Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T10:36:59.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Test Consistency with Varying SamplingFrequency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Pierre Perron
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the consistency property of sometest statistics based on a time series of data.While the usual consistency criterion is based onkeeping the sampling interval fixed, we let thesampling interval take any equispaced path as thesample size increases to infinity. We consider testsof the null hypotheses of the random walk andrandomness against positive autocorrelation(stationary or explosive). We show that tests of theunit root hypothesis based on the first-ordercorrelation coefficient of the original data areconsistent as long as the span of the data isincreasing. Tests of the same hypothesis based onthe first-order correlation coefficient of thefirst-differenced data are consistent againststationary alternatives only if the span isincreasing at a rate greater thanT½, whereT is the sample size. On theother hand, tests of the randomness hypothesis basedon the first-order correlation coefficient appliedto the original data are consistent as long as thespan is not increasing too fast. We provide MonteCarlo evidence on the power, in finite samples, ofthe tests Studied allowing various combinations ofspan and sampling frequencies. It is found that theconsistency properties summarize well the behaviorof the power in finite samples. The power of testsfor a unit root is more influenced by the span thanthe number of observations while tests of randomnessare more powerful when a small sampling frequency isavailable.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Econometric Theory , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 341 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Aiyar, R.J. Asymptotic efficiency of rank tests of randomness against autocorrelation. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 33 (1981): 255–262.10.1007/BF02480939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bergstrom, A.R. Continuous time stochastic models and issues of aggregation over time. In Intriligator, M.D. and Griliches, Z. (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2, 1145–1212. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984.10.1016/S1573-4412(84)02012-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dickey, D.A. Estimation and hypothesis testing for nonstationary time series. PhD Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 1976.Google Scholar
4. Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W.A.. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (1979): 427–431.Google Scholar
5. Evans, G.B.A. & Savin, N.E.. The calculation of the limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of the parameter in a random walk model. Annals of Statistics 9 (1981): 1114–1118.10.1214/aos/1176345591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fuller, W.A. Introduction to Statistical Time Series. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
7. Kreiss, J.P. On adaptive estimation in stationary ARMA processes. Annals of Statistics 15 (1987): 112–133.10.1214/aos/1176350256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Mikulski, P.W. & Monsour, M.J.. Optimality of the maximum likelihood estimator in first-order autoregressive processes. Mimeo, University of Maryland, 1989.Google Scholar
9. Perron, P. A continuous time approximation to the unstable first-order autoregressive model: the case without an intercept. Econometrica 59 (1991): 211–256.10.2307/2938247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Perron, P. The calculation of the limiting distribution of the least squares estimator in a near-integrated model. Econometric Theory 5 (1989): 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Perron, P. Testing for a random walk: A simulation experiment when the sampling interval is varied. In Raj, B. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics and Modeling, 47–68. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1989.10.1007/978-94-015-7819-6_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Phillips, P.C.B. Time series regression with unit roots. Economelrica 55 (1987): 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Phillips, P.C.B. Towards a unified asymptotic theory for autoregression. Biometrika 74 (1987): 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Phillips, P.C.B. & Ouliaris, S.. Asymptotic properties of residual based tests for cointegration. Econometrica 58 (1990): 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Priestley, M.B. Spectral Analysis and Time Series. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
16. Rao, C.R. Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Roussas, G.G. Contiguity of Probability Measures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sargan, J.D. & Bhargava, A.. Testing residuals from least squares regression for being generated by the Gaussian random walk. Econometrica 51 (1983): 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Shiller, R.J. & Perron, P.. Testing the random walk hypothesis: Power versus frequency of observations. Economics Letters 18 (1985); 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar