Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Krister Bykvist (a1)

How do we determine the well-being of a person when her preferences are not stable across worlds? Suppose, for instance, that you are considering getting married, and that you know that if you get married, you will prefer being unmarried, and that if you stay unmarried, you will prefer being married. The general problem is to find a stable standard of well-being when the standard is set by preferences that are not stable. In this paper, I shall show that the problem is even worse: inconsistency threatens if we accept both that your desires determine what is good for you and that you must prefer what is better for you. After I have introduced a useful toy model and stated the inconsistency argument, I will go on to discuss a couple of unsuccessful theories and see what we can learn from their mistakes. One important lesson is that how you would have felt about a life had you never led it is irrelevant to the question of how good that life is for you. What counts is how you feel about your life when you are actually leading it. Another lesson is that a life can be better for you even if you would not rank it higher, if you were to lead it.

Hide All
P. Bricker 1980. Prudence. Journal of Philosophy 77: 381401.

R. Bradley 2008. Comparing evaluations. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108: 85100.

J. Broome 2004. Weighing Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

R. Chisholm 1964. The descriptive element in the concept of action. Journal of Philosophy 61: 613625.

F. Feldman 2005. Basic intrinsic value. In Recent Work on Intrinsic Value, ed. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen and M. Zimmerman . Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy 17: 379400.

J. Harsanyi 1953. Welfare economics of variable tastes. Review of Economic Studies 21: 204213.

T. Hurka 2001. Virtue, Vice, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

R. Kraut 1994. Desire and the human good. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 68: 3954.

C. List 2003. Are interpersonal comparisons of utility indeterminate? Erkenntnis 58: 229260.

D. Sobel 1994. Full information accounts of well-being. Ethics 104: 784810.

L. Temkin 1996. A continuum argument for intransitivity. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25: 175210.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 380 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.