Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:15:11.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XV.—An Introduction to the Ecology of Intertidal Rock Surfaces on the Coast of Argyll

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

J. A. Kitching
J. A. Kitching
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Zoology, Birkbeck College, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In order to study the ecology of intertidal plants and animals it is desirable to choose a coast-line which is as simple as possible. When numerous factors vary simultaneously it is impossible to decide which of them is responsible for any change which may occur in the flora and fauna. The complexity of a shore which is ravined or boulder-strewn makes ecological work difficult. Unfortunately, certain major influences, such as wave action, involve a whole complex of subsidiary effects, so that the perfect locality, where each environmental factor would be found to vary in turn independently of all the other factors, cannot exist.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , 1935 , pp. 351 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Air Ministry (Meteorological Office), 1924. The Book of Normals of Meteorological Elements for the British Isles, for Periods ending 1915. Section 14A. The Range of Variation of Temperature and Rainfall. Section V. Monthly Normals of Rainfall. London.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, P. de, 1923. “Etude de bionomie intercôtidale. Les îles de Ré et d'Yeu,” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., T. lxi, pp. 455–520.Google Scholar
Børgesen, F., 1908. “The Algæ-vegetation of the Faeröes Coasts, with remarks on the Phytogeography,” Botany of the Faeröes, pt. 3, pp. 683–834. London.Google Scholar
Brown's, Nautical Almanac, 1934. Glasgow.Google Scholar
Colman, J., 1933. “The Nature of the Intertidal Zonation of Plants and Animals,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., vol. xviii, pp. 435–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotton, A. D., 1912. “Clare Island Survey. Marine Algæ, “Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., vol. xxxi, sec. i,pt. 15 pp. 1–178.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1932. “Répartition des principales espèces fixées sur les rochers battus des côtes îles et de la manche, de Lamnion à Fécamp,” Ann. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, T. xii, pp. 107–213.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E., 1934. “Sur la distribution verticale des organismes fixés dans la zone des fluctuations de la mer,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, T. cxcviii, p. 1728.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W., 1928. Biological Chemistry and Physics of Sea Water. Pp. 1–194. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hatton, H., and Fischer-Piette, E., 1932. “Observations et expériences sur le peuplement des côtes rocheaues par les cirripèdes,” Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, No. 592.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., 1919. Shore Processes and Shoreline Development. Pp. 1–584. New York.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. Graham, 1912. “Loch Sween,” Glasg. Nat., vol. iv, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
Kitching, J. A., Macan, T. T., and Gilson, H. C., 1934. “Studies in Sublittoral Ecology. 1. A Submarine Gully in Wembury Bay, South Devon,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., vol. xix, pp. 677–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, M., and Parke, M. W., 1931. “Manx Algæ,” L. M. B. C. Mem., xxx. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Knop, J., 1924. “Diphenylamine as Indicator in the Titration of Iron with Dichromate Solution,” Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. xlvi, pp. 263–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1931. Plymouth Marine Fauna. Plymouth.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M., and Orr, A. P., 1927. “The Relation of the Plankton to some Chemical and Physical Factors in the Clyde Sea Area,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., vol. xiv, pp. 837–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1934. “The Biology of Balanus balanoides. 1. Growth Rate and its relation to Size, Season, and Tidal Level,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., vol. xix, pp. 851–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of the British Seaweeds. Pp. 1–478. London.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1929. “Observations on Patella vulgata. Part III. Habitat and Habits,” Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., vol. xvi, pp. 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruvot, G., 1897. “Essai sur les fonds et la faune de la Manche occidentale comparés à ceux du golfe du Lion,” Arch. Zool. exp. gén., 3, T. v, pp. 511–662.Google Scholar
Shelford, V. E., and Gail, F. W., 1922. “A Study of the Light Penetration into Sea Water made with the Kunz Photoelectric Cell with particular reference to the Distribution of Plants,” Publ. Puget Sound Biol. Sta., vol. iii, pp. 141–176.Google Scholar
Thompson, H., 1933. The Tunicata of the Scottish Area. Part III. Sedentary Tunicata (continued), pp. 1–42. Edinburgh.Google Scholar