Skip to main content

Using a Product’s Sustainability Space as a Design Exploration Tool

  • Christopher A. Mattson (a1), Andrew T. Pack (a1), Vicky Lofthouse (a2) and Tracy Bhamra (a2)

Sustainable design is often practiced and assessed through the consideration of three essential areas: economic sustainability, environmental sustainability, and social sustainability. For even the simplest of products, the complexities of these three areas and their tradeoffs cause decision-making transparency to be lost in most practical situations. The existing field of multiobjective optimization offers a natural framework to define and explore a given design space. In this paper, a method for defining a product’s sustainability space (defined by economic, environmental, and social sustainability objectives) is outlined and used to explore the tradeoffs within the space, thus offering both the design team and the decision makers a means of better understanding the sustainability tradeoffs. This paper concludes that sustainable product development can indeed benefit from tradeoff characterization using multiobjective optimization techniques – even when using only basic models of sustainability. Interestingly, the unique characteristics of the three essential sustainable development areas lead to an alternative view of some traditional multiobjective optimization concepts, such as weak-Pareto optimality. The sustainable redesign of a machine to drill boreholes for water wells is presented as a practical example for method demonstration and discussion.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Using a Product’s Sustainability Space as a Design Exploration Tool
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Using a Product’s Sustainability Space as a Design Exploration Tool
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Using a Product’s Sustainability Space as a Design Exploration Tool
      Available formats
Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license (
Corresponding author
Email address for correspondence:
Hide All

Fulbright Scholar to the United Kingdom (2014–2015), hosted by the Loughborough Design School.

Hide All
Acharya, T., Adesina, D. & Blair, M. 2008 Design for Social Impact: A How-To Guide.
Alfaris, A., Siddiqi, A., Rizk, C., de Weck, O. & Svetinovic, D. 2010 Hierarchical decomposition and multidomain formulation for the design of complex sustainable systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (9), 91003.
Al-Ghamdi, S. G. & Bilec, M. M. 2015 Life-cycle thinking and the leed rating system: global perspective on building energy use and environmental impacts. Environmental Science & Technology 49 (7), 40484056.
Antipova, E., Boer, D., Cabeza, L. F., Guillén-Gosálbez, G. & Jiménez, L. 2013 Uncovering relationships between environmental metrics in the multi-objective optimization of energy systems: a case study of a thermal solar Rankine reverse osmosis desalination plant. Energy 51, 5060.
Baker, S. P., O’Neill, B., Haddon, W. & Long, W. B. 1974 The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. The Journal of Trauma 14 (3), 187196.
Bermejo, R. 2014 Circular economy: materials scarcity, European union policy and foundations of a circular economy. In Handbook for a Sustainable Economy, pp. 269287. Springer.
Bhamra, T. A., Evans, S., McAloone, T. C., Simon, M., Poole, S. & Sweatman, A. 1999 Integrating environmental decisions into the product development process in the early stages. In Environmentally Conscious Design And Inverse Manufacturing 1999 Proceedings. EcoDesign’99: First International Symposium On, pp. 329333. IEEE.
Bhamra, T. & Lofthouse, V. 2007 Design For Sustainability: A Practical Approach. Gower Publishing, Ltd.
Brezet, H. 1997 Dynamics in ecodesign practice. Industry and Environment 20 (1–2), 2124.
Brezet, H., Van Hemel, C., Böttcher, H. & Clarke, R. 1997 Ecodesign: A Promising Approach to Sustainable Production And Consumption. {U}nited {N}ations {E}nvironment {P}rogramme.
Brundtland, G. H. 1987 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: ‘Our Common Future’. Oxford University Press.
Buchert, T., Neugebauer, S., Schenker, S., Lindow, K. & Stark, R. 2015 Multi-criteria decision making as a tool for sustainable product development – Benefits and obstacles. In Procedia CIRP, vol. 26, pp. 7075. Elsevier.
Byggeth, S. & Hochschorner, E. 2006 Handling trade-offs in ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (15), 14201430.
Cardinale, B. J., Srivastava, D. S., Duffy, J. E., Wright, J. P., Downing, A. L., Sankaran, M. & Jouseau, C. 2006 Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443 (7114), 989992.
Clark, G., Kosoris, J., Hong, L. N. & Crul, M. 2009 Design for sustainability: current trends in sustainable product design and development. Sustainability 1 (3), 409424.
Cortés-Borda, D., Guillén-Gosálbez, G. & Esteller, L. J. 2013 On the use of weighting in {LCA}: translating decision makers’ preferences into weights via linear programming. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18 (5), 948957.
Das, I. & Dennis, J. E. 1997 A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems. Structural Optimization 14 (1), 6369.
Deb, K. 2014 Multi-objective optimization. In Search Methodologies, pp. 403449. Springer.
DeVoil, P., Rossing, W. A. H. & Hammer, G. L. 2006 Exploring profit–sustainability trade-offs in cropping systems using evolutionary algorithms. Environmental Modelling & Software 21 (9), 13681374.
Du Pont, B. L. & Cagan, J. 2012 An extended pattern search approach to wind farm layout optimization. Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (8), 81002.
Elkington, J. 1997 Cannibals with forks. In The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century, Capstone Publishers.
EPA2011 AP 42, Fifth edition: compilation of air pollutant emission factors, Volume 1: stationary point and area sources. Technical Report. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Erickson, L. E., Burkey, A., Morrissey, K. G., Reynolds, M., Robinson, J., Ronnebaum, B., Wagner, T., Singh, P., Natarajan, B. & Pahwa, A. 2016 Social, economic, technological, and environmental impacts of the development and implementation of solar-powered charge stations. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 34 (6), 18081813.
Farid, A. M. & Suh, N. P. 2016 Axiomatic Design in Large Systems: Complex Products, Buildings and Manufacturing Systems. Springer.
Fitzgerald, D. P., Herrmann, J. W. & Schmidt, L. C. 2010 A conceptual design tool for resolving conflicts between product functionality and environmental impact. Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (9), 91006.
Gacso & IEMA2015 Defining corporate sustainability: a GACSP & IEMA white paper. Technical Report.
Garff, P., Dahlin, E. C., Ward, C. & Lewis, R. 2014 Analysis of integrated engineering and social science approaches for projects in developing communities. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship 137150.
Garriga, E. & Melé, D. 2004 Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1–2), 5171.
Goedkoop, M., Effting, S. & Collignon, M.2000 The Eco-indicator 99: A Damage Oriented Method for Life-cycle Impact Assessment: Manual for Designers. PR{é}Consultants.
Goggin, P. A. 1994 An appraisal of ecolabelling from a design perspective. Design Studies 15 (4), 459477.
Grabowski, M., Merrick, J. R. W., Harrold, J. R., Massuchi, T. A. & van Dorp, J. D. 2000 Risk modeling in distributed, large-scale systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 30 (6), 651660.
Hauschild, M. Z. 2015 Better – but is it good enough? On the need to consider both eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness to gauge industrial sustainability. Procedia CIRP 29, 17.
Holden, E., Linnerud, K. & Banister, D. 2014 Sustainable development: our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change 26 (1), 130139.
Howarth, G. & Hadfield, M. 2006 A sustainable product design model. Materials and Design 27 (10), 11281133.
ISO2013 ISO/TS 14067:2013 Greenhouse gases – Carbon footprint of products – Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Technical Report. International Standard Organization, (ISO).
Jin, W. & Azarm, S. 2001 Metrics for quality assessment of a multiobjective design optimization solution set. Journal of Mechanical Design 123 (1), 1825.
Kishita, Y., Low, B. H., Fukushige, S., Umeda, Y., Suzuki, A. & Kawabe, T. 2010 Checklist-based assessment methodology for sustainable design. Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (9), 91011.
Lofthouse, V. 2013 Social issues: making them relevant and appropriate to undergraduate student designers. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 18 (2), 823.
Luttropp, C. & Lagerstedt, J. 2006 EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (15), 13961408.
Mala-Jetmarova, H., Barton, A. & Bagirov, A. 2014 Exploration of the trade-offs between water quality and pumping costs in optimal operation of regional multiquality water distribution systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 141 (6), 04014077.
Malewicki, D. 1983 New unified performance graphs and comparisons for streamlined human-powered vehicles. In 2nd Human-Powered-Vehicle Scientific Symposium, Human Powered Vehicle Association, Inc.
Malmiry, R. B, Dantan, J.-Y., Pailhès, J. & Antoine, J.-F. 2016 A product functional modelling approach based on the energy flow by using characteristics-properties modelling. Journal of Engineering Design 27 (12), 817843.
Marler, R. T. & Arora, J. S. 2004 Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 26 (6), 369395.
Matar, M. M., Georgy, M. E. & Ibrahim, M. E. 2008 Sustainable construction management: introduction of the operational context space ({OCS}). Construction Management and Economics 26 (3), 261275.
Mattson, C. A., Lofthouse, V. & Bhamra, T. 2015 Exploring decision tradeoffs in sustainable design. In ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 114. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Mattson, C. A., Wood, A. E. & Renouard, J. 2016 Village Drill: a case study in engineering for global development with five years of data post market-introduction. In ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Mattson, C. A., Wood, A. E. & Renouard, J. 2017 Village drill: a case study in engineering for global development with five years of data post market-introduction. Journal of Mechanical Design 139 (6), 065001.
McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. 2002 Design for the triple top line: new tools for sustainable commerce. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9 (3), 251258.
McPhee, J. & Yeh, W. W.-G. 2004 Multiobjective optimization for sustainable groundwater management in semiarid regions. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130 (6), 490497.
Messac, A. 2000 From dubious construction of objective functions to the application of physical programming. AIAA Journal 38 (1), 155163.
Messac, A. & Mattson, C. A. 2004 Normal constraint method with guarantee of even representation of complete Pareto frontier. AIAA Journal 42 (10), 21012111.
Michalek, J. J., Chester, M., Jaramillo, P., Samaras, C., Shiau, C.-S. N & Lave, L. B. 2011 Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (40), 1655416558.
Michalek, J. J., Papalambros, P. Y. & Skerlos, S. J. 2004 A study of fuel efficiency and emission policy impact on optimal vehicle design decisions. Ann Arbor 1001, 48109.
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.-H., Broman, G. & Sverdrup, H. 2010 Exploring the possibility of a systematic and generic approach to social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (10), 11071112.
Norman, W. & MacDonald, C. 2004 Getting to the bottom of ‘triple bottom line’. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (2), 243262.
Pandey, V., Mourelatos, Z. P. & Nikolaidis, E. 2013 Limitations of Pareto Front in Design Under Uncertainty and their Reconciliation. Journal of Mechanical Design 135 (7), 71010.
Pareto, V. 1927 Manual of Political Economy.
Pohekar, S. D. & Ramachandran, M. 2004 Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning – a review. Renewable and Sutsainable Energy Reviews 8 (4), 365381.
Qureshi, A. J., Eisenbart, B., Dantan, J.-Y. & Blessing, L. 2013 Design automation with the characteristics properties model and property driven design for redesign. In Smart Product Engineering, pp. 563572. Springer.
Reuter, B. 2016 Assessment of sustainability issues for the selection of materials and technologies during product design: a case study of lithium–ion batteries for electric vehicles. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 10 (3), 217227.
Rossing, W. A. H., Jansma, J. E., De Ruijter, F. J. & Schans, J. 1997 Operationalizing sustainability: exploring options for environmentally friendly flower bulb production systems. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103 (3), 217234.
Shahi, S. K., Wang, G. G., An, L., Bibeau, E. & Pirmoradi, Z. 2012 Using the pareto set pursuing multiobjective optimization approach for hybridization of a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Journal of Mechanical Design 134 (9), 94503.
She, J. & MacDonald, E. 2014 Priming designers to communicate sustainability. Journal of Mechanical Design 136 (1), 112.
Short, T., Lee-Mortimer, A., Luttropp, C. & Johansson, G. 2012 Manufacturing, sustainability, ecodesign and risk: lessons learned from a study of Swedish and English companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 37, 342352.
Telenko, C. & Seepersad, C. C. 2010 A methodology for identifying environmentally conscious guidelines for product design. Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (9), 91009.
Thurston, D. L. & Srinivasan, S. 2003 Constrained optimization for green engineering decision-making. Environmental Science & Technology 37 (23), 53895397.
Tischner, U. & Charter, M. 2001 Sustainable product design. Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future 22 (138).
Tobias, H., Figge, F., Pinkse, J. & Preuss, L. 2010 Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment 19 (4), 217229.
Walden, D. D., Roedler, G. J., Forsberg, K., Hamelin, R. D. & Shortell, T. M. 2015 Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. John Wiley & Sons.
Whitefoot, K., Fowlie, M. & Skerlos, S.2011 Product design response to industrial policy: evaluating fuel economy standards using an engineering model of endogenous product design, Energy Institute at Haas Working Paper No. WP-214.
Witczak, J., Kasprzak, J., Klos, Z., Kurczewski, P., Lewandowska, A. & Lewicki, R. 2014 Life cycle thinking in small and medium enterprises: the results of research on the implementation of life cycle tools in polish smes–part 2: Lca related aspects. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19 (4), 891900.
You, F., Tao, L., Graziano, D. J. & Snyder, S. W. 2012 Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input–output analysis. AIChE Journal 58 (4), 11571180.
Yuan, C. Y. & Dornfeld, D. A. 2010 A schematic method for sustainable material selection of toxic chemicals in design and manufacturing. Journal of Mechanical Design 132 (9), 91014.
Zhu, Z., Wang, K. & Zhang, B. 2014 Applying a network data envelopment analysis model to quantify the eco-efficiency of products: a case study of pesticides. Journal of Cleaner Production 69, 6773.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Design Science
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2053-4701
  • URL: /core/journals/design-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed