Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:06:20.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IV.—Bishop James Kennedy: An Anthropological Study of His Remains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

David Waterston
Affiliation:
Bute Professor of Anatomy, University of St Andrews.

Extract

James Kennedy, Bishop of St Andrews from 1440 to 1465, was a man of great importance and eminence in the political as well as in the ecclesiastical history of Scotland. He was the third son born to Sir James Kennedy of Dunure and his wife, the Princess Mary. His father belonged to a widely connected family, which traced its descent from Walter the sixth High Steward of Scotland, and through him was related, though indirectly, to the Royal family of Bruce. On his mother's side the Bishop was of Royal descent and was even more widely connected, for the Princess Mary was a daughter of Kobert the Third and elder sister of James the First of Scotland, and was four times married. Sir James Kennedy was her second husband, for she had been married to the great George Douglas, Earl of Angus. The Bishop was the third son born of her marriage to Sir James Kennedy, and after the death of the Bishop's father she married William, Lord of Graham. (Her fourth husband was Sir William Edmondstone of Culloden.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Chambers, R., 1857. “Memorandum respecting the Tomb of Bishop Kennedy, in the Chapel of St Salvador's College, St Andrews,” Archœologia Scotica, vol. iv, pp. 382384.Google Scholar
Fick, R., 1923. “Über die Massverhältnisse der Hand,” Sitz.-Ber. Preuss. Akad. d. Wiss. Phys.-Math. Kl., Bd. xxiv, pp. 219241.Google Scholar
Giuffrida-Ruggeri, V., 1913. “Über die endocranischen Furchen der Arteria meningea media beim Menschen,” Zeits.f. Morph. u. Anthrop., Bd. xv, pp. 401412.Google Scholar
Manouvrier, L., 1893. Mém. Soc. Anthrop. Paris, sér. 2, T. iv, pp. 662766.Google Scholar
Martin, R., 1928. Lehrb. d. Anthrop., 2 Aufl.Google Scholar
Parsons, F. G., 1916. “On the Proportions and Characteristics of the Modern English Clavicle,” Journ. Anat., vol. li, pp. 7193.Google Scholar
Pearson, Karl, 1908. In Martin's Lehrbuch, Bd. 2, pp. 1070 and 1071.Google Scholar
Pearson, Karl, 1924. “The Skull of Robert Bruce, King of Scotland, 1274–1329,” Biometrika, vol. xvi, pp. 253273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Karl, 1926. “The Skull and Portraits of George Buchanan,” Biometrika., vol. xviii, pp. 233257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Karl, 1928. “Skulls and Portraits of Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley, and their Bearing upon the Tragedy of Mary Queen of Scots,” Biometrika., vol. xx, pp. 1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfitzner, W., 1892. “Das menschlichen Extremitätenskelet,” Schwalbe, G. Morphol. Arb., Bd. i, pp. 1120.Google Scholar
Tildesley, M. L., 1923. “Sir Thomas Browne, his Skull, Portraits, and Ancestry,” Biometrika, vol. xv, pp. 176, and vol. xvi, p. 204.Google Scholar
Turner, W., 1884. “Report on the Human Crania and other Bones of the Skeletons collected during the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger in the Years 1873–1876. Pt. I.—The Crania,” Challenger Reports, Zool., vol. x, pt, 29.Google Scholar
Turner, W. 1903. “A Contribution to the Craniology of the People of Scotland,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xl, pp. 547613.Google Scholar
Wavrin, J. De., 1863. Anchiennes Cronicques d'Engleterre, annotés et publiés par Mlle Dupont, vol. iii, pp. 164175. Jules Renouard, Paris.Google Scholar