Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model: A foundation for unifying perspectives on design activity

  • Philip Cash (a1) and Melanie Kreye (a1)
Abstract

This paper proposes the Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model, which unifies the fragmented literature on design activity. The UDA model conceptualises design activity as a process consisting of three core actions: information action, knowledge-sharing action, and representation action, which are linked via uncertainty perception. The foundations of the UDA model in the design literature are elaborated in terms of the three core actions and their links to designer cognition and behaviour, utilising definitions and concepts from Activity Theory. The practical relevance and theoretical contributions of the UDA model are discussed. This paper contributes to the design literature by offering a comprehensive formalisation of design activity of individual designers, which connects cognition and action, to provide a foundation for understanding previously disparate descriptions of design activity.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model: A foundation for unifying perspectives on design activity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model: A foundation for unifying perspectives on design activity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) model: A foundation for unifying perspectives on design activity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence: pcas@dtu.dk
References
Hide All
Ahmed, S. & Storga, M. 2009 Merged ontology for engineering design: contrasting empirical and theoretical approaches to develop engineering ontologies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 23 (4), 391407.
Andreasen, M. M., Thorp Hansen, C. & Cash, P. 2015 Conceptual Design: Interpretations, Mindset, and Models. Springer.
Aurisicchio, M., Bracewell, R. & Wallace, K. 2006 Evaluation of DRed a way of capturing and structuring engineering design processes. In NordDesign, The Design Society, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Aurisicchio, M., Bracewell, R. & Wallace, K. 2010 Understanding how the information requests of aerospace engineering designers influence information-seeking behaviour. Journal of Engineering Design 21 (6), 707730.
Aurisicchio, M., Bracewell, R. & Wallace, K. M. 2013 Characterising the information requests of aerospace engineering designers. Research in Engineering Design 24 (1), 4363.
Ball, L. J. et al. 1997 Problem-solving strategies and expertise in engineering design. Thinking and Reasoning 3 (4), 247270.
Ball, L. J. & Christensen, B. T. 2009 Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies 30 (2), 169186.
Ball, L. J., Onarheim, B. & Christensen, B. T. 2010 Design requirements, epistemic uncertainty and solution development strategies in software design. Design Studies 31 (6), 567589.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K. & Li, N. 2013 The theory of purposeful work behavior: the role of personality, job characteristics, and experienced meaningfulness. Academy of Management Review 38 (1), 132153.
Bedny, G. Z. & Harris, S. R. 2005 The systemic-structural theory of activity: applications to the study of human work. Mind, Culture, and Activity 12 (2), 128147.
Bedny, G. Z. & Karwowski, W. 2004 Activity theory as a basis for the study of work. Ergonomics 47 (2), 134153.
Beheshti, R. 1993 Design decisions and uncertainty. Design Studies 14 (1), 8595.
Belkin, N. J., Oddy, R. N. & Brooks, H. M. 1982 ASK for information retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation 38 (2), 6171.
Beylier, C. et al. 2009 A collaboration-centred approach to manage engineering knowledge: a case study of an engineering SME. Journal of Engineering Design 20 (6), 523542.
Biazzo, S. 2009 Flexibility, structuration, and simultaneity in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (3), 336353.
Bilda, Z. & Gero, J. S. 2007 The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Design Studies 28 (4), 343367.
Blandin, J. S. & Brown, W. B. 1977 Uncertainty and management’s search for information. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 24 (4), 114119.
Borlund, P. 2003 The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research 8 (3), 811.
Briggs, R. O. 2006 On theory-driven design and deployment of collaboration systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (7), 573582.
Brun, J., Le Masson, P. & Weil, B. 2016 Designing with sketches: the generative effects of knowledge preordering. Design Science 2(Goldschmidt 1991), e13.
Bstieler, L. 2005 The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on new product development and time efficiency*. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (3), 267284.
Busby, J. S. 2001 Error and distributed cognition in design. Design Studies 22 (3), 233254.
Calantone, R. & Rubera, G. 2012 When should RD&E and marketing collaborate? the moderating role of exploration-exploitation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (1), 144157.
Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J. & Adams, R. S. 2006 Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers. Design Studies 27 (1), 524.
Cash, P. & Gonçalves, M. 2017 Information-triggered co-evolution: a combined process perspective. In Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation (ed. Christensen, B. T., Ball, L. J. & Halskov, K.), pp. 501520. CRC Press.
Cash, P., Hicks, B. & Culley, S. 2015 Activity Theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: a protocol study of design in practice. Design Studies 38 (May), 132.
Cash, P., Hicks, B. & Culley, S. et al. 2015 A foundational observation method for studying design situations. Journal of Engineering Design 26 (7–9), 187219.
Cash, P. & Kreye, M. E. 2017 Exploring uncertainty perception as a driver of design activity. Design Studies (in press).
Cash, P. & Maier, A. 2016 Prototyping with your hands: the many roles of gesture in the communication of design concepts. Journal of Engineering Design 27 (1–3), 118145.
Cash, P. J., Hicks, B. J. & Culley, S. J. 2013 A comparison of designer activity using core design situations in the laboratory and practice. Design Studies 34 (5), 575611.
Chan, J., Paletz, S. B. F. & Schunn, C. D. 2012 Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty. Memory and Cognition 40, 13521365.
Cave, P. R. & Noble, C. E. I. 1986 Engineering design data management. In 1st International Conference on Engineering Management, Theory and Applications, Swansea, UK.
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H. & Wang, E. T. G. 2006 Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42 (3), 18721888.
Christensen, B. T. & Ball, L. J. 2016a Creative analogy use in a heterogeneous design team: the pervasive role of background domain knowledge. Design Studies 46, 3858.
Christensen, B. T. & Ball, L. J. 2016b Fluctuating epistemic uncertainty in a design team as a metacognitive driver for creative cognitive processes. In DTRS11: Design Thinking Research Symposium 2016, pp. 117. CRC Press.
Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. 1991 Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, pp. 127149. American Psychological Association.
Court, A. W. 1997 The relationship between information and personal knowledge in new product development. International Journal of Information Management 17 (2), 123138.
Crilly, N. 2015 Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies 38 (C), 5491.
Cross, N. 2007 Forty years of design research. Design Studies 28 (1), 14.
Daalhuizen, J. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2011 The use of methods by advanced beginner and expert industrial designers in non-routine situations: a quasi-experiment. International Journal of Product Development 15 (1/2/3), 54.
Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. 1986 Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32 (5), 554571.
Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H. & Trevino, L. K. 1987 Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly 11 (3), 355366.
Daley, J. 1982 Design creativity and the understanding of objects. Design Studies 3 (3), 133137.
Davies, G. B. 2006 Rethinking risk attitude: aspiration as pure risk. Theory and Decision 61 (2), 159190.
Deckers, E. et al. 2012 Designing for perceptual crossing: applying and evaluating design notions. International Journal of Design 6 (3), 4155.
Deken, F. et al. 2012 Tapping into past design experiences: knowledge sharing and creation during novice-expert design consultations. Research in Engineering Design 23 (3), 203218.
Demirbaş, O. O. & Demirkan, H. 2003 Focus on architectural design process through learning styles. Design Studies 24 (5), 437456.
Dong, A. 2005 The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication. Design Studies 26 (5), 445461.
Dong, A., Kleinsmann, M. S. & Deken, F. 2013 Investigating design cognition in the construction and enactment of team mental models. Design Studies 34 (1), 133.
Dorst, K. & Cross, N. 2001 Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22 (5), 425437.
Dorst, K. & Dijkhuis, J. 1995 Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies 16 (2), 261274.
Dorst, K. & Vermaas, P. E. 2005 John Gero’s function-behaviour-structure model of designing: a critical analysis. Research in Engineering Design 16 (1–2), 1726.
Ellsberg, D. 2001 Risk, Ambiguity and Decision Studies in Psychology. Routledge.
Engeström, Y. 2000 Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43 (7), 960974.
Eris, O. 2002 Perceiving, Comprehending and Measuring Design Activity Through the Questions Asked While Designing. Stanford University.
Eris, O., Martelaro, N. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2014 A comparative analysis of multimodal communication during design sketching in co-located and distributed environments. Design Studies 35 (6), 559592.
Evans, J. S. B. T. 2008 Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59 (1), 255278.
Evans, J. & Stanovich, K. E. 2013 Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3), 223241.
Fairlie-Clarke, T. & Muller, M. 2003 An activity model of the product development process. Journal of Engineering Design 14 (3), 247272.
Fidel, R. & Green, M. 2004 The many faces of accessibility: engineers’ perception of information sources. Information Processing and Management 40 (3), 563581.
Fox, B. 1981 Design-based studies: an action-based “form of knowledge” for thinking, reasoning and operating. Design Studies 2 (1), 3340.
Francis, J. J. et al. 2009 Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology 14 (4), 625646.
Garcia, R. 2005 Uses of agent-based modeling in innovation/new product development research. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (5), 380398.
Ge, C. P. & Wang, B. 2007 An activity-based modelling approach for assessing the key stakeholders’ corporation in the eco-conscious design of electronic products. Journal of Engineering Design 18 (1), 5571.
Gerber, E. & Carroll, M. 2012 The psychological experience of prototyping. Design Studies 33 (1), 6484.
Gero, J. S. 1990 Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 11, 26.
Gero, J. S. & Kannengiesser, U. 2004 The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Design Studies 25 (4), 373391.
Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2016 Inspiration choices that matter: the selection of external stimuli during ideation. Design Science 2 (November), e10.
Gonnet, S., Henning, G. & Leone, H. 2007 A model for capturing and representing the engineering design process. Expert Systems with Applications 33 (4), 881902.
Gursoy, B. & Ozkar, M. 2015 Visualizing making: shapes, materials, and actions. Design Studies 41, 2950.
Hatchuel, A. & Weil, B. 2002 CK theory. In Proceedings of the Herbert Simon International conference on Design Sciences. Lyon, France, pp. 122. Citeseer.
Hatchuel, A. & Weil, B. 2003 A new approach of innovative design: an introduction to C-K theory. In Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm. ICED 03 International Conference on Engineering Design. Stockholm, Sweden. The Design Society.
Hazelrigg, G. A. 1998 A framework for decision-based engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design 120, 5.
Heavey, C. & Simsek, Z. 2013 Top management compositional effects on corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating role of perceived technological uncertainty. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30 (5), 837855.
Hertz, K. 1992 A coherent description of the process of design. Design Studies 13 (4), 393410.
Horvath, I. 2004 A treatise on order in engineering design research. Research in Engineering Design 15, 155181.
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J. & Slater, S. F. 2004 Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance. Academy of Management Journal 47 (2), 241253.
Humayun, M. & Gang, C. 2013 An empirical study on improving shared understanding of requirements in GSD. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications 7 (1), 7992.
Hurley, R. J., Kosenko, K. A. & Brashers, D. 2011 Uncertain terms: message features of online cancer news. Communication Monographs 78 (3), 370390.
Jonas, W. 1993 Design as problem-solving? or: here is the solution -what was the problem? Design Studies 14 (2), 157170.
Kan, J. W. T., Gero, J. S. & Tang, H. H. 2011 Measuring cognitive design activity changes during an industry team brainstorming session. In Design Computing and Cognition ’10 (ed. Gero, J. S.), pp. 621640. Springer.
Kanstrup, A. M. 2014 Design concepts for digital diabetes practice: design to explore, share, and camoufage chronic illness. International Journal of Design 8 (3), 4960.
Kavakli, M. & Gero, J. S. 2001 Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies 22 (4), 347364.
Kim, K. & Lee, K. 2016 Collaborative product design processes of industrial design and engineering design in consumer product companies. Design Studies 46, 226260.
Kleinsmann, M. et al. 2012 Development of design collaboration skills. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (7), 485506.
Kleinsmann, M. & Valkenburg, R. 2008 Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Design Studies 29 (4), 369386.
Kosslyn, S. M. et al. 1984 Individual differences in mental imagery ability: a computational analysis. Cognition 18 (1–3), 195243.
Kreye, M. E. et al. 2012 Approaches of displaying information to assist decisions under uncertainty. Omega - International Journal of Management Science 40 (6), 682692.
Kreye, M. E. 2016 Uncertainty and Behaviour: Perceptions, Decisions and Actions in Business. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
Kreye, M. E., Goh, Y. M. & Newnes, L. B. 2011 Manifestation of uncertainty – a classification. In ICED’11 – International Conference on Engineering Design, Copenhagen, Denmark. The Design Society.
Kulkarni, S., Summers, J. D., Vargas-Hernandez, N. & Shah, J. J. 2000 Evaluation of collaborative sketching (C-Sketch) as an idea generation technique for engineering design. Journal of Creative Behaviour 35 (3), 168198.
Lamarra, N. & Dunphy, J. 1998 Interactive sharable environment for collaborative spacecraft design. In Aerospace Conference, 1998. Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 487496. IEEE.
Lasso, S., Cash, P., Daalhuizen, J. & Kreye, M. E. 2016 A model of designing as the intersection between uncertainty perception, information processing, and coevolution. In Design 2016, pp. 301310. The Design Society.
Leont’ev, A. N.1981 Problems of the Development of the Mind. Progress.
Liikkanen, L. A. & Perttula, M. 2010 Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective. Journal of Engineering Design 21 (5), 545560.
Liu, Y. T. 1996 Is designing one search or two? A model of design thinking involving symbolism and connectionism. Design Studies 17 (4), 435449.
Love, T. 2000 Philosophy of design: a meta-theoretical structure for design theory. Design Studies 21 (3), 293313.
Love, T. 2002 Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: some philosophical issues. Design Studies 23 (3), 345361.
Luck, R. 2013 Articulating (mis)understanding across design discipline interfaces at a design team meeting. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 27 (2), 155166.
Luo, J. 2015 The united innovation process: integrating science, design, and entrepreneurship as sub-processes. Design Science 1 (October 2015), e2.
Macleod, I. A., McGregor, D. R. & Hutton, G. H. 1994 Accessing of information for engineering design. Design Studies 15 (3), 260269.
Maier, J. F., Eckert, C. M. & Clarkson, P. J. 2017 Model granularity in engineering design – concepts and framework. Design Science 3 (e-1), 129.
Markus, L. M. 2001 Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (1), 5793.
Maznevski, M. L. & Chudoba, K. M. 2000 Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science 11 (5), 473492.
McAlpine, H., Cash, P. & Hicks, B. 2017 The role of logbooks as mediators of engineering design work. Design Studies 48 (January), 129.
McCarthy, I. P. et al. 2006 New product development as a complex adaptive system of decisions. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (5), 437456.
McDonnell, J. 1997 Descriptive models for interpreting design. Design Studies 18 (4), 457473.
McMahon, C., Lowe, A. & Culley, S. 2004 Knowledge management in engineering design: personalization and codification. Journal of Engineering Design 15 (4), 307325.
Medland, A. J. 1992 Forms of communications observed during the study of design activities in industry. Journal of Engineering Design 3 (3), 243253.
Miltenberger, R. 2011 Behavior Modification: Principles and Procedures. Wadsworth Publishing.
Moscoso, P. G. 2007 A design-oriented framework for modelling production management systems. Journal of Engineering Design 18 (6), 599616.
Nagai, Y. & Gero, J. S. 2012 Design creativity. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (4), 237239.
O’Connor, G. C. & Rice, M. P. 2013 A comprehensive model of uncertainty associated with radical innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30, 218.
Oh, S., Oh, J. S. & Shah, C. 2009 The use of information sources by internet users in answering questions. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 45 (1), 113.
Oliver, R. L. 1980 A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 17 (4), 460469.
Omta, S. W. F. & de Leeuw, A. C. J. 1997 Management control, uncertainty, and performance in biomedical research in universities, institutes and companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14 (3–4), 223257.
Ostergaard, K. J. & Summers, J. D. 2009 Development of a systematic classification and taxonomy of collaborative design activities. Journal of Engineering Design 20 (1), 5781.
Oxman, R. 1990 Prior knowledge in design: a dynamic knowledge-based model of design and creativity. Design Studies 11 (1), 1728.
Oxman, R. 1997 Design by re-representation: a model of visual reasoning in design. Design Studies 18 (4), 329347.
Pahl, G. & Beitz, W. 1996 Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer.
Paletz, S. B. F., Chan, J. & Schunn, C. D. 2017 The dynamics of micro-conflicts and uncertainty in successful and unsuccessful design teams. Design Studies 50, 3969.
Papalambros, P. Y. 2015 Design science: why, what and how. Design Science 1, e1.
Pask, G. 1975 Conversation, Cognition and Learning. Elsevier.
Peeters, M. A. G. et al. 2007 The development of a design behaviour questionnaire for multidisciplinary teams. Design Studies 28 (6), 623643.
Preston, D. S., Karahanna, E. & Rowe, F. 2006 Development of shared understanding between the Chief Information officer and top management team in U.S. and French Organizations: a cross-cultural comparison. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53 (2), 191206.
Pugh, S. 1989 Knowledge-based systems in the design activity. Design Studies 10 (4), 219227.
Puttre, M. 1991 Product data management. Mechanical Engineering 113 (10), 8183.
Robinson, M. A. 2010a An empirical analysis of engineers’ information behaviours. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (4), 640658.
Robinson, M. A. 2010b Work sampling: methodological advances and new applications. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries 20 (1), 4260.
Rouibah, K. & Caskey, K. 2003 A workflow system for the management of inter-company collaborative engineering processes. Journal of Engineering Design 14 (3), 273293.
Sanders, E. B. N. & Stappers, P. J. 2014 Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10 (1), 514.
Sauder, J. & Jin, Y. 2016 A qualitative study of collaborative stimulation in group design thinking. Design Science 2 (April), e4.
Scaife, M. & Rogers, Y. 1996 External cognition: how do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (2), 185213.
Schön, D. A. & Wiggins, G. 1992 Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13 (2), 135156.
Schraw, G. & Dennison, R. S. 1994 Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19 (4), 460475.
Scrivener, S. A. R., Ball, L. J. & Tseng, W. 2000 Uncertainty and sketching behaviour. Design Studies 21 (5), 465481.
Shull, F. et al. 2004 Knowledge-sharing issues in experimental software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering 9 (1), 111137.
Sim, S. K. & Duffy, A. H. B. 2003 Towards an ontology of generic engineering design activities. Research in Engineering Design 14 (4), 200223.
Singh, V. & Gu, N. 2012 Towards an integrated generative design framework. Design Studies 33 (2), 185207.
Song, M., Van Der Bij, H. & Weggeman, M. 2005 Determinants of the level of knowledge application: a knowledge-based and information-processing perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (5), 430444.
Stempfle, J. & Badke-Schaub, P. 2002 Thinking in design teams – an analysis of team communication. Design Studies 23 (5), 473496.
Storga, M. et al. 2010 The design ontology: foundation for the design knowledge exchange and management. Journal of Engineering Design 21 (4), 427454.
Suh, N. P. 1998 Axiomatic design theory for systems. Research in Engineering Design 10 (4), 189209.
Sun, L. et al. 2014 Designers’ perception during sketching: an examination of creative segment theory using eye movements. Design Studies 35 (6), 593613.
Suss, S. & Thomson, V. 2012 Optimal design processes under uncertainty and reciprocal dependency. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (10–11), 826848.
Suwa, M., Purcell, T. & Gero, J. S. 1998 Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Design Studies 19 (4), 455483.
Taura, T. et al. 2012 Constructive simulation of creative concept generation process in design: a research method for difficult-to-observe design-thinking processes. Journal of Engineering Design 23 (4), 297321.
Thielman, J. & Ge, P. 2006 Applying axiomatic design theory to the evaluation and optimization of large-scale engineering systems. Journal of Engineering Design 17 (1), 116.
Tracey, M. W. & Hutchinson, A. 2016 Uncertainty, reflection, and designer identity development. Design Studies 42, 86109.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. 1974 Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (4157), 11241131.
Vajna, S. et al. 2005 The autogenetic design theory: an evolutionary view of the design process. Journal of Engineering Design 16 (4), 423440.
Van Der Lugt, R. 2005 How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies 26 (2), 101112.
Visser, W. 2009 Design: one, but in different forms. Design Studies 30 (3), 187223.
Viswanathan, V. et al. 2014 A study on the role of physical models in the mitigation of design fixation. Journal of Engineering Design 25 (1–3), 2543.
Wacker, J. G. 1998 A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management 16 (4), 361385.
Wang, W. et al. 2013 Creation dependencies of evolutionary artefact and design process knowledge. Journal of Engineering Design 24 (9), 681710.
Wasiak, J. et al. 2010 Understanding engineering email: the development of a taxonomy for identifying and classifying engineering work. Research in Engineering Design 21 (1), 4364.
Whitefield, A. & Warren, C. 1989 A blackboard framework for modelling designers’ behaviour. Design Studies 10 (3), 179187.
Wild, P. J. et al. 2010 A diary study of information needs and document usage in the engineering domain. Design Studies 31 (1), 4673.
Wilson, M. 2002 Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9 (4), 625636.
Wilson, T. D. 1999 Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation 55 (3), 249270.
Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T. & Ball, L. J. 2013 Collaborative problem-solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies 34 (5), 515542.
Wynn, D. & Clarkson, J. 2005 Models of designing. In Design Process Improvement, pp. 3459. Springer.
Wynn, D. C., Grebici, K. & Clarkson, P. J. 2011 Modelling the evolution of uncertainty levels during design. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 5 (3), 187202.
Yang, M. C. 2009 Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 20 (1), 111.
Yilmaz, S. et al. How do designers generate new ideas? Design heuristics across two disciplines. Design Science 1 (2015), e4.
Yu, B. Y. et al. 2016 Human behavior and domain knowledge in parameter design of complex systems. Design Studies 45, 126.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed