Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hn9fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T19:03:57.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPLOITATION, INTENTIONALITY AND INJUSTICE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

Hillel Steiner
Hillel Steiner*
Affiliation:
9 Clayton Avenue, Didsbury, Manchester M20 6BL, UK. Email: hillel.steiner@manchester.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper argues that, inasmuch as exploitation is a form of injustice, exploitative acts need not be performed intentionally.

Keywords

RightsEndowmentsSurplus valueFairnessJustice

Information

Type
Symposium Article
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 34 , Special Issue 3: Exploitation , November 2018 , pp. 369 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bajaj, S. 2015. On Hillel Steiner's ‘A Liberal Theory of Exploitation’. Ethics 125: 1157–1159.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1981. Is there a right to pornography? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1: 177–212.Google Scholar
Ferguson, B. and Steiner, H.. Forthcoming. Exploitation. In Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice, ed. Olsaretti, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1955. Are there any natural rights? Philosophical Review LXIV: 175–91.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, transl. and ed. Beck, L.W.. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1965. The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, transl. and ed. Ladd, J.. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1991. The Metaphysics of Morals, transl. and ed. Gregor, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1867. Capital, Vol. 1, ch. 32. <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch32.htm>..>Google Scholar
Murphy, J. 1970. Kant: The Philosophy of Right. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1958. Justice as Fairness. Philosophical Review 67: 164–94.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1972. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 1984. A liberal theory of exploitation. Ethics 94: 225–41.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 1987. Exploitation: a liberal theory amended, defended and extended. In Modern Theories of Exploitation, ed. Reeve, A., 132–148. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 1994. An Essay on Rights. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 2010. Exploitation takes time. In Economic Thought and Economic Theory: Essays in Honour of Ian Steedman, ed. Vint, J., Metcalfe, J. S., Kurz, H. D., Salvadori, N. and Samuelson, P. A., 20–29. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 2013. Directed duties and inalienable rights. Ethics 123: 230–244.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, A. 1996. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar