Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T05:57:54.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shell-boring algae on the Scottish continental shelf: identification, distribution, bathymetric zonation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

E. B. Akpan  and
G. E. Farrow
E. B. Akpan
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Calabar, Nigeria.
G. E. Farrow
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Scotland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

3050 dead molluscan shells and fragments of calcareous algae were collected from 104 benthic stations at depths from 2 to 160 m in the Firth of Clyde, the Firth of Lorne and on the Orkney shelf, British Isles. The following micro-algal borings were recognised and are described: (i) Rhodophyta: Conchocelis, (ii) Chlorophyta: Ostreobium quekettii, Eugomontia sacculata, Phaeophila sp. and (iii) Cyanophyta: Plectonema terebrans, Hyella spp.

These endolithic algae are bathymetrically zoned. Eugomontia, Phaeophila and the cyanophytes characterize the upper part of the photic zone (2–20 m). Shallow sheltered environments are typified by a high density of algal borings, most of them aligned perpendicular to shell surfaces. The lower photic zone is characterized by Ostreobium and Conchocelis whose borings are parallel to shell surfaces. The photic limit is about 40 m for the open Orkney shelf (59°N), and about 22 m for the partly enclosed firths (56°N).

The Orkney population is dominated by two chlorophyte taxa: rhodophytes and cyanophytes are absent. This may be due to higher tidal energy conditions.

Keywords

bioerosionbivalvecarbonateChlorophytaendolithphotic zoneRhodophyta.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , 1984 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

11. References

Alexandersson, E. T. 1972. Micritization of carbonate particles: process of precipitation and dissolution in modern shallow-water sediments. BULL GEOL INST UNIV UPPSALA NS 3, 201–36.Google Scholar
Batters, E. A. 1982. On Conchocelis, a new genus of perforating algae. PHYCOL MEM 1, 25–8.Google Scholar
Bromley, R. G. & Hanken, N. 1981. Shallow marine bioerosion at Vardo, Arctic Norway. BULL GEOL SOC DEN 29, 103–9.Google Scholar
Brown, B. J. 1979. Shell transport and community recognition in modern shelf seas. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Glasgow University.Google Scholar
Budd, D. A. & Perkins, R. D. 1980. Bathymetrie zonation and paleoecological significance of microborings in Puerto Rican shelf and slope sediments. J SEDIMENT PETROL 50, 881–904.Google Scholar
Clokie, J. J. P., Boney, A. D. & Farrow, G. E. 1979. Use of Conchocelis as indicator organism: data from Firth of Clyde and NW shelf. BR PHYCOL J 14, 120–1.Google Scholar
Clokie, J. P. & Boney, A. D. 1980. Conchocelis distribution in the Firth of Clyde: estimates of the lower limits of the photic zone. J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL 46, 111–25.Google Scholar
Conway, E. & Cole, K. 1977. Studies in the Bangiaceae: structure and reproduction of the Conchocelis of Porphyra and Bangia in culture. PHYCOLOGIA 16, 205–16.Google Scholar
Craig, R. E. 1959. Hydrography of Scottish coastal waters. MAR RES 2, Edinburgh: Scottish Home Dept.Google Scholar
Craig, G. Y. 1967. Size frequency distributions of living and dead populations of pelecypods from Bimini, Bahamas. J GEOL 75, 34–45.Google Scholar
Deegan, C. E., Kirby, R., Rae, I. & Floyd, R. 1973. The superficial deposits of the Firth of Clyde and its sea lochs. REP INST GEOL SCI 73/9.Google Scholar
Ellett, D. J. & Edwards, A. 1983. Oceanography and inshore hydrography of the Inner Hebrides. PROC R SOC EDINBURGH 83B, 143–60.Google Scholar
Farrow, G. E. 1974. On the ecology and sedimentation of the Cardium shellsands and transgressive shellbanks of Traigh Mhor, Island of Barra, Outer Hebrides. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 69, 203–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, G. E. & Clokie, J. 1979. Molluscan grazing of sublittoral algal bored shells and production of carbonate mud in the Firth of Clyde, Scotland. TRANS R SOC EDINBURGH 70, 139–48.Google Scholar
Farrow, G. E., Allen, N. H. & Akpan, E. B. 1984. Bioclastic carbonate sedimentation on a high-latitude, tide-dominated shelf: NE Oŗkney Islands, Scotland. J SEDIMENT PETROL 54, 373–93.Google Scholar
Gall, H. M. W 1949. Measurements to determine extinction coefficient of the North Sea and English Channel. J MAR BIOL ASSOC U K 28, 757–80.Google Scholar
Golubić, S., Perkins, R. D. & Lukas, K. J. 1975. Boring micro-organisms and microborings in carbonate substrates. In Frey, R. W. (ed.) The study of trace fossils, 229–59. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Gunatilaka, A. 1976. Thallophyte boring and micritization within skeletal sands from Connemara, Western Ireland. J SEDIMENT PETROL 46, 548–54.Google Scholar
Harris, P. M., Halley, R.B. & Lukas, K. J. 1979. Endolithic microborings and their preservation in Holocene-Pleistocene (Bahama-Florida) ooids. GEOLOGY 7, 316–20.Google Scholar
Hessland, I. 1949. Investigations of the Lower Ordovician of the Siljan District, Sweden. II. Lower Ordovician penetrative and enveloping algae from the Siljan District. BULL GEOL INST UNIV UPPSALA 33, 409–28.Google Scholar
Holme, N. A. 1961. The bottom fauna of the English Channel. J MAR BIOL ASSOC U K 41, 397–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holme, N. A. 1965. Mollusc shells as evidence of sediment transport. REP CHALLENGER SOC 3, 17.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S. & Jablonski, D. 1983. Taphonomic Feedback: ecological consequences of shell accumulation. In Tevesz, M. J. S. & McCall, P. L. (eds) Biotic interactions in Recent and fossil benthic communities, 195–248. London: Plenum.Google Scholar
Kobluk, D. R. & Risk, M. J. 1974. Devonian boring algae or fungi associated with micrite tubules. CAN J EARTH SCI 11, 1601–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobluk, D. R. & Risk, M. J. 1977. Algal borings and framboidal pyrite in upper Ordovician brachiopods. LETHAIA 10, 135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornmann, P. 1960. Die Heterogene Cattung Gomontia. II. Der fadige Anteil Eugomontia sacculata nov. gen. nov. sp. HELGOLANDER WISS MEERESUNTERS 7, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. J. & Ramster, J. W. (eds) 1981. Atlas of the seas around the British Isles. Lowestoft: Ministry of Agriculture, Fish and Food.Google Scholar
Lukas, K. J. 1974. Two species of chlorophyte genus Ostreobium from skeletons of Atlantic and Caribbean corals. J PHYCOL 10, 331–5.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M. & Orr, A. P. 1928. The photosynthesis of diatom cultures in the sea. J MAR BIOL ASSOC U K 15, 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Kay, P. 1951. Sorting of lamellibranch valves on beaches in Trinidad. GEOL MAG 88, 432–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, A. C. 1966. Observations on coastal erosion in Bermuda and measurements of boring rate of the sponge Cliona lampa. LIMNOL OCEANOGR 11, 92–108.Google Scholar
Rooney, S. W. & Perkins, R. D. 1972. Distribution and geologic significance of microboring organisms within sediments of Arlington Reef complex, Australia. BULL GEOL SOC AM 83, 1139–50.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. 1976. Biological and inorganic factors in the destruction of limestone coasts. CONTRIB SEDIMENTOL 6.Google Scholar
Sheath, R. D., Hellebust, J. A. & Sawa, T. 1977. Changes in plastic structure, pigmentation and photosynthesis of Conchocelis stage of Porphyra leucosticta (Rhodophyta, Bangiophyceae) in response to low light and darkness. PHYCOLOGIA 16, 265–78.Google Scholar
Swinchatt, J. P. 1969. Algal boring: a possible depth indicator in carbonate rocks and sediments. BULL GEOL SOC AM 80, 1391–6.Google Scholar
Tebble, N. 1966. British bivalve seashells. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1961. Paleoecologic molluscan geography of the California Pleistocene. UNIV CALIFORNIA PUBL GEOL SCI 34, 309–442.Google Scholar
Warme, J. E. 1969. Live and dead molluses in a coastal lagoon. J PALEONTOL 43, 141–50.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M. 1974. Investigations on the autoecology of Eugomontia sacculata Kornmann, a shell boring alga. J EXP MAR BIOL ECOL 16, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M. 1975. The occurrence of shell-boring Phaeophila species in Britain. BR PHYCOL J 10, 235–40.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M. & Burrows, E. M. 1970. Eugomontia sacculata Kornmann in Britain and North America. BR PHYCOL J 5, 235–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar