Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-dr4jh Total loading time: 1.085 Render date: 2021-06-19T10:10:13.977Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

PUBLIC POLICY AND THE CONDITIONAL VALUE OF HAPPINESS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2013

Jan-Willem van der Rijt
Affiliation:
University of Bayreuth, GermanyJan-Willem.VanderRijt@uni-bayreuth.de
Corresponding

Abstract

This paper examines the increasingly popular view that new insights from the science of subjective well-being (SSWB) should play a prominent role in the determination of public policy. Though there are instrumental reasons for caring about societal happiness too, these political aspirations of the SSWB appear to be mostly intrinsically motivated. As the intrinsic value of happiness is endorsed across the political–philosophical spectrum, there is some initial plausibility to the expectation that it should not be too difficult to develop intrinsically motivated policies that can count on widespread support. This paper argues, however, that intrinsically motivated policies based on SSWB findings will always be highly controversial. This is because, although happiness is widely held to be intrinsically valuable, it is usually not deemed unconditionally valuable. By exploring the policy implications of three different views of this conditionality – happiness as a fitting response to the state of the world, authenticity, and merit – it is shown that different views of the conditionality of the intrinsic value of happiness have widely diverging policy implications, which greatly undermines the political aspirations of the SSWB.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Argyle, M. 1999. Causes and correlates of happiness. In Well-Being. The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, ed. Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N., 353373. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Barrotta, P. 2008. Why economists should be unhappy with the economics of happiness. Economics and Philosophy 24: 145165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, D., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M. and Rees-Jones, A.. 2010. Do people seek to maximize happiness? Evidence from new surveys. NBER Working Paper Series 16489.Google Scholar
Bok, D. 2010. The Politics of Happiness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, S. and Vitrano, C., ed. 2008. Happiness. Classic and Contemporary Readings in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diener, E. and Seligman, M.. 2004. Beyond money. Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5: 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diener, E. and Suh, E.. 1999. National differences in subjective well-being. In Well-Being. The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, ed. Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N., 434450. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U. and Helliwell, J.. 2009. Well-Being for Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eid, M. and Larsen, R., ed. 2008. The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. 1992. Confrontations with the Reaper. A Philosophical Study of the Nature and Value of Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, B. 2008. Happiness. A Revolution in Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. and Stutzer, A.. 2007. ‘Should national happiness be maximized?’ Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper Series 306.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. 2006. Stumbling on Happiness. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 1986. Well-Being. Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2000. Freedom as the inner value of the world. In Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness, 96125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsema, F. 2008. Geluk! Voorbij de Hyperconsumptie, Haast en Hufterigheid. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. 2010. Hedonism and welfare economics. Economics and Philosophy 26: 321344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. 2012. Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haybron, D. 2008. The Pursuit of Unhappiness. The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, T. 2002. Happiness and human flourishing. In Human Welfare and Moral Worth. Kantian Perspectives, 164200. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. 2009. Democracy and happiness: what causes what? In Happiness, Economics and Politics. Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Approach, ed. Dutt, A. and Radcliff, B., 256–270. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 2010. Faith and freedom: traditional and modern ways to happiness. In International Differences in Well-Being, ed. Diener, E., Helliwell, J. and Kahneman, D., 351397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. 2002. Happiness as a rational end. In Kant's Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, ed. Timmons, M., 317330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. 1992. The limits of well-being. Social Philosophy and Policy 9: 169189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Krueger, A. 2006. ‘Developments in the Measurement of Subjective WellbeingThe Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Sugden, R. 2005. ‘Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy EvaluationEnvironmental and Resource Economics 32: 161181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. and Sarin, R.. 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 375405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N., ed. 1999. Well-Being. The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1996. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1998. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelman, M. 2005. Hedonic Psychology and the Ambiguities of ‘Welfare’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 391412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layard, R. 2005. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1989. Happiness. In The Examined Life. Philosophical Meditations, 99117. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A., ed. 1993. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2010. Who is the happy warrior? Philosophy poses questions to psychology. In Law and Happiness, ed. Posner, E. and Sunste, C.in, 81114. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacek, A. 2009. Politics and happiness: an empirical ledger. In Happiness, Economics and Politics. Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Approach, Dutt, A. and Radcliff, B., 231–255. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Pavot, W. 2008. The assessment of subjective well-being: successes and shortfalls. In The Science of Subjective Well-Being, ed. Eid, M. and Larsen, R., 124140. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pojman, L. 2001. Justice as desert. Queensland University Law and Justice Journal 1: 88109Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971/1999. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1982/1999. Social Unity and Primary Goods. In Collected Papers, 359387. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2004. The role of well-being. Philosophical Perspectives 18: 269294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A. and Fitoussi, J. 2010. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.Google Scholar
Sumner, L. 1996. Welfare, Happiness and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C.. 2008. Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. 1997. Happiness and meaning: two aspects of the good life. Social Philosophy and Policy 14: 207225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

PUBLIC POLICY AND THE CONDITIONAL VALUE OF HAPPINESS
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

PUBLIC POLICY AND THE CONDITIONAL VALUE OF HAPPINESS
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

PUBLIC POLICY AND THE CONDITIONAL VALUE OF HAPPINESS
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *