Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-z9m8x Total loading time: 0.418 Render date: 2022-09-29T07:46:50.243Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Children classified as controlling at age six: Evidence of disorganized representational strategies and aggression at home and at school

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Judith Solomon*
Affiliation:
Center for the Family in Transition, Corte Madera, California
Carol George
Affiliation:
Mills College, Oakland, California
*
Judith Solomon, Center for the Family in Transition, 5725 Paradise Drive Bldg. B, Suite 300, Corte Madera, CA 94925.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether children classified as controlling in attachment differ from children classified into the traditional Ainsworth attachment categories in their symbolic representations of attachment and level of behavior problems. Sixty-nine middle-class kindergarten children and their mothers participated in a laboratory separation and reunion. Children enacted doll-play stories about attachment-related themes. A four-group representation classification scheme was developed from the doll-play transcripts of 27 children. Mothers (n = 44) completed Achenbach's Child Behavior Checklist and teachers (n = 40) completed a 30-item inventory of classroom behavior. Results showed significant agreement between the representational system and Main and Cassidy's classification system (1988) for children's reunion behavior. The doll-play of controlling children was characterized by themes of catastrophe and helplessness or by complete inhibition of play and suggested disorganization of representational processes. Controlling children also were described by mothers and teachers as significantly more aggressive than other children. The results validate the distinction between the controlling and traditional classification groups and suggest that controlling children are at risk for behavioral maladaptation at home and at school.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss, Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss. Vol. 3. Loss. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bates, J. E., Maslin, C. A., & Frankel, K. A. (1985). Attachment security, mother-child interaction, and temperament as predictors of behavior-problem ratings at age three years. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research (pp. 66104). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2, Serial No. 209).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, J. E., & Bayles, K. (1988). Attachment and the development of behavior problems. In Belsky, J. and Nezworski, T. (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 253294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: retrospect and prospect. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research (pp. 3–35). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2, Serial No. 209).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, I., Ridgeway, D., & Cassidy, J. (1990). The role of internal working models in the attachment relationship: Can it be studied in three-year-olds? In Greenberg, M., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 273308). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, V., Cicchetti, D., Barnett, D., & Braunwald, K. (1989). Finding order in disorganization. In Cicchetti, D. & Carlson, V. (Eds.), Child maltreatment. Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 494528). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, J. (1988). The self as related to child-mother attachment at age six. Child Development, 59, 121134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, J., & Kobak, R. (1988). Avoidance and its relation to other defensive processes. In Belsky, J. & Nezworski, T. (Eds.). Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 300323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J., Marvin, R. S., & The Attachment Working Group of the John D. and Catherine MacArthur Network on the Transition from Infancy to Early Childhood. (1987). Attachment organization in 3- and 4-year-olds: A classification system. Unpublished scoring system.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D., & Barnett, D. (1991). Attachment organization in maltreated preschoolers. Development and Psychopathology, 3, 397411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, D. A. (1990). Child-mother attachment of six-year-olds and social competence at school. Child Development, 61, 152162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crittenden, P. (1988). Relationships at risk. In Belsky, J. & Nezworski, T. (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 136174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Crittenden, P. (1992). Quality of attachment in the preschool years. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 209241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagot, B. I., & Kavanagh, K. (1990). The prediction of antisocial behavior from avoidant attachment classifications. Child Development, 61, 864873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fish-Murray, C. C., Kolby, E. V., & van der Kolk, B. A. (1987). Evolving ideas: The effect of abuse on children's thought. In van der Kolk, B. A. (Ed.), Psychological trauma (pp. 89110). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
George, C., Main, M., & Kaplan, N. (1985). The adult attachment interview. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
George, C., & Solomon, J. (1989). Internal working models of caregiving and security of attachment at age six. Infant Mental Health Journal, 10 (3), 222237.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, C., & Solomon, J. (1993, 03). Toward a theory of caregiving. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development. New Orleans LA.Google Scholar
George, C., & Solomon, J. (in press). Representational models of relationships: Links between caregiving and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal.Google Scholar
Grossman, K. E., & Grossman, K. (1990). The wider concept of attachment in cross-cultural research. Human Development, 33, 3147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, J. L., & van der Kolk, B. (1987). Traumatic antecedent of borderline personality disorder (pp. 111126). In van der Kolk, B. A. (Ed.), Psychological trauma. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. J., Markman, H. C., Stinson, C. H., Fridhandler, B., & Ghannan, J. H. (1990). A classification theory of defense. In Singer, J. L. (Ed.), Repression and dissociation (pp. 6184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. (1993). Multiple caregiving among African-Americans and infant attachment: The need for an emic approach. Human Development, 36, 87102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobak, R. R., & Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence: working models, affect regulation, and representation of self and others. Child Development, 59, 135146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M., Feiring, C., McGuffog, C., & Jaskir, J. (1984). Predicting psychopathology in six-year-olds from early social relations. Child Development, 55, 123136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons-Ruth, K. (in press). Attachment relationships among children with aggressive behavior problems: The role of disorganized early attachment strategies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
Lyons-Ruth, K., Connell, D. B., Grunebaum, H., & Botein, S. (1990). Infants at social risk: Maternal depression and family support services as mediators of infant development and security of attachment. Child Development, 61, 8598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons-Ruth, K., Alpern, L., & Repacholi, B. (1993). Disorganized infant attachment classification and maternal psychosomatic problems as predictors of hostile-aggressive behavior in the preschool classroom. Child Development, 64, 572585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons-Ruth, K., & Block, D. (in press). The disturbed caregiving system: relations among childhood trauma, maternal caregiving, and infant attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal.Google Scholar
Lyons-Ruth, K., Easterbrooks, M. A., & Davidson, C. (in preparation). Disorganized attachment strategies and mental lag in infancy interact to predict externalizing problems at age seven.Google Scholar
Main, M. (1990a). Cross-cultural studies of attachment organization: Recent studies, changing methodologies, and the concept of conditional strategies. Human Development, 33, 4861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, M. (1990b). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) models of attachment: Findings and directions for future research. In Stevenson-Hinde, J. and Marris, P. (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 127159). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Cassidy, J. (1988). Categories of response to reunion with the parent at age 6: Predictable from infant attachment classifications and stable over a 1-month period. Developmental Psychology, 24 (3), 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parent's unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In Greenberg, M., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 161182). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research (pp. 66104). Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2, Serial No. 209).Google Scholar
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of a new, insecure-disorganized/disoriented attachment pattern. In Brazelton, T. B. & Yogman, M. (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 95124). Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth strange situation. In Greenberg, M., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 121160). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Weston, D. (1981). The quality of the toddler's relationship to mother and father: Related to conflict behavior and the readiness to establish new relationships. Child Development, 52, 932940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, M., Sigman, M., & Brill, N. (1987). Disorganization of attachment in relation to maternal alcohol consumption. Journal of Clinical & Consulting Psychology, 51, 831836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrone, E. R., Egeland, B., Kalkoske, M., & Carlson, E. A. (1994). Relations between early maltreatment and mental representations of relationships assessed with projective storytelling in middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 99120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, E. L. (1973). Inferred Self-Concept Scale. Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The origin of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Radke-Yarrow, M., Cummings, E. M., Kuczynski, L., & Chapman, M. (1985). Patterns of attachment in two- and three-year olds in normal families and families with parental depression. Child Development, 56, 884893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solomon, J., George, C., & Ivins, B. (1987, 04). Mother-child interaction in the home and security of attachment at age six. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore MD.Google Scholar
Solomon, J., & George, C. (1991, 04). Working models of attachment of children classified as controlling at age six: Disorganization at the level of representation. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Solomon, J., & George, C. (1994, 06). Role reversal and the disorganized caregiving system. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Infant Studies, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Solomon, J., & George, C. (in press). Defining the caregiving system: Toward a theory of caregiving. Infant Mental Health Journal.Google Scholar
Spiegal, D. (1990). Hypnosis, dissociation, and trauma: Hidden and overt observers. In Singer, J. L. (Ed.), Repression and dissociation (pp. 121142). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Spangler, G., & Grossman, K. E. (1993). Biobehavioral organization in securely and insecurely attached infants. Child Development, 64, 14391450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speltz, M. L., Greenberg, M. T., & Deklyen, M. (1990). Attachment in preschoolers with disruptive behavior: A comparison of clinic-referred and non-problem children. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 3146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (1988). The role of infant-caregiver attachment in development. In Belsky, J. & Nezworski, T. (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 1838). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Teti, D. M., & Gelfand, D. (1994, 06). Correlated of preschool attachment in a sample of depressed and nondepressed mothers. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Infant Studies, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Wartner, U. G., Grossman, K., Fremmer-Bombik, E., & Suess, G. (1994). Attachment patterns at age six in South Germany: Predictability from Infancy and Implications for Preschool Behavior. Child Development, 65, 10101023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
211
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Children classified as controlling at age six: Evidence of disorganized representational strategies and aggression at home and at school
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Children classified as controlling at age six: Evidence of disorganized representational strategies and aggression at home and at school
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Children classified as controlling at age six: Evidence of disorganized representational strategies and aggression at home and at school
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *