Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-7qhmt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T12:42:43.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological, behavioral, and relational levels of resilience in the context of risk for early childhood behavior problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2007

Susan D. Calkins
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Alysia Y. Blandon
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Amanda P. Williford
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Susan P. Keane
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Abstract

Longitudinal growth patterns of internalizing and externalizing behavior problems were examined in a community sample of 441 children across the ages of 2 to 5 using hierarchical linear modeling. Contextual risk was measured using five indicators (socioeconomic status, marital status, number of siblings, parent stress, parent psychopathology), and three levels of child resilience (biological, behavioral, and relational) were also assessed. Results indicate that a general pattern of decline in both types of behavior problems was observed for the entire sample across time, although considerable individual variability in this pattern was observed. Children's externalizing and internalizing behavior at age 5 was predicted by the level of risk at age 2. All three child resilience factors were also predictive of externalizing and internalizing behaviors at age 5. In the prediction of the slope of problem behavior over time, risk status interacted with both temperamental fearlessness and a mutually responsive orientation with the mother to predict the decline in externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Results underscore the complex interactions of risk and multiple levels of resilience that are implicated in the maintenance of problem behavior over time. They highlight the importance of considering whether expected resilience factors operate similarly across different levels of risk.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)