Skip to main content

Towards a shared ontology: A generic classification of cognitive processes in conceptual design

  • Laura Hay (a1), Alex H. B. Duffy (a1), Chris McTeague (a1), Laura M. Pidgeon (a2), Tijana Vuletic (a1) and Madeleine Grealy (a2)...

Towards addressing ontological issues in design cognition research, this paper presents the first generic classification of cognitive processes investigated in protocol studies on conceptual design cognition. The classification is based on a systematic review of 47 studies published over the past 30 years. Three viewpoints on the nature of design cognition are outlined (search, exploration and design activities), highlighting considerable differences in the concepts and terminology applied to describe cognition. To provide a more unified view of the cognitive processes fundamentally under study, we map specific descriptions of cognitive processes provided in protocol studies to more generic, established definitions in the cognitive psychology literature. This reveals a set of 6 categories of cognitive process that appear to be commonly studied and are therefore likely to be prevalent in conceptual design: (1) long-term memory; (2) semantic processing; (3) visual perception; (4) mental imagery processing; (5) creative output production and (6) executive functions. The categories and their constituent processes are formalised in the generic classification. The classification provides the basis for a generic, shared ontology of cognitive processes in design that is conceptually and terminologically consistent with the ontology of cognitive psychology and neuroscience. In addition, the work highlights 6 key avenues for future empirical research: (1) the role of episodic and semantic memory; (2) consistent definitions of semantic processes; (3) the role of sketching from alternative theoretical perspectives on perception and mental imagery; (4) the role of working memory; (5) the meaning and nature of synthesis and (6) unidentified cognitive processes implicated in conceptual design elsewhere in the literature.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Towards a shared ontology: A generic classification of cognitive processes in conceptual design
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Towards a shared ontology: A generic classification of cognitive processes in conceptual design
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Towards a shared ontology: A generic classification of cognitive processes in conceptual design
      Available formats
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence:
Hide All
Abraham, A. & Bubic, A. 2015 Semantic memory as the root of imagination. Frontiers in Psychology 6, 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00325.
*Akin, Ö. 1979 An exploration of the design process. Design Methods and Theories: Journal of the DMG 13 (3/4), 115119.
*Akin, O. & Akin, C. 1996 Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (a-h-a-!). Design Studies 17 (4), 341361.
*Athavankar, U., Bokil, P. & Guruprasad, K. 2008 Reaching out in the mind’s space. In Design Computing and Cognition ’08, pp. 321340. Springer.
*Athavankar, U. A. 1997 Mental imagery as a design tool. Cybernetics and Systems 28 (1), 2542. doi:10.1080/019697297126236.
Baddeley, A. 1983 Working memory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 302 (1110), 311324.
Baddeley, A. 2003 Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews – Neuroscience 4, 829839.
*Ball, L. J., Ormerod, T. C. & Morley, N. J. 2004 Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies 25 (5), 495508. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.004.
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E. & Benedek, M. 2014 The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition 42 (7), 11861197. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8.
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F. & Neubauer, A. C. 2013 To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage 88, 125133. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021.
*Bilda, Z. & Demirkan, H. 2003 An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media. Design Studies 24 (1), 2750. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00032-7.
*Bilda, Z. & Gero, J. S. 2007 The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Design Studies 28 (4), 343367. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.005.
*Bilda, Z., Gero, J. S. & Purcell, T. 2006 To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies 27 (5), 587613. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2006.02.002.
Boyle, I. M., Duffy, A. H. B., Whitfield, R. I. & Liu, S. 2009 Towards an understanding of the impact of resources on the design process. In 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED ’09). The Design Society.
Bruce, V., Green, P. R. & Georgeson, M. A. 2003 Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology. Psychology Press.
Buys, A. & Mulder, H. 2014 A study of creativity in technology and engineering. In Proceedings of PICMET ’14: Infrastructure and Service Integration, pp. 879891. IEEE.
*Chan, C.-S. 1990 Cognitive processes in architectural problem solving. Design Studies 11 (2), 6080. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(90)90021-4.
Chan, R. C. K., Shum, D., Toulopoulou, T. & Chen, E. Y. H. 2008 Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 23 (2), 201216. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010.
*Chandrasekera, T., Vo, N. & D’Souza, N. 2013 The effect of subliminal suggestions on sudden moments of inspiration (SMI) in the design process. Design Studies 34 (2), 193215. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.09.002.
*Chen, X. & Zhao, J. 2006 Research on the model and application of knowledge-based industrial design. In International Technology and Innovation Conference 2006, Vol 1, pp. 258263. Institution of Engineering and Technology.
*Chiu, M. L. 2003 Design moves in situated design with case-based reasoning. Design Studies 24 (1), 125. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00007-8.
Cross, N. 2001 Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education (ed. Eastman, C. M., McCracken, W. M. & Newstetter, W. C.), pp. 79103. Elsevier Science Ltd.
*Daly, S. R., Yilmaz, S., Christian, J. L., Seifert, C. M. & Gonzalez, R. 2012 Design heuristics in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 101 (4), 601629.
Dietrich, A. 2004 The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (6), 10111026. doi:10.3758/BF03196731.
Dinar, M., Shah, J. J., Cagan, J., Leifer, L., Linsey, J., Smith, S. M. & Hernandez, N. V. 2015 Empirical studies of designer thinking: past, present, and future. Journal of Mechanical Design 137 (2), 113. doi:10.1115/1.4029025.
*Dorst, K. & Cross, N. 2001 Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22 (5), 425437. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
Dorst, K. & Dijkhuis, J. 1995 Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies 16 (2), 261274. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3.
*Eckersley, M. 1988 The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies 9 (2), 8694. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(88)90034-8.
Ericsson, A. K. & Simon, H. A. 1984 Protocol Analysis - Verbal Reports as Data. MIT.
Eysenck, M. W. & Keane, M. T. 2005 Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook, 5th ed. Pyschology Press Ltd.
Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., Ochoa, E. & Kutas, M. 2002 The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: an ERP study. Psychophysiology 39 (2), 133146. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3920133.
Finke, R. A. 1996 Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness and Cognition 5 (3), 381393. doi:10.1006/ccog.1996.0024.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M. 1992 Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. The MIT Press.
Fish, J. & Scrivener, S. 1990 Amplifying the mind’s eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo 23 (1), 117126.
Ganis, G. 2013 Visual mental imagery. In Multisensory Imagery (ed. Lacey, S. & Lawson, R.), pp. 928. Springer; doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5879-1.
Gero, J. S. 1990 Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11 (4), 2636. doi:10.1609/aimag.v11i4.854.
Gero, J. S. & Kannengiesser, U. 2004 The situated function-behaviour-structure framework. Design Studies 25 (4), 373391. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010.
Gero, J. S. & Kannengiesser, U. 2007 A function-behavior-structure ontology of processes. AI EDAM 21 (4), 379391. doi:10.1017/S0890060407000340.
Gero, J. S., Kannengiesser, U. & Pourmohamadi, M. 2014 Commonalities across designing: empirical results. In Design Computing and Cognition ’12, pp. 265281. Springer; doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_15.
Gero, J. S. & Tang, H.-H. 2001 The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies 22 (3), 283295. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00030-2.
Gobet, F., Chassy, P. & Bilalic, M. 2011 Foundations of Cognitive Psychology. McGraw-Hill Education.
Goel, A. K. 1997 Design, analogy, and creativity. IEEE Expert 12 (3), 6270. doi:10.1109/64.590078.
*Goel, V. 1995 Cognitive processes involved in design problem solving. In Sketches of Thought (ed. Goel, V.), pp. 95126. MIT Press.
Goel, V. 2014 Creative brains: designing in the real world. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 114. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00241.
*Goldschmidt, G. 1991 The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4 (2), 123143. doi:10.1080/10400419109534381.
Hay, L., McTeague, C., Duffy, A. H. B., Pidgeon, L. M., Vuletic, T. & Grealy, M.A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition: Design as search and exploration. Design Science (under review).
*Jin, Y. & Benami, O. 2010 Creative patterns and stimulation in conceptual design. AI EDAM 24 (2), 191209. doi:10.1017/S0890060410000053.
*Jin, Y. & Chusilp, P. 2006 Study of mental iteration in different design situations. Design Studies 27 (1), 2555. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.003.
*Kavakli, M. & Gero, J. S. 2001 Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies 22 (4), 347364. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00002-3.
*Kavakli, M. & Gero, J. S. 2002 The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies 23 (1), 2540. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00021-7.
Khorshidi, M., Shah, J. J. & Woodward, J. 2014 Applied tests of design skills. Part III: Abstract reasoning. Journal of Mechanical Design 136, 101101-1–101101-11. doi:10.1115/1.4027986.
*Kim, J. & Ryu, H. 2014 A design thinking rationality framework: framing and solving design problems in early concept generation. Human–Computer Interaction 29 (5–6), 516553. doi:10.1080/07370024.2014.896706.
*Kim, J. E., Bouchard, C., Omhover, J. F. & Aoussat, a. 2010 Towards a model of how designers mentally categorise design information. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 3 (3), 218226. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.11.004.
*Kim, M. H., Kim, Y. S., Lee, H. S. & Park, J. a. 2007 An underlying cognitive aspect of design creativity: limited commitment mode control strategy. Design Studies 28 (6), 585604. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.04.006.
*Kim, Y., Jin, S. & Lee, H. 2005 Dual protocol analysis based on design information and design process: a case study. In Studying Designers ’05, pp. 7185. Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
*Kim, Y. S., Jin, S. T. & Lee, S. W. 2006 Design activities and personal creativity characteristics: a case study of dual protocol analysis using design information and process. In ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Kosslyn, S. M. 1995 Mental imagery. In Visual Cognition: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, Vol. 2 (ed. Kosslyn, S. M. & Osherson, D. N.), pp. 267296. Cambridge.
*Kruger, C. & Cross, N. 2006 Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Design Studies 27 (5), 527548. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.001.
*Lane, D. & Seery, N. 2011 Examining the development of sketch thinking and behaviour. In Annual Conference for the American Society of Engineering Education, Vancouver, Canada, The American Society for Engineering Education.
*Leblebici-Basar, D. & Altarriba, J. 2013 The role of imagery and emotion in the translation of concepts into product form. The Design Journal 16 (3), 295314.
*Lee, J., Gu, N. & Williams, A. 2014 Parametric design strategies for the generation of creative designs. International Journal of Architectural Computing 12 (3), 263282.
Li, Y., Wang, J., Li, X. & Zhao, W. 2007 Design creativity in product innovation. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 33 (3–4), 213222. doi:10.1007/s00170-006-0457-y.
*Liikkanen, L. a. & Perttula, M. 2009 Exploring problem decomposition in conceptual design among novice designers. Design Studies 30 (1), 3859. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.07.003.
Lloyd, P., Lawson, B. & Scott, P. 1995 Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition? Design Studies 16 (2), 237259. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00011-2.
*Lloyd, P. & Scott, P. 1994 Discovering the design problem. Design Studies 15 (2), 125140. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)90020-5.
Maher, M. L., Balachandran, M. B. & Zhang, D. M. 1995 Case-Based Reasoning in Design. Psychology Press Ltd.
*Maher, M. L. & Kim, M. 2006 The effects of tangible user interfaces on designers’ cognitive actions. In The International Workshop on Spatial Cognition 2006, pp. 119124. Springer-Verlag.
*Maher, M. & Tang, H.-H. 2003 Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design 14 (1), 4764. doi:10.1007/s00163-002-0016-y.
Martin, A. & Chao, L. L. 2001 Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11 (2), 194201. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00196-3.
McKoy, F. L., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Summers, J. D. & Shah, J. J. 2001 Influence of design representation on effectiveness of idea generation. In Proceedings of DETC’01: ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, September 9–12, 2001, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 110. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
*McNeill, T., Gero, J. S. & Warren, J. 1998 Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design 10 (3), 129140. doi:10.1007/BF01607155.
Mednick, S. 1962 The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69 (3), 220232.
Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. 2008 Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 46 (3), 774785. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. 2009 Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6 (7), 16. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E. & Partlow, P. J. 2012 Creative thinking: processes, strategies, and knowledge. Journal of Creative Behavior 46 (1), 3047. doi:10.1002/jocb.003.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. 1972 Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall.
*Park, J. & Kim, Y. 2007 Visual reasoning and design processes. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED07, pp. 112. The Design Society.
Poldrack, R.2009 Cognitive Atlas: a collaboratively developed cognitive science ontology [online]. (accessed 05.09.17).
Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., Parker, D. S., Sabb, F. W. & Bilder, R. M. 2011 The cognitive atlas: toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 5, 111. doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00017.
Rabbitt, P. 2004 Methodology of Frontal and Executive Function. Psychology Press Ltd.
Runco, M. A. & Chand, I. 1995 Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review 7 (3), 243267. doi:10.1007/BF02213373.
Sarkar, P. & Chakrabarti, A. 2014 Ideas generated in conceptual design and their effects on creativity. Research in Engineering Design 25 (3), 185201. doi:10.1007/s00163-014-0173-9.
Shah, J. J., Millsap, R. E., Woodward, J. & Smith, S. M. 2012 Applied tests of design skills. Part 1. Divergent thinking. Journal of Mechanical Design 134, 021005-1–021005-10. doi:10.1115/1.4005594.
Shah, J. J., Millsap, R. E., Woodward, J. & Smith, S. M. 2013 Applied tests of design skills. Part II. Visual thinking. Journal of Mechanical Design 135, 071004-1–071004-11. doi:10.1115/1.4005594.
Sim, S. K. & Duffy, A. H. B. 2003 Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Research in Engineering Design 14 (4), 200223. doi:10.1007/s00163-003-0037-1.
Sim, S. K. & Duffy, A. H. B. 2004 Evolving a model of learning in design. Research in Engineering Design 15 (1), 4061. doi:10.1007/s00163-003-0044-2.
Squire, L. R. & Zola, S. M. 1998 Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia. Hippocampus 8, 205211.
*Stauffer, L. A. & Ullman, D. G. 1991 Fundamental processes of mechanical designers based on empirical data. Journal of Engineering Design 2 (2), 113125. doi:10.1080/09544829108901675.
*Sun, G., Yao, S. & Carretero, J. A. 2013 Evaluating cognitive efficiency by measuring information contained in designers’ cognitive processes. In Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Portland, Oregon, pp. 110.
*Suwa, M. 2003 Constructive perception: coordinating perception and conception toward acts of problem-finding in a creative experience. Japanese Psychological Research 45 (4), 221234. doi:10.1111/1468-5884.00227.
*Suwa, M., Gero, J. & Purcell, T. 2000 Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies 21 (6), 539567.
*Suwa, M., Purcell, T. & Gero, J. 1998 Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies 19 (4), 455483. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00016-7.
*Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. 1997 What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies 18 (4), 385403. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00008-2.
Taborda, E., Chandrasegaran, S. K., Kisselburgh, L., Reid, T. & Ramani, K. 2012 Enhancing visual thinking in a toy design course using freehand sketching. In Volume 7: 9th International Conference on Design Education; 24th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, p. 267. ASME; doi:10.1115/DETC2012-71454.
Tulving, E. 1983 Elements of Episodic Memory. Clarendon Press.
Tversky, B. 2014 Some ways of thinking. In Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology, Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (ed. Magnani, L.), pp. 38. Springer; doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9.
van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F. & Sandberg, J. A. C. 1994 The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. Academic Press, London.
Viswanathan, V. K. & Linsey, J. S. 2012 Physical models and design thinking: a study of functionality, novelty and variety of ideas. Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (9), 091004. doi:10.1115/1.4007148.
*Won, P. H. 2001 The comparison between visual thinking using computer and conventional media in the concept generation stages of design. Automation in Construction 10 (3), 319325. doi:10.1016/S0926-5805(00)00048-0.
*Yu, R., Gero, J. & Gu, N. 2015 Architects’ cognitive behaviour in parametric design. International Journal of Architectural Computing 1 (13), 83101.
*Yu, R. & Gero, J. S. 2015 An empirical foundation for design patterns in parametric design. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA 2015 (ed. Ikeda, Y., Herr, C. M., Holzer, D., Kaijima, S., Kim, M. J. & Schnabel, A.), pp. 19. The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research In Asia (CAADRIA).
*Yu, R., Gu, N. & Lee, J. H. 2013 Comparing designers’ behavior in responding to unexpected discoveries in parametric design environments and geometry modeling environments. International Journal of Architectural Computing 11 (4), 393414.
*Yu, R., Gu, N., Ostwald, M. & Gero, J. S. 2014 Empirical support for problem–solution coevolution in a parametric design environment. AI EDAM 29 (1), 3344. doi:10.1017/S0890060414000316.
Zhang, L. & Lin, W. 2013 Selective Visual Attention: Computational Models and Applications. John Wiley & Sons Singapore Pte Ltd.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed