Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T05:13:44.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Couple power dynamics, systemic family functioning, and child adjustment: A test of a mediational model in a multiethnic sample

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2004

KRISTIN M. LINDAHL ,
NEENA M. MALIK ,
KAREN KACZYNSKI  and
JULIE S. SIMONS
KRISTIN M. LINDAHL
Affiliation:
University of Miami
NEENA M. MALIK
Affiliation:
University of Miami
KAREN KACZYNSKI
Affiliation:
University of Miami
JULIE S. SIMONS
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Power dynamics in the marital dyad and systemic elements of whole-family functioning (cohesion, subsystem boundary formations) were examined in relation to each other and also in relation to child adjustment in a multiethnic sample of families. Support was found for a mediational model, such that family functioning was found to mediate the relationship between marital power dynamics and children's internalizing and externalizing behavior. Some support also was found for ethnicity as a moderator of the association between systemic family processes and children's adjustment. Disturbances in family cohesion and subsystem boundaries were more strongly related to internalizing symptomatology for children in European American families compared to children in Hispanic American families.This research was funded by National Institute of Mental Health Grant R03 MH54631. We thank Jean–Philippe Laurenceau for his feedback on drafts of this manuscript and for statistical consultation. We also are very grateful to the participating families for the generous donation of their time and effort.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 609 - 630
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
Bean, F. D., Curtis, R. L., Jr., & Marcum, J. P. (1977). Familism and marital satisfaction among Mexican Americans: Effects of family size, wife's labor force participation, and conjugal power. Journal of Marriage and the Family 39, 759–767.Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (1981). Early human experience: A family perspective. Developmental Psychology 17, 3–23.Google Scholar
Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Demand-withdraw interaction in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67, 666–674.Google Scholar
Bertalanffy, L. von (1968). General systems theory. New York: Braziller.
Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Buehler, C., & Gerard, J. M. (2002). Marital conflict, ineffective parenting, and children's and adolescents' maladjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family 64, 78–92.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, D., Camparo, L., Christensen, A., Gonzalez, L., & Hinshaw, S. (1992). Mothers and fathers interacting in dyads and triads with normal and hyperactive sons. Developmental Psychology 28, 500–509.Google Scholar
Casa de la Mujer. (1988). Violencia en la intimidad. Bogota, Columbia: Corporación Casa de la Mujer.
Chao, R. K. (2001). Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development 72, 1832–1843.Google Scholar
Christensen, A., & Shenk, J. L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 458–463.Google Scholar
Cook, W. L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 62, 500–509.Google Scholar
Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology 48, 243–267.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Campbell, S. B. (2000). Developmental psychopathology and family process: Theory, research, and clinical implications. New York: Guilford Press.
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 116, 387–411.Google Scholar
Davey, A., Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Brody, G. H. (2001). Attributions in marriage: Examining the entailment model in dyadic context. Journal of Family Psychology 15, 721–734.Google Scholar
DeNavas–Walt, C., Cleveland, R., & Webster, B. H. (2003). Current population reports. In Income in the United States: 2002 (pp. 60–221). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
El-Sheikh, M., & Cummings, E. M. (1995). Children's responses to angry adult behavior as a function of experimentally manipulated exposure to resolved and unresolved conflict. Social Development 4, 75–91.Google Scholar
El-Sheikh, M., & Cummings, E. M., & Reiter, S. (1996). Preschoolers' responses to ongoing interadult conflict: The role of prior exposure to resolved versus unresolved arguments. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 24, 665–679.Google Scholar
Engfer, A. (1988). The interrelatedness of marriage and the mother–child relationship. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson–Hinde (Eds.), Relationships within families: Mutual influences (pp. 104–118). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent–child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 118, 108–132.Google Scholar
Fincham, F. (1998). Child development and marital relations. Child Development 69, 543–574.Google Scholar
Florsheim, P., Tolan, P., & Gorman–Smith, D. (1996). Family processes and risk for externalizing behavior problems among African American and Mexican American boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64, 1222–1230.Google Scholar
Gordis, E. B., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (1997). Marital aggression, observed parental hostility, and child behavior during triadic family interaction. Journal of Family Psychology 11, 76–89.Google Scholar
Gordis, E. B., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (2001). Parents' hostility in dyadic marital and triadic family settings and children's behavior problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 69, 727–734.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61, 6–15.Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2002). Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century. Family Process 41, 159–197.Google Scholar
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children's adjustment: A cognitive-contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin 108, 267–290.Google Scholar
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (Eds.). (2001). Interparental conflict and child development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hartmann, D. P., & Wood, D. D. (1992). Observational methods. In A. Bellack, M. Hersen, & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), International handbook of behavior modification and therapy (pp. 107–138). New York: Plenum Press.
Holmbeck, G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples for the child—Clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 65, 599–610.Google Scholar
Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 169–219). New York: W. H. Freeman.
Jacob, T., Tennenbaum, D. L., & Krahn, G. (1987). Factors influencing the reliability and validity of observational data. In T. Jacob (Ed.), Family interaction and psychopathology: Theories, methods, and findings. Applied clinical psychology (pp. 297–328). New York: Plenum Press.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30 and PRELIS 2.30. Chicago: Chicago Scientific Software International, Inc.
Katz, L. F. (2001). Physiological processes and mediators of the impact of marital conflict on children. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 188–212). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1996). Spillover effects of marital conflict: In search of parenting and coparenting mechanisms. In J. P. McHale & P. A. Cowan (Eds.), Understanding how family-level dynamics affect children's development: Studies of two-parent families (New directions for child development, No. 74, pp. 57–76). San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass/Pfeiffer.
Kerig, P. (2001). Introduction and overview: Conceptual issues in family observation research. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research (pp. 1–22). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
Kerig, P. K. (1995). Triangles in the family circle: Effects of family structure on marriage, parenting, and child adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology 9, 28–43.Google Scholar
Kitzmann, K. M. (2000). Effects of marital conflict on subsequent triadic family interactions. Developmental Psychology 36, 3–13.Google Scholar
Komter, A. (1989). Hidden power in marriage. Gender & Society 3, 187–215.Google Scholar
Krishnakumar, A., & Buehler, C. (2000). Interparental conflict and parenting behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies 49, 25–44.Google Scholar
Leaper, C., & Valin, D. (1996). Predictors of Mexican American mothers' and fathers' attitudes toward gender equality. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 18, 343–355.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M. (1998). Family process variables and children's disruptive behavior problems. Journal of Family Psychology 12, 420–436.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M. (2001). Methodological issues in family observational research. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research (pp. 23–32). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (1999a). Observations of marital conflict and power: Relations with parenting in the triad. Journal of Marriage and the Family 61, 320–330.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. M. (1999b). Marital conflict, family processes, and boys' externalizing behavior in Hispanic American and European American families. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 28, 12–24.Google Scholar
Lindahl, K. M., & Malik, N. (2001). The System for Coding Interactions and Family Functioning. In P. K. Kerig & K. M. Lindahl (Eds.), Family observational coding systems: Resources for systemic research (pp. 77–92). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
Lynch, M., & Cicchetti, D. (1998). An ecological–transactional analysis of children and contexts: The longitudinal interplay among child maltreatment, community violence, and children's symptomatology. Development and Psychopathology 10, 235–257.Google Scholar
Malik, N. M., & Lindahl, K. M. (1998). Aggression and dominance: The role of power and culture in domestic violence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 5, 409–423.Google Scholar
Malik, N. M., & Lindahl, K. M. (2004). System for Coding Interactions in Dyads (SCID). In P. K. Kerig & D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Couple observational coding systems (pp. 173–188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Margolin, G., Oliver, P. H., & Medina, A. M. (2001). Conceptual issues in understanding the relation between interparental conflict and child adjustment: Integrating developmental psychopathology and risk/resilience perspectives. In J. Grych & F. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development (pp. 9–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McHale, J. P., & Cowan, P. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding how family-level dynamics affect children's development: Studies of two-parent families. New Directions for Child Development 74.Google Scholar
McHale, J. P., & Fivas–Depeursinge, E. (1999). Understanding triadic and family group interactions during infancy and toddlerhood. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 2, 107–127.Google Scholar
McLoyd, V. C., Harper, C. I., & Copeland, N. L. (2001). Ethnic minority status, interparental conflict, and child adjustment. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 98–125). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mintz, S., & Kellogg, S. (1988). Domestic revolutions: A social history of American family life. New York: Free Press.
Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development 56, 289–302.Google Scholar
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Minuchin, S., Rosman, B. L., & Baker, L. (1978). Psychosomatic families: Anorexia nervosa in context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (2004). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Olson, D. H., & Cromwell, R.E. (1975). Power in families. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families (pp. 3–11). New York: Sage.
Patterson, G. R., & Stouthamer–Loeber, M. (1984). The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development 55, 1299–1307.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. (1983). Developmental systems: Contexts and evolution. In W. Kessen (Ed.), P. H. Mussen (Ser. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. I. History, theory, and methods (pp. 237–294). New York: Wiley.
Sameroff, A. J., & Chandler, M. J. (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F. Horowitz, M. Hetherington, S. Scarr–Salapatek, & G. Siegal (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 187–244). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sameroff, A. J., & MacKenzie, M. J. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development: The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology 15, 613–640.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 86, 420–428.Google Scholar
Staples, R., & Mirandé, A. (1980). Racial and cultural variations among American families: A decennial review of the literature on minority families. Journal of Marriage and the Family 42, 887–903.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L. H., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., Mounts, N. S., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Over-time changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development 66, 754–770.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S., Dornbusch, S., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development 63, 1266–1281.Google Scholar
Vega, W. A. (1990). Hispanic families in the 1980's: A decade of research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52, 1015–1024.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, S., Wood, B., & Vuchinich, R. (1994). Coalition and family problem solving with preadolescents in referred, at-risk, and comparison families. Family Process 33, 409–424.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Kirchler, E., Clack, F., Tekarslan, E., & Verma, J. (1990). Male dominance, role segregation, and spouses' interdependence in conflict. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 21, 48–70.Google Scholar
Westerman, M. A. (1987). “Triangulation,” marital discord and child behaviour problems. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 4, 87–106.Google Scholar
Westerman, M. A., & Massoff, M. (2001). Triadic coordination: An observational method for examining whether children are “caught in the middle” of interparental discord. Family Process 40, 479–493.Google Scholar
Yllö, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47–62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zimet, D. M., & Jacob, T. (2001). Influences of marital conflict on child adjustment: Review of theory and research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 4, 319–335.Google Scholar