Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-fppf4 Total loading time: 0.173 Render date: 2022-01-18T17:41:31.455Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Models of internalizing outcomes of early rejection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2009

Virginia Salzer Burks*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Kenneth A. Dodge
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
Joseph M. Price
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
*
Virginia Salzer Burks, Box 512 Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.

Abstract

Viewing social rejection from same-age peers as a source of stress for children, the current study sought to determine the most appropriate model of the effects of temporary versus consistent experiences with rejection for both short-term and long-term internalizing problems. Adopting a cross-sectional longitudinal design, the sociometric status of children in the first year of the study (when the children were in the first, second, or third grades), and then again in the next school year (when children were in the second, third, or fourth grades) was assessed to determine which children were rejected by their peers. Internalizing outcome measures were administered in the third and sixth years of follow-up. Results indicated that, for boys, the Threshold Model best represented the stressful effects of rejection. That is, only boys who were exposed to rejection for 2 consecutive years demonstrated both short-term and long-term internalizing problems in subsequent years. For girls, however, there appeared to be few significant differences among those who never experienced rejection, who had only temporary experiences with rejection, and girls who were consistently exposed to rejection. Results are discussed in terms of the significance of a Threshold Model as well as possible explanations for these gender differences.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavioral Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1991 a). Manual for the teacher's report form and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1991 b). Manual for the youth selfreport and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Albee, G. W. (1984). Prologue: A model for classifying prevention programs. In Joffe, J. M., Albee, G. W., & Kelly, L. D. (Eds.), Readings in primary prevention of psychopathology: Basic concepts (pp. 228245). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Asher, S. R., Hymel, S., & Renshaw, P. D. (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55, 14561464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, S. R., & Wheeler, V. A. (1985). Children's loneliness: A comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 53, 500505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development, 58, 11011113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261282.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., & Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. Journal of Consulting and Clincial Psychology, 60, 783792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeRosier, M. E., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Patterson, C. J. (1994). Children's academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection. Child Development, 65, 17991813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 13861399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A. (1993). Social information processing and peer rejection factors in the development of behavior problems in children. Invited lecture presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., & Brakke, N. P. (1982). Behavior patterns of socially rejected and neglected preadolescents: The roles of social approach and aggression. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 389410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymel, S., Rubin, K. H., Rowden, L., & LeMare, L. (1990). Children's peer relationships: Longitudinal predictions of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Development, 61, 20042021.Google Scholar
Kovacs, M. (1985). The children's depression inventory. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 21, 995998.Google ScholarPubMed
Kupersmidt, J. B., & Coie, J. D. (1990). Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence. Child Development, 61, 13501362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kupersmidt, J. B., & Patterson, C. J. (1991). Childhood peer rejection, aggression, withdrawal, and perceived competence as predictors of self-reported behavior problems in preadolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 1991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladd, G. W., Price, J. M., & Hart, J. (1990). Preschooler's behavioral orientations and patterns of peer contact: Predictive of peer status? In Asher, S. R. & Coie, J. D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood(pp. 90115). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lever, J. (1976). Sex differences in the games children play. Social Problems, 23, 479487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted chidlren at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhurst, J. R., & Asher, S. R. (1985). Goals and concerns: Implications for the study of children's social competence. In Lahcy, B. & Kazdin, A. E. (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 199228). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, C. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Vaden, N. A. (1990). Income level, gender, ethnicity, and household composition as predictors of children's school-based competence. Child Development, 61, 485494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, K. H., LeMare, L. J., & Lollis, S. (1990). Social withdrawal in childhood: Developmental pathways to peer rejection. In Asher, S. R. & Coie, J. D. (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 217249). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., & Lollis, S. (1988). Origins and consequences of social withdrawal. In Belsky, J. & Nezworski, T. (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 219252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., & Mills, R. S. (1988). The many faces of social isolation in childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 916924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M. (1983). Stress, coping, and development: Some issues and some questions. In Garmezy, N. & Rutter, M. (Eds.), Stress, coping and development in children (pp. 141). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Savin-Williams, R. C. (1980 a). Dominance hierarchies in groups of middle to late adolescent males. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9, 7585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savin-Williams, R. C. (1980 b). Social interactions of adolescent females in natural groups. In Foot, H. C., Chapman, A. J., & Smith, J. R. (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
52
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Models of internalizing outcomes of early rejection
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Models of internalizing outcomes of early rejection
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Models of internalizing outcomes of early rejection
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *