course of design-related interaction between architects and clients
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Sharedness of team mental models in the course of design-related interaction between architects and clients
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Sharedness of team mental models in the course of design-related interaction between architects and clients
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: casakin@ariel.ac.il
References
Hide All
Annett, J. 2004 Hierarchical task analysis. In The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human–Computer Interaction (ed. Diapor, D. & Stanton, N.), pp. 6782. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Arrow, H., Mcgrath, J. E. & Berdahl, J. L. 2000 Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaption. Sage Publications.
Badke-Schaub, P. & Buerschaper, C. 2001 Creativity and complex problem-solving in the social context. In Decision Making: Social and Creative Dimensions (ed. Allwood, C. M. & Selart, M.), pp. 177196. Kluwer.
Badke-Schaub, P. & Frankenberger, E. 1999 Analysis of design projects. Design Studies 20, 465480.
Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A. & Lauche, K. 2011 An observation-based method for measuring the sharedness of mental models in teams. In Coordination in Human and Primate Groups (ed. Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P. M. & Ellwart, T.), pp. 177197. Springer.
Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K. & Mohammed, S. 2007 Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration? CoDesign 3, 520.
Baer, J. 1998 The case for domain specificity in creativity. Creativity Research Journal 11, 173177.
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R. R., Burke, M. J. & Mclendon, C. L. 2003 Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology 88, 9891004.
Belbin, R. M. 1993 Team Roles at Work. Butterworth Heinemann.
Berliner, C. & Brimson, J. A. 1988 A Cost Management for Today’s Advanced Manufacturing: The CAM-I Conceptual Design. Harvard Business School Press.
Bierhals, R., Schuster, I., Kohler, P. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2007 Shared mental models – linking team cognition and performance. CoDesign 3, 7594.
Boos, M., Kolbe, M. & Strack, M. 2011 An inclusive model of group coordination. In Coordination in Human and Primate Groups (ed. Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P. M. & Ellwart, T.), pp. 1135. Springer.
Bradahaw, D. 1989 Higher education, personal qualities and employment: teamwork. Oxford Review of Education 15, 5571.
Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, R. E. 2006 Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework, Rev. edn. Wiley (Jossey Bass).
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. & Converse, S. 1993 Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues (ed. Castellan, N. J. Jr), pp. 221246. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Carron, A. V. & Brawley, L. R. 2000 Cohesion: conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research 31, 89106.
Casakin, H. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2013 Measuring sharedness of mental models in architectural and engineering design teams. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design – ICED13 (ed. Lindemann, U., Srinivasan, V., Kim, Y. S., Lee, S. W., Clarkson, J. & Cascini, G.), pp. 169178. Lightning Source, Inc.
Casakin, H. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2015 Mental models and creativity in engineering and architectural design teams. In Design Computing and Cognition’14 (ed. Gero, J. S. & Hanna, S.), pp. 155171. Springer International Publishing.
Casakin, H., Ball, L., Christensen, B. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2015 How do analogizing and mental simulation influence team dynamics in innovative product design? AIEDAM – Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 29, 173183.
Craik, K. J. W. 1943 The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press.
Cuff, D. 1991 Architecture: The History of Practice. MIT Press.
Denton, H. G. 1997 Multidisciplinary team-based project work: planning factors. Design Studies 18, 155170.
Delvin, K. & Nasar, J. 1989 The beauty and the beast: some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology 9, 333344.
Eckersley, M. 1988 The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies 9, 8694.
Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A. 1993 Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, Rev. edn. MIT Press.
Espinosa, A., Lerch, F. J. & Kraut, R. E. 2004 Explicit versus implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: one size does not fit all. In Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors that Drive Process and Performance (ed. Salas, E. & Fiore, S. M.), pp. 107129. American Psychological Association.
Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., Kraut, R. E. & Herbsleb, J. D. 2007 Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 135169.
Fleiss, J. L. 1971 Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76, 378382.
Gentner, D. A. & Stevens, A. L. 1983 Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gersick, C. J. G. 1988 Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal 32, 941.
Glock, F. 2009 Aspects of language use in design conversation. CoDesign 5, 519.
Goldschmidt, G. & Eshel, D. 2009 Behind the scenes of the design theatre: actors, roles and the dynamics of communication. In About Designing: Analysing Design Meetings (ed. McDonnell, J. & Lloyd, P.), pp. 519. CRC Press.
Goldschmidt, G. 2007 To see eye to eye: the role of visual representations in building shared mental models in design teams. CoDesign 3, 4350.
Ivory, C. 2004 Client, user and architect interactions in construction: implications for analysing innovative outcomes from user–producer interactions in projects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 16, 495508.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1980 Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science 4, 71115.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983 Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Harvard University Press.
Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. 2005 Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the Muse. Erlbaum.
Klimoski, R. & Mohammed, S. 1994 Team mental model – construct or metaphor? Journal of Management 20, 403437.
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M., Manser, T., Kunzle, B. & Grote, G. 2011 The role of coordination in preventing harm in healthcare groups: research examples from anaesthesia and an integrated model of coordination for action teams in health care. In Coordination in Human and Primate Groups (ed. Boos, M., Kolbe, M., Kappeler, P. M. & Ellwart, T.), pp. 7592. Springer.
Langan-Fox, J., Anglim, J. & Wilson, J. R. 2004 Mental models, team mental models, and performance: process, development, and future directions. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 14, 331352.
Le Dantec, C. & Do, E. Y. L. 2009 The mechanisms of value transfer in design meetings. Design Studies 30, 138156.
Lim, B. C. & Klein, K. J. 2006 Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational. Behavior 27, 403418.
Luck, R. 2009 Does this compromise your design? Socially producing a design concept in talk-in-interaction. CoDesign 5, 2134.
Marshall, N. 2007 Team mental models in action: a practice-based perspective. CoDesign 3, 2936.
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T. & Gilson, L. 2008 Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management 34, 410476.
Mathieu, J. E. & Rapp, T. L. 2009 Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: the roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology 94, 90103.
McDonnell, J. 2009 Collaborative negotiation in design: a study of design converstations between architect and building users. CoDesign 5, 3550.
McDonnell, J. & Lloyd, P. 2009 About Designing: Analysing Design Meetings. CRC Press.
Mohammed, S. & Dumville, B. C. 2001 Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior 22, 89106.
Mohammed, S., Klimoski, R. & Rentsch, J. R. 2000 The measurement of team mental models: we have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods 3, 123165.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. 1972 Human Problem-Solving. Englewood Cliffs.
Norman, D. A. 1983 Some observations on mental models. In Mental Models (ed. Gentner, D. A. & Stevens, A. L.). Erlbaum.
Oak, A. 2009 Performing architecture: talking ‘architect’ and ‘client’ into being. CoDesign 5, 5164.
Owen, W. F. 1985 Metaphor analysis of cohesiveness in small discussion groups. Small Group Research 16, 415424.
Peeters, M. A. G. & van Tuijl, F. J. M. 2007 The development of a design behaviour questionnaire for multidisciplinary teams. Design Studies 28, 623643.
Reymen, I., Dorst, K. & Smulders, F. 2009 Co-evolution in design practice. In About Designing: Analysing Design Meetings (ed. McDonnell, J. & Lloyd, P.), pp. 335346. CRC Press.
Schaub, H. 2007 The Importance of the characteristics of the task to understand team mental models. CoDesign 3, 3742.
Simon, H. A. 1996 The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press.
Smyth, M. M., Collins, A. F., Morris, P. E. & Levy, P. 1994 Cognition in Action, 2nd edn. Psychology Press.
Stachowski, A. A., Kaplan, S. A. & Waller, M. J. 2009 The benefits of flexible team interaction during crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology 94, 15361543.
Stempfle, J. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2002 Thinking in design teams – an analysis of team communication. Design Studies 23, 473496.
Stewart, G. L. 2006 A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management 32, 2955.
Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E. & Milanovich, D. M. 1999 Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: an empirical link is established. . Human Factors 41, 6171.
Tuckman, B. W. 1965 Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin 63, 384399.
Wegner, D. M. 1987 Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis on the group mind. In Theories of Group Behavior (ed. Mullen, B. & Goethals, G.), pp. 185208. Springer.
Wegner, D. M. 1995 A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition 13, 121.
Wittenbaum, G. M., Stasser, G. & Merry, C. J. 1996 Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32, 129152.
Wittenbaum, G. M., Vaughan, S. I. & Stasser, G. 1998 Coordination in task-performing groups. In Theory and Research on Small Groups (ed. Tindale, R. S., Heath, L., Edwards, J., Posavac, E. J., Bryant, F. B., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Henderson-King, E. & Myers, J.), pp. 177204. Plenum.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 142 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 218 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 22nd August 2017 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.