Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:09:19.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—Studies on the Physiology of Reproduction in the Ewe. Part I. The Symptoms, Periodicity, and Duration of Œstrus. Part II. Changes in the Vagina and Cervix. Part III. Gross Changes in the Ovaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

R. Grant
R. Grant
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture Research Scholar in Agricultural Science. From the Institute of Animal Genetics, University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This and the two following papers constitute part of the report upon a detailed investigation of the normal reproductive cycle in the ewe. Although the reproductive processes of mammals have been studied intensively during the past decade, it is to the small “laboratory” mammals that most workers have devoted their attention: little is known regarding reproduction in Ungulates except in relation to the cow, which has been studied by Hammond (1927) and others.

Certain aspects of reproduction in the ewe were studied by Marshall (1903) and Assheton (1906). During the last three years many minor papers on this subject have appeared but no comprehensive account is yet available, while, as will be shown in the following pages, many of the conclusions reached by previous workers were based upon examination of insufficient material.

It is hoped that this investigation will form the basis for fuller experimental study of reproductive phenomena in the ewe, particularly as they concern breeding practice, and that it will, stimulating interest in the sex physiology of the Ungulates, assist in laying the foundations for a more thorough understanding of the physiological mechanisms underlying reproduction in this group.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , 1934 , pp. 1 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Allen, E., M'Kenzie, F. F., Kennedy, J. W., and Beare, W. K., 1931. “Œstrous Periods, Ovarian Changes, and Tubal Ova in the Sheep,” Anat. Rec., vol. xlviii, Suppl. Art. 9 (Abst.).Google Scholar
Alongi, G., 1924. “Sulla comparsa dei ‘calore’ e sulla loro durata in alcuni animali domestici (cavella, vacca, pecora, cagna, scrofa, capra) di varie regioni d'Italia,” Rass. Studi Sess. Eugen., vol. iv, pp. 85–91, 158–165.Google Scholar
Assheton, R., 1906. “The Morphology of the Ungulate Placenta, particularly the Development of that Organ in the Sheep, and Notes upon the Placenta in the Elephant and Hyrax,” Phil. Trans., B, vol. cxcviii.Google Scholar
Benedict, G. F., and Ritzman, E., 1931. “Über die den Energieumsatz bei Schaffen beeinflussenden Faktoren,” Arch. f. Tierernährung u. Tierzucht., vol. v, S. 1–88.Google Scholar
Brambell, F. W. R., and Parkes, A. S., 1927. “The Normal Ovarian Cycle in relation to Œstrous Production,” Quart. Journ. Exp. Physiol., vol. xviii, pp. 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casida, L. E., and M'Kenzie, F. F., 1932. “The Œstrous Cycle of the Ewe; Histology of the Genital Tract,” Univ. Missouri Agric. Expt. Sta. Res. Bull., vol. clxx.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H., 1930. “A Study of the Mucosa of the Genital Tract of the Cow, with special reference to Cyclic Changes,” Amer. Journ. Anat., vol. xlvi, pp. 261–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H., and Miller, R. F., 1931. “The Vaginal Smear of the Ewe,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., vol. xxviii, p. 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H., and Miller, R. F., 1932 a. “Data on Reproduction in the Sheep,” Anat. Rec., vol. lii, Suppl., p. 49 (Abst.).Google Scholar
Cole, H. H., and Miller, R. F., 1932 b. “The Vaginal Smear of the Ewe,” Anat. Rec., vol. lii, Suppl., p. 50 (Abst.).Google Scholar
Cole, H. H., and Miller, R. F., 1933. “Artificial Induction of Ovulation and Œstrum in the Ewe during Anœstrum,” Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. civ, pp. 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, G. W., 1921. “Cyclic Changes in the Ovaries and Uterus of the Sow and their Relations to the Mechanism of Implantation,” Carnegie Inst., Washington, Contrib. to Embryology., vol. xiii, pp. 119–146.Google Scholar
Darlow, A. E., and Hawkins, L. E., 1932. “The Œstrous Cycle in the Sheep,” Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., Nov. 1931, pp. 205–207.Google Scholar
Darlow, A. E., and Hawkins, L. E., 1933. “The Influence of Nutrition on the Œstrous Cycle in the Ewe,” Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., Nov. 1932, pp. 173–176.Google Scholar
Frei, W., and Lutz, E., 1929. “Der heutige Stand der Forschungen über das Œstrushormon und die Nymphomania des Rhindes,” Virchow's Arch. Path. Anat. u. Physiol., vol. cclxxi, S. 572–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frei, W., and Metzger, E., 1926. “Die Sexualperiodizität in der Vagina des Rindes,” Berl. Tierarz. Wochenschr., vol. xxxix, S. 645.Google Scholar
Genther, I. T., 1931. “Irradiation of the Ovaries of Guinea-pigs and its Effects on the Œstrous Cycle,” Amer. Journ. Anat., vol. xlviii, pp. 99–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giesbertz, H., 1929. “Zur Frage der periodischen Veränderungen des menschlichen Schleimhautepithels,” Arch. f. Gynäkol., vol. cxxxvi, S. 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., 1921. “Further Observations on the Factors controlling Fertility and Fœtal Atrophy,” Journ. Agric. Sci., vol. xi, pp. 337–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., 1927. The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow., Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
Hartman, C. G., and Ball, J., 1930. “On the almost Instantaneous Transport of Spermatozoa through the Cervix and the Uterus in the Rat,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., vol. xxviii, pp. 312–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, R. R., 1926. “Effects of Vasoligation in Sheep and Goats,” Anat. Rec., vol. xxxiii, pp. 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanow, E. I., about 1914. “The Relation of Ovulation to Heat in the Sheep” (in Russian). (Separate reprint in the possession of Professor Crew: no Journal given.)Google Scholar
Küpfer, M., 1929. “The Sexual Cycle of Female Domesticated Animals. The Ovarian Changes and the Periodicity of Œstrum in Cattle, Sheep, Goats, Pigs, and Horses (Observations on Animals in Central Europe and South Africa),” 13th and 14th Reports of the Dir. of Vet. Educ. and Res. Dept. of Agric., Pretoria, Union of S.A., Pt. II, pp. 1209–1270, and Supplement.Google Scholar
Kurzrok, R., and Miller, E. C., 1927. “Mucin of the Cervix Uteri,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., vol. xxiv, p. 670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzrok, R., and Miller, E. C., 1928. “Biochemical Studies of Human Semen and its Relations to the Mucus of the Cervix Uteri,” Amer. Jour. Obstet. and Gynecol., vol. xv, pp. 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. C., 1926. “Studies on the Œstrous Cycle in the Rat. III. Effect of Low Environmental Temperatures,” Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. lxxviii, pp. 246–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. A., and Evans, H. M., 1922. “The Œstrous Cycle in the Rat and its Associated Phenomena,” Mem. of the Univ. of California., vol. vi.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A., 1903. “The Œstrous Cyle and the Formation of the Corpus Luteum in the Sheep,” Philos. Trans., B, vol. cxcvi, pp. 47–97.Google Scholar
M'Kenzie, F. F., 1926. “The Normal Œstrous Cycle in the Sow,” Univ. of Missouri Coll. of Agric. Res. Bull., vol. lxxxvi.Google Scholar
M'Kenzie, F. F., and Phillips, R. W., 1931. “Some Observations on the Estrual Cycle in the Sheep,” Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod., Nov. 1930, pp. 138–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Wm. C., Personal communication.Google Scholar
Murphey, H. S., 1926. “Studies of the Œstrous Cycle in the Ox,” Iowa State Coll. Vet. Pract. Bull., No. 25, pp. 153–163.Google Scholar
Papanicolaou, G. N., and Stockard, C. R., 1920. “Effect of Under Feeding on Ovulation and the Œstrous Rhythm in Guinea-pigs,” Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., vol. xvii, p. 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, J., and Maré, G. S., 1931. “The Physiological Changes in the Ovary of the Merino Sheep in South Africa, and their Practical Application in Breeding,” 17th Rept, of the Dir. of Vet. Services and Animal Indust., Union of S.A., pp. 663–701.Google Scholar
Richter, F., and Rittau, M., 1933. “Vaginalcyclus beim Schaf,” Arch. f. Tierernährung u. Tierzucht., B, vol. ix, S. 232–242.Google Scholar
Robson, J. M., and Wiesner, B. P., 1931. “Causation of Mucification and Cornification in the Vagina of the Mouse,” Quart. Journ. Exp. Physiol., vol. xxi, pp. 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanctis, A. De., 1926. “Periodi di calore o di frega in alcuni mammiferi,” Rass. Studi Sess. e Eugen., vol. vi, pp. 10–18.Google Scholar
Schatalow, P., 1930. “Zur Frage der Sexualzyklen” (in Russian), Veterinärzootechnischer Bote., No. 2.Google Scholar
Schatalow, P., 1933. “Zur Frage des Geschlechtszyklus der Pferde und Kühe nach dem mikroskopischen Bilde des vaginal Austriches,” Berl. Tierartz. Woch., vol. xlix, S. 81–84.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, R., 1921. Das Geschlechtsleben der Haussaügetiere, Berlin, Schoetz. 3 Auflage.Google Scholar
Shiraki, K., 1929. “Study on the Relation of the Fat to the Sexual Cycle,” Trans. Jap. Path. Soc., vol. xix, pp. 83–84.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. B., 1927. “Superfœtation: Further Cases in Pigs and Sheep,” Journ. Anat., vol. lxii, pp. 100–104.Google Scholar
Stieve, H., 1931. “Verhornungserscheinungen im Epithel der menschlichen Speisröhren und Scheidenschleimhaut,” Zeit. mikrosk.-anat. Forschg., vol. xxiv, S. 213–236.Google Scholar
Trautmann, , 1917. “Anatomisches und Histologisches über die Cervix uteri. I. Mit,” Arch. f. Tierheilkunde., vol. xliii, S. 239–261.Google Scholar
Turner, C. W., Frank, A. H., Lomas, C. H., and Hibler, G. W., 1930. “A Study of the Œstrus Producing Hormone in the Urine of Cattle during Pregnancy,” Univ. Missouri Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull., No. 150.Google Scholar
Vilhjelmsson, . Private communication.Google Scholar
Weber, E., 1911. “Untersuchungen über die Brunst des Rindes,” Arch.f. Wiss. u. Prakt. Tierheilkunde., vol. xxxvii, S. 382–406, 443–454.Google Scholar
Wiesner, B. P. Private communication.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. M., 1926. “Histological Changes in the Vaginal Mucosa of the Sow in Relation to the Œstrous Cycle,” Amer. Journ. Anat., vol. xxxvii, pp. 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zupp, B. A., 1924. “Studies on the Œstral Flow of the Pig,” Anat. Rec., vol. xxvii, p. 244 (Abst.).Google Scholar