Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T00:11:43.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVII.—The Actinopterygian Fishes from the Lower Carboniferous of Glencartholm, Eskdale, Dumfriesshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

J. A. Moy-Thomas  and
M. Bradley Dyne
J. A. Moy-Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, Oxford.
M. Bradley Dyne
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, Oxford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Nearly sixty years ago fossil fishes were first discovered at Glencartholm, since when so much material has been collected from this locality that very few museums in the British Isles are without some representative of this remarkable fauna; remarkable both for the number of specimens collected and for the variety of forms it contains. One of us (J. A. M.-T.) became interested in this fauna while studying some of its more problematical members, and spent a few weeks collecting at Glencartholm during the summers of 1933, 1934, 1935 and 1936. During these visits a large quantity of new material was amassed which, when studied by modern methods with a low-powered binocular microscope under liquids, particularly xylol, revealed far more of the anatomy than it had been possible for earlier workers to describe. Some of these results have already been published and the present paper deals only with the Actinopterygians. The new descriptions in this work are not intended to be exhaustive accounts of all that is known of these fishes, but merely to serve as a supplement and summary to the excellent descriptions of Traquair. In so doing an attempt has been made to re-define all the genera and species, and in some cases it has been necessary to repeat the existing description, but where this has been done care has been taken to be as brief as possible. The definitions of the genera are only intended to apply to the species here described, and are consequently confined to characters which are determinable in these species. In certain cases species have been found to exist on brief and inadequate descriptions, in two species the type specimens being unfigured; in these cases the types have been figured, and new and more complete accounts given. Where the shape or ornament of a bone was indeterminable, it has been omitted without comment, in order to make the text as short as possible.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , 1938 , pp. 437 - 480
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Aldinger, H., 1931. “Über Karbonische Fische aus Westfalen,” Paläont. Zeits. Berlin, vol. xiii, pp. 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldinger, H., 1937. “Permische Ganoidfische aus Ostgrönland,” Medd. Grønland, vol. cii, No. 3.Google Scholar
Brough, J., 1936. “On the Evolution of Bony Fishes during the Triassic Period,” Biol. Revs., Cambridge, vol. xi, pp. 385–405.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1933. “The Anatomy and Affinities of Tarrasius problematicus Traq.,” Nature, London, vol. cxxxii, pp. 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1934. “The Structure and Affinities of Tarrasius problematicus, Traquair,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1935 a. “The Structure and Affinities of Chondrenchelys problematica, Tr.,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 391–403.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1935 b. “Notes on the Types of Fossil Fishes in the Leeds City Museum. Part II: Acanthodii, Dipnoi, and Crossopterygii,” Proc. Leeds Phil. Lit. Soc, vol. iii, pp. 111–116.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1936. “The Structure and Affinities of the Fossil Elasmobranch Fishes from the Lower Carboniferous Rocks of Glencartholm, Eskdale,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 761–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1937 a. “The Palæoniscids from the Cement Stones of Tarras Waterfoot, Eskdale, Dumfriesshire,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 10, vol. xx, pp. 345–356.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1937 b. “The Carboniferous Cœlacanth Fishes of Great Britain and Ireland,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, ser. B, pt. iii, pp. 383–415.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1938 a. “Carboniferous Palæoniscids from Northumberland and Berwickshire,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxxv, p. 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1938 b. “A Revision of the Fishes referred to the genus Canobius from Localities other than Glencartholm,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 11, vol. ix, pp. 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1938 c. “On the Dentition of a new Species of Elasmobranch from Glencartholm, Eskdale, Dumfriesshire,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. In the press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E., 1936. “Some few Preliminary Remarks on the Triassic Fishes from East Greenland,” Medd. Gronland, vol. cxii, no. 3.Google Scholar
Peach, B. N., and Horne, J., 1903. “The Canonbie Coalfield: Its Geological Structure and Relations to the Carboniferous Rocks of the North of England and Central Scotland,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xl, pp. 835–877.Google Scholar
Piveteau, J., 1934. “Paléontologie de Madagascar. Part XXI: Les Poissons du Trias inférieur, etc.,” Ann. Paléont. Paris, vol. xxiii.Google Scholar
Scupin, H., 1896. “Vergleichende Studien zur Histologie der Ganoidschuppen,” Arch. Naturgesch. Berlin, vol. lxii, pt. i, pp. 145–186.Google Scholar
Stensio, E. A., 1921. Triassic Fishes from Spitzbergen, pt. i. Vienna.Google Scholar
Stensio, E. A., 1932. “Triassic Fishes from East Greenland,” Medd. Gronland, vol. lxxxiii, no. 3.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1877. “The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formations. Part I: Palæoniscidæ,” Palœont. Soc. Monogr., pt. i.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1879. “On the Structure and Affinities of the Platysomidæ,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxix, pp. 343–391.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1881. “Report on Fossil Fishes collected by the Geological Survey of Scotland in Eskdale and Liddesdale. Part I: Ganoidei,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxx, pp. 15–71.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1884 a. “Description of a Fossil Shark (Ctenacanthus costellatus) from the Lower Carboniferous Rocks of Eskdale, Dumfriesshire,” Geol. Mag., London, n.s., Dec. 3, vol. i, pp. 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1884 b. “Description of a New Species of Elonichthys from the Lower Carboniferous Rocks of Eskdale, Dumfriesshire,” Geol. Mag., London, n.s., Dec. 3, vol. i, pp. 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1888 a. “Notes on Carboniferous Selachii,” Geol. Mag., London, n.s. Dec. 3, vol. v, pp. 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1888 b. “Further Notes on Carboniferous Selachii,” Geol. Mag., London, n.s., Dec. 3, vol. v, pp. 101–104.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1890 a. “List of Fossil Dipnoi and Ganoids of Fife and the Lothians,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xvii, pp. 385–400.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1890 b. “Observations on some Fossil Fishes from the Lower Carboniferous Rocks of Eskdale,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 6, vol. vi, pp. 491–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1901. “The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formations. Part I: Palæoniscidæ,” Palœont. Soc. Monogr., pt. ii.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1903. “On the Distribution of Fossil Fish Remains in the Rocks of the Edinburgh District,” Trans. Roy.Soc. Edin., vol. xl, pp. 687–707.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1904. Summary of Progress of the Geological Survey for 1903, pp. 121–123.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1907 a. “Report on Fossil Fishes collected by the Geological Survey of Scotland from Shales exposed on the Shore near Gullane, East Lothian,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlvi, pp. 103–117.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1907 b. “The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formations. Part I: Palæoniscidæ,” Palœont. Soc. Monogr., pt. iii.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1909. “The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formations. Part I: Palæoniscidæ,” Palœont. Soc. Monogr., pt. iv.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1911. “The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formations. Part I: Palæoniscidæ,” Palœont. Soc. Monogr., pt. v.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1912. “The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formations. Part I: Palæoniscidæ,” Palœont.Soc. Monogr., pt. vi.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. H., 1914. “The Ganoid Fishes of the British Carboniferous Formations. Part I: Palæoniscidæ,” Palœont. Soc. Monogr., pt. vii.Google Scholar
Waterlot, G., 1934. “Bassin Houiller de la Sarre et de la Lorraine. Part II: Faune fossile, Étude de la continental du Terrain Houiller Sarro-Lorraine,” Études Gîtes Minéraux de la France.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., 1925. “The Structure of certain Palæoniscids and the Relationships of that Group with other Bony Fish,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 815–870.Google Scholar
Watson, D. M. S., 1928. “On some Points in the Structure of Palæoniscid and Allied Fish,” Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pp. 49–70.Google Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1936. “On the Structure of the Dermal Ethmoid Shield of Osteolepis,” Geol. Mag., London, vol. lxxiii, pp. 157–171.Google Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1937 a. “On a remarkable Fish from the Lower Permian of Autun, France,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 10, vol. xix, pp. 553–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westoll, T. S., 1937 b. “On the Cheek Bones in Teleostome Fishes,” Journ. Anat., London, vol. lxxi, pp. 362–382.Google Scholar
White, E. I., 1927. “The Fish-Fauna of the Cementstones of Foulden, Berwickshire,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lv, pp. 255–287.Google Scholar
White, E. I., 1937. “The Fishes of the ‘Crangopsis Bed’ at Ardross, Fifeshire,” Geol. Mag., London, vol. lxxiv, pp. 411–428.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., 1889. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). Part I: Elasmo-branchii. London.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., 1891. Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the British Museum (Natural History). Part II: Elasmobranchii, Holocephali, etc. London.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., 1921. “Observations on some Elasmobranch Fishes,” Proc. Linn. Soc. London, Session 133, pp. 29–39.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S., 1924. “A Hybodont Shark (Tristychius) from the Calciferous Sandstone Series of Eskdale, Dumfriesshire,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. lxxx, pp. 338–342.Google Scholar