Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 70
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cicchetti, Dante 2016. Systems Neuroscience in Depression.

    Davies, Patrick T. Martin, Meredith J. and Sturge-Apple, Melissa L. 2016. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Granic, Isabela Hollenstein, Tom and Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Anna 2016. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Anderson, George M. Montazeri, Farhad and de Bildt, Annelies 2015. Network Approach to Autistic Traits: Group and Subgroup Analyses of ADOS Item Scores. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Vol. 45, Issue. 10, p. 3115.

    Beauchaine, Theodore P. and Marsh, Penny 2015. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Bergman, Lars R. Von Eye, Alexander and Magnusson, David 2015. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Cicchetti, Dante and Curtis, W. John 2015. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Cicchetti, Dante 2015. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Cooke, David J. and Logan, Caroline 2015. Capturing clinical complexity: Towards a personality-oriented measure of psychopathy. Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 262.

    Deboeck, Pascal R. Nicholson, Jody Kouros, Chrystyna Little, Todd D. and Garber, Judy 2015. Integrating Developmental Theory and Methodology: Using Derivatives to Articulate Change Theories, Models, and Inferences. Applied Developmental Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 217.

    Fox, Nathan A. Ashley Hane, Amie and Pérez-Edgar, Koraly 2015. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Granic, Isabela and Hollenstein, Tom 2015. Developmental Psychopathology.

    Hartman, Suzanne and Manfra, Louis 2015. Change in child behaviour concerns associated with childcare quality features among a sample of low-income Latino children. Early Child Development and Care, p. 1.

    Mark Cummings, E. and Valentino, Kristin 2015. Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science.


    Edwards, Nicole Megan 2014. Distinct Factors Associated With Head Start Mothers’ Self-Report of Perceived Low Positive and High Negative Maternal Expressiveness. Early Education and Development, Vol. 25, Issue. 8, p. 1219.

    Hollenstein, Tom and Lanteigne, Dianna 2014. Models and methods of emotional concordance. Biological Psychology, Vol. 98, p. 1.

    Brennan, Tim and Oliver, William L. 2013. The Emergence of Machine Learning Techniques in Criminology. Criminology & Public Policy, Vol. 12, Issue. 3, p. 551.

    Denham, Susanne A. Kalb, Sara Way, Erin Warren-Khot, Heather Rhoades, Brittany L. and Bassett, Hideko H. 2013. Social and emotional information processing in preschoolers: indicator of early school success?. Early Child Development and Care, Vol. 183, Issue. 5, p. 667.

    Elison, Jed T. Wolff, Jason J. Heimer, Debra C. Paterson, Sarah J. Gu, Hongbin Hazlett, Heather C. Styner, Martin Gerig, Guido and Piven, Joseph 2013. Frontolimbic neural circuitry at 6 months predicts individual differences in joint attention at 9 months. Developmental Science, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 186.


The Hubble hypothesis and the developmentalist's dilemma

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 June 1997

Developmental psychopathology stands poised at the close of the 20th century on the horns of a major scientific dilemma. The essence of this dilemma lies in the contrast between its heuristically rich open system concepts on the one hand, and the closed system paradigm it adopted from mainstream psychology for investigating those models on the other. Many of the research methods, assessment strategies, and data analytic models of psychology's paradigm are predicated on closed system assumptions and explanatory models. Thus, they are fundamentally inadequate for studying humans, who are unparalleled among open systems in their wide ranging capacities for equifinal and multifinal functioning. Developmental psychopathology faces two challenges in successfully negotiating the developmentalist's dilemma. The first lies in recognizing how the current paradigm encourages research practices that are antithetical to developmental principles, yet continue to flourish. I argue that the developmentalist's dilemma is sustained by long standing, mutually enabling weaknesses in the paradigm's discovery methods and scientific standards. These interdependent weaknesses function like a distorted lens on the research process by variously sustaining the illusion of theoretical progress, obscuring the need for fundamental reforms, and both constraining and misguiding reform efforts. An understanding of how these influences arise and take their toll provides a foundation and rationale for engaging the second challenge. The essence of this challenge will be finding ways to resolve the developmentalist's dilemma outside the constraints of the existing paradigm by developing indigenous research strategies, methods, and standards with fidelity to the complexity of developmental phenomena.

Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr. J. E. Richters, Child & Adolescent Disorder Branch, Room 18C-17, NIMH, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. E-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Development and Psychopathology
  • ISSN: 0954-5794
  • EISSN: 1469-2198
  • URL: /core/journals/development-and-psychopathology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *