Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:00:53.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parsing apart the persisters: Etiological mechanisms and criminal offense patterns of moderate- and high-level persistent offenders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2016

Jamie Amemiya ,
Susan Vanderhei  and
Kathryn C. Monahan
Jamie Amemiya*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Susan Vanderhei
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Kathryn C. Monahan
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jamie Amemiya, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 210 South Bouquet Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; E-mail: jaa141@pitt.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Longitudinal investigations that have applied Moffitt's dual taxonomic framework to criminal offending have provided support for the existence of adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial individuals, but have also identified additional trajectories. For instance, rather than a single persistent trajectory, studies have found both high-level and moderate-level persistent offenders. To inform theory and progress our understanding of chronic antisocial behavior, the present study used a sample of serious adolescent offenders (N =1,088) followed from middle adolescence to early adulthood (14–25 years), and examined how moderate-level persistent offenders differed from low-rate, desisting, and high-level persistent offenders. Results indicated that moderate-level persisters' etiology and criminal offense patterns were most similar to high-level persisters, but there were notable differences. Specifically, increasing levels of contextual adversity characterized both moderate-level and high-level persisting trajectories, but moderate-level persisters reported consistently lower levels of environmental risk. While both high- and moderate-level persisters committed more drug-related offenses in early adulthood compared to adolescence, moderate-level persisters engaged in lower levels of antisocial behavior across all types of criminal offenses. Taken cumulatively, the findings of this study suggest that sociocontextual interventions may be powerful in reducing both moderate- and high-level persistence in crime.

Type
Regular Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , August 2017 , pp. 819 - 835
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The project described was supported by funds from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, National Institute of Justice, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, William T. Grant Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, William Penn Foundation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R01DA019697, Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency, and the Arizona Governor's Justice Commission. We are grateful for their support. However, the content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these agencies.

References

Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aguilar, B., Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., & Carlson, E. (2000). Distinguishing the early-onset/persistent and adolescence-onset antisocial behavior types: From birth to 16 years. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 109–132.Google Scholar
Baker, T., Metcalfe, C. F., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). What are the odds? Predicting specialization in offending over the life course. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40, 909–932.Google Scholar
Brame, R., Fagan, J., Piquero, A. R., Schubert, C. A., & Steinberg, L. (2004). Criminal careers of serious delinquents in two cities. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 256–272.Google Scholar
Cernkovich, S., & Giordano, P. (1992). School bonding, race and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 261–291.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Monetary costs of gender and ethnicity disaggregated group-based offending. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 159–172.Google Scholar
Conger, R., Ge, X., Elder, G., Lorenz, F., & Simons, R. (1994). Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development, 65, 541–561.Google Scholar
Eggleston, E. P., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2004). Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 1–26.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1993). Motivations for conduct disorder and delinquency. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 225–241.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theorertical and empirical issues—The Sutherland Award address. Criminology, 41, 221–225.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1993). Criminal, penal and life histories of chronic offenders: Risk and protective factors and early identification. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 3, 492–523.Google Scholar
Golden, C. (1978). Stroop color and word test. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting Company.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1994). Adolescent problem behaviors: Issues and research. In Ketterlinus, R. & Lamb, M. (Eds.), A general theory of adolescent problem behavior: Problems and prospects (pp. 41–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Henry, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1996). Temperamental and familial predictors of violent and nonviolent criminal convictions: Age 3 to age 18. Developmental Psychology, 32, 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, G. E., Bush, M. D., Marcum, C. D., Ricketts, M. L., & Kirchner, E. E. (2010). Ensnared into crime: A preliminary test of Moffitt's snares hypothesis in a national sample of African Americans. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 8, 181–200.Google Scholar
Hindelang, M. J., Hirschi, T., & Weis, J. G. (1981). Measuring delinquency. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Huizinga, D., Esbensen, F., & Weihar, A. (1991). Are there multiple paths to delinquency? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 83–118.Google Scholar
Jennings, W. G., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the number and shape of developmental/life-course violence, aggression, and delinquency trajectories: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 472–489.Google Scholar
Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S., & Roeder, K. (2001). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociological Methods Research, 29, 374–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, T., Small, W., Johnston, C., Li, K., Montaner, J. S., & Wood, E. (2008). Characteristics of injection drug users who participate in drug dealing: Implications for drug policy. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 40, 147–152.Google Scholar
Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1–14.Google Scholar
Le Blanc, M. (1996). Changing patterns in the perpetration of offences over time: Trajectories from early adolescence to the early 30's. Studies on Crime & Crime Prevention, 5, 151–165.Google Scholar
Lo, C. C., Kim, Y. S., & Cheng, T. C. (2008). Offense specialization of arrestees: An event history analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 54, 341–365.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 355–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., & Milne, B. J. (2002). Males on the life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways: Follow-up at age 26 years. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 179–207.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., Lynam, D. R., & Silva, P. A. (1994). Neuropsychological tests predicting persistent male delinquency. Criminology, 32, 277–300.Google Scholar
Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. P. (2009). Trajectories of antisocial behavior and psychosocial maturity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1654–1668.Google Scholar
Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., & Mulvey, E. P. (2013). Psychosocial (im)maturity from adolescence to early adulthood: Distinguishing between adolescence-limited and persisting antisocial behavior. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1093–1105.Google Scholar
Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Chassin, C., et al. (2004). Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 213–236.Google Scholar
Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Piquero, A. R., Besana, M., Fagan, J., Schubert, C., et al. (2010). Trajectories of desistance and continuity in antisocial behavior following court adjudication among serious adolescent offenders. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 453–475.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: Specification and esimtation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.Google Scholar
Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., et al. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 673–716.Google Scholar
Piquero, A. R. (2001). Testing Moffitt's neuropsychological variation hypothesis for the prediction of life-course persistent offending. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piquero, A. R. (2008). Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In Liberman, A. (Ed.), The long view of crime: A synthesis of longitudinal research (pp. 23–78). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Piquero, A. R., Blumstein, A., Brame, R., Haapanen, R., Mulvey, E. P., & Nagin, D. S. (2001). Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 54–74.Google Scholar
Piquero, A. R., Monahan, K. C., Glasheen, C., Schubert, C. A., & Mulvey, E. P. (2013). Does time matter? Comparing trajectory concordance and covariate association using time-based and age-based assessments. Crime and Delinquency, 59, 738–763.Google Scholar
Raine, A., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Lynam, D. (2005). Neurocognitive impairments in boys on the life-course persistent antisocial path. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 38–49.Google Scholar
Reitan, R. (1979). Trail-making test. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Monahan, K. C., Campbell, S. B., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2010). Is adolescence-onset antisocial behavior developmentally normative? Development and Psychopathology, 22, 295–311.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for non-response in surveys. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. J. (Ed.). (2009). The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Google Scholar
Sampson, R., & Raudenbush, S. (1999). Systematic social observation on public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). A life course view of the development of crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602, 12–45. doi:10.1177/0002716205280075 Google Scholar
Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.Google Scholar
Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Steinberg, L., Cauffman, E., Losoya, S. H., Hecker, T., et al. (2004). Operational lessons from the pathways to desistance project. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 237–255.Google Scholar
Selner-Ohagan, M., Kindlon, D., Buka, S., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1998). Assessing exposure to violence in urban youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 39, 215–224.Google Scholar
Shook, J. J., Vaughn, M. G., & Salas-Wright, C. P. (2013). Exploring the variation in drug selling among adolescents in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 365–374.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281.Google Scholar
Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Wei, E., Loeber, R., & Masten, A. S. (2004). Desistance from persistent serious delinquency in the transition to adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 897–918.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice, 4, 33–83.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2001). The development of delinquency: An interactional perspective. In White, S. (Ed.), Handbook of youth and justice (pp. 289–305). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Thornberry, T. P., Lizotte, A. J., Krohn, M. D., Farnworth, M., & Jang, S. J. (1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83.Google Scholar