Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T10:54:09.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

III.—The Spermatogenesis of the Axolotl (Amblystoma tigrinum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Robert Carrick
Robert Carrick
Affiliation:
Carnegie Research Student, Zoology Department, University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The material for this work was obtained from the stock of Axolotls which breed in the Zoology Department of Glasgow University. The objection to using captive specimens for cytological work is overridden by the fact that the Axolotl, unlike some other urodeles, breeds readily in captivity, so that the germ-cell cycle can be taken as normal.

The reasons for wishing to add yet another account of urodele spermatogenesis to the considerable number already existing are twofold. First, widely different interpretations of a similar process in different species have been put forward, and one of the most recent accounts (Stieve, 1920, on Proteus) is entirely at variance with the usual course of spermatogenesis in urodeles. Second, there has been great discrepancy in the number of chromosomes assigned to this species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , 1934 , pp. 63 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Agar, W. E., 1911. “The Spermatogenesis of Lepidosiren,” Q.J.M.S., vol. lvii.Google Scholar
Champy, C., 1913. “Recherches sur la Spermatogénèse des Batrachians,” Arch. Zool. Exp., T. lii.Google Scholar
Dehorne, A., 1921. “Sur le processus meiotique dans la spermatogénèse de la Salamandre et du Triton,” C.R. Acad. Sci., T. clxxii (8).Google Scholar
Eisen, G., 1900. “The Spermatogenesis of Batrachoseps,” Journ. Morph., vol. xvii.Google Scholar
Farmer, J. B., and Moore, J. E. S., 1905. “The Meiotic Phase in Animals and Plants,” Q.J.M.S., vol. xlviii.Google Scholar
Iriki, S., 1931. “Studies on Amphibian Chromosomes (6 and 7),” Sci. Repts. Tokyo B. D., Sect. B.I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, F. A., 1901. “La Spermatogénèse chez les Tritons,” La Cellule, T. xix.Google Scholar
Janssens, F. A., 1906. “Evolution des Auxocytes mâles du Batrachoseps,” La Cellule, T. xxii.Google Scholar
Janssens, F. A., 1909. “La Théorie de la Chiasmatypie,” La Cellule, T. xxv.Google Scholar
Janssens, F. A., et Dumez, R., 1903. “L'element nucleinien pendant les cinèses de maturation des spermatocytes chez Batrachoseps et Plethodon,” La Cellule, T. xx.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B. F., 1901. “The Spermatogenesis of Desmognathus,” Amer. Journ. Anal., vol. i.Google Scholar
M'Gregor, J. H., 1899. “The Spermatogenesis of Amphiuma,” Journ. Morph., vol. xv (supplement).Google Scholar
Meves, F., 1891. “Ueber amitotischen Kerntheilung in den Spermatogonien des Salamanders,” Anat. Anz., Bd. v.Google Scholar
Meves, F., 1896. “Ueber die Entwicklung der männlichen Geschlechtszellen von Salamandra,” Archiv. mikr. Anat., Bd. xlviii.Google Scholar
Meves, F., 1911. “Chromosomenlängen bei Salamandra, nebst Bemerkung zur Individualitätstheorie der Chromsomen,” Archiv. mikr. Anat., Bd. lxxvii.Google Scholar
Montgomery, T. H., 1903. “The Heterotypic Maturation Mitosis in Amphibia and its General Significance, Biol. Bull., vol. iv.Google Scholar
Moore, J. E. S., and Embleton, A. L., 1906. “On the Synapsis in Amphibia,” Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. lxxvii.Google Scholar
Oguma, K., and Kakino, S., 1932. “Chromosome Numbers in Vertebrates,” Journ. Genet., vol. xxvi, No. 2.Google Scholar
Parmenter, C. L., 1919. “Chromosome Number and Pairs in Somatic Mitoses of Amblystoma,” Journ. Morph., vol. xxxiii.Google Scholar
Snook, H. J., and Long, J. A., 1914. “Parasynaptic Stages in the Testis of Aneides lugubris,” Univ. Calif. Publ., vol. xi.Google Scholar
Stieve, H., 1920. “Die Entwicklung der Keimzellen des Grottenolmes (Proteus). I. Spermatogenese,” Arch. für mikr. Anat., Bd. xciii.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. B., 1910. “A New Type of Chromosome-Combination in Metapodius,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. ix.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. B., 1912. “Observations on the Maturation-Phenomena in certain Hemiptera,” Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. xiii.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. B., 1925. The Cell in Development, and Heredity. New York. Third edition, 1925.Google Scholar