Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:38:36.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

V.—Notes on the Kidston Collection of Fossil Plant Slides. No. V. On the Structure of Two Lower Carboniferous Lepidodendroid Stems, one of the Lepidophloios Wünschianus Type and the other of the Lepidodendron fuliginosum Type. No. VI. On the Structure of Two Lepidodendroid Stems from the Carboniferous Flora of Berwickshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Mary G. Calder
Mary G. Calder
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There are in the Kidston Collection of Fossil Plant Slides sections of four specimens of Lepidodendroid stems, from different Scottish localities in the Carboniferous Limestone Series, which were grouped together by the late Dr Kidston as “Lepidodendron Langi n.sp.” The specimens may be referred to as Nos. 1—4, and the various localities and the numbers of the slides by which the specimens are represented in the Kidston Collection are enumerated here for convenience of reference.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , 1934 , pp. 113 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Absalom, R. G., 1929. “The Lower Carboniferous Coal-Ball Flora of Haltwhistle, Northumberland,” Proc. Univ. Durham Phil. Soc. vol. viii, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Bailey, E. B., 1926. “Plant Migration across the Millstone Grit,” Geol. Mag., vol. lxiii, pp. 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, Mary G., 1933. “Notes on the Kidston Collection of Fossil Plant Slides. No. I. The Anatomy of the Axis of Lepidodendron Brownii Unger sp., etc.,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lvii, pt. 2, pp. 547–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crookall, R., 1931. “The Genus Lyginorachis Kidston,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. li, pt. 1, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
Crookall, R., 1932. “The Stratigraphical Distribution of British Lower Carboniferous Plants,” Summ. Prog. Geol. Surv. for 1931, pt. 2, pp. 70–104.Google Scholar
Crookall, R., 1933. “Geology of South Wales Coalfield, Part V” (2nd. ed.), Mem. Geol. Sun., chap. x.Google Scholar
Hirmer, M., 1927. Handbuch der Paläobotanik, I. Munich and Berlin.Google Scholar
Jongmans, W., 1929. Fossilium Catalogus, ii, pt. 15 (Lycopodiales II).Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1923. “Fossil Plants of the Carboniferous Rocks of Great Britain,” Mem. Geol. Sun., Palœontology, vol. ii, pt. 1.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., 1926. “Central Coalfield of Scotland, Area V” (2nd ed.), Mem. Geol. Sun., p. 145.Google Scholar
Kidston, R., and Gwynne-Vaughan, D. T., 1912. “On the Carboniferous Flora of Berwickshire. Part I. Stenomyelon Tuedianum Kidston,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xlviii, pt. ii, pp. 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, R. G., 1928. “Researches on the Flora of the Coal Balls from the ‘Finefrau-Nebenbank’ Horizon in the Province of Limburg (the Netherlands),” Flora en Fauna van het Nederlandsche Karboon, I (Jongmans, W. J.).Google Scholar
Renault, B., 1879. “Structure Comparée de Quelques Tiges de la Flore Carbonifère,” Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat., Paris, 2e sér. T. ii.Google Scholar
Renault, B., 1896. Études des Gîles Minéraux de la France, Bassin Houiller et Permien d'Autun et d'Epinac, fa.sc. iv, Flore Fossile, pt. ii. Paris.Google Scholar
Scott, D. H., 1920. Studies in Fossil Botany, I (3rd ed.). London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1899. “Notes on the Binney Collection of Coal-measure Plants. Part I. Lepidophloios,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., vol. x, pt. 3.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., 1910. Fossil Plants, vol. ii. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Seward, A. C., and Hill, A. W., 1900. “On the Structure and Affinities of a Lepidodendroid Stem from the Calciferous Sandstone of Dalmeny, Scotland,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxix, pt. 4, pp. 907–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solms-Laubach, H. Graf Zu, 1896. “Ueber die seinerzeit von Unger beschriebenen strukturbietenden Pflanzenreste des Unterculm von Saalfeld in Thüringen,” Abhandl. d. Kgl. geol. Landesanstalt, N.F., Heft 23.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1872. “On the Organization of the Fossil Plants of the Coal Measures, Parts II, III,” Phil. Trans., vol. clxii.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1880. “On the Organization, etc., Part X,” Phil. Trans., vol. clxxi.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1881. “On the Organization, etc., Part XI,” Phil. Trans., vol. clxxii.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1887. “Note on Lepidodendron Harcourtii and Lepidodendron fuliginosum (Will.),” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., vol. xlii, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1889. “On the Organization, etc., Part XVI,” Phil. Trans., B, vol. clxxx.Google Scholar
Williamson, W. C., 1893. “General, Morphological, and Histological Index to the Author's Collective Memoirs, etc., Part II,” Mem. Proc. Manch. Lit. and Phil. Soc., vol. vii, ser. 4.Google Scholar
Zalessky, M. D., 1909. “On the Internal Structure of the Stem of the Type of Lepidodendron aculeatum Sternberg and Sigillaria Boblayi Brongn.,” Mem. Imp. Russ. Miner. Soc., vol. xlvi, pt. 2.Google Scholar
Zalessky, M. D., and Zalessky, G., 1921. “Structure du rameau du Lepidodendron caracubense Schmalhausen,” Annuaire Soc. Pal. de Russie, T. iii, pp. 18–20 (French résumé).Google Scholar