Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

DISABILITY, STATUS ENHANCEMENT, PERSONAL ENHANCEMENT AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION

  • Jonathan Wolff (a1)
Abstract

It often appears that the most appropriate form of addressing disadvantage related to disability is through policies that can be called “status enhancements”: changes to the social, cultural and material environment so that the difficulties experienced by those with impairments are reduced, even eradicated. However, status enhancements can also have their limitations. This paper compares the relative merits of policies of status enhancement and “personal enhancement”: changes to the disabled person. It then takes up the question of how to assess the priority of the claims of disabled people in the face of scarcity of resources for which there can be many competing social claims, arguing for the theory of “declustering disadvantage”.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arneson, R. 1989. Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56: 7793.
Burchardt, T. 2004. Capabilities and disability: the capabilities framework and the social model of disability’. Disability & Society 19: 735–51.
Casal, P. 2007. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics 117: 296326.
Dolan, P. and Kahneman, D. 2008. Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. The Economic Journal 118: 215–34.
Dworkin, R. 1981. What is equality Part 2: equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 283345.
Elster, J. 1992. Local justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Klinenberg, E. 2002. Heat wave. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marmot, M. 2004. Status syndrome. London: Bloomsbury.
Miller, D. 1999. Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Radcliffe Richards, J. 1997. Equality of opportunity. Ratio 10: 253–79.
Sen, A. 1980. Equality of what? In Tanner lectures on human values, ed. McMurrin, S., 195220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.
Wilkinson, R. G. 2005. The impact of inequality. London: Routledge.
Wolff, J. 2002. Addressing disadvantage and the human good. Journal of Applied Philosophy 19: 207–18.
Wolff, J. 2007. Equality: the recent history of an idea. Journal of Moral Philosophy 4: 125–36.
Wolff, J. forthcoming. Disability among equals. In Philosophy and Disability, ed. Brownlee, K. and Cureton, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wolff, J. and de-Shalit, A. 2007. Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed