Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-6f8dk Total loading time: 0.232 Render date: 2021-03-08T14:00:59.905Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Rejoinder - Error in Economics. Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology, Julian Reiss, Routledge, 2007, xxiv + 246 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Julian Reiss
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Rotterdam

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article
Type
Reviews Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Mayo, D. G. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. G. and Spanos, A. 2004. Methodology in practice: statistical misspecification testing. Philosophy of Science 71: 1007–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, D. G. and Spanos, A. 2006. Severe testing as a basic concept in a Neyman–Pearson philosophy of induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 323–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1817. Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Vol. 1 of The Collected Works of Davie Ricardo, ed. Sraffa, P. and Cambridge:, M. Dobb.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spanos, A. 1986. Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, A. 1995. On theory testing in econometrics: modeling with nonexperimental data. Journal of Econometrics 67: 189226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, A. 2006. Econometrics in retrospect and prospect. In New Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 1, ed. Mills, T. C. and Patterson, K.. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Student 1931. The Lancashire milk experiment. Biometrika 23: 398406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teira, D. Forthcoming. Why Friedman's methodology did not generate consensus among economists? Journal of the History of Economic Thought.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 8th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rejoinder - Error in Economics. Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology, Julian Reiss, Routledge, 2007, xxiv + 246 pages.
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Rejoinder - Error in Economics. Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology, Julian Reiss, Routledge, 2007, xxiv + 246 pages.
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Rejoinder - Error in Economics. Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology, Julian Reiss, Routledge, 2007, xxiv + 246 pages.
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *