Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 17
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Melasalmi, Anitta and Husu, Jukka 2016. The content and implementation of shared professional knowledge in early childhood education. Early Years, p. 1.

    O'Madagain, Cathal 2014. CAN GROUPS HAVE CONCEPTS? SEMANTICS FOR COLLECTIVE INTENTIONS. Philosophical Issues, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 347.

    Razmerita, Liana Kirchner, Kathrin and Nabeth, Thierry 2014. Social Media in Organizations: Leveraging Personal and Collective Knowledge Processes. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 74.

    Rose, Jo and Norwich, Brahm 2014. Collective commitment and collective efficacy: a theoretical model for understanding the motivational dynamics of dilemma resolution in inter-professional work. Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Amatrudo, Anthony 2012. An intentional basis for corporate personality. International Journal of Law in Context, Vol. 8, Issue. 03, p. 413.

    O’Madagain, Cathal 2012. Group Agents: Persons, Mobs, or Zombies?. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 271.

    WRIGHT, GEMMA and NOBLE, MICHAEL 2012. Does Widespread Lack Undermine the Socially Perceived Necessities Approach to Defining Poverty? Evidence from South Africa. Journal of Social Policy, p. 1.

    AMATRUDO, ANTHONY 2011. Corporate Personality: A Politico-Jurisprudential Argument. Ratio Juris, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 471.

    Rose, Jo 2011. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved?. Children & Society, Vol. 25, Issue. 2, p. 151.

    Hakli, Raul Miller, Kaarlo and Tuomela, Raimo 2010. TWO KINDS OF WE-REASONING. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 26, Issue. 03, p. 291.

    Lanzi, Diego 2010. Embedded choices. Theory and Decision, Vol. 68, Issue. 3, p. 263.

    Miller Moya, Luis Miguel 2007. Coordination and Collective Action. Revista Internacional de Sociología, Vol. LXV, Issue. 46,

    ROSE, JO 2007. COLLECTIVE PREFERENCES IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS. Psychological Reports, Vol. 101, Issue. 7, p. 803.

    Weirich, Paul 2007. Initiating Coordination. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 74, Issue. 5, p. 790.

    List, Christian and Pettit, Philip 2006. Group Agency and Supervenience. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 44, Issue. S1, p. 85.

    Gilbert, Margaret 2005. Teamwork.

    Schmid, Hans Bernhard 2003. Rationality-in-Relations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 62, Issue. 1, p. 67.


Collective preferences, obligations, and rational choice

  • Margaret Gilbert (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2001

Can teams and other collectivities have preferences of their own, preferences that are not in some way reducible to the personal preferences of their members? In short, are collective preferences possible? In everyday life people speak easily of what we prefer, where what is at issue seems to be a collective preference. This is suggested by the acceptability of such remarks as ‘My ideal walk would be . . . along rougher and less well-marked paths than we prefer as a family’. One can imagine, indeed, that each member of a given family prefers something other than what the family prefers. What, then, do the collective preferences of everyday understanding amount to?

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *