Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T17:04:09.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adolescents' behavior in the presence of interparental hostility: Developmental and emotion regulatory influences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2005

MARC S. SCHULZ ,
ROBERT J. WALDINGER ,
STUART T. HAUSER  and
JOSEPH P. ALLEN
MARC S. SCHULZ
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College
ROBERT J. WALDINGER
Affiliation:
Judge Baker Children's Center
STUART T. HAUSER
Affiliation:
Judge Baker Children's Center
JOSEPH P. ALLEN
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within-family covariation between interparental hostility and adolescent behavior across three interactions over a 2-year period was explored in a sample that included 37 typical adolescents and 35 adolescents recently hospitalized for psychiatric difficulties. More interparental hostility across the three interactions was associated with more adolescent hostility and more positive engagement (at a trend level) regardless of psychiatric background. Parent-to-child hostility in each interaction mediated the link for adolescent hostility but not for positive adolescent engagement. Emotion regulation capacities and age were linked to variability in adolescents' behavior in the presence of interparental conflict. In interactions with more interparental hostility, adolescents with greater capacity to tolerate negative affect were more likely to show increased positive engagement, and adolescents who were better able to modulate their emotional expression were less likely to show increased hostility. Covariation between interparental and adolescent hostility across the three family interactions decreased as the adolescent aged. These findings are consistent with the theory that exposure to interparental hostility is emotionally disequilibrating, and that adolescent responses may reflect differences in emotion regulation and other developmentally based capacities. Gender and variations across families in overall levels of hostile parenting were also linked with adolescent behavior in the presence of interparental hostility.This research was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (RO1 MH 4493). The authors thank J. Heidi Gralinski–Bakker and Rebecca Billings for their valuable assistance with this research.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 489 - 507
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J. P., Hauser, S. T., Bell, K. L., & O'Connor, T. G. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of autonomy and relatedness in adolescent–family interactions as predictors of adolescent ego development and self-esteem. Child Development 65, 179–194.Google Scholar
Allen, J. P., Kuperminc, G. P., & Moore, C. M. (1997). Developmental approaches to understanding adolescent deviance. In S. S. Luthar, J. A. Burack, D. Cicchetti, & J. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Perspectives on risk and disorder (pp. 548–567). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Amato, P. R., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 110, 26–46.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
Breslow, N., & Clayton, D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88, 9–25.Google Scholar
Cairns, R. B., Bergman, L. R., & Kagan, J. (Eds.). (1998). Methods and models for studying the individual. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., & Candee, D. (1986). Assessing moral judgements: A Manual. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Teti, L. O. D. (1994). The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: A clinical perspective. In N. A. Fox (Ed.), The development of emotion regulation: Biological and behavioral considerations (Vol. 59, pp. 73–100). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Crockenberg, S., & Forgays, D. K. (1996). The role of emotion in children's understanding and emotional reactions to marital conflict. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly 42, 22–47.Google Scholar
Crockenberg, S., & Langrock, A. (2001). The role of emotion and emotional regulation in children's responses to interparental conflict. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interpersonal conflict and child development: Theory, research and application (pp. 129–156). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cummings, E. M. (1987). Coping with background anger in early childhood. Child Development 58, 976–984.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Ballard, M., & El-Sheikh, M. (1991). Response of children and adolescents to interadult anger as a function of gender, age, and mode of expression. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly 37, 543–560.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Campbell, S. B. (2000). Developmental psychopathology and family process: Theory, research, and clinical implications. New York: Guilford Press.
Cummings, E. M., Iannotti, R., & Zahn–Waxler, C. (1985). The influence of conflict between adults on the emotions and aggression of young children. Developmental Psychology 21, 495–507.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Simpson, K. S., & Wilson, A. (1993). Children's responses to interadult anger as a function of information about resolution. Developmental Psychology 29, 978–985.Google Scholar
Cummings, E. M., Vogel, D., Cummings, J., & El-Sheikh, M. (1989). Children's responses to different forms of expression of anger between adults. Child Development 60, 1392–1404.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 116, 387–411.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Cummings, E. M. (1998). Exploring children's emotional security as a mediator of the link between marital relations and child adjustment. Child Development 69, 124–139.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., & Forman, E. M. (2002). Children's patterns of preserving emotional security in the interparental subsystem. Child Development 73, 1880–1903Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., Myers, R. L., & Cummings, E. M. (1996). Responses of children and adolescents to marital conflict scenarios as a function of the emotionality of conflict endings. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly 42, 1–21.Google Scholar
Davies, P. T., Myers, R. L., Cummings, E. M., & Heindel, S. (1999). Adult conflict history and children's subsequent responses to conflict: An experimental test. Journal of Family Psychology 13, 610–628.Google Scholar
Davis, B. T., Hops, H., Alpert, A., & Sheeber, L. (1998). Child responses to parental conflict and their effect on adjustment: A study of triadic relations. Journal of Family Psychology 12, 163–177.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A. (1991). Emotion and social information processing. In J. Garber & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation (pp. 159–181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Easterbrooks, M. A., Cummings, E. M., & Emde, R. N. (1994). Young children's responses to constructive marital disputes. Journal of Family Psychology 8, 160–176.Google Scholar
El-Sheikh, M., Harger, J., & Whitson, S. M. (2001). Exposure to interparental conflict and children's adjustment and physical health: The moderating role of vagal tone. Child Development 72.Google Scholar
Emery, R. E. (1982). Interparental conflict and the children of discord and divorce. Psychological Bulletin 29, 310–330.Google Scholar
Emery, R. E., & O'Leary, K. D. (1984). Marital discord and child behavior problems in a nonclinic sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 12, 411–420.Google Scholar
Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent–child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 108–132.Google Scholar
Fincham, F. D., & Grych, J. H. (2001). Advancing understanding of the association between interparental conflict and child development. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and application (pp. 443–451). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gordis, E. B., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (1997). Marital aggression, observed parental hostility and child behavior during triadic family interaction. Journal of Family Psychology 11, 76–89.Google Scholar
Greene, S. M., & Anderson, E. R. (1999). Observed negativity in large family systems: Incidents and reactions. Journal of Family Psychology 13, 372–392.Google Scholar
Grych, J., & Cardoza–Fernandes, S. (2001). Understanding the impact of interparental conflict on children: The role of social cognitive processes. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and application (pp. 157–187). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Marital conflict and children's adjustment: A cognitive–contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin 108, 267–290.Google Scholar
Grych, J. H., & Fincham, F. D. (1993). Children's appraisals of marital conflict: Initial investigations of the cognitive–contextual framework. Child Development 64, 215–230.Google Scholar
Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending: Processes of self-environment organization. New York: Academic Press.
Haan, N. (1993). The assessment of coping, defense, and stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Ed.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (2nd ed., pp. 258–273). New York: Free Press.
Hauser, S. T. (1978). Semi-structured interview for adolescents: Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Medical School.
Hauser, S. T., Powers, S. I., & Noam, G. (1991). Adolescents and their families: Paths of ego development. New York: Free Press.
Hauser, S. T., Powers, S., Noam, G., Jacobson, A. M., Weiss, B., & Follansbee, D. (1984). Familial contexts of adolescent ego development. Child Development 55, 195–213.Google Scholar
Hauser, S. T., Powers, S. I., Weiss–Perry, B., Follansbee, D., Rajapark, D. C., Greene, W. M., Waters, P. L., Levine, H., & Jurecic, L. (1992). Constraining and enabling coding system. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard Medical School.
Jenkins, J. M., Smith, M. A., & Graham, P. J. (1989). Coping with parental quarrels. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 28, 182–189.Google Scholar
Jouriles, E. N., Bourg, W., & Farris, A. M. (1991). Marital adjustment and child conduct problems: A comparison of the correlation across subsamples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 354–357.Google Scholar
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 221–242.Google Scholar
Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1995). Vagal tone protects children from marital conflict. Development and Psychopathology 7, 83–92.Google Scholar
Katz, L. F., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Buffering children from marital conflict and dissolution. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 26, 157–171.Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Quantitative methods in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233–265). New York: McGraw–Hill.
Kerig, P. K. (1998). Moderators and mediators of the effects of interparental conflict on children's adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 26, 199–212.Google Scholar
Kerig, P. K. (2001). Children's coping with interparental conflict. In J. H. Grych & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and application (pp. 213–245). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kurdek, L. A. (1998). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality over the first four years of marriage for first-married husbands and wives. Journal of Family Psychology 12, 56–65.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Luborsky, L. (1998). A guide to the CCRT Method. In L. Luborsky & P. Crits–Christoph (Eds.), Understanding transference: The core conflictual relationship theme method (2nd ed., pp. 15–54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. B. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33–64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Margolin, G., Gordis, G. E. B., & John, R. S. (2001). Coparenting: A link between marital conflict and parenting in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology 15, 3–21.Google Scholar
Maughan, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2002). Impact of child maltreatment and interadult violence on children's emotion regulatory abilities and socioemotional adjustment. Child Development 73, 1525–1542.Google Scholar
McHale, J. P., & Cowan, P. A. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding how family-level dynamics affect children's development: Studies of two-parent families. New directions for child development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey–Bass.
Nesselroade, J. R. (2001). Intraindividual variability in development within and between individuals. European Psychologist 6, 187–193.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M., & Peyton, V. (2002). Parenting attitudes and marital intimacy: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Psychology 16, 118–127.Google Scholar
Osborne, L. N., & Fincham, F. (1996). Marital conflict, parent–child relationships, and child adjustment: Does gender matter? Merrill–Palmer Quarterly 42, 48–75.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R., & Reid, J. B. (1984). Social interactional processes within the family: The study of the moment-by-moment family transactions in which human social development is embedded. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 5, 237–262.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
Reid, W. J., & Crisafulli, A. (1990). Marital discord and child behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 18, 105–117.Google Scholar
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (2002). Beginning behavioral research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice.
Roston, D., Lee, K. A., & Vaillant, G. E. (1992). A q-sort approach to identifying defenses. In G. E. Vaillant (Ed.), Ego mechanisms of defense: A guide for clinicians and researchers (pp. 217–233). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Schulz, M. S., & Lazarus, R. S. (in press). Emotion regulation during adolescence: A cognitive-mediational conceptualization. In A. M. Cauce & S. T. Hauser (Eds.), Adolescence and beyond: Family interactions and transitions to adulthood; Advances in Family Research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Strodtbeck, F. (1951). Husband–wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociology Review 16, 463–473.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakeslee, S. (1989). Second chances: Men, women, and children a decade after divorce. New York: Tichnor & Fields.